This can't go on. It's a crime against humanity.
It's an organized crime against humanity.
The third discovery has just been published.
They've shown − this is the German group, our group, now − that this gene is passed from mother to
child through the placenta, through the placenta, folks.
You can’t accept that, for heaven’s sake!
We are now facing the most difficult problem in medicine − almost unsolvable, because it’s completely new.
There’s no prior experience. It’s all trial and error, trial and error.
And the question is always, when you try something out, how can you measure success?
Welcome to a new exciting episode! Today, Marc is speaking with Prof. Dr. Bhakdi. Mr. Bhakdi, it’s great that you have time.
It’s great that you have time, Mr. Friedrich.
Yes, you reached out to me, right.
You said you had something very exciting to share.
The fact is we’re living in historic times.
So I believe no one can deny this turning point anymore.
Everything is changing de facto; we’ll probably never have the pre-COVID era again.
And more and more truth is coming to light − the old narratives are collapsing.
Now, of course, I’m curious to hear what you have to say, Mr. Bhakdi.
Yes, Mr. Friedrich, you probably know that we’ve published a new book.
The book came out three weeks ago, and many are asking, why?
Six months ago, I said I had written my last book.
Exactly, there is a link to the interview at the top.
That’s why I want to say that this book wasn’t written by me, but rather I am the
editor, co-editor with a certain Dr. Helmut Sterz.
Now, who is Helmut Sterz? Helmut Sterz is the former chief toxicologist at Pfizer, Pfizer for the whole of Europe.
He’s retired, and he stood up and wrote a book. And this book is a must-read.
This book really belongs in every household,
because he has provided the final piece of the puzzle in our story.
We wrote back then that this so-called vaccine was manufactured using an unapproved process − it was
never tested for safety and was certainly dangerous.
It was evident that the whole thing was planned. That’s in our book, too.
The only question was, how could this have happened?
And the answer is provided by Helmut Sterz, the former toxicologist at Pfizer.
Dr. Sterz, you worked as the chief toxicologist for Pfizer Europe. Is that correct?
Yes, that is correct. I was responsible there for all animal experiments related to drug safety.
Thank you. My questions concern Comirnaty from Pfizer BioNTech.
You have dealt extensively with the approval of this vaccine and the documentation. Is that correct?
That is correct.
Was the carcinogenicity of this vaccine tested prior to approval?
No. The carcinogenic risk was not investigated due to time constraints.
Incidentally, I find it very worrying and also regrettable that no alternative studies were conducted.
We are observing in Germany, but also in many other countries, that the birth rate plummeted following the vaccination campaign.
Yes, you are referring to studies concerning reproduction.
A study on rats using Comirnaty was inadequately conducted.
Consequently, no reliable assessments of the vaccine’s effect on pregnancy or the development of offspring were possible.
Nothing had been learned from the thalidomide disaster.
According to the RKI protocol, approval was granted in a fast-track procedure.
This meant that essential toxicity studies were sacrificed for the sake of speed, without acceptable justification.
I know of no case with a comparable indication in which all these studies were omitted.
Thus, the approval led to prohibited human trials.
So the RKI had noted internally at the time that side effects and vaccine-related injuries were only to be investigated
after the product had been launched. What came of that?
Pfizer’s post-marketing report mentioned over 1,200 suspected deaths within just two months of approval.
Comirnaty should have been withdrawn from the market by then at the latest.
If I am correctly informed, The Paul Ehrlich Institute has received 2,133 reports of deaths following Comirnaty to date.
With these spontaneous reports, there is a high number of unreported cases due to “underreporting”.
The actual number is therefore much higher. In the U.S., an underreporting factor of 30 is assumed,
by which the registered cases should be multiplied.
For Germany, that would correspond to 60,000 deaths caused by the vaccine.
60,000. So the federal government is withholding the important SafeVac and KV data on vaccination injuries, and the majority
of this commission has even refused to request this data.
Could vaccine injuries and deaths have been avoided with approval compliant with the regulations?
Yes, because Comirnaty should not have been approved at all under the regulations.
Currently, many vaccine-injured individuals in Germany are fighting for compensation for pain and suffering.
They often lose because the courts say Comirnaty has a positive risk-benefit ratio. Is this assumption justified?
In my view, absolutely not. Comirnaty was not tested at all during clinical development
for the prevention of severe illness or deaths.
Pfizer documents therefore do not indicate a positive risk-benefit ratio at all.
Mathematician Robert Rockenfeller from the University of Koblenz estimates that for every severe case of COVID-19 that
Comirnaty allegedly prevents, there are 25 severe side effects.
Okay. Did age-adjusted mortality in Germany decline after the start of this vaccination campaign?
No, mortality rose significantly from 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020.
If there had been a positive risk-benefit ratio, mortality should have declined when the vaccine became available in early 2021.
That makes sense. Did the population receive the active ingredient during the vaccination campaign that
Pfizer tested in the shortened emergency approval process?
No. A highly purified substance was used for the clinical trial prior to approval. It was too expensive for mass production.
The public received a vaccine produced using the escherichia coli bacterium.
The result is significant contamination with bacterial DNA, and the consequence could
be a significantly increased risk of cancer.
Thank you very much.
And he has every reason to know this. He’s not just an insider; he’s a true expert.
He’s not a quack; he’s not a conspiracy theorist.
He’s simply an incredibly knowledgeable, honest, and sincere person.
And this book really gave me a jolt.
If something else comes along now that gives the whole thing another push, then I want to finish Helmut
Sterz’s book with a sequel, with the final piece that was needed to set everything in motion.
And that piece arrived at the same time his book was published.
And that is why Helmut Sterz and I have teamed up to publish this new book.
And this book is intended to serve as a guide for the public, a guide for lawyers, and a guide for politicians, doctors,
and the media, so they know things cannot go on this way.
It is a crime against humanity. It is an organized crime against humanity.
And this book has been well received. The book contains only one chapter by me, which was written specifically for it.
That was the final chapter, where I included the latest discovery.
And why this discovery must turn everything upside down.
But there were other discoveries as well.
And the next discovery, which I absolutely wanted to include, is not in the book currently on the market.
It’s in the second edition, which will be released soon once the first edition is sold out.
And the second discovery is that, due to the unapproved procedure that was used and due to the contaminants present, it
has now been proven that it leads to turbo-cancer formation.
And regarding the actual integration of this foreign DNA into human genes, in this case causing turbo-cancer.
The case has been published; it’s a done deal. And we’ll report on that in the second edition.
Now, the fact is that this has become internationally known.
And everyone is saying, “Hey, we heard you published a book with Helmut Sterz. Will it come out in English?”
Because the US publishers are waiting.
And this book is now being translated into English.
Helmut Sterz’s book has already been translated and is essentially on its way to the market, through the US publisher.
And we want to approach this publisher once our new book with the expanded chapter is out.
And that is the reason why I wanted to announce this.
Because the latest discoveries, which are still being made public, concern, first of all, persistence.
That means it has now been proven that this foreign gene remains present and active in
humans for up to years after the last injection.
That means, people are genetically modified for a long, long time, perhaps even forever. That’s not okay, folks!
The second finding is that because of this vaccination− it throws a spanner in the
entire works of the human genome, at every level.
And people are fundamentally modified in their being. This has also been published in a
top-tier journal. So this is the highest...
I’d like to jump in here briefly − perhaps also as an appeal to the viewers, because I hear this time and again.
Do any of you have acquaintances, friends, relatives, or people in your social circle who suddenly − perhaps without
any prior risk factors − developed cancer, and of course also regarding, yes, changes in their nature?
So let us know, because there aren’t many studies on this.
I told you in a private conversation that my mother was also a victim of this very aggressive, fast-growing cancer in her neck.
And even then the doctors said, well, it’s atypical, they’d never seen anything like it − but then they added that, yes,
this aggressive type of cancer has been on the rise lately.
So in that regard, I’d of course be interested, so to speak, in the empirical data that the public can
provide. Please feel free to write in the comments.
Because, of course, this is all information that is important, because, as you said, it might not have been a
vaccination after all, but perhaps rather genetic therapy − and that people of course react to that.
Mr. Friedrich, it wasn’t genetic therapy; it was a genetic experiment. You really have to distinguish between the two.
Right.
And that constitutes a grave violation of the Nuremberg Code.
And that is why I am here with you, because I wanted to tell you: This violation of the Nuremberg Code has now been proven!
And the incidence of cancer cases and of diseases in general associated with this
so-called genetic experiment has also been proven.
Yes, we don’t need to do any more work.
There is scientific literature on it. It’s completely clear.
And by the way, the third discovery, which has just come in, and I must tell you, of these three discoveries I’m actually a bit
proud to say that our lab, our institute Inmodia was involved.
Specifically, in collaboration with the Americans.
And that is why I am also asking that the links to Inmodia and MWGFD be provided, where you can help.
Because the whole endeavor involves an enormous amount of effort − enormous.
You can’t imagine what all this costs, not just in money, but in lifeblood. So much time, so much work.
The third discovery has just been published.
There they showed − this is the German group now, our group − that this gene passes from mother to child through the placenta.
Through the placenta, folks− you can’t accept that! Damn it!
So, now I’m almost at the end.
We’re really trying to get our book to go viral.
And this time we’ve included this link from the world’s largest US distributor.
And for a very simple reason: Because these operators and distributors − you all know
them, someone we don’t normally buy from…
But they have a ranking, and if you’re in the top 50 to 100, then the Americans see it.
And the publishers are, of course, very, very eager to pick up the book, to acquire the license.
And that would help us immensely. That’s one thing.
I’d like to say that the last chapter, where the new discoveries come in, is almost the most important part.
And I’ve arranged with Mr. Kopp that these last 10 pages − it’s only 10 pages − will again be
available as a sample for all of you to download for free.
You’ll need to go to Kopp Verlag and click on the book.
And there it says “Excerpt.” Click on that and share − for heaven’s sake − these 10 pages with all your friends − and to
those who don’t want to believe it, tell them this isn’t just coming from me, but from Pfizer’s former chief toxicologist.
The subtitle of his book says, namely: Pfizer’s former chief toxicologist proves how toxic substances
were illegally sold to us as a cure for Covid-19.
I mean, as you said, chief toxicologist, an insider at Pfizer − he was responsible for the whole of Europe.
Why wasn’t his voice heard before, or rather, why is he only coming forward with this now?
He knew right from the start, but he didn’t believe the vaccine would actually come.
He thought, as I did, that it couldn’t be true − they wouldn’t allow it. And then the vaccine came.
So, and now I’m going to − I don’t know if I’m allowed to say this, Helmut…
Yes, his wife got vaccinated, against his advice.
She got sick. And she’s still sick. And that almost made him sick, too.
I believe that.
And only after that did he tell himself, I have to do something.
And then he wrote his book. That’s why we haven’t heard from him.
He wasn’t doing well, and even now the crisis isn’t over.
But that’s not the book we wrote together.
Yes, of course.
“The Vaccine Mafia” is a different book, which is good.
You’re welcome to mention the title of the new book.
I really have to say, I’m hesitating because otherwise we’ll get “shadowbanned”.
Yes, ... – The last interviews I did are all basically shadowbanned.
Okay…
The last three − they didn’t reach anyone. And that...
So, all the more important, dear viewers, if you want to support this topic, if it interests you, if you want people to actually
see this topic − even if they might have nothing to do with it or don’t want to know about it anymore − share, share, share!
Feel free to turn on notifications, subscribe, and just spread the word.
Because, as we can see, the whole COVID narrative is falling apart.
We can see that those who were supposed to protect us have, in some cases, lied to us outright.
We can see that all those “crazy people,” “conspiracy theorists,” and “nonconformists” were probably right all along.
And in that regard, it’s important that the truth comes to light.
It’s coming to light, but you can be a multiplier.
Now one last point, and then I’m done.
You know that BioNTech has now become more vulnerable.
The board has resigned or will step down, or the founders.
And secondly, you know that on March 9 a ruling was issued by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH). .
This BGH ruling is very, very important! Please take the time to familiarize yourselves with
this ruling. Because this ruling offers hope.
Hope, because manufacturers are now obligated to provide information when requested.
And they will be requested. And this request can be so unpleasant for them that they will
face real legal problems in the second stage.
I also want to say that this entire development, since it is now established that the Nuremberg Code was violated − with fatal
consequences − means that the time has come for the doctors who were persecuted, some of whom were thrown in jail and
are currently in prison, for the public to have the opportunity to secure their acquittal − and compensation.
A quick question about BioNTech:
Do you think these are the real reasons why the founders of BioNTech are, so to speak,
jumping ship? Or is liability also a factor?
I don’t know. And I don’t want to know.
And what do you think about the Enquete Commission’s investigation?
Do you think it will lead to anything, including consequences, or is it just a bit of
window dressing and a sedative for the public?
So far, it’s been window dressing.
But the tide is turning there, too. The tide is turning there, too.
Okay. Because some of what’s coming out is truly hair-raising and proves once again that many of the critics were actually right.
You’ve probably also heard about the ominous email in the Epstein Files between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein.
That was also about depopulation − or rather, what to do with poor people?
Yes, “vaccinating them away” was the idea… And he was also involved with COVID-19. What do you say to the new facts?
Yes, that’s a fact. It’s common knowledge.
Unbelievable, yes.
It’s common knowledge.
But if people here want to close their eyes and ears − “That’s not true, it’s a conspiracy, it’s…” − I can’t help them.
Mr. Bhakdi, this is truly so sick and malicious that people are, so to speak, being kept quiet with a vaccination −
simply because they may not be as well-off mentally or economically − and that this is being planned well in advance.
I couldn’t have imagined this in my wildest dreams…
But to me, this makes every conspiracy theory seem like child’s play in comparison…
Yes. I have nothing more to say.
Unbelievable. Of course, I always get a lot of emails now, especially when I have you on the show.
The first interview with Mr. Bakhdi − highly recommended; it was a great sweeping overview− and I
think it’s already had over half a million views.
I’ll be happy to post the link to it again at the top.
People are asking me, what can be done?
I’m vaccinated, my mother is vaccinated, my child is vaccinated.
Is there any way to flush it out?
Is there some kind of treatment? Or what can you give people as a suggestion?
No, there’s nothing that’s been tested.
Yes. And that’s, of course, a huge difficulty.
We’re now facing the most difficult problem in medicine.
Almost unsolvable, because it’s also completely new. There’s no experience.
It’s all trial and error, trial and error.
And the question is always, when you try out something, how can you measure success?
And I’m working on that, but it’s a long road; it will take years.
I’ll just say it again: If someone has survived, then he or she should thank God.
And get down on their knees, knowing that certainly more than half of these batches were inactive.
Certainly more − maybe 70 percent, 80 percent.
And of the batches that were active, they varied in how dangerous they were. Yes. For a variety of reasons.
And that’s why it’s not the case that everyone who got it will have to die.
Rather, humans are resilient. The body has the ability to heal. He gave this to you. To me, too.
Be grateful for that! Be grateful and return to this world that believes in a good Creator.
Yes. Definitely. I believe, there was the option recently to file claims for injuries through a lawyer who posted on X.
There were the specific batches from Pfizer, that is, of the COVID-19 vaccine.
And there were, I believe, three that have been proven to have caused disproportionately high levels of harm or death.
Of course, you can check which batch you received, and was it contaminated?
Was it somehow more dangerous than average?
Of course, that doesn’t help those who already have serious illnesses, or who have developed autoimmune diseases,
or who have died − from a heart attack or turbo cancer.
And I know there are many who consider all of this a conspiracy theory.
But if you know someone who has become a victim or perhaps even died, can you still file a
claim for injuries? Does it make a difference?
I mean, will more attention and focus be placed on it so that the public actually wakes up and
realizes this wasn’t for the good of the people?
Yes, Mr. Friedrich, those are questions that are very difficult to answer.
Because you know there are brakes built in everywhere here.
And that’s precisely why this Federal Court of Justice ruling is so important. Because there are no more brakes there.
And, I’m familiar with this call regarding the three batches.
The three batches are mentioned because those are the three batches that were examined by us − that is, by our group Inmodia
− where these contaminants were detected in high concentrations.
And since it is now known that these contaminants are life-threatening, it is no longer up to
us or others to prove that this is the cause.
It is up to the manufacturers to prove that these contaminants are harmless.
And that is actually the basis for this lawsuit.
Although I must say, I’m not sure if it will succeed.
Because the Federal Court of Justice acknowledges − allows − that one can and should obtain information.
And that’s what I would do first. I would first get the information out.
And if they can’t answer the questions − for example: Have you really ruled that out?
And if they say, we haven’t tested it, then comes the next step.
But first, you have to formulate the questions and, in principle, sue to obtain the answers.
The lawsuit must aim to obtain the answers, the information.
Yes. We see that the rule of law still works after all.
Just like the RKI files or the nuclear files, which were obtained through litigation, or of course here,
where the Federal Court of Justice ruled accordingly.
What’s important is that the information gets out.
But it is quite striking that the Federal Court of Justice ruling is issued, and then the founders of BioNTech say
they’re leaving BioNTech to start something new− something similar, actually − but under a new protective umbrella.
And that could, of course, be a correlation − perhaps that they’re protecting themselves or something.
On the other hand, we also know that the EU, under von der Leyen at the time, of course excluded liability
for the companies, and assumed liability for the EU.
That’s why you wouldn’t have to fear, right? Or am I wrong about that?
Yes, that is not correct.
And Helmut Sterz also explained that in his book.
The moment fraud occurs. The moment fraud occurs.
And this is fraud, and the product is fraudulent. And there’s no protection there.
Oh, that would be interesting. Okay.
Because, as you know, I’m very active in finance and the economy.
And I know some people were truly shocked by this abrupt departure of the two founders and saviors, as they were touted.
And apparently, it came as a great surprise even to employees.
And of course there are now plenty of rumors circulating.
And that was, after all, following the Federal Court of Justice ruling ...
One day later.
One day later, exactly. And that’s, of course, quite telling − so everyone can draw their own conclusions.
Nothing happens without a reason. So why exactly one day after the BGH ruling was announced?
That’s very interesting and intriguing.
Malicious tongues claim, “the rats are leaving the sinking ship,” and they want to protect themselves from any liability claims.
Yes, I hope the ship sinks.
Clearly, if BioNTech is successfully sued, I mean, a somewhat naive thought of mine is that, given the fraud that has now been
proven − and that the product was, is, and still is a fraud − it should be possible for the federal government to
rescind the purchase agreement − fraudulent goods and delivery of the wrong product, which has truly harmed people.
If they were to do that, or if they were forced to do so, I don’t know how, - then that’s billions, Mr. Friedrich, billions!
And BioNTech has 17 or 15 billion in the bank.
They could immediately pay out 2, 3, 4, 5 billion, pay it back.
If they were then to set up a relief fund, that would be something, wouldn’t it?
For the vaccination victims, for those harmed by the vaccinations.
Yes, indeed, indeed.
Now, if we take a look at excess mortality in recent years − at the beginning of this year it
was a bit higher, which could be due to the flu.
Last year it was even slightly below the average trend, and in 2024 it was ...
No, no. Most of those calculations aren’t accurate.
And there are so many interpretations of that as well; I won’t get into it.
The interpretations that are correct are overwhelmingly clear.
There is excess mortality right now. And it’s significant.
It’s not small; it’s large. Yes, and it’s bad. And the decline in births, too.
Yes, it’s striking.
Do you think it also has something to do with the administration of this vaccine that people are less fertile?
Of course! There were intrauterine deaths and miscarriages galore!
Yes, the coming years will reveal this.
I’m curious to hear your opinions and examples from your circle of acquaintances.
It’s often the case that someone suddenly dies or develops cancer.
Many people might not even be able to make the connection to the COVID-19 vaccine.
It is clear now. And internationally, there are several movements seeking to impose a moratorium on all mRNA vaccines.
And I have to say − and I’m going with this − I’ll be online in Florida tomorrow.
I wanted to ask about that. You mentioned before that you’re supporting the Florida Department of Health.
I’m conducting a training session for the doctors there.
And the training session is on the topic: “Are mRNA vaccines safe?”
And of course, there’s only one answer, and I’ll explain why.
And the health minister is present. He’s there.
Of Florida or the U.S.?
Florida.
Wow, okay.
That’s the great Ladapo, who’s of course working with DeSantis.
And you know that Florida is heading in the same direction as Alabama, Idaho, and Arkansas. They want to stop the whole thing.
Maybe you’ll also manage to connect with Robert Kennedy so he’ll do something with “Make America Healthy Again.”
He’s been a critic, after all. He was also at demonstrations in Germany.
Of course.
The right people are definitely coming together now.
In case you see him, say hello for me. I’d love to invite him for an interview.
Yes, unfortunately Kennedy is in poor health right now. He needs surgery.
Ah, okay.
Yes.
Nevertheless, after that, I’d be happy to interview him, because when someone like the U.S. Secretary of Health says things like
that − and he’s already made a lot of changes in the U.S. with the food pyramid and so on, as well as with the pharmaceutical
companies − then it’s definitely for the good of humanity.
Yes, all right.
Mr. Bhakdi, best of luck in Florida. We’ll see and hear from you again.
And if you have any news, please feel free to reach out to us.
Best of luck, all the best! Stay healthy! Thank you!
Thank you all! Goodbye! Yes.