Many countries around the world require children to be vaccinated against measles.
They must have a measles vaccination when they start school or kindergarten.
Parents are told by the state that the measles vaccination is useful and protective for their child.
The fact that a vaccination is a medical procedure that may well lead to vaccine damage is concealed!
This can be caused by the active substance itself or by the chemical agents contained in each
vaccination to enhance the vaccination reaction.
There are also hardly any comparative studies to date that show that vaccinated
children are healthier than unvaccinated children!
The few studies that do exist actually show the opposite.
For this reason, the Society of Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy (MWGFD for short) has set up
a working group to campaign against compulsory measles vaccination and the existing measles protection law in Germany.
Listen to a summary of the MWGFD press symposium on November 15, 2025 with the most important arguments against
mandatory measles vaccination in Germany and worldwide.
"And by the way, other countries in Europe are also affected by compulsory vaccination, some of which go beyond compulsory measles
vaccination - for example Italy, France, Slovenia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Latvia and Poland.
And I also call on these countries - I think that we might then broadcast to these countries via Kla.TV. Because even in these
countries there is a fundamental right to physical integrity.
This means that wherever vaccination is mandatory, the fundamental right to physical integrity is violated.
and also trampled on parental rights. We cannot accept this.
Let's create a common European movement!
I call on everyone to join us!"
Four hours of highly competent technical expertise shortened to 40 minutes.
Now watch the Kla.TV summary of the MWGFD symposium.
Gynecologist, general practitioner, naturopath, deputy chairman of the MWGFD e.V. "Welcome to our press conference with
the topic: The "Measles Protection Act" on the test bench.
The vaccination we are targeting today still corresponds to the old class of vaccines, where a certain amount of an
antigen, in the case of measles an attenuated virus, is injected together with other questionable accompanying substances.
Here, too, we cannot know exactly how long and where this attenuated virus works in the body.
And strictly speaking, three or even four virus types are injected together in this MMR vaccination,
because the measles vaccine is no longer available here in Germany or in Europe as a single vaccine, but only
in a triple combination, together with mumps and rubella, or in a quadruple combination with chickenpox.
Incidentally, these conventional vaccines, which, as we will show you in a moment, are anything but harmless or free of side
effects, will also be converted to this modern, new mod RNA technology, as used in the Covid
vaccines, at the instigation of the WHO in the near future.
And that, of course, must also be vigorously prevented.
Now to the background to today's project.
In November 2019, shortly before the coronavirus pandemic, a law was quickly rushed through the German Bundestag
under the leadership of Health Minister Jens Spahn, which then came into force in March 2020.
This so-called Measles Protection Act includes a de facto compulsory vaccination against measles for all children from
their first birthday who are cared for in daycare centers, kindergartens or schools and for all persons born after
1970 if they want to work in community or medical facilities.
According to the STIKO recommendation measles should be administered twice, i.e. in children aged 11 and 15
months, and if immunity is lacking, it (the vaccination) should then be repeated as the child grows older.
This means that every year a birth cohort is affected - in Germany that is 650,000 to 700,000 parents with their young
children - and which incidentally also generates annual profits in the multi-digit
million range for the pharmaceutical companies.
And despite the fact that this law is accompanied by serious violations of important fundamental rights, such as the right to
physical integrity enshrined in Article 2 of the Basic Law, or the parental rights laid down in Article 6, this law was even
confirmed as allegedly constitutional in July 2022 by the highly questionable so-called Kita
decision of the Federal Constitutional Court.
The Measles Protection Act is therefore naturally also a good blueprint for any other
vaccination obligations that may be considered,
A scenario that could also quickly become reality as a result of the current machinations of the WHO.
And, to come straight to the point, that was probably also the reason why it was rushed through the Federal Council so quickly
at the end of 2019, because they wanted to have a legal template for a planned general coronavirus law and mandatory coronavirus
vaccination in the knowledge that the "pandemic" was coming soon.
And I think we can also thank our efforts on the part of the MWGFD for the fact that this law with
mandatory vaccination did not receive a majority among parliamentarians in the vote in April 2022.
A review of both the explanatory memorandum to the Measles Protection Act and the explanatory memorandum to the Federal
Constitutional Court's decision on daycare centers reveals that several medically and scientifically untenable
assumptions and assertions are used as arguments for an allegedly necessary vaccination requirement.
And that is why we at the MWGFD saw the need to set up this working group, which is introducing itself to you here today.
Our aim is for this compulsory vaccination to be lifted as quickly as possible.
And we have produced a detailed information letter with all the important facts about the childhood disease
measles, the measles vaccination, with all the important facts and the scientific sources.
And this morning we sent this letter to our staff, to all members of the Bundestag and the state parliaments by e-mail, to some
groups also by post, and also to the judges of the Federal Constitutional Court, in order to substantiate the
arguments for the constitutional complaints pending there.
But now I am pleased to announce the first speaker contribution from our MWGFD Honorary Chairman Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi."
Specialist in microbiology and infection epidemiology, long-standing director of the
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at
of the University of Mainz. "At the beginning of the twentieth century, measles infections were quite dangerous.
The main cause of severe outbreaks was bacterial pneumonia, which, like the plague in the Middle Ages, spread like
wildfire, especially among malnourished and undernourished people living in cramped and unhygienic conditions.
The improvement in living conditions after the end of the First World War led to a
rapid decline in the number of measles victims.
And with the introduction of modern antibiotics to treat the underlying bacterial infections, measles has
finally lost its status as a dangerous infectious disease.
Conclusion: There is in fact no longer any need to vaccinate against measles today.
Is the live measles vaccine really safe, as experts, health politicians and the mass media assure us?
Ladies and gentlemen, are you aware that the introduction of a foreign substance into the
depths of your body is never completely risk-free?
This applies all the more to the introduction of functioning foreign genes.
Do you know that nothing is really known? Nothing about the many organs, including the brain, in which the virus multiplies?
Nothing about the duration of the multiplication and of course nothing about possible consequences?"
Laboratory specialist, specialist in internal medicine
m. Additional infectiology, molecular biologist Medical ethics and social considerations on compulsory measles vaccination "My
presentation is not really so much about compulsory measles vaccination or even about vaccinations per se. It's
about what we can put up with, what we have to put up with as patients and what we don't have to put up with.
And it is really about the foundations of such ethical considerations and their significance in society.
The first principle is the principle of the right to physical integrity.
The patient has absolute sovereignty over their own body and over their physical integrity.
As a medical student, I learned that it's not even allowed to comb a patient's hair if they don't want it.
The second principle: The principle of informed consent.
What does informed consent mean? Informed consent, if you are aware of it, is a direct,
personal relationship between doctor and patient.
The doctor must inform the patient verbally about the benefits, risks and side effects.
He can then give him something in writing. But the crucial thing is this verbal explanation, where the patient also has the
opportunity to ask questions and actually, if you read the German law, also has time to consider whether they want it or not.
And then we come to the third, and that is the core principle: First, do no harm!
What it means is that for the individual patient in front of you, the doctor has to be sure that
this treatment will do them more good than harm.
This means that the focus is on the individual patient, not on society, not on the community.
And the problem we have now is that we have this very, very intimate, very fragile relationship between doctor and patient,
and now the state is coming in and intervening, so to speak.
So, in my opinion at least, compulsory measles vaccination is essentially about socio-political and
ethical issues that could not be more fundamental.
The first question is: Who determines our bodies and the bodies of our children?
Do we decide or does the state decide?
The second point is: To whom is the doctor obliged?
Is the doctor obliged to his patients - as he should be? Or is he obliged to the state?
Thirdly, if the doctor is then the extended arm of the state: where is the trust?
And where does that leave the doctor-patient relationship?
Because if a doctor works in such a system, then you have to ask the question: Is he still a doctor at all?
Or is he merely a medical technician working for the state? - which is something completely different.
Specialist in internal medicine and MWGFD member - Is the measles vaccination contraindicated? "And now let's take a look
at whether there is actually a contraindication for the measles vaccination for all healthy children in Germany.
An absolute contraindication for measles vaccination, for example, would be a severe, congenital
immunodeficiency, where no live viruses may be vaccinated because the person would become seriously ill.
A relative contraindication is a medical measure whose potential harm or risk is greater than the benefit.
Next, let's take a look at whether the measles vaccination doesn't actually have a relative contraindication.
And here you simply have to weigh up the benefits of the vaccination against the harms of the vaccination.
There were no deaths in 2023/24. There have been 14 reported measles deaths in Germany since the start of
mandatory reporting of measles. Although we don't know in detail whether the people died with or from measles.
The serious complications - figures of between one in a thousand and one in ten thousand are quoted - are
ultimately extremely rare. They have been virtually non-existent in Germany for decades.
This means that the risk of being harmed by measles is very manageable.
The risk of contracting measles in Germany, if you convert it to a percentage, so to speak, is 0.0006 percent. And the risk of
suffering a serious measles complication is, yes, let's put another three zeros in
between, because it's roughly one in a thousand.
And the lifetime risk, so if we multiply that by 80, we're still at 0.0005 percent.
The risk of contracting or dying from measles is negligible.
There is no epidemic emergency that would justify a restriction of fundamental rights.
And compulsory measles vaccination is therefore clearly incompatible with the Basic Law.
Does the measles vaccination prevent deaths? Very doubtful.
Sucharit Bakhdi has already said that. These are now figures from the USA. Measles mortality was actually still
relatively high there at the beginning of the 20th century.
By the 1960s, however, it had fallen to virtually zero.
And vaccination was only introduced in the USA in 1963 and in Germany in 1973.
So the vaccination definitely came too late here.
It couldn't prevent any more deaths because the deaths were already gone.
Is the measles vaccination harmful? There is a Cochrane review on this.
And it is quite clear that vaccination has the potential to cause harm.
So the main side effects are aseptic meningitis
. Sucharit Bhakdi has already said that. These are living viruses that spread throughout the body,
They also go into the nerve tissue, they also go into the brain, they also multiply.
They do not cause such an obvious disease as measles, the wild virus.
But this is a virus that is injected and multiplies in the body and also causes damage
- for example in the brain and nerve tissue. It leads to febrile convulsions and epilepsy.
It leads to autoimmune diseases such as ITP, i.e. idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura,
a lack of platelets, where the immune system breaks down its own platelets
and Schönlein-Henoch purpura, which is an autoimmune disease of the blood vessels.
There are also possible indications of inflammatory bowel diseases - i.e. ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease,
developmental delays in childhood, dermatitis, eczema, type 1 diabetes, allergies, asthma, autism spectrum disorders.
These are the notifications to the Paul Ehrlich Institute from 2001 to 2012.
There were almost 1,700 suspected reports with 5,300 vaccination reactions, including
1,300 suspected reports with severe side effects.
Permanent damage is reported in 3.4 percent of reports and a fatal outcome in 0.9 percent.
And the PEI itself considers a causal link to be probable or possible in around half of these reported cases.
The conclusion is quite clear: the benefit-harm ratio from the point of view of the individual child, and that is the
issue, is definitely negative, because the risk of contracting measles or suffering a measles complication is virtually zero.
And the risk of suffering a serious vaccination side effect with 1.2 million vaccinations per year - and I have now halved the 110
serious reports that the Paul Ehrlich Institute receives, because the Paul Ehrlich Institute only sees causality in half of the
cases - the risk of damage is still 0.005 percent and therefore ten times higher than the risk of contracting
measles and a hundred times higher than the lifetime risk of a serious measles complication.
In addition, it can be assumed that vaccination injuries are underreported by a factor of 10 to 20.
This is a relative contraindication to the measles vaccination for every healthy German child at the individual level and
therefore a reason to issue a vaccination exemption in accordance with Section 20 (9) of the
Infection Protection Act completely legally."
University lecturer in Vienna Can "herd immunity" justify vaccinations? "I made a conscious decision to work on just one
topic. And this topic is precisely the core issue how an individual medical decision
can be transformed into a social compulsion.
And the question is, does this herd protection, this herd immunity that is repeatedly mentioned, even exist?
And if so, is the term even applicable when it comes to vaccinations?
The term is very popular with the WHO.
And when Mr. Tedros says something like that, alarm bells should ring.
He addresses it a little differently and says: "No one is safe, until everyone is safe".
And this argument is of course based on a very great simplification.
Especially when you go here and say that it's not the individual animal, the individual living being, that matters, but the herd.
And this means that the individual right - as Paul Cullen has already explained today - is completely set aside.
However, we now know from vaccinations, for example, that even if you believe in this vaccination principle, no single
vaccination provides lasting protection for even a short time.
But that is the prerequisite for this topic of herd protection.
However, all of this applies to 100% immunity. This is only the case, for example, if someone has had a disease such
as measles, against which they have then developed immunity.
Where does this concept of herd protection actually come from?
It was first mentioned in 1923 by a British bacteriologist, but not at all in relation to vaccinations.
And then this concept was adopted in 1933 by an American doctor who observed a measles epidemic in Baltimore and found
that when around 55 percent of children had contracted the disease, the epidemic had come to a standstill.
But that presupposes, as in the case of 1933, that immunity has actually developed as a result of contracting measles.
And in the 1960s, the pharmaceutical industry then simply adopted this consideration, this experience of the American doctor from
1933, and said, then we take this term herd protection and herd immunity and simply use it, because we say
that a vaccination is just as good as undergoing a natural disease that leads to immunity
- which of course is not legitimate at all. Herd immunity should not be used at all in connection with
vaccination coverage rates and vaccination of the population.
This only has something to do with going through natural illnesses.
This means that vaccinations and herd immunity have nothing to do with each other.
And so it is not at all legitimate to use the term on the one hand and to exert pressure on the other with the argument that an
individual decision can be played off against a group benefit."
Medical journalist, editor of the magazine "impf-report", operator of the portal website "Impfkritik" and the nationwide
regulars' table network NEFUNI Vaccination decision from the perspective of a medical layman and father. Excerpt from song by
Hans Tolzin (Lyrics and music: Hanning & Mike (+KI), animation: Torsten Neumann (+KI)) "Once
upon a time there was a mother who loved her child.
She was looking for the doctor who would bring her the truth.
He said: "Your son is as healthy as a tree. But without vaccination... - then it remains a dream."
But the mother asked: "Where does it say in black and white that vaccinated people are healthier and what is the price?
Give me proof of study, just give me a piece - blind faith alone does not bring happiness in life."
The doctor, he stuttered, looked at his watch, spoke of smallpox and polio, horror without cure.
But he has not named any studies that prove this.
"Basically, this song is actually about my path to clarity on the vaccination issue.
It starts with admitting that you are allowed to ask this question. And that the burden of proof is not on us parents,
but on those who claim that you have to allow this bodily harm.
This is a very important step before dealing with the topic.
What was interesting for me was the statement based on many inquiries with the authorities -
nobody claims that antibodies guarantee immunity.
A very clear statement from both the RKI and the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
What does this mean for measles vaccinations?
The Freedom of Information Act came into force in 2006
and this has also given my requests more weight with the federal authorities.
I have made around 200 inquiries to date, not all of which have actually been published.
The answers, if you really probe, are often circular.
If you really follow up and then involve a lawyer and then go to the administrative court, with moderate success,
The answer at the end is often: "It's true because that's what the textbooks say."
That's no joke and I was really shocked, it can't be.
It's all about asking the right questions in the right place and not being fobbed off.
And that is a big challenge for many parents.
My message to all parents: If you remain isolated, you will perish.
Network with like-minded parents who don't patronize you but are in the same situation,
exchange experiences, strengthen each other.
We are not prepared for what is yet to come.
That's what's keeping me very busy at the moment.
Yes, the measles vaccination requirement is wrong, must be dropped, absolutely!
But what is coming towards us is a tsunami at the speed of sound.
There are well over 100 gene vaccines in the pipeline. The pharmaceutical mafia is now going all out.
In my opinion, the Achilles heel of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, the vaccine manufacturers, is the liability issue.
Surely it cannot be that vaccine manufacturers of all things are exempt from liability.
And I believe that we need to tackle this issue together, the entire anti-vaccination movement together, and bring it to the
public's attention. Because even vaccination advocates should actually be of the same opinion: Yes, we have better
vaccines if the manufacturers have to accept liability."
General practitioner and homeopath, Medical Director of the Levana Association and President of the Academy for Health, Sport
and Communication "When protection becomes coercion - criticism of the Measles Protection Act is growing" "Parents are
forced to make decisions that deeply affect their conscience.
Parents who already have a child with a severe vaccination reaction are faced with a choice: the risk of
recurrence or exclusion from kindergarten or school.
This is what happened to Sabrina, a young mother, for example.
She herself had developed severe neurodermatitis and asthma after vaccinations as a child, which is why she did not
have her son Timo vaccinated and he was bursting with health.
When Timo was due to start kindergarten at the age of four - Sabrina had to work part-time to earn money - proof of measles
vaccination was required. Otherwise he would not be admitted.
The pediatrician insistently urged her to get vaccinated at every check-up anyway.
He then confidently administered the MMR vaccination, the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.
Timo was weak for days afterwards and after nine days had a very, very high fever of up
to 41 degrees and then also had a seizure.
Timo was then taken to hospital by the emergency doctor,
There the diagnosis of abacterial meningitis was made.
Timo died three years later from aspiration pneumonia, i.e. severe pneumonia - he had choked.
Since this vaccination incident, he has been 100 percent disabled and autistic.
The pediatrician and also other doctors and authorities naturally deny a connection with
the vaccinations, they say: "Pure coincidence."
But where do the doctors get the certainty that it was a pure coincidence, especially since bacterial or
abacterial meningitis is even mentioned in the package inserts.
A state that pretends to protect its citizens from a harmless childhood disease under
duress must not forget its own fundamental values.
Human dignity, physical integrity and parental rights are not a luxury, they are a right for all of us,
They are the foundation of our free and democratic basic order.
It's time for us to look again. Time for politicians and lawyers to gain the courage to question
this measles protection law and abolish it again."
General practitioner/naturopath, graduate physicist and MWGFD member Measles: Experiences of a general practitioner
"Yes, very briefly some comments I have made as a general practitioner with measles and with the measles vaccination.
It is well known that measles deaths were practically zero at the time I opened the practice.
And this decline was not due to the vaccinations.
This has already happened regardless of the vaccinations.
It was the living conditions. So better hygiene, better nutrition, the absence of war and
fear. These are the things that were important.
So you would need three factors - Hans Tolzin has just illustrated this very nicely - to
advocate vaccination: a need, a benefit and few risks.
And all of this must be properly investigated. And all three are not given.
Nevertheless, pediatricians have always urged vaccination - and continue to do so today.
In some cases, parents have been literally expelled from the pediatrician's office or kicked out and
vilified as freeloaders or as anti-social fellow citizens.
That is simply a disaster. You should never say something like that as a doctor.
And we have side effects from the vaccination
- I want to keep this short. But we also benefit from the measles
- I don't want to leave this unmentioned. Children who have had measles have better health later in life.
Children who have had measles are much less likely to develop cancer later on,
much rarer diabetes, much rarer autoimmune diseases.
So then all I can really say is: bring on the measles!
Well, I had measles cases in the practice. What did I do with them?
Point one: The most important thing is to take away the parents' fear!
Measles has a high fever and a stupid rash.
That looks pretty "crappy" - sorry.
And then the first thing I have to do is go after the mother.
The mother's fear is transferred one-to-one to the child.
Point two: Do not reduce the high fever! Fever is a welcome helper in an infectious disease to cope with the infection.
If you take away the weapon, the immune system can no longer work.
Then bed rest was always important to me. In fact: Bed rest means bed REST
and not: Sofa with TV on. Bed-RUHE
After that, even if the child is no longer contagious after four days, I would still leave it at home. One or even two weeks.
And if the parents say that's not possible for us, we're both working, then I immediately disagree.
That's not true. We have a statutory guarantee of continued pay, 15 days per year per parent."
Physician, psychologist, psychotherapist and professor at the Medical University of Innsbruck in the Department of
Psychoneuroimmunology. Compulsory vaccination from the perspective of the psychoneuroimmunologist "Psychoneuroimmunology
deals with the interactions between the psyche, nervous system and immune system and has been able to show very clearly in
recent decades that overriding factors in our everyday lives, psychological factors, social factors,
relationship factors and also societal factors, have a significant influence on our immune activity.
And there is clear evidence from psychoneuroimmunology that shows that conventional vaccinations are not at all successful
and are associated with high side effects when people are under chronic stress and/or feel compelled to be vaccinated.
We also know from psychoneuroimmunology that people who are abused, who are under
pressure and duress, develop autoimmune reactions
and there was also an effect in relation to all the vaccinations.
What does this have to do with the measles vaccination?
Well, we know from the above that vaccination has to be seen in a wider context.
And what has been in place for a few years now, namely compulsory vaccination for measles, should be viewed very,
very sceptically and criticized for the reasons mentioned."
Beate Bahner Lawyer and specialist lawyer for medical law. 10 legal reasons against the Measles Protection Act "Yes, I
actually decided very spontaneously this year to write this book, "Measles Vaccination and Measles Protection Act".
It has been on the market for three months and my title today based on these findings is: 10
reasons why the Measles Protection Act is an unjust law.
That was my conclusion at the end of 464 pages.
The Measles Protection Act will thus go down in the legal history of the 21st century.
And as an impressive example of how this law was intended to quietly establish a health and vaccination tyranny.
And this under the pretense of science and health protection, under unscrupulous abuse of the law with the blessing of the
Federal Constitutional Court and under shameless abuse of the trust of bona fide citizens, but
probably also of the health authorities and courts.
Why do I believe that the Measles Protection Act is an unjust law?
Because the goals supposedly pursued by this law are either contradictory or unattainable or have
already been achieved and are therefore hypocritical.
The allegation of a serious, dangerous disease is therefore incorrect.
I call it a bold and shameless lie.
Measles was eliminated in Germany in 2020, in 21, in 22 and in 23.
They no longer existed according to WHO criteria.
So why make vaccination compulsory if the disease has already been eliminated anyway?
So why make vaccination compulsory? What is this really about?
Certainly not to protect patients, but at best to protect the revenues of the two vaccine manufacturers.
It's about the goal of the vaccinated citizen at the command of the state.
Finally, the legislator claims that compulsory vaccination protects vulnerable patients who allegedly cannot be vaccinated.
About the babies, you've already said it, dear Ronny,
the nest protection that they actually get when the mothers go through the measles naturally is reduced by the vaccination,
and so the legislator produces the vulnerability of the infants themselves.
Pregnant women: Here too, there is not a single study according to which pregnant mothers are particularly at risk from measles.
In the case of immunosuppressed people , it is easy to imagine that they should not be vaccinated, as is also
stated in the information for healthcare professionals.
A case from my practice: An employee of a subcontractor of Münster University Hospital requires
dialysis and is therefore definitely immunosuppressed.
He was forced to be vaccinated by Münster University Hospital, although the titer was already
very borderline and has even been proven today.
The man is in his early 50s, so he still belongs to the group that probably had the measles.
He was forced to be vaccinated, he was fined and banned from entering the premises.
So much for the group of immunosuppressed patients who are supposedly to be protected, that they have
to be vaccinated in order to protect this patient, who in turn is forced to be vaccinated.
Münster University Hospital, it's a shame! There is not a single evidence-based comparative
study between vaccinated and unvaccinated people
- we already had here - in which the necessity, effectiveness and safety of the measles vaccination was proven.
What is there? There are manufacturer studies that compare their old vaccine with the newer variant
and - great (we have also published here) the manufacturers who compare their vaccines:
GlaxoSmithKline compared its vaccine with Merck's, and there wasn't much difference.
Because if I do that and accept the side effects that the first vaccine has, then that is window dressing.
So the claim that measles vaccines are effective and safe is a life-threatening lie, as I see it
here, it has to be said, with high criminal potential.
Let's just put it this way! Figures and statistics show a much higher mortality rate
after measles vaccination than after measles.
So then mandatory vaccination for all children with this deadly risk-benefit ratio is also no longer constitutional,
which the Federal Constitutional Court claims, but criminal.
The state is forcing its own citizens to risk life and limb with a completely unnecessary and pointless measles vaccination.
Human dignity is absolutely inviolable and even eternally guaranteed by the Basic Law.
Nevertheless, this principle was trampled underfoot by the unspeakable daycare decision
of the Federal Constitutional Court in 2022.
In particular, the exclusion of healthy nursery children from nursery - simply because they do not have a measles vaccination -
is unbelievable discrimination, an inexcusable violation of the human dignity of these children and at the same
time a violation of the parental right to education and care and thus to medical self-determination.
Nothing can justify this violation.
If the Federal Constitutional Court nevertheless considers compulsory measles vaccination to be constitutional, then it is
clearly no longer protecting the rights of children and citizens, but only the greed for profit of the pharmaceutical companies.
Ladies and gentlemen, after many months of work on my latest book and the summary of my meticulous medical legal research - on 464
pages, with more than 700 references - I have come to the conclusion that the Measles Protection Act is an unjust law - and
therefore null and void - due to the intolerable contradictions to truth and justice and the violation of human dignity!
I call on the Bundestag to repeal this unjust law better today than tomorrow, just as quickly and quietly as it
quietly passed this law in the shadow of the Corona staging.
Until then, until this law is repealed, the health authorities, school administrators and day-care center directors,
especially the courts, must refuse to obey this unjust law.
Do not tolerate any more obvious contradictions and human rights violations! Do not allow yourself to be
harnessed to dubious interests and make an active contribution,
for the restoration of law and order, science, clean medicine and real health protection!"
Vetopedia.org - the free encyclopedia of dissenting voices "I would now like to introduce you to a website.
I was invited a week ago last Saturday to the AZK, the anti-censorship coalition conference in
Switzerland, with the Kla.TV team around the Sasek family.
And I was also impressed by Elias Sasek, one of the editors responsible, who presented a completely new
project, a platform on which you can actively participate.
It's a kind of encyclopedia of uncensored and uncolored truth, you could say.
And I would like to strongly recommend it to you. You can access it via vetopedia.org.
And if you go there, you will see on the homepage that certain categories are dealt with here.
Vaccine damage, mobile phone damage, Freemason foundations, Ritual violence, crisis profits.
21 languages can be viewed simultaneously.
All articles are translated into these languages. Sensational!
But let's take a look, let's click on "Vaccine damage".
And here you can already see the stories of 64,507 aggrieved witnesses
If you look, you have 805 study articles listed on specific vaccinations.
There can always be more. Anyone can enter something.
And the editors are still checking whether all this can be published before publication. So I think it's sensational.
And if you take a look: So studies and facts you can see at the top left, 805 study articles,
and these can be translated into the various languages.
So everyone is called upon to help make sure that this page is really filled and continues to be used.
I think it's sensational what a great encyclopaedia can be created here that will serve us all."
Studies show: Vaccinated people are healthier than unvaccinated people. "And the crucial question is, how do we teach this to our
fellow human beings who, thanks to this decades-long vaccination propaganda, which is of course aimed at fear and scaremongering,
have virtually internalized this sacred vaccination?
And you can see all these scaremongering pharmaceutical advertising campaigns, on
which an incredible amount of money is spent.
And of course they brainwash people.
Even in my field here, where it's about cervical cancer, where people also say that we
have to protect children, girls and even boys.
This is basically crazy and absurd.
And I think one possibility could be that we show people that there are now powerful arguments based on the fact
that there are studies that show that vaccinated people are basically less healthy than unvaccinated people.
So there are more and more studies. And the big one is this new Henry Ford study, as it is
called, which should actually be kept under wraps.
And the background is as follows. The study was conducted in the USA by the head of a large infectiology department,
Markus Servus, who brought a few other colleagues into the team.
And he was approached in 2017 by the vaccination critic Del Bigtree and was asked: "Tell me, you have the
data from a lot of children, could we not even do a study, vaccinated versus unvaccinated."
And Markus Servus agreed because he thought he could prove to the vaccination critic Del
Bigtree that vaccinations protect and are safe.
And they then analyzed the data from over 550 medical sites, children's data from 2000 to 2016, then got over
18,000 children together, of which almost 2000 were without vaccinations, really without any vaccinations at all
and over 16,000 were vaccinated. And yes, the agreement from the outset was that the results had to be published no matter what.
And then he didn't publish it.
And why? He then said that he himself was astonished by the outcome of this study and thought I wouldn't bother,
because he was afraid, he later stated on the record, that he could embarrass the vaccinating doctors.
And Servus himself once said in an interview that he was afraid of losing his job at Henry Ford.
And that shows how dominant this pharmaceutical lobby is everywhere, that people have
to be afraid to bring the truth to light.
Where can that lead? And these results have now been exposed and that is sensational.
And this study, simply by virtue of the fact that there were so many participants, carried an incredible amount of weight.
So six times more autoimmune diseases, five and a half times more neurological developmental disorders, four
times more asthma, four times more speech disorders and three times more atopic diseases.
Among the unvaccinated children in this group, there were no cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, learning difficulties,
mental disabilities, tics or other mental disorders.
And the result was that the risk of chronic diseases was more than three times higher in those vaccinated.
So 75 percent in the group of vaccinated children developed a chronic disease after ten years, compared to
only 17 percent in the group of unvaccinated children."
Bringing the issue to the public together! "So how can you support our campaign to repeal the measles protection
law and the vaccination obligation formulated therein?
So, please take a look at the website that has been made available as of today: https://masernschutzgesetz.mwgfd.org.
And on this website you will be kept up to date on all our activities and results.
Please also fill in the contact form there!
Very, very important, so that we can really keep all those who take part in petitions on
the ball if things somehow come to nothing.
We will keep at it, and the more addresses we have, the more we can ask people to take action and inform them.
As a team, we created a nine-page information letter with all the important source information, .
This can also be downloaded from this website. Anyone can download it, print it out and bring it with
them when they go to the vaccination center. Please also give it to your vaccinators and so on.
And so that the members of the Bundestag, because we want to send it to all of them, members of the Bundestag and state
parliaments, so that they also read it, we have written them a two-page accompanying letter in preparation, so that they are
perhaps even prepared to read this nine-page information letter.
But if the pressure from the general public becomes greater, they will be forced to read it, I think.
We have produced a flyer, including our working group, which you can distribute and which can be used for signature campaigns
- in other words, campaigns throughout Germany are best.
This flyer is downloadable. And you can also download the signature collection sheets.
And it is important that our petition demands, which I have now also submitted to the
Bundestag, should always be on the signature sheet.
So talk to your MPs, talk to the politicians!
We have to exert pressure from below! Talk to your doctors, talk about it in your circle of friends and work groups!
Talk to affected families, to all young families!
This affects 700,000 people a year. And bring the issue out into the open!