More and more concerned parents and experts such as educational scientists, child psychologists and teachers no longer seem to
trust the "sexual education of diversity" that is widely advertised and already demanded in kindergartens and
elementary school, as the following e-mail lines suggest:
"... sexual education is an important part of school and extracurricular educational work - but it is increasingly coming
under pressure. Anti-queer, anti-feminist and right-wing actors are attacking diversity-oriented sex education and attempting
to discredit scientifically sound educational programs."
These are the opening lines of the letter sent by the Rhineland-Palatinate Ministry of Education to all schools in
Rhineland-Palatinate to promote a symposium entitled "Strengthening Sexual
Education - Defending Diversity" on 29.09.2025.
The letter continues: " What narratives and ideologies are behind these attacks?
And how can evidence-based, age-appropriate sexual education continue to be implemented safely and effectively?
The symposium is an event organized by pro familia Landesverband Rheinland-Pfalz in cooperation with the Ministry of
Education and the Pädagogisches Landesinstitut Rheinland-Pfalz."
Now, in this subtle letter, concerned parents and warning experts have already been declared "queer-hostile,
anti-feminist and right-wing actors" who must belong to certain "narratives and ideologies".
Otherwise they would not be criticizing so-called "evidence-based, age-appropriate sexual education".
The evidence-based, in other words science-based, facts on which this "age-appropriate education" is supposed to be
based are documented by the AG Kindeswohl on its website and numerous Kla.TV programs, among others.
We summarize: Prof. Dr. Uwe Sielert is the central figure in "sexual education for diversity".
He headed the Society for Sex Education and is represented as a consultant, trainer and scientific
advisor in almost all sex education institutions.
He writes for the Federal Center for Health Education (BZgA) and works closely with pro familia.
His sex education is based on the statement: "Children are sexual. No sexual life without sexualization."
Sielert calls for "sexual education from the very beginning", which must go far beyond simply naming genitals,
sexual activities, risks of injury and prohibited activities.
Through cooperation with the BZgA, Sielert's ideas were also included in the "WHO
Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe".
Sex education concepts in schools and daycare centers are based on these standards.
These WHO standards call for supposedly "age-appropriate" sexuality education in the following age groups:
0 - 4 years: early childhood masturbation, "doctor games"
4 - 6 years: Homosexuality, sexual feelings (lust, arousal)
6 - 9 years: contraception, sexual intercourse
9 - 12 years: Gender, pleasure, masturbation, orgasm
12-15 years: Gender identity and sexual orientation
15 and older: transactional sex, pornography, sexual addiction, different sexual behavior
Sielert was able to make his way into family and education policy with his ideas and founded
the Institute for Sexual Pedagogy in Dortmund.
Under the leadership of the ISP, providers of sex education programs have founded the Society for Sex Education and
are allowed to award the "Quality Seal" for sex educators.
Sielert's networking work enabled his "sexual education of diversity" to achieve a monopoly position in the
training of sex educators, including in the teaching profession.
The concept of diversity pedagogy in abuse prevention also goes back to Sielert.
Children should be actively encouraged to "allow the pleasurable aspects of the body, the senses and touching themselves", for
example in cuddly caves and during "doctor games" in daycare centers or by practicing on appropriate
materials (vulva, clitoris, penis, testicles) in schools.
This should develop a sense of self-worth and self-confidence that will later enable children to say "no".
However, this is a typical pedophile attempt at an explanation.
First the boundary of shame is violated and the protective space is invaded and then the child is
expected to bear the responsibility for saying "no".
Kentler's pedagogy, as a forerunner of the "sexual pedagogy of diversity", also aimed to shift the natural boundary of shame and
break down the existing boundaries and protective devices so that the "unbridled
expression of sexual desire" is no longer hindered.
Kentler was the most important pedophile activist in the 1970s.
As a "reform pedagogue with an outstanding reputation", he was an enthusiastic advocate of
practicing sexuality between adults and children.
His expert opinions have helped to ensure that pedophile offenders are not convicted.
He worked in a pedophile network that extended as far as the Odenwaldschule, pro familia and the Kinderschutzbund.
He lobbied politicians for the abolition of paragraphs §174 and §176 and was heard by individual members of the Green Party.
In an experiment in cooperation with the Berlin Youth Welfare Office, homeless male youths with criminal
convictions and later also children were specifically placed in the care of pedophile men.
In several studies on the pedophile involvement of the Green Party and the Berlin Senate,
Kentler's work was finally scientifically analyzed.
The "emancipatory sexual pedagogy" he founded was therefore continued under the term "sexual pedagogy of diversity".
Sielert himself once described himself as "Kentler's student" and called Kentler a "pioneer", while others spoke
of a "fatherly friendship" between Kentler and Sielert.
Today, after Kentler's experiment has finally been discredited as a pedophile practice for which Kentler was never
prosecuted due to the statute of limitations, Sielert has publicly distanced himself from Kentler.
However, Sielert's publications and teachings show little distance from Kentler's "emancipatory sex education".
The combination of the original "emancipatory sex education" according to Kentler with gender ideology and queer
education has developed an enormously destructive force.
Various political groups, such as the JUSO Baselland from Switzerland, are already
calling for holistic, shame-free sex education.
This is to be carried out by external experts in order to convey gender, sexual and romantic diversity.
This so-called external specialist staff is then increasingly provided by LGBTIQ groups who carry out educational projects -
often without the presence of teachers - with the primary aim of making LGBTIQ lifestyles "visible" to children and presenting
them as equal and equivalent to heterosexual lifestyles, demanding acceptance of them and creating "fear-free
spaces of diversity" in which they can "strengthen" children's "sexual and gender self-determination".
LGBTIQ groups prefer to work alone with the children, i.e. without the presence of a teacher or supervisor.
They argue that the children are then more impartial and more liberated to discuss even "sensitive" issues without false shame.
The fact that these external educators are then, in case of doubt, over the hill without consequences if parents
should have further questions about the disturbance of their children, is not taken into account here.
Nor do they realize that this is about their own goals and not about meeting the needs of the children in particular.
Parents who speak out critically about this form of sex education and queer education to protect their children are often pushed
into a corner and labeled as "prudish", "conservative" and "intolerant" of other people's diverse ways of living and loving.
They are pigeonholed in order to divide parents and prevent them from dealing with the exact content.
Children are playful beings and should be allowed to learn through play instead of
being sexualized and instrumentalized by adults.
They are perfectly naive and act without any evil ulterior motives.
This perfect and endearing naivety was taken up by screenwriter and director Ivo Sasek in
his 2011 feature film "Kosima - perfekt naiv".
At the 40th Festival of Nations in 2012, this feature film was named one of the three best
feature-length films by an international jury.
The FSK then intervened and upgraded the age rating to 18.
Anyone who has seen the movie for themselves will seriously wonder which scenes even come close to justifying
this classification in comparison to Hollywood films.
However, since the film already dealt with precisely this problem of early sexualization and external
specialist educators 14 years ago, it was probably blacklisted.
Watch the exciting feature film "Kosima-perfekt naiv!" exclusively on Kla.TV and recommend
it to interested parents in your environment!