There is an increasing number of discussions about AI child pornography or so-called child pornographic mangas on
public television, such as in this case on Swiss television SRF.
No children are supposed to be physically harmed in the process.
The possession of such drawn manga or images generated with artificial intelligence is still prohibited.
But even this ban is already being shaken up,
The alleged science and practice are increasingly calling it into question.
"Some argue that it is wiser to provide pedophiles with something for which no children had to
suffer," said forensic psychologist Jérôme Endrass.
"This could reduce the consumption of 'real' child porn with real abuse."
Regula Bernhard Hug, Director of the Swiss Child Protection Foundation, counters this: "That would be
a dangerous trivialization. Because an AI also had to be fed with real 'material'."
It strictly rejects a general legalization of artificially produced child pornography content.
Forensic psychiatrist Frank Urbaniok also considers the ban to be fundamentally correct.
In his opinion, it is an important signal "(...) that society condemns sexual abuse."
In exceptional cases, however, he could imagine giving pedosexuals access to artificial material and can imagine a controlled
distribution of AI child porn under certain conditions.
Urbaniok and Endrass go on to discuss and distinguish between two different types of offenders.
Those who can distinguish fantasy from reality should then be allowed to watch artificially produced child porn.
In their opinion, this would reduce the risk of assaults and the images would give them a kind of outlet.
And those who can't should not get them under any circumstances.
And finally, Child Protection Switzerland also folds:
A closely controlled therapeutic use would even be conceivable for them in principle.
Dear viewers, should such questions be put up for public debate in the first place?
After all, the debate here is about the rape of children - whether artificially generated or not is not the question!
The fact that forensic psychiatrists like Urbaniok then also swear on SRF Kultur that "ritual abuse" is just a conspiracy
theory and does not exist, even though 1024 survivors describe it in Lois Sasek's documentary on ritual violence,
does not make their debate appear any more trustworthy.
Everyone knows and understands that an addiction can only be cured or "cured" with absolute renunciation.
Just as the ex-alcoholic must not touch a drop and the ex-drug addict must not even think about drugs, these
atrocities must not even be thought about, let alone discussed!
AI pornography
for pedosexuals would be tantamount to a criminal gateway drug!
In the Kla.TV documentary
"Pedophiles demand 'right' to our children" more than clearly reveals how small demands at the beginning
lead to ever deeper dependencies and heinous perversions.
Through lobbying, humane-sounding "understanding" and under a therapeutic pretext, absolute taboos
also receive support, thus opening "Pandora's box".
Seeing or referring to children as sexual beings was, is and will forever remain a taboo, and that cannot be changed.