On November 15, 2025, the MWGFD held a press symposium near Passau, directly on the beautiful Danube, on
the topic of "Measles Protection Act under scrutiny".
According to the measles protection law working group, consisting of doctors, scientists and lawyers, the law unconstitutionally
interferes with physical integrity and parental rights.
They demand its immediate repeal. Kla.TV was there live and supports the cause by broadcasting the
individual presentations, which are well worth watching.
Below you will find informative flyers on the topic and ways in which you too can support this cause.
The next speaker is my MWGFD colleague Andreas Diemer.
It has already been mentioned several times today.
He worked a lot with Hans Tolzin.
He is a physicist and doctor, a specialist in general medicine and also has an additional qualification in naturopathy.
He is the former director of the Academy for the Art of Living and Health in Gernsbach and spokesman for the
German Working Group for Independent Vaccination Education.
And today he will tell us about his experiences with the childhood disease measles, which he
was allowed to experience as a family doctor.
I look forward to your presentation, dear Andreas.
Thank you! Yes, very briefly a few comments I have made as a GP about measles and the measles vaccination.
It is well known that measles deaths were practically zero at the time I opened the practice.
Measles cases have continued to fall. So in 2024 there will still be around 500 cases, give or take a little.
But 500 cases out of 88 or 82 million inhabitants is not an issue, there is no danger.
So there is no need to act urgently and vaccinate everyone, especially not by force.
And this decline was not caused by the vaccinations. It all happened independently of the vaccinations.
It was the living conditions. So better hygiene, better nutrition, absence of war and fear.
These are the things that were important. My willingness to be vaccinated - generally with other
vaccinations as well - has gone closer and closer to zero.
I have also always found that the data on the value of vaccinations is very poor.
So you would need - Hans Tolzin has just illustrated this very nicely - to advocate vaccination, you would
need three factors: a need, a benefit and few risks.
And all of this must be properly investigated. And all three are not given, above all the
benefits and risks have not been properly investigated.
Nevertheless, pediatricians have always urged vaccination - and continue to do so today.
In some cases, parents have been literally expelled from the pediatrician's office or kicked out and
vilified as freeloaders or as anti-social fellow citizens.
That is simply a disaster. You should never say something like that as a doctor.
So they came to me because word got around that I listened to the parents' questions or arguments or
objections to the vaccination in the first place.
I then also had repeated cases of measles.
Enough is known about the vaccination that it is neither necessary nor has the benefit been sufficiently proven.
The antibodies say nothing, and viral diseases are mainly answered by the cellular immune system.
Not about the humoral - that's medical expertise now!
So, the T lymphocytes are the decisive fighters against viral diseases and not the antibodies.
That is why the benefit of trying to determine or prove the presence of antibodies after a vaccination
is completely useless. The antibodies say nothing.
If I do a study and want to find out whether the vaccination protects, then I also have to
investigate whether it protects, and not do a blood test.
So I have to make two groups - vaccinated and unvaccinated - large groups over a long period of time - 10
years - 10,000 test subjects - and then see who gets sick here and who gets sick here.
That is the only thing I will accept for a benefit-risk study on vaccination.
Everything else is actually nonsense or a dazzle.
And we have side effects from the vaccination - I'll keep this short now.
But we also benefit from measles - I don't want to leave that unmentioned.
Children who have had measles have better health later in life.
However, this is usually not mentioned at all and is often not even included in the risk-benefit analysis.
It's also difficult to quantify.
But the fact is that children who have had measles are much less likely to have cancer later on, they are
much less likely to have diabetes, they are much less likely to have autoimmune diseases.
So then all I can really say is: bring on the measles!
These famous measles parties were then organized by parents who had a clue and who wanted their child to become
more immunologically stable after going through the measles.
And measles is a disease with a strong immunological effect.
You can tell just by the high temperature. I'll get to it in a minute.
I also stumble across the measles vaccination because there is no single vaccine.
There are only triple or quadruple vaccines.
This means that if I come to the conclusion that I have to vaccinate against measles, despite all the explanations
given so far, then I will also vaccinate against mumps and rubella at the same time, without it being necessary.
And any medical intervention without necessity is again bodily harm. So that's not possible either.
So after all that has been said, these famous vaccination exemption certificates can also be justified solely by the fact
that there is a problem with the measles vaccination and not with the patient's state of
health. This could be a perfectly healthy child.
So if measure A does not make sense for person B or is not permitted or leads to
disadvantages, then I can issue such a certificate.
Unfortunately, this has not yet gotten around to the courts and judges.
However, I do think that this can be legally valid. I'm still curious to see what Beate Bahner will say about this.
Well, I had measles cases in the practice. What did I do with them?
Point one: The most important thing is to take away the parents' fear!
Measles has a high fever and a stupid rash.
That looks pretty "crappy" - sorry!
As a mother, you get scared. And then the first thing I have to do is get my mother's attention - I did the same
with my wife when my daughter had measles and a fever of 41 degrees, and I had to reassure my wife.
The mother's fear is transferred one-to-one to the child.
Children feel everything, they know everything, even if you tell them otherwise.
And the child's fear is again an obstacle to recovery.
So that is the very first and most important point.
Point two: Do not reduce the high temperature! Fever is a welcome helper in an infectious disease to cope with the infection.
If you take away the weapon, the immune system can no longer work.
So reducing fever is almost always contraindicated and wrong for me.
You can perhaps lower the temperature by half a degree with a calf compress or maybe with
an enema - it works well with small children.
But please don't use paracetamol, the notorious fever suppository or fever juice! That's not good.
The paracetamol probably even has side effects itself, so that we can no longer distinguish whether it is the measles
that is so dangerous or the treatment that is so dangerous.
And it's the same with fever reduction. The next thing I did was to give the children vitamin A.
This is a very simple matter. In poor countries, we still have a severe vitamin A deficiency. Occasionally here too.
So it's not a mistake to do this without necessity.
It is available in drop form, easy to administer, inexpensive and cheap.
You calculate this a little according to body weight for two or three days, then that's enough.
Then I used homeopathic remedies, according to my modest knowledge of homeopathy.
I am not a trained homeopath. There are also complex remedies that you can take that all support recovery and healing.
Then bed rest was always important to me. And bed rest means bed REST. And not: sofa with TV on. Bed - REST.
The bed and rest. A seriously ill child needs rest.
And it may need a little more.
You also have to look after the child in a benevolent and comfortable way.
Sitting by the bed, asking: "Are you warm? Are you cold? Are you thirsty? What would you like to drink?
Are you hungry? Is it too bright for you? Draw the curtain a little? Is it too loud for you?"
Then I close the door to the living room or the kitchen.
These are the things that the child needs and that help the child to get better. And it's very easy to do.
After that, even if the child is no longer contagious after four days, I would still leave it at home.
One or even two weeks. It needs a rest, so to speak.
And if the parents say: "That's not possible for us, we're both working," then I immediately disagree.
That's not true. We have a legally guaranteed continued payment of wages,
15 days per year per parent. That's no problem.
Then someone can stay at home with the child and let the child get completely healthy. That's really important.
Okay, so the measles vaccination - I've already said - has to go.
And the measles vaccination requirement under the Measles Protection Act must be abolished.
And I think I've already said the most important thing. Thank you very much!
Thank you Andreas. Such great words, they went down like oil. Wonderful.
I also remember my children having measles, it wasn't a big problem at all.
And I always grumbled about all this fever reduction.
I didn't even bring the temperature down on any of my kids, they had a fever too and I didn't even measure it in some cases.
We have never lowered it, but we know that it is an important healing reaction.
And actually, we who have come together should demand that our children should actually have the
right to have normal childhood illnesses again.
Because they emerge stronger, as you have just said again, they are much less susceptible to certain diseases.
In the case of mumps, for example, as a gynecologist I know that girls who have had mumps have a
lower risk of ovarian cancer, ovarian cancer and so on.
So these childhood diseases are important immune training for us humans and we have to stop this crazy
vaccination against childhood diseases at such an early age.
That's really important and I thank you for it.
An important factor that we have perhaps not addressed is that, as a result of the vaccination and the resulting lower antibody
levels, young mothers now have a problem or mothers have a problem because they are simply no longer
able to pass on the nest protection to their child.
Nest protection is what mothers actually innately pass on to their child during pregnancy, even after birth,
including through breastfeeding, through antibodies that are transferred via the placenta or through breast milk.
And normally a mother protects her child against all the diseases she has had to deal with in her life to date.
If she had measles as a child, she has good protection and so an infant, a breastfed child, will never contract measles.
But now, since the vaccination and the associated often very reduced antibody formation, reduced immunity, infants are now
also contracting measles again, which means that they have a slightly increased risk of complications in this early phase.
This is also something that needs to be addressed and that we have included in our information letter to politicians.
Four hours of highly competent technical expertise shortened to 40 min.
Watch the Kla.TV summary of the MWGFD symposium on the "Measles Protection Act" on the test bench.
You want to become active yourself?
So how can you support our campaign to repeal the measles protection law and the vaccination obligation formulated therein?
So, please take a look at the website that has been made available as of today: https://masernschutzgesetz.mwgfd.org.
And on this website you will be kept up to date on all our activities and results.
We have produced a flyer, including our working group, which you can distribute and which can be used for
signature campaigns - in other words, campaigns throughout Germany are best. This flyer can be downloaded.
And you can also download the signature collection sheets.
And it is important that our petition demands, which I have now also submitted to the
Bundestag, should always be on the signature sheet.
So talk to your MPs, talk to the politicians!
We have to exert pressure from below! Talk to your doctors, talk about it in your circle of friends and work groups!
Talk to affected families, to all young families!
This affects 700,000 people a year. And bring the issue to the public!