Dr. Andrea Christidis is a fighter for truth and justice - for children and parents.
She is a psychologist for clinical, educational and neuropsychological, criminalistic and
forensic psychology as well as a behavioral therapist.
In her role as an independent expert, she has already examined over 1,000 family cases to determine whether youth
welfare offices were justified in taking children into care.
In doing so, she uncovered expert opinions, forged signatures, misuse of data, false diagnoses, state
corruption, falsified records, defamation of character and the assertion of false facts.
She also came across cases of satanic-ritual violence.
Due to her strong commitment, she faced a great deal of resistance from the outset.
For example, attempts were made to strip her of her professional titles.
More than 80 criminal charges were brought against them, but all of them were refuted.
Dr. Christidis reveals that institutional abuse is taking place in Germany, exploiting children in a variety of ways.
To counter this, she founded the "Axion Resist" association in 2024.
It consists of experts from the fields of medicine, psychology, education, law, criminology, biology and IT and
is committed to the protection of children and their health as well as freedom and the rule of law.
The merger allows the expertise of the various specialist areas to be combined effectively.
Dr. Andrea Christidis and her husband are also on the board of MWGFD, an association dedicated to serving
the health and social well-being of the population.
Hello Andrea! Nice to have you here!
We would like to hear a few facts from you about child trafficking and taking children into care.
You are the absolute expert in this field.
We would love to hear about your experiences.
You give talks that people can listen to for hours. You have a lot to say.
Today you only have 20 minutes, I wish you good luck in summarizing it!
Thank you for having me here, and I realized that I already know some of the speakers and have already
conducted symposia or interviews with them myself.
It still took me away again. Now I'm just starting to talk about how the state can get hold of all these children.
And I'll start with several points right away.
Point one - the introduction: The double face of child protection.
Germany is considered a constitutional state, a safe haven for children.
But the reality shows a completely different picture.
At the end of 2023, around 215,000 children were in the care of others - in homes, foster families or youth welfare facilities.
In 2024, around 190 children were separated from their parents every day.
Every year, there are around 148,600 proceedings relating to custody and contact issues - up to 86,000 children
are involved and trapped in high-conflict proceedings.
At the same time, the costs per case are rising: in 2016 they were already over 12,000
euros - today they are significantly higher.
The total annual expenditure for external accommodation amounts to 8 billion euros.
Child protection has long since become a billion-dollar business.
But behind this façade lurks institutional violence, economic interests and structural failure.
Second point: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has conducted reconnaissance with a global reach.
This internationally renowned lawyer, Reiner Fuellmich, became known to an audience of millions through the Corona Committee.
His mission: to shed light on political and social grievances.
He also reported on child trafficking, institutional sexual abuse and corruption in authorities.
But when Fuellmich wants to investigate the flood disaster in the Ahr valley in the Corona Committee - where it is said to have
been about washed up baby skulls, which many local residents are said to have reported, which is of course
an indication of ritual abuse - a power struggle begins that extends far beyond Germany.
This point has also led (because it has already been mentioned several times today) to other people who have claimed that they
wanted to investigate - not only Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, but also, for example, Max Eder, who is now in custody and has still not
been charged, who founded the GSG 9 at the time, who was very, very active in this area, and others, in connection with the
so-called Prinz-Reuß group, I believe it was about 26 people - are still in custody today. Two of them have died in the meantime.
The baseless criminal complaint against Dr. Fuellmich follows on 5.9.2022.
It fails, but the court then opens its own charges.
It's a pattern that many educationalists are familiar with - if you ask uncomfortable questions, you become a case yourself.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich later founds ICIC.law (https://icic.law/ ), an international information portal.
His interviews - for example with Calin Georgescu on 22.12.2022 and Cathy O'Brien on 20.8.2023 - reached viewers worldwide.
Cathy O'Brien was, as Marcel Polte has already explained today, a victim of ritual abuse. She was also affected in this MKultra
program as a "test subject" - let me just put it that way.
Now I come to point three: A Berlin abuse case - when the system fails.
The story centers on a four-year-old boy who tells his mother about oral and anal abuse by his father.
A pediatrician and doctors from Charité confirm the strong suspicion of continuous sexual
abuse. There are photos of evidence and reports.
I also reported on this last year in December at a symposium in Bavaria.
You can still watch it on YouTube at "Axion Resist".
However, according to the mother, the victim's lawyer in Berlin did not pass on key findings of the investigation to the court.
The LKA then closes the investigation.
The reason: "It must all have been the child's imagination or the mother's influence."
Audio recordings of the interrogations show that there was no trace of influence by the mother. I have the audio recordings.
The proceedings are over. The mother has had no access to her child for many years. The boy is now 14 years old.
Witnesses have told me - I can't verify or investigate this - that the boy is now said to be streetwalking in Berlin.
Fourthly: Escalation and perpetrator privilege.
The boy develops severe behavioral problems: Sexualized behaviour, incontinence and suicidal thoughts.
He encourages adults to engage in sexual acts and repeats scenes of abuse in kindergarten and school.
There were treatment recommendations from doctors. These were ignored.
The father rejected her, but was nevertheless granted sole custody in 2015.
The mother, as I said before, loses all contact with the child.
She was not allowed to see her child at all for a year.
Then sporadically and accompanied, and now she has had no contact for years.
Several party reports confirmed the abuse. They were all ignored.
The Neukölln Youth Welfare Office documented massive sexualized behaviour in the child in 2017 and 2018,
when the child had long been living with the father.
The boy said several times: "I want to die."
I have looked through all the files that have been submitted to me by the family court etc. There is no
evidence of the mother endangering the child's welfare.
Fifth, entanglements and systemic offender protection.
The mother learns that the "National Center for Missing and Exploited Children", NCMEC - which has already been mentioned by
Uwe Kranz - has registered a report about child pornography in this case. It was registered with the LKA (State
Criminal Police Office), but there was no investigation.
According to the mother, Carsten Stahl, who publicly presents himself as a child protector, has known the
alleged perpetrator - the father - personally since his youth.
He also visits him in their shared apartment - back when his mother was still living with his father.
But Carsten Stahl sues the mother because she said that Carsten Stahl knows this father.
The mother wins in court and the judge asks: "What is Stahl actually trying to achieve with this?
Why shouldn't the mother be allowed to say that he knows the father?"
Sixth: The case of Dr. Dorothea Thul - The intimidation of a doctor.
The pediatrician Dr. Dorothea Thul prepares a medical report on behalf of the mother, which
confirms the chronic sexual abuse of the boy.
Shortly afterwards, she is attacked outside her apartment. She is threatened, admitted to a psychiatric ward and remanded in custody
- when she could not be psychiatrized - for alleged "insult".
Seventh: Social context - When child protection becomes an industry.
Behind these individual fates lies a system with misguided incentives.
Public child and youth welfare devours billions every year.
On average, over 12,000 euros per month are paid for each child accommodated. Some providers receive ten times this amount.
Now politicians - I was a local politician myself, so I can say this - have assessed poverty as a threat to children's welfare.
If poverty is supposed to be a threat to a child's welfare, the question naturally arises: Why don't the parents get the child?
Why do children's homes or foster parents receive this money?
In addition, there is increasing child poverty - which, according to the Bundestag, has "far-reaching consequences for the entire
educational process" -, excessive demands on family courts, a lack of evidence in cases of sexual abuse and
institutional protection of perpetrators, which criminalizes mothers if they suspect or report abuse.
I can say that because years ago I reviewed over a thousand family law files and examined and criticized so many expert opinions.
It is very difficult to prove sexual abuse if no genetic material or massive injuries are found, I must say that up front.
If the children claim this, the mother is often accused of manipulating the child.
Then it is said that the mother is the person who endangers the child's welfare and the child comes to the alleged perpetrator
- and I can actually confirm that in almost all cases.
And the institutional protection of perpetrators, which criminalizes mothers - that's on top of everything else - very
often the mothers then have criminal proceedings against them or they are psychiatrized. Sometimes they
are given diagnoses that are completely inaccurate.
This means that anyone who speaks out about abuse risks losing their own child. This is how the
protection of perpetrators becomes a reason of state.
Eighth: Historical parallels - The dark side of home education. The cases are not unique.
From the Kentler experiments to the Haasenburg to the SOS Children's Villages or little Lena from Wunsiedel:
Time and again, sexualized violence, torture or death occurred in state or church-supervised institutions.
These things are publicly documented. You can also look them up on our homepage at "Axion Resist" .
We have also held many symposia on this topic and named many cases and sources.
Many victims were never heard. And those who name grievances - I can tell you a thing or two
about that - often become targets themselves.
And ninthly, and also the conclusion: The price of truth.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is symbolic of those who speak uncomfortable truths.
He wanted to shed light on corruption, abuse and misuse of power. He was criminalized for this.
Dr. Dorothea Thul diagnosed what no one wanted to hear and lost her freedom.
This also applies to Max Eder and others from the Prinz-Reuß group and certainly to many others.
And that is why I would like to add that we will list donation accounts on our "Axion Resist" homepage for the
individual victims who are in custody and urgently need support - money for their legal defense.
We will therefore publish this on our homepage.
Mothers who wanted to protect their children were disenfranchised.
And children who needed help were left to the system to break them.
I remember the politician and former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who said back in 2002: "We have
already won air sovereignty over the children's beds."
This means that the state has incorporated the children.
They are indoctrinated - already in kindergartens and schools - with sexual and inappropriate sex education.
We had this "original play" where parents didn't know that strange men were invading
kindergartens and sexually molesting the children.
There was even abuse, etc. So these things happen and the parents don't stand a chance. If they complain, they have to
expect that their children will be snatched away from them.
And the core message of all this is: Child protection must not be a cover for cover-ups.
Those who uncover abuses protect children - not systems.
And accommodating children is practically a license to print money. I just have to say that here.
And enlightenment begins where silence is made compulsory.
Thank you. Thank you.
[This is so brilliantly done here in such a short time, so compact!
I would really like to thank you very, very much for standing up for the children and being so brave.
The good woman is constantly facing legal proceedings.
When we spoke on the phone, she still had to go to court here and another trial here, "Wait, I still have to ..."
And that night she prepared because she was still in court and there - simply: You're a hero!
Yes, and thank you for connecting those dots too.
And I wish you much, much success and thank you for this contribution, from the bottom of my heart.
Thank you. Thank you very much.