"On March 1, 2025, Dr. Regina Möckli, a psychiatrist with more than 40 years of practical experience, relentlessly exposed the
profound failings of modern psychiatry and the global healthcare system at the WHO symposium in Winterthur, Switzerland.
Her presentation not only revealed the abuses within the system, but also questioned the central role of the
World Health Organization (WHO) as the driving force behind a dangerous development.
She spoke in clear terms about how children, doctors and society as a whole are being manipulated by a
system that has long since ceased to serve people," said Nicole Hammer from Wissensgeist.TV.
In the second part of her presentation, Dr. Möckli questions, among other things, the role of
the WHO as the supposed guardian of global health.
It also refers to the ICD , which the WHO publishes on a regular basis.
In their opinion, however, these are no longer an adjustment to medical developments, but a manipulative game.
Wissensgeist.tv sums it up like this: "The conditions are diagnosed - but not in order to really cure those affected.
Rather, the aim is to integrate them into a system that focuses on care rather than treatment."
Dr. Möckli's criticism of the WHO is just one piece of the puzzle.
It is therefore highly recommended that you also watch the programmes "WHO a criminal organization?" and "WHO plans insidious
coup in 194 countries" for a more comprehensive picture.
After her criticism of institutions and structures, Dr. Möckli concludes her speech by appealing to the
strength of the individual and the power of the community.
She emphasized that it is crucial not to be discouraged, especially in difficult times: children need
our support - no matter what they are going through.
Even if we are personally attacked or socially ostracized, we must not abandon them.
Her presentation left no doubt that the future of health does not lie in the hands of large systems, but in
our own courage to take responsibility and demand change.
I can quickly introduce myself.
I have been a psychiatrist and doctor for 40 years.
In 1992, I specialized in a National Fund study on dissociality in adolescence and differentiated assessment of adolescents.
Children and child development are our greatest social asset. (I am now switching to written German.)
The highest good is the child and its positive development.
Who in this room is worried about their own child?
Who? Everyone has a child inside them. And concern for every child here is appropriate.
I saw that in the preparation for this lecture.
The WHO - the bad news is, this didn't start with vaccination.
This actually continued seamlessly in the research that was carried out in medicine, and the WHO published the ICD codes for
clinical pictures and, from 1948, also for psychiatric diagnoses.
It started quite innocently with the veterans who became ill, and led to the fact that research could always be
carried out invisibly, sold as help, on the mentally ill, minors, orphans, half-orphans, adults.
Actually on all psychiatric patients who were inpatients or outpatients.
Because - what happens inside us?
Where do we dare to stand up to our doctors and say, sorry, I don't understand.
I can't get out.
Can you please explain and re-explain it to me.
And until I have understood it myself, how can anything help me?
Nothing can help me that I cannot grasp in my own consciousness.
Let's go back to the children.
The tragic thing that has happened in these classifications of diseases has actually led to it being accompanied
by the separation of teaching, research and practice.
In psychiatry we say "fragment", everything falls apart.
That alone is actually psychotic.
And I became aware of this because my colleagues suddenly had the idea that I was dangerous.
Really, because I asked for information and clarification in the treatment of a relative in forensic psychiatry.
And then I realized what was actually going on.
These diagnoses are then used in conjunction with the health insurance to cover and pay for legal treatment,
and the people know nothing about it, nothing at all.
And the children are suddenly suppressed in their naturalness, in their breathing, after these
coercive measures that took place in the psychiatric ward.
So the target was the children.
Because what happens to a child who can't breathe?
If I can't breathe, can't move freely, what happens to my intelligence?
Then I stand there, have to learn, memorize and repeat. And if I'm not good, I'm bad.
And the one who can do this very well is the best.
There is only rivalry. And a huge treasure trove of wisdom, of intuitive body wisdom, is lost.
It is well known that a child, even the child within us, has around 4 billion bytes of information at its
disposal, whereas we can only absorb, process and reproduce 2000 bytes of information in the intellectual sphere.
And the WHO's entire goal, which it should actually achieve, is for every child to have access to clean water and food.
Actually, if it feels responsible for global health, for all living beings.
Instead, it has specialized in this classification of diagnoses since 1948.
Our diagnoses originated in the 19th century from death statistics.
They found it exciting and worked it out in the context of industrialization.
And since 1996, Switzerland has also had a compulsory health insurance law.
With this health insurance law, you can now get wonderfully rich from everything and you can manipulate
and determine what is considered sick and what is not.
The WHO is in charge, medically and, in my area, psychiatrically.
Why do I dare to talk about children and child psychiatry here as an adult psychiatrist?
I would say about child psychiatry that it is sick, it has always been sick, because it
examines a child on an individual psychological level.
It does not take its environment into account.
A child without its environment is always a victim.
We, without our environment, are also a victim.
This has been confirmed for me.
Now to the major changes from ICD 10 to ICD 11 :
I realized at the very beginning - and in the meantime I've read all the trade journals again in
the last few days - that nobody understands a word.
But I read that at the very beginning, in 2023. And I saw serious changes in the personality disorders.
Personality disorders were previously divided into ten categories, which had to have existed
persistently since puberty for them to be called that at all.
Recently, interestingly, especially after a pandemic that lasts about two years, it takes another two years, and all you have
to do as a psychiatrist is say it's a personality disorder, it's mild, moderate or severe, then there is a need for treatment.
When I started working in psychiatry, personality disorders were taboo for pharmaceuticals.
They said you can't treat themit, you have to treat schizophrenia.
The schizophrenics, the crazy people who say something about traumas they've had, rapes they've experienced or God knows what.
They're crazy, they need treatment, then they won't talk about it any more.
This no longer seems so interesting since corona. And it is also interesting that it has
taken 40 years to change from ICD 10 to ICD 11.
It usually took 10 or 15 years for a change to take place.
So this change is more or less final now.
This is practically the death blow for all conspiracy theorists.
But now I've been thinking that medicine has actually gone mad.
Psychiatry has become insane.
I said that back in 2011, in an interview about forensic psychiatry.
As an affected relative myself, I really realized what it means when my relative is tortured in a psychiatric ward.
If I had told the public back then that there was torture in Switzerland, that there was compulsory treatment in Switzerland,
everyone would have thought, hey, she's crazy, she's schizophrenic, she needs treatment now, she
should take medication to get herself back in order.
I didn't do any of that. And I almost ended up on the front page of the Tagesanzeiger, I think, as the
psychiatrist from eastern Switzerland who threatened Frank Urbaniok and the cantonal government.
Of course I was acquitted of everything, but that doesn't matter, threatening my existence.
It is very important that we are always aware that we have a lot of information in here and that we dare to say that anything I
don't understand, I want to have explained to me until I can understand it, if something concerns my own body, my own space.
And my body doesn't stop here.
Every injection that goes into my room, if I am an infant, a baby, a toddler, I feel it very intensely.
Four billion pieces of information are affected by this.
And my whole development is influenced by that.
If I get another one now, not much will happen. I'm so hardened.
I've been betrayed or told nonsense so many times.
But for child development, curiosity, the joy of life, joy, peace, freedom, that is what the child in us and children
want. They want and need, and they have the right to do so.
And the WHO would be there to ensure this and only this.
Instead . So, it's a very sad thing, because I've been seeing cases recently where parents are
losing their children because they didn't go along.
Where colleagues are psychiatrized because they didn't go along.
So that takes place.
So, what else is interesting in ICD 11?
Behavioral and emotional disorders with onset in childhood and adolescence are no longer listed separately.
They are now under the adult chapters.
So that means the child has already been eradicated!
That is, all of us here - who is a mother?
All of us here, we fight like lions for our children and our children's children.
And we stand there and don't want that, because it's simply not right for our child or
for our society, which wants to live in peace.
The next thing to come is post-traumatic stress disorder.
More and more people are traumatized by these massive police and state interventions.
Now they have finally included these complex stress disorders in the catalog.
What for?
Because then they are also the next ones who can be well looked after.
So the WHO has been very dangerous for a long time.
If you think back, it emerged from the League of Nations.
The League of Nations was founded after the First World War.
The WHO adopted it after the Second World War.
After the First World War, there was a completely different interest.
The Children's Rights Charter was published.
And that changed completely after the Second World War.
Oh, yes. The question is whether it is an adjustment, as is claimed, in each case these codes that
change, these classifications, due to the development of medicine or due to political objectives.
The previous speakers have presented this in such a way that I actually stood there almost
like a child and thought, this can't be true.
What can we do to stop those who advocate this?
This minority, the salt in the soup that we are, that's all well and good, but how can we get the others to wake up?
This means that what has already happened really needs to be named.
In all our state institutions, these forensic-psychiatric recording systems about violence and all sorts of things have
already been trained, computer-assisted, in all important places.
In other words, it's so firmly established that we as individuals have no chance in this situation.
What we are doing here now - coming together, also in other places, and not giving up on each other when something happens
- that is the way and also the example that our children need.
No matter what the child experiences, it needs our support.
And if we are later ostracized by everyone else and experience bullying, this bullying will also help us to
wake up and contribute to the well-being of our family and of all people and animals on earth.
I was also thinking, should I put all the articles from "Blick" and "Tagesanzeiger" here on one slide?
It wasn't worth my time.
Anyone can see it any time.
For years now, people have been talking about how many child psychiatric places are
lacking and that the waiting time is up to a year.
I know of a case where a guardian would have to do this.
It's now been a year and a half.
Either she doesn't want any treatment for the child or there is none. There is no treatment.
Why?
What happened in Switzerland?
And where should responsibility be taken?
We still have a lack of study places.
That is the only thing that was finally officially admitted.
It's not just the numerus clausus - we've known that for a long time, it was already the case
when I was a student - but the lack of places.
Why haven't we built the study places for our doctors?
It is too expensive.
We now need a cheap but fantastic healthcare system, and we have had this compulsory health
insurance since 1996, and yet we still lack doctors.
And what is the government doing?
The medical profession and the government? They are stopping permission for doctors to practise.
This has led to a shortage of doctors, especially in child psychiatry.
And as far as premiums are concerned, no matter what is done, the premiums rise immeasurably.
And what does that lead to?
As a result, without anyone realizing it, 75% of insured persons will no longer have a free
choice of doctor in 2024 in return for lower premiums.
In other words, we are repeating what has always happened since industrialization, that we are enslaved here and not free
at all unless we get a quasi veto right and use and enforce it.
And thanks to everyone here for that.
Courtesy of Nicole Hammer, Wissensgeist.TV. Film editing: Paul Fehr. We would like to
thank you for the very friendly cooperation.