It can't go on like this. It is a crime against humanity.
It is an organized crime against humanity.
The third discovery has also now appeared.
They have shown - this is the German group now, our group - that this gene passes from mother to child
through the placenta, through the placenta, people.
You can't fucking accept that!
We are now facing the most difficult problem in medicine - almost unsolvable, because it is also completely new.
There is no experience. It's all trial and error.
And the question is always, when you try something, how can you measure its success?
Welcome to another exciting episode! Marc is talking to Prof. Dr. Bhakdi today. Mr. Bhakdi, it's great that you have time.
Thank you for your time, Mr. Friedrich.
Yes, you approached me, that's right.
You said you have something really exciting to report.
The fact is, we are living in historic times.
So I don't think anyone can deny that the times are changing.
Everything is de facto changing, we will probably never have the time before Corona again.
And more and more truth is coming to light, so the narratives, the old narratives are collapsing.
Now, of course, I'm curious to hear what you have to report, Mr. Bhakdi.
Yes, Mr. Friedrich, you probably know that we have published a new book.
The book was published three weeks ago, and many people are asking why?
Six months ago, I said I had written my last book.
Exactly, also on my channel. I'll link the interview up here.
That is why I want to say that this book is not written by me, but I am the editor, co-editor with a certain Doctor Helmut Sterz.
Well, who is Helmut Sterz? Helmut Sterz is the ex-chief toxicologist of Pfizer, Pfizer for all of Europe .
He's retired and he got up and wrote a book. And this book is a must-read.
This book should be in every household,
because he has provided the last piece of the mosaic to our story.
We wrote back then that this so-called vaccine was produced using an unapproved process - was never
tested for safety and was certainly dangerous, wasn't it?
It was clear that the whole thing was planned. That's also in our book.
The only question was, how could it be that this happened?
And the answer is provided by Helmut Sterz, the ex-toxicologist from Pfizer.
Dr. Sterz, you worked as chief toxicologist for Pfizer Europe. Is that correct?
Yes, that's correct. I was responsible there for all animal experiments that serve drug safety.
Thank you. My questions relate to Comirnaty from Pfizer BioNTech.
You have dealt intensively with the approval of this vaccine, with the documentation. Is that correct?
That is correct.
Was the carcinogenicity of this vaccine tested before approval?
No. The carcinogenic risk was not investigated due to time constraints.
Incidentally, I find it very worrying and also regrettable that no alternative investigations were carried out.
In Germany, but also in many other countries, we have observed that the birth rate plummeted after the vaccination campaign.
Yes, you are alluding to studies on reproduction.
A study on rats was carried out with Comirnaty inadequately.
This made it impossible to reliably assess the effect of the vaccine on pregnancy or the development of the offspring.
Nothing had been learned from the thalidomide disaster.
According to the RKI protocol, approval was granted in a fast-track procedure.
This meant that essential toxicity studies were sacrificed for speed, without acceptable justification.
I know of no case with a comparable indication in which all these studies were omitted.
The approval led to prohibited human trials.
So the RKI made an internal note at the time that the side effects and vaccine damage should only be
tested after the market launch. What was the outcome?
Pfizer's postmarketing report spoke of over 1,200 suspected deaths within just two months of approval.
Comirnaty should have been taken off the market by then at the latest.
If I am correctly informed, the Paul Ehrlich Institute has so far received 2,133 reports of deaths after Comirnaty.
There is a high number of unreported cases due to "underreporting" .
The real number is therefore much higher. In the USA, an underreporting factor of 30 is assumed, by
which the registered cases would have to be multiplied.
For Germany, this would correspond to 60,000 deaths caused by the vaccination.
60,000. So the Federal Government is withholding the important SafeVac and KV data on vaccination damage, and the majority
of this Commission has even refused to request this data.
Could vaccine damage and deaths have been avoided with a compliant license?
Yes, because according to the rules Comirnaty should not have been admitted at all.
So, many vaccination victims in Germany are currently fighting for compensation.
They often lose because the courts say that Comirnaty has a positive risk-benefit ratio. Is this assumption justified?
In my view, not at all. Comirnaty was not tested at all in clinical development for
the prevention of serious illness or death.
Pfizer documents therefore do not even indicate a positive risk-benefit ratio.
Mathematician Robert Rockenfeller from the University of Koblenz estimates that for every severe case of Covid that
Comirnaty allegedly prevents, there are 25 severe side effects.
Okay. Did the age-adjusted mortality rate in Germany drop after the start of this vaccination campaign?
No, mortality increased significantly from 2021 and 2022 compared to 2020.
With a positive risk-benefit ratio, mortality should have fallen when the vaccine became available in early 2021.
That makes sense. During the vaccination campaign, did the population receive the active substance that
Pfizer tested in the shortened emergency approval procedure?
No. A high-purity substance was used for the clinical trial prior to approval. It was too expensive for mass production.
The population received a vaccine produced with the help of the bacterium Escherichia coli.
The result is significant contamination with bacterial DNA, and the consequence could
be a significantly increased risk of cancer.
Thank you very much.
And he has every reason to know that. He's not an insider, he's someone who knows.
He's not a con man, he's not a conspiracy theorist.
He is simply an incredibly knowledgeable, honest and sincere person.
And this book really gave me a jolt.
If something else comes along now that gives the whole thing a boost, then I want to finish his book with Helmut Sterz with a
sequel, with the last stone that had to get everything rolling.
And this stone arrived at the same time as his book was published.
And that's why Helmut Sterz and I have joined forces and published this new book.
And this book should serve as help for the population, help for the lawyers and help for politicians, doctors and the
media, so that they know that things can't go on like this.
It is a crime against humanity. It is an organized crime against humanity.
And this book went down well. The book only contains one chapter of mine, which was written specially.
This was the last chapter where I put in the latest discovery.
And why this discovery has to topple everything.
But there were other discoveries too.
And the next discovery that I really wanted to bring in is not in the book that is now on the market.
It's in the second edition, which will soon be on the market when the first edition is gone.
And the second discovery is that because of the unauthorized process that was used and because of the impurities that are in
it, it has now been proven that turbo-cancer formation occurs.
And to the actual incorporation of this foreign DNA into human genes, in this case causing a turbo cancer.
The case has been published, it's over. And we will report on it in the second edition.
Now it is the case that this has become internationally known.
And everyone says, gosh, we've heard that you've published a book with Helmut Sterz. Will it ever be published in English?
Because the American publishers are waiting.
And this book is now being translated into English.
The book by Helmut Sterz has already been translated and is in principle already on its
way to the market from the American publisher.
And we want to approach this publisher when our new book with the extended chapter is out.
And that's the reason why I wanted to make this known.
Because the latest discoveries that are still being made public concern, firstly, persistence.
This means that it has now been proven that this foreign gene is present and active in
humans up to years after the last injection.
This means that people will be genetically modified for a long, long time, perhaps even forever. That's not possible, people!
The second work is that due to this vaccination - this throws sand into the entire gears of the human genome, at all levels.
And people have changed in essence. Also published, high profile. So that's the highest...
I'd like to have a quick word - perhaps an appeal to the viewers, because I keep hearing that too.
Do any of you have acquaintances, friends or relatives in your circle of friends who have suddenly developed
cancer, perhaps without a previous history, and of course also with regard to, yes, changes in character?
So let us know, because there aren't many studies on this.
I told you in a private conversation that my mother was also a victim of this very aggressive, rapid cancer on her neck.
And then the doctors said, yes, it's atypical, they've never seen anything like it before - and then said, yes, but
recently this aggressive type of cancer has become more common.
So in this respect, I would of course also be interested in the empirical study, so to speak, that the
masses can give me. Feel free to write in the comments.
Because, of course, this is all information that is naturally important, because as you said, it may not have
been a vaccination after all, but perhaps a gene therapy - and that people then naturally react to it.
Mr. Friedrich, it was not gene therapy, it was a gene experiment. You really have to keep that apart.
Yes, that's right.
And that violates the Nuremberg Code in the worst way.
And that is the reason why I am here with you, because I wanted to tell you: This
violation of the Nuremberg Code has now been proven!
And the incidence of cancer cases and diseases in general in connection with this
so-called genetic experiment has also been proven.
Yes, we don't need to do any more work.
There is scientific literature on this. Absolutely clear.
And by the way, the third discovery, which has also just come in, and I have to tell you, of these three discoveries,
I'm really a bit proud to say that our laboratory, our Institute Inmodia was involved in two of them.
And in cooperation with the Americans.
And that's why I also ask that the link to Inmodia and MWGFD be provided where you can help.
Because the whole thing involves an enormous amount of time and effort.
You can't imagine what it all costs, not just in money, but in heart and soul. So much time, so much work.
The third discovery has also now appeared.
They have shown - this is the German group now, our group - that this gene passes from mother to child through the placenta.
Through the placenta, people - you can't accept this! Damn it all!
So, now I'm almost at the end.
We are really trying to get our book into explosive circulation.
And we have provided this link this time from the major American distributor in the world.
And for one very simple reason: because these operators and distributors - you all know
the one, someone we don't normally buy from...
But they have a ranking list, and if you're in the top 50 to 100, the Americans see that.
And the publishers are of course very, very happy to take over the book, to take over the license.
And that would help us immensely. That's one thing.
I would like to say that almost the most important thing is the last chapter, where the new discoveries come in.
And I have agreed with Mr. Kopp that these last 10 pages, there are only 10 pages, will again be a free download for all of you.
You have to go to Kopp-Verlag and click on the book.
And it says "reading sample". Click on it and - damn it - distribute these 10 pages to everyone you know - and tell those
who don't want to believe it that this is something that didn't just come from me, but from the ex-chief toxicologist at Pfizer.
The subtitle of his book refers to Pfizer's former chief toxicologist proving how we were
illegally sold toxins as a cure for Covid-19.
I mean, as you said, chief toxicologist, insider at Pfizer, so he was responsible for the whole of Europe.
Why wasn't his voice heard before, or why is he only coming out with it now?
He knew about it at the very beginning, but he didn't believe that the vaccination was really coming.
He believed, as I did, that it couldn't be, they wouldn't allow it. And then came the vaccination.
So now I'm going to - I don't know if I'm allowed to say this, Helmut...
Yes, his wife had herself vaccinated, against his advice.
She has become ill. And she is still ill. And that almost made him ill too.
I believe that.
And only after that did he say to himself, I have to do something.
And then he wrote his book. That's why nothing was heard from him.
He was not well, and even now the crisis is not over.
But this is not the book we made together.
Yes, yes, of course. I only knew his book.
"Die Impfmafia" is another book, which is already good.
You are welcome to say the title of the new book.
Yes, I really have to say I hesitate, because otherwise we will be "shadowbanned" .
Yes, if that somehow... - The last interviews I did are all basically shadowbanned.
Okay...
The last three - they didn't reach anyone. And that...
So, all the more important, dear ones, if you want to support the topic, if you are interested, if you want people to actually
see this topic, even if they may have nothing to do with the topic or don't want to know anymore, then share, share, share!
You are also welcome to activate the bell, leave a subscription and simply spread the word.
Because we can see that the whole coronavirus narrative is collapsing.
We can see that those who should have protected us have lied to us, sometimes blatantly.
As we can see, all the cranks, the fuddy-duddies, the lateral thinkers have probably been right about everything.
And in this respect, it is important that the truth comes to light.
It comes to light, but you can be a multiplier.
Now one last point and then I'm done.
You know that BioNTech has now become more vulnerable.
The Management Board has left or will leave, or the founders.
And secondly, you know that on March 9 there was a BGH ruling .
This BGH ruling is very, very important! You should please take a look at this judgment, because it gives hope.
Hope, because manufacturers are now obliged to provide information when requested.
And they are requested. And this request can be so unpleasant for them that they really
get into legal trouble in the second stage.
I also want to say that this whole development, because it is now clear that the Nuremberg Law was violated - with fatal
consequences, that the time has now come for the doctors who were persecuted, some of whom were thrown into prison and
who are in prison, that the population must have the opportunity to enforce their acquittal - and for reparation.
Quick question about BioNTech:
Do you think these are the real reasons why the founders of BioNTech are jumping ship,
so to speak? Or is it also about liability?
I don't know. I don't want to know either.
And what do you say about the Enquete Commission's clarification?
Do you think this will lead to anything, including consequences, or is it just a bit of
window-dressing and reassurance pills for the public?
So far it's window dressing.
But the wind is changing there too. The wind is turning there too.
Okay. Because some of the things that come out of this are hair-raising and prove once again
that many of the critics were actually right.
You probably also noticed that there was an ominous e-mail in the Epstein Files between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein.
It was also about depopulation - or rather, what do you do with poor people?
Yes, vaccinating away was the idea... And he was also involved with corona. What do you think of the new facts?
Yes, that's a fact. It is not a situation. It is a known fact.
Madness, yes.
It is known.
Only if people here want to close their eyes and ears - "That's not true, that's a conspiracy, that's ..." - I can't help.
Mr. Bhakdi, it really is so sick and malicious that other people are somehow immobilized with a vaccination just
because they are perhaps not so well off mentally or economically - and that this is planned long in advance.
In my wildest dreams I could never have imagined this...
But that sounds to me, yes, every conspiracy theory suddenly becomes a kindergarten in comparison...
Yes. That's all I have to say. Yes.
It's amazing. Now, of course, I always get lots of emails, especially when I have you in an interview.
And as I said, the preliminary talk or the first talk, the first interview with Mr. Bhakdi - highly
recommended, there was also a great all-round success - and I think already over half a million views.
I will gladly link it here again.
They ask me, of course, what can I do?
I am vaccinated, the mother is vaccinated, the child is vaccinated.
Is there any way of eliminating this?
Is there some kind of treatment? Or what can you give people, as an indication?
No, it's nothing that's been tested.
Yes, and that is of course a huge difficulty.
We are now facing the most difficult problem in medicine.
Almost unsolvable, because it is also completely new. There is no experience.
It's all trial and error.
And the question is always, when you try something, how can you measure its success?
Yes, and I'm on my way there, but it's a long road, it will take years.
Yes, I'll just say again: if someone has got away with it, then he or she should thank God.
And kneel down, knowing that certainly more than half of these batches were not active.
Certainly more, maybe 70 percent, 80 percent.
And of the batches that were active, they were differently dangerous. Yes. For a variety of reasons.
And that's why it's not the case that everyone who gets it will have to die.
Rather, people are resilient . The body is capable of healing. He gave it to you. Me too.
Be grateful for that! Be grateful and return to this world that believes in a good Creator.
Yes. In any case. So recently, I think there was also the possibility of claiming
damages from a lawyer who also posted on X.
There were also the direct batches from Pfizer, i.e. from the coronavirus vaccine.
And there were, I believe, three that have now been proven to have simply led to
disproportionately high levels of injury or death.
Of course, you can check which badge you received, and was it contaminated?
Was it somehow more dangerous than average?
Of course, this doesn't help those who already have any serious illnesses, have developed autoimmune diseases or
have died - from heart attacks or turbo cancer, in fact.
And I know there are also many who think this is all a conspiracy theory.
But can you, for example, if you now know someone who has (become) a victim or perhaps even died, can
you also make a claim for damages? Is it any good?
So, will even more attention, focus be placed on it so that the public actually wakes up and
realizes that this was not for the good of the people?
Yes, Mr. Friedrich, these are questions that are very, very difficult to answer.
Because you know that there are brakes everywhere.
And that is precisely why this BGH ruling is so important. Because there are no more brakes.
And, I know this call with the three batches.
The three batches are named because these are the three batches that were examined by us, i.e. by our Inmodia group,
where these impurities were detected in high concentrations.
And since it is now known that these impurities are life-threatening, it is not up to us
or the others to prove that this is the cause.
It is up to the manufacturers to prove that these impurities do nothing.
And that is actually the basis for this experiment.
Although I have to say, I'm not sure if this will go through.
This is because the BGH admits that information can and should be obtained.
And I would do that first. I would get the information out first.
And if they can't answer the questions - for example: Have you really ruled this out?
And if they say we haven't tested it, then the next step comes.
But first, you have to formulate the questions and, in principle, sue for the answers.
The action must (aim at) a free action of answers, of information.
Yes. So we see that the rule of law still works after all.
See also RKI files, or Atomfiles, which have been released, or of course here that the BGH has ruled accordingly.
The important thing is that the information gets out.
But it is very striking that the BGH ruling is pronounced and then the founders of BioNtech suddenly say they are
leaving BioNtech and doing something new, something similar actually, but under a new protective cloak.
And that could of course be a correlation, perhaps that you protect yourself or something.
On the other hand, we also know that the EU under von der Leyen naturally excluded liability for
the companies, so to speak, and made the EU liable.
That's why you shouldn't really have anything to worry about. Or am I seeing it wrong?
Yes, that's not right.
And Helmut Sterz has also explained this in his book.
The moment fraud is committed. The moment fraud is committed.
And this is fraud and the goods are fraud. And there is no protection.
Oh, that would be interesting. Okay.
Yes, because I simply know, because I am, you know, I am also very, very active in finance, in business.
And I know that some people were really shocked by this abrupt departure of the two
founders and saviors, as they had been touted.
And it apparently came as a great surprise even to employees.
And of course there are now many rumors in the rumor mill.
And that was after the BGH ruling - to the effect that it is...
One day later.
The day after, exactly. And of course that's very, so everyone can make up their own mind.
Nothing happens without a reason. So why exactly one day after the announcement of the BGH ruling?
That is very interesting and very exciting.
Malicious tongues claim that "the rats are leaving the sinking ship", and people want to
protect themselves from any liability claims.
Yes, I hope the ship sinks.
Clearly, if BioNTech is successfully sued, I mean, a somewhat really naive thought of mine is that because of the fraud that
has now been proven - and that the product was and is and still is fraud - it should be possible for the federal government
to rescind the purchase agreement - fraudulent product and delivery of the wrong product that really harmed people.
If they were to do that, or if they were forced to do that, I don't know how, then...
- that's billions, Mr. Friedrich, billions!
And BioNTech has 17 or 15 billion on the high edge.
You can pay out 2, 3, 4, 5 billion immediately, pay it back.
If you then set up an aid fund, that would be something, wouldn't it?
For the vaccination victims, for the vaccination victims.
Yes, actually, actually.
Now, if we look at the excess mortality rate in recent years - it was a little higher at the beginning of
the year - it could of course also be due to the flu.
Last year it was even slightly below the average trend, and in 2024 it was also...
No, no. All these bills are usually not clean.
And there are so many explanations, I won't get involved.
The statements that are correct are so overwhelmingly clear.
There is an excess mortality now. And it is significant.
It's not small, it's big. Yes, and it's bad. And so is the decline in the birth rate.
Yes, that's right. It really is, it's striking.
Do you think that the fact that people are less fertile also has something to do with the administration of this vaccine?
Of course! Intrauterine death , abortions were also a dime a dozen!
Yes, the next few years will tell.
I am of course looking forward to hearing your opinions, including examples from your circle of friends.
As I said, it is often the case that someone suddenly dies or gets cancer.
And many people may not even be able to make the connection to the coronavirus vaccine.
No, but it's all very clear now. And internationally there are several movements that want
to impose a moratorium on all mRNA vaccines.
And I have to say - and I'm going with this - I'll be online tomorrow in Florida.
I wanted to ask you that. You said in the previous interview that you support the Department of Health in
Florida. What exactly do you do there? Tell me about it.
I'm doing a training course for the doctors there.
Yes, and the topic of the training was: "Are mRNA vaccines safe?"
And of course there is only one answer, and I will explain why.
And the Minister of Health is present. He is there.
From Florida or from the USA?
Florida.
Wow, okay.
This is the great Ladapo, who of course is with the DeSantis.
And you know Florida is on the path like Alabama, like Idaho, like Arkansas. They want to stop the whole thing.
Hm, yes. Yes, maybe you can also get Robert Kennedy to do something with "Make America Healthy Again".
He was also a critic. He was also at demonstrations in Germany.
Exactly. And I think the right people will definitely be found now.
If you see him, say hello. I would like to invite him to the interview.
Yes, Kennedy is unfortunately now in poor health. He needs an operation.
Ui. Yes. Ah, okay.
Yes, that is so.
Yes, good. Nevertheless, I will of course be happy to interview him afterwards, because when someone like the US Secretary of
Health and Human Services says things like that - and he has already changed a lot in the US with the food pyramid
and so on, yes, as well as with the pharmaceutical companies - then it is definitely for the good of humanity.
Yes, all right.
Mr. Bhakdi, good luck in Florida. We'll see and hear from you again.
And if you have any further news, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Good luck, all the best! Stay healthy! Thank you very much!
Thank you all! Goodbye, everyone! Yes.
Witnessed vaccine damage? Record it on Vetopedia - the free encyclopedia of dissenting voices: www.vetopedia.org