Many countries worldwide require children to be vaccinated against measles.
They must have a measles vaccination when they start school or kindergarten.
Parents are told by the government that the measles vaccination is useful and protective for their child.
The fact however is concealed that a vaccination is a medical intervention that may well lead to vaccine damage!
This can be caused by the active substance itself or by the chemical agents contained in every
vaccination to enhance the vaccination reaction.
There are hardly any comparative studies to date showing that vaccinated children are healthier than unvaccinated children!
The few studies that do exist actually show the opposite.
For this reason, the Association of Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy (MWGFD for short) has set up
a working group to campaign against compulsory measles vaccination and the existing measles protection law in Germany.
Listen to a summary showing excerpts of the MWGFD press symposium on November 15, 2025. Most important arguments against mandatory
measles vaccination in Germany and worldwide are presented.
"By the way, other countries in Europe are affected by vaccine mandates as well, some going beyond measles vaccine mandate
- for example Italy, France, Slovenia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Latvia and Poland.
And I also call upon these countries - I think we might broadcast to them via Kla.TV. In these countries a
fundamental right to physical integrity also exists,
meaning that wherever vaccination is mandatory, the fundamental right to physical integrity is violated
and parental rights are trampled on. We cannot accept this.
Let us create a common European movement!
I appeal to everybody to join us!"
Four hours of highly competent technical expertise shortened to 40 minutes.
Watch this Kla.TV summary of the MWGFD symposium.
Gynecologist, general practitioner, naturopath, deputy chairman of the MWGFD e.V. "Welcome to our press conference with
the topic: The German "Measles Protection Act" under scrutiny.
The vaccination we are targeting today is still one of the old sort of vaccines, where a certain amount of an
antigen, in the case of measles an attenuated virus, is injected together with other questionable substances.
Even though in this case we also cannot know exactly how long and where this attenuated virus will work in the body.
Strictly speaking, three or even four virus types are actually injected in this MMR vaccination,
because the measles vaccine is no longer available as a standalone vaccine in Germany or Europe, but only
in a triple combination, together with mumps and rubella, or in a quadruple combination with chickenpox.
By the way, these conventional vaccines, which, as we will show you in a moment, are anything but harmless or free of side
effects - at the instigation of the WHO, these vaccines will also be converted to this modern, new mod RNA
technology, as used in the Covid vaccines, in the near future.
And that, of course, must be vigorously prevented.
Now to the background to today's project.
In November 2019, shortly before the coronavirus pandemic, a law was quickly rushed through the German
Bundestag under the leadership of Health Minister Jens Spahn. It then came into force in March 2020.
This so-called Measles Protection Act includes a de facto compulsory vaccination against measles for all children from
their first birthday if they enter daycare centers, kindergartens or schools and for all people born after 1970
if they want to work in community or medical facilities.
According to the recommendation of the German Vaccine Commission (STIKO) measles shots should be administered twice, i.e. in
children aged 11 and 15 months, and if immunity is lacking, the vaccination should then be repeated as the child grows older.
This means that every year a birth cohort is affected - in Germany that is 650,000 to 700,000 parents with their young
children - and which incidentally generates annual profits in the multi-digit million range for the pharmaceutical companies.
And despite the fact that this law implies serious violations of important fundamental rights, such as the right to physical
integrity enshrined in Article 2 of the German Constitution, or the parental rights laid down in Article 6, this law was even
confirmed as allegedly constitutional in July 2022 by the highly questionable so-called Kita
decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
This makes the Measles Protection Act a good blueprint for any other considered vaccination mandates.
A scenario that could quickly become reality due to the current machinations of the WHO.
And, to address it right away, this was probably the reason why it was rushed through the German Federal Council so quickly at
the end of 2019, because knowing of the upcoming "pandemic", a legal template was desired for a planned general
coronavirus law and mandatory coronavirus vaccination.
The fact that this law with a vaccine mandate did not receive a majority among parliamentarians in the vote in April 2022 I
think can be traced back to our efforts as MWGFD, amongst others.
When you look at both the explanatory memorandum to the Measles Protection Act and the explanatory memorandum to the Federal
Constitutional Court's decision on daycare centers you find several medically and scientifically untenable
assumptions and assertions that are being used as arguments for requiring an allegedly necessary vaccine mandate.
And that is why we at the MWGFD saw the need to set up this working group, whose members
are introducing themselves to you here today.
Our aim is that this vaccine mandate be lifted as quickly as possible.
And we have produced a detailed information letter with all the important facts on the childhood disease
measles, the measles vaccination, containing all the important facts and scientific sources.
And we sent it this morning via e-mail to all members of the Bundestag and to the state parliaments, to some groups also by
mail, and to the judges of the Federal Constitutional Court, with the aim to substantiate the
arguments for the constitutional complaints pending there.
Now I am pleased to announce the first speaker, our MWGFD Honorary Chairman Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi." Specialist in
microbiology and infection epidemiology, long-standing director of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene
of the University of Mainz. "At the beginning of the twentieth century, measles infections were dangerous.
The main cause for severe outbreaks was bacterial pneumonia, which, like the plague in the Middle Ages, spread like
wildfire, especially among malnourished and undernourished people living in crowded and unhygienic conditions.
The improvement in living conditions after the end of the First World War led to a
rapid decline in the number of measles victims.
And with the introduction of modern antibiotics to treat the underlying bacterial infections, measles has
finally lost its status as a dangerous infectious disease.
Conclusion: There is in fact no longer any need to vaccinate against measles today.
Is the live measles vaccine really safe, as experts, health officials and the mass media assure us?
Ladies and gentlemen, are you aware that the injection of a foreign substance into the
depths of your body is never completely risk-free?
This applies all the more to the injection of functioning foreign genes.
Do you know that there is no knowledge about this? No knowledge about the many organs, including
the brain, in which the vaccine virus multiplies?
Nothing is known about the duration of the multiplication and of course nothing about possible consequences." Laboratory
specialist, specialist in internal medicine with the field of
infectiology, molecular biologist Medically ethical and social considerations on compulsory measles vaccination "My presentation
does not revolve around compulsory measles vaccination or vaccinations as such. It's about what we have to put up with,
what patients have to accept and what they do not have to accept.
It is really about the basics of such ethical considerations and their significance in society.
The first principle is the principle of the right to physical integrity.
The patient has absolute sovereignty over their own body and over their physical integrity.
As a medical student, I learned that it's not even allowed to comb a patient's hair if they don't want it.
The second principle is the principle of informed consent.
What does informed consent mean? Informed consent, if you are aware of it, is a direct,
personal relationship between doctor and patient.
The doctor must inform the patient verbally about the benefits, risks and side effects.
He can then give him something in written form. But the crucial point is this verbal explanation, where the patient also has the
opportunity to ask questions and actually, if you read the German law, also has time to consider whether they want it or not.
And then we come to the third, and that is the core principle: First, do no harm!
This means for the individual patient that the doctor must be sure this treatment will do this patient more good than harm.
This means the focus is on the individual patient, not on society, not on the community.
And the problem we are facing now is here we have this very intimate, fragile relationship between doctor and
patient, and now the state comes and intervenes, so to speak.
So, in my opinion, the measles vaccine mandate essentially is about socio-political and
ethical issues that could not be more fundamental.
The first question is: Who determines about our bodies and the bodies of our children?
Do we decide or does the state decide?
The second point is: Towards whom is the doctor liable?
Is the doctor liable towards his patients - as it should be? Or is he liable to the state?
Thirdly, if the doctor becomes the extended arm of the state: is there still trust?
And what about the doctor-patient relationship?
Because if a doctor works in such a system, then you have to ask the question: Is he still a doctor at all?
Or has he merely become some medical technician working for the state? - which is something completely different.
Specialist in internal medicine and MWGFD member - Is the measles vaccination contraindicated? "And now let's take a
look at whether such a contraindication for measles vaccination exists for all healthy children in Germany.
An absolute contraindication for measles vaccination, for example, would be a severe, congenital
immunodeficiency, where no live viruses may be vaccinated because the person would become seriously ill.
A relative contraindication is a medical measure whose potential harm or risk is greater than the benefit.
Next, let's take a look at whether the measles vaccination implies such a relative contraindication. You have
to weigh the vaccination's benefits against the harms.
There were no deaths in 2023/24. Since the start of mandatory reporting of measles there have been 14 reported
measles deaths in Germany, although we don't know in detail whether the people died with or from measles.
The serious complications, of which figures between one in a thousand and one in ten thousand are quoted, are very rare.
They have been virtually non-existent in Germany for decades.
This means that the risk of being harmed by measles is very manageable.
The risk of contracting measles in Germany, if you convert it to a percentage, is 0.0006 percent. And the risk of
suffering a serious measles complication is, another three zeros in between, it's roughly one in a thousand infections.
And the lifetime risk, so if we multiply that by 80, we're still at 0.00005 percent.
The risk of contracting or dying from measles is negligibly small.
There is no epidemic emergency that would justify a restriction of fundamental rights.
And compulsory measles vaccination is therefore clearly incompatible with the Constitution.
Does the measles vaccination prevent deaths? Very doubtful.
Sucharit Bakhdi has already said that. These are figures from the USA. Measles mortality was actually still
relatively high there at the beginning of the 20th century.
By the 1960s, however, it had fallen to virtually zero.
And vaccination was introduced in the USA in 1963 and in Germany in 1973.
So the vaccination definitely came too late here.
It cannot prevent any more deaths because the deaths had already been stopped before.
Does the measles vaccination cause harm? There is a Cochrane review on this.
It is quite clear that this vaccination has the potential to cause harm.
Main side effects are aseptic meningitis
. Sucharit Bhakdi has already said that. These are living viruses that spread throughout the body,
They also go into the nerve tissue, they also go into the brain, they multiply.
They do not cause such an obvious disease as the wild measles virus.
But this is a virus. It is injected and multiplies in the body and also causes damage
- for example in the brain and nerve tissue. It leads to febrile convulsions and epilepsy.
It leads to autoimmune diseases such as ITP, that is idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura,
a lack of platelets, where the immune system breaks down its own platelets
and Schönlein-Henoch purpura, which is an autoimmune disease of the blood vessels.
There are also possible indications of inflammatory bowel diseases - that is, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease,
developmental delays in childhood, dermatitis, eczema, type 1 diabetes, allergies, asthma, autism spectrum disorders.
These are the notifications to the Paul Ehrlich Institute from 2001 to 2012.
There were almost 1,700 reported suspicions with 5,300 vaccination reactions, including 1,300 reports of
severe side effects suspected to be linked to the shot.
Permanent damage is reported in 3.4 percent of reports and a fatal outcome in 0.9 percent.
And the PEI itself considers a causal link to be probable or possible in around half of these reported cases.
The conclusion is clear: the benefit-harm ratio from the point of view of the individual child, and that's what this is about,
is definitely negative, because the risk of contracting measles or suffering a measles complication is virtually zero.
And the risk of suffering a serious side effect with 1.2 million vaccinations per year - and I have now only taken half of the 110
serious reports that the Paul Ehrlich Institute received, because they only see causality in half of the cases - so the risk of
damage is still 0.005 percent and therefore ten times higher than the risk of contracting measles and a hundred times
higher than the lifetime risk of a serious measles complication.
In addition, it can be assumed that vaccination injuries are underreported by a factor of 10 to 20.
And therefore, for every healthy German child on an individual level, a relative contraindication to the measles vaccination is
evident, and therefore it is completely legal to issue a vaccination exemption in accordance with
Section 20 (9) of the Infection Protection Law."
University lecturer in Vienna Can "herd immunity" justify vaccinations? "I made a conscious decision to work on just one
topic. And this topic is precisely the core issue how an individual medical decision
can be transformed into a social compulsion.
And the question is, does this herd protection, this herd immunity that is repeatedly mentioned, even exist?
And if so, is the term even applicable when it comes to vaccinations?
The term is very popular with the WHO.
And when Mr. Tedros says something like that, alarm bells should ring.
He addresses it a little differently and says: "No one is safe, till everyone is safe".
And this argument is of course based on a very great simplification.
Especially when you say it's not the individual animal, the individual living being,
that matters, but it's the herd that matters.
And this means that the individual right - as Paul Cullen already explained today - is completely nullified.
However, we know from vaccinations, for example, that even if you believe in this vaccination principle, no single
vaccination provides lasting protection for even a short time.
But that is the prerequisite for this topic of herd protection.
All of this, however, applies to 100% immunity only given when someone has suffered a disease such as measles,
against which this person has developed immunity then.
Where does this concept of herd protection actually come from?
It was first mentioned in 1923 by a British bacteriologist, but not at all in relation to vaccinations.
And then this concept was adopted in 1933 by an American doctor who observed a measles epidemic in Baltimore and found
that when around 55 percent of children had lived through the disease, the epidemic had come to a standstill.
But that presupposes, as in the case of 1933, that immunity has actually developed as a result of contracting measles.
And in the 1960s, the pharmaceutical industry then simply adopted this consideration, this experience of the American doctor from
1933, and said, we then take this term of herd protection and herd immunity and simply use it, because we
say that a vaccination is just as good as undergoing a natural disease that leads to immunity
- which of course is not legitimate at all. Herd immunity should not be used at all in connection with
vaccination coverage rates and vaccination of the population.
This only has something to do with going through natural illnesses.
This means that vaccinations and herd immunity have nothing to do with each other.
And so it is not at all legitimate to use the term on the one hand and to exert pressure on the other with the argument that an
individual decision can be played off against a group benefit."
Medical journalist, editor of the magazine "impf-report", operator of the portal website "Impfkritik" and the nationwide
regulars' table network NEFUNI Vaccination decision from the perspective of a medical layman and father. Excerpt from song by
Hans Tolzin (Lyrics and music: Hanning & Mike (+KI), animation: Torsten Neumann (+KI)) "Once
upon a time there was a mother who loved her child.
She was looking for the doctor who would bring her the truth.
He said: "Your son is as healthy as a tree. But without vaccination... this will remain a dream."
But the mother asked: "Where does it say in black and white that vaccinated people are healthier and what is the price?
Give me proof of study, just give me a piece - blind faith alone does not bring happiness in life."
The doctor, he stuttered, looked at his watch, spoke of smallpox and polio, horror without cure.
But he did not name any studies to prove this.
"Basically, this song is about my path to clarity on the vaccination issue.
It starts with admitting that you are allowed to ask this question. And secondly that the burden of
proof is not on us parents, but on those who claim that you have to accept this bodily harm.
This is a very important step before dealing with the topic.
One statement I found quite interesting after many inquiries with the authorities was this:
nobody claims that antibodies guarantee immunity.
This is a very clear statement from both the RKI and the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
What does this mean for measles vaccinations?
The German Freedom of Information Act came into force in 2006
and this underpinned my requests with the federal authorities.
I have made around 200 inquiries to date, not all of which have actually been published.
The answers, if you really probe, are often fallacies of circular reasoning.
If you really follow up, get a lawyer and then go to the administrative court, with moderate success,
the answer at the end is often: "It's true because that's what the textbooks say."
That's no joke and I was really shocked.
It's all about asking the right questions in the right place and not have yourself be fobbed off.
And that is a big challenge for many parents.
My message to all parents: If you remain isolated, you will perish.
Network with like-minded parents who don't patronize you but are in the same situation,
exchange experiences, strengthen each other.
We are not prepared for what is yet to come.
That's what's moving me very much at the moment.
Yes, the measles vaccination requirement is injustice and absolutely must be ended!
But what is coming towards us is a tsunami at the speed of sound.
There are well over 100 gene "vaccines" in the pipeline. The pharmaceutical mafia is now going all out.
In my opinion, the Achilles heel of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, the vaccine manufacturers, is the liability issue.
It cannot be that vaccine manufacturers of all entities are exempt from liability.
And I believe that we need to tackle this issue together, the entire movement that is questioning vaccines, and bring it to
public attention. Because even vaccination advocates should actually be of the same opinion: Yes, we will have
better vaccines if the manufacturers must accept liability."
General practitioner and homeopath, Medical Director of the Levana Association and President of the Academy for Health, Sport
and Communication "When protection becomes coercion - criticism of the Measles Protection Act is growing" "Parents are
forced to make decisions that deeply affect their conscience.
Parents who already have a child with a severe vaccination reaction are faced with a choice: either risk
another injury or be excluded from kindergarten or school.
This is what happened to Sabrina, a young mother, for example.
She herself had developed severe neurodermatitis and asthma after vaccinations as a child, which is why she did not
have her son Timo vaccinated and he was healthy and thriving.
When Timo was due to start kindergarten at the age of four - Sabrina had to work part-time to earn money - proof of measles
vaccination was required. Otherwise he would not be admitted.
The pediatrician insistently urged her to get her son vaccinated at every check-up anyway.
He then confidently administered the MMR vaccination, the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.
Timo was weak for days afterwards and after nine days had a very, very high fever of up
to 41 degrees and then also had a seizure.
Timo was then taken to hospital by the emergency doctor,
There the diagnosis of abacterial meningitis was made.
Timo died three years later from aspiration pneumonia, i.e. severe pneumonia - he had choked.
Since this vaccination incident, he has been 100 percent disabled and autistic.
The pediatrician and also other doctors and authorities of course deny a connection to
vaccinations, they say: "Pure coincidence."
But where do the doctors get the certainty that it was a pure coincidence, especially since bacterial or
abacterial meningitis is even mentioned in the package inserts.
A federal state that pretends to protect its citizens from a harmless childhood disease under
duress must not forget its own fundamental values.
Human dignity, physical integrity and parental rights are not a luxury, they are our rights.
They are the foundation of our free and democratic basic order.
It's time for us to look again. Time for politicians and lawyers to gain the courage to
question this measles protection law and get rid it."
General practitioner/naturopath, graduate physicist and MWGFD member Measles: Experiences of a general
practitioner "Briefly some comments I made as a general practitioner concerning measles and measles vaccination.
It is well known that measles deaths were practically zero at the time I opened the practice.
And this decline was not due to the vaccinations.
It happened regardless of the vaccinations.
It was the living conditions: better hygiene, better nutrition, the absence of war and
fear. These are the things that were important.
you would need three factors - Hans Tolzin just illustrated this very nicely - to advocate vaccination
you'd need three factors: a need, a benefit and few risks.
And all of this must be properly investigated. And all three are not given.
Nevertheless, pediatricians have always urged to vaccinate - and continue to do so today.
In some cases, parents have been literally expelled from the pediatrician's office or kicked out and
vilified as freeloaders or as anti-social citizens.
That is simply a disaster. You must never say something like this as a doctor.
And we have side effects from the vaccination
- I want to keep this short. But we also have benefits from the measles
- I don't want to leave this unmentioned. Children who have had measles have better health later in life.
Children who have had measles are much less likely to develop cancer later on,
much less often have diabetes, much less often have autoimmune diseases.
So I would rather say: let me have the measles!
Well, I had measles cases in the practice. What did I do with them?
Point one: The most important thing is to take away the parents' fear!
Measles has a high fever and a stupid rash.
That looks pretty "crappy" - sorry.
And then the first thing I have to do is deal with the mother.
because the mother's fear is transferred one-to-one to the child.
Point two: Do not reduce the high fever! Fever is a welcome helper in an infectious disease to cope with the infection.
If you take away the weapon, the immune system can no longer work.
Then rest in bed was always important to me. In fact: Rest in bed means REST in bed
and not: couch with TV. Rest in Bed
After that, even if the child is no longer contagious after four days, I would still keep it at home. One or even two weeks.
And if the parents say that's not possible for us, we're both working, then I immediately disagree.
That's not true. In Germany we have a statutory guarantee of continued pay, 15 days per year per parent."
Physician, psychologist, psychotherapist and professor at the Medical University of Innsbruck in the Department of
Psychoneuroimmunology. Compulsory vaccination from the perspective of the psychoneuroimmunologist "Psychoneuroimmunology
deals with the interactions between the psyche, nervous system and immune system and has been able to show very clearly in
recent decades that overriding factors in our everyday lives, psychological factors, social factors,
relationship factors and also societal factors, have a significant influence on our immune activity.
And there is clear evidence from psychoneuroimmunology that shows that conventional vaccinations are not at all successful
and are associated with high side effects when people are under chronic stress and/or feel coerced into vaccination.
We also know from psychoneuroimmunology that people who are abused, who are under
pressure and duress, develop autoimmune reactions
and there was also an effect in relation to all the vaccinations.
What does this have to do with the measles vaccination?
Well, we know from what was just said that vaccination has to be seen in a wider context.
And this vaccine mandate for measles we are having for some years now, should be viewed very, very
sceptically and criticized for the reasons mentioned."
Beate Bahner Lawyer and specialist lawyer for medical law. 10 legal reasons against the Measles Protection Act "I
actually decided very spontaneously this year to write this book, "Measles Vaccination and Measles Protection Act".
It has been on the market for three months and my title today based on these findings is: 10 reasons
why the Measles Protection Act is a law of injustice.
This is what I concluded at the end of 464 pages.
The Measles Protection Act will thus go down in the legal history of the 21st century.
And as an impressive example of how this law was intended to quietly establish a health and vaccination tyranny,
namely under the pretense of science and health protection, under unscrupulous abuse of the law with the blessing of the Federal
Constitutional Court and under shameless abuse of the trust of bona fide citizens, but
probably also of the health authorities and courts.
Why, in my opinion, is the Measles Protection Act a law of injustice?
Because the goals supposedly pursued by this law are either contradictory or unattainable or have
already been achieved and are therefore hypocritical.
The allegation of a serious, dangerous disease - Prof. Sönnichsen already mentioned it - is therefore incorrect.
I call it a bold and shameless lie.
Measles was eliminated in Germany in 2020, in 21, in 22 and in 23.
It no longer existed according to WHO criteria.
So why make vaccination compulsory if the disease has already been eliminated anyway?
So why make vaccination compulsory? What is this really about?
Certainly not to protect patients, but at best to protect the revenues of the two vaccine manufacturers.
It's about the goal of the vaccinated citizen at the order of the state.
The legislator claiming that compulsory vaccination would protect vulnerable patients who allegedly cannot be vaccinated.
About the babies, you've already said it, Ronny,
the nest protection that they actually get when the mothers go through the measles naturally is reduced by the vaccination,
and so the legislator produces the vulnerability of the infants themselves.
Pregnant women: Here too, there is not a single study according to which pregnant mothers are particularly at risk from measles.
In the case of immunosuppressed people , it is easy to imagine that they should not be vaccinated, as is also
stated in the information for healthcare professionals.
A case from my practice: An employee of a subcontractor of Münster University Hospital requires
dialysis and is therefore definitely immunosuppressed.
He was forced to be vaccinated by Münster University Hospital, although the titer was already
very borderline and has even been proven today.
The man is in his early 50s, so he still belongs to the group that probably had the measles.
He was forced to be vaccinated, he was fined and banned from entering the premises.
So much for the group of immunosuppressed patients who are supposedly to be protected, that they have
to be vaccinated in order to protect this patient, who in turn is forced to be vaccinated.
Münster University Hospital, it's a shame! There is not a single evidence-based comparative
study between vaccinated and unvaccinated people
- we already said that - in which the necessity, effectiveness and safety of the measles vaccination was proven.
What is there? There are manufacturer studies that compare their old vaccine with the newer variant
and - great (we published this) the manufacturers who compare their vaccines:
GlaxoSmithKline compared its vaccine with Merck's, and there wasn't much difference.
Because if I do that and accept the side effects that the first vaccine has, then that is window dressing.
So the claim that measles vaccines are effective and safe is a life-threatening lie, in my opinion, and
it has to be said, with a highly criminal potential.
Let's name it! Figures and statistics show a much higher mortality rate after measles vaccination than after measles disease.
So mandatory vaccination for all children with this deadly risk-benefit ratio is no longer constitutional, which the
Federal Constitutional Court claims, but actually criminal.
Because the federal state is forcing its own citizens to risk life and limb with a completely
unnecessary and pointless measles vaccination.
Human dignity is absolutely inviolable and even eternally guaranteed by the Basic Law.
Nevertheless, this principle was trampled underfoot by the unspeakable daycare decision
of the Federal Constitutional Court in 2022.
In particular, the exclusion of healthy nursery children from nursery - simply because they do not have a measles vaccination -
is unbelievable discrimination, an inexcusable violation of the human dignity of these children and at the same
time a violation of the parental right to education and care and thus to medical self-determination.
Nothing can justify this violation.
If the Federal Constitutional Court nevertheless considers compulsory measles vaccination to be constitutional, then it is
clearly no longer protecting the rights of children and citizens, but only the greed for profit of the pharmaceutical companies.
Ladies and gentlemen, after many months of work on my latest book and the summary of my meticulous medical legal research - on 464
pages, with more than 700 references - I have come to the conclusion that the Measles Protection Act is a law of injustice
- and therefore null and void - due to the intolerable contradictions to truth and
justice and the violation of human dignity!
I call on the Bundestag to repeal this law of injustice today rather than tomorrow, just as quickly and quietly as it quietly
passed this law in the wake of staging the Corona crisis.
Until then, until this law is repealed, the health authorities, school administrators and day-care center directors, especially
the courts, must refuse to obey this law of injustice.
Do not tolerate any more obvious contradictions and human rights violations! Do not allow yourself to be
harnessed to dubious interests and thereby actively contribute
to restoring law and order, science, clean medicine and real health protection! Thank you."
Vetopedia.org - the free encyclopedia of dissenting voices "I would now like to introduce you to a website.
I was invited a week ago to the AZK, the Anti-Censorship Coalition Conference in Switzerland,
with the Kla.TV team around the Sasek family.
And I was impressed by Elias Sasek, one of the editors responsible, who presented a completely new
project, a platform on which you can actively participate.
It's a kind of encyclopedia of uncensored and untainted truth, you can say.
And I would like to strongly recommend it to you. You can access it via vetopedia.org.
And if you go there, you will see different categories on the website.
Vaccine injuries, wireless radiation damage, freemason founded entities, Ritual violence, crisis profits.
21 languages can be viewed simultaneously.
All articles are translated into these languages. Sensational!
But let's take a look, let's click on "Vaccine injuries".
And here you can see witness reports of already 64,507 witnesses who suffered vaccine injuries.
There are 805 articles from studies listed on specific vaccinations.
There can always be more. Anyone can enter something.
And the editors are still checking whether all this can be published as it is before
publication. So I think it's sensational.
At the top-left you see studies and facts: 805 articles from studies,
and these can be translated into the various languages.
So everyone is called upon to help make sure this page is filled and continues to be used.
I think it's sensational what a great encyclopaedia that will serve us all can be created here together."
Studies show: Vaccinated people are healthier than unvaccinated people. "And the crucial question is, how do we teach this to our
fellow human beings who, thanks to this decades-long vaccination propaganda, which is of course aimed at fear and scaremongering,
have virtually internalized this sacred protective vaccination?
And you can see all these scaremongering pharmaceutical advertising campaigns, on
which an incredible amount of money is spent.
And of course they brainwash people.
Even in my field of expertise, where it's about cervical cancer, where people say we
have to protect children, girls and even boys.
This is crazy and absurd.
And I think one possibility could be that we show people meanwhile there are powerful arguments based on the
fact that there are studies that show vaccinated people are basically less healthy than unvaccinated people.
So there are more and more studies. And the big one is this new Henry Ford study, as it is
called, which was supposed to be kept under wraps.
And the background is as follows. The study was conducted in the USA by the head of a large Center for Infectious Diseases,
Markus Zervos, who brought a few other colleagues into the team.
And he was approached in 2017 by the vaccination critic Del Bigtree and was asked: "Hey, you have the
data from a lot of children, could we conduct a study, vaccinated versus unvaccinated."
And Markus Zervos agreed because he thought he could prove to the vaccination critic Del
Bigtree that vaccinations protect and are safe.
And they analyzed the data from over 550 medical facilities, children's data from 2000 to 2016, they had over
18,000 children together, of which almost 2000 were without vaccinations, really without any vaccinations at all
and over 16,000 were vaccinated. And the agreement from the outset was that the results had to be published no matter what.
And then he didn't publish it.
Why? He said he himself was astonished by the outcome of this study
because he was afraid, he later stated on the record, that he could embarrass the vaccinating doctors.
And Zervos himself once said in an interview that he was afraid of losing his job at Henry Ford.
And that shows how dominant this pharmaceutical lobby is everywhere, that people have
to be afraid to bring the truth to light.
Where will that take us? And these study results now have been released through a court case and that is sensational.
And this study, simply by virtue of the fact that there were so many participants, carries an incredible amount of weight.
So six times more autoimmune diseases, five and a half times more neurological developmental disorders, four
times more asthma, four times more speech disorders and three times more atopic diseases.
Among the unvaccinated children in this group, there were no cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, learning difficulties,
mental disabilities, tics or other mental disorders.
And the result was that the risk of chronic diseases was more than three times higher in those vaccinated.
So 75 percent in the group of vaccinated children developed a chronic disease after ten years, compared to
only 17 percent in the group of unvaccinated children."
Bringing the issue to the public together! "So how can you support our campaign to repeal the measles
protection law and the vaccine mandate formulated therein?
So, please take a look at the website that has been made available as of today: https://masernschutzgesetz.mwgfd.org.
And on this website you will be kept up to date on all our activities and results.
Please register with the contact form there!
This is very important, so that we can keep in touch with all those taking part in
petitions in case things somehow lead to nothing.
We will keep at it, and the more addresses we have, the more we can ask people to take action and keep them informed.
As a team, we created a nine-page information letter with all the important source information, .
This can be downloaded from this website. Anyone can download it, print it out and bring it with them when they
go to the vaccination center. Please also give it to your vaccinating doctors and so on.
And the members of the Bundestag, we want to send it to all of them, to the members of the Bundestag and state
parliaments, we made a two-page accompanying letter so they are maybe prepared to read this nine-page information letter.
And if the pressure from the general public becomes greater, they will be forced to read it, I think.
We have produced a flyer which you can distribute and which can be used to collect signatures - in other
words, it would be best to have campaigns all over Germany.
This flyer is downloadable. And you can download the signature collection sheets.
It is important that our petition demands are on it, which I have also submitted to the
Bundestag, they should always be on the signature sheet.
So talk to your MPs, talk to the politicians!
We have to exert pressure from below! Talk to your doctors, talk about it with your friends and colleagues at work!
Talk to affected families, to all young families!
This affects 700,000 people every year. And bring the issue out to the public!