Justified by a supposed pandemic emergency, countless red lights were run and, based on the current data situation,
it can be said that this emergency never actually existed.
Mr. K. is a patient of mine. As a responsible nursing professional and amateur sportsman,
he had himself vaccinated out of solidarity.
Mr. K. developed chronic fatigue syndrome after the booster, as a result of which he lost everything -
his job, his sport, his home and not least his dignity.
The modRNA technology differs fundamentally from conventional vaccination principles and has
practically not been researched in this field of application.
The vaccination campaign was therefore a global field trial.
All associated constraints were unlawful.
On the other hand, a high concentration of spike proteins was found in the blood of vaccine-injured
patients, sometimes years after the last vaccination.
These chronic inflammatory and coagulation processes urgently need to be researched.
Until then, the modRNA vaccines must be withdrawn from the market.
On February 23, 2026, a press conference of the "Aktionsbündnis freie Schweiz", or "ABF Schweiz" for short, took place in Bern.
Together with the Swiss health politician Rémy Wyssmann (SVP) and other prominent scientists, doctors and lawyers, they
called for a moratorium for the so-called modRNA vaccines.
A modRNA vaccine does not consist of natural mRNA, which is normally read in the cell, but of modified RNA.
This means that a building block of the modRNA is artificially modified.
This artificial mRNA is read in the cell and the cell uses it to produce a protein consisting of a series of amino acids.
The modRNA vaccinations were propagated during the coronavirus pandemic as a "game changer
with no alternative" and are still used today.
Due to the lack of scientific standards in the approval process, this is negligent and dangerous.
In his welcome address at the press conference, Dr. Philipp Gut made it clear that, from the perspective of
"ABF Switzerland", modRNA vaccines are a gene therapy and not a conventional vaccine.
However, because it has become so established in common parlance, "ABF Switzerland" also
refers to "vaccines" in connection with modRNA.
Dr. Daniel Beutler, a family doctor attending the press conference, explained why modRNA technology differs
fundamentally from conventional vaccination principles.
Listen to some excerpts from his speech:
"Ladies and gentlemen, members of the media.
I am speaking here as a general practitioner in the capacity of an ordinary doctor trained in conventional medicine who
has been actively involved in primary care for several years as a rural, school and vaccination doctor and still is.
I emphasize that my contribution is not about views or opinions on medical procedures, but about facts and the clear demand for
a scientific discourse that really deserves this designation.
The principles of evidence-based medicine and "good medical practice" in the manufacture of medical products and the
important principle of "Primum nil nocere" - i.e. first and foremost, do no harm - were grossly
disregarded and violated in the Covid vaccination campaign.
Justified by a supposed pandemic emergency, countless red lights were run and, based on the current data situation, it
can be said that this emergency never actually existed, at least not to the extent of the official narrative.
But it was a pandemic of media-fueled fear and positive PCR tests, even though these tests did not and do not allow any
statement to be made about the presence of a Covid infection.
Mr. K. is a patient of mine. As a responsible nursing professional and amateur sportsman,
he had himself vaccinated out of solidarity.
I emphasize, out of solidarity.
He was told that the vaccination was effective and safe.
When he had the booster, i.e. the third modRNA injection, administered, it had long been known that it
did not protect against infection or transmission.
Nevertheless, it was strongly recommended to him by his family doctor.
As you have already noticed, we use the term "modRNA" here, i.e. modified mRNA, as this is not normal messenger RNA.
One component, namely the nucleoside uridine, was replaced by pseudo-uridine in order to camouflage the mRNA
from the immune system and thus prevent rapid degradation.
- De facto a medical experimentation game with fire.
However, the safety concerns due to severe side effects and even a conspicuous increase in unclear deaths, including among
vaccinated amateurs and professional athletes, were ignored and, with a few exceptions, have not yet been reported
in specialist journals and certainly not in the mass media.
An analysis of data from the Robert Koch Institute shows an up to 30-fold increase in the
death rate compared to conventional vaccines.
Our patient, Mr. K., developed chronic fatigue syndrome after the booster, as a result of which he lost everything -
his job, his sport, his home and not least his dignity. (...)
A doctor colleague then financed a measurement of the so-called spike proteins in his blood - a relatively
expensive determination - in a specialist German laboratory.
The overwhelming result was a twelve-fold increase in spike proteins in the blood.
And since no virus core proteins were present, there was definitive proof of vaccine damage.
In a conventional vaccination, a precisely defined amount of antigen is injected, which generates an equally
defined immune response through the formation of antibodies.
In the modRNA vaccination, a copy template is injected instead of the antigen and body cells
are induced to produce the foreign protein. (...)
It was recognized early on that the vaccine does not remain in the upper arm - where it is injected - but can be
detected in almost all organs a few hours after application.
The chemical modification of the mRNA to modRNA contributes to this.
It also favors reading errors, due to which the body produces tens of thousands, if not
millions, of different spike proteins. (...)
"The manufacturing process for the approval study was not the same as for mass production.
The latter apparently led to DNA contamination.
Is such a violation of "Good Medical Practice" compatible with the maintenance of the license, or rather the
emergency license for an emergency that no longer exists?
I repeat the three core statements from a medical point of view.
The modRNA technology differs fundamentally from conventional vaccination principles and has
practically not been researched in this field of application.
According to the Robert Koch Institute in Germany, it was assumed - and you have to let this sink in - that relevant data
on efficacy and safety would only be collected postmarketing .
In Switzerland it was exactly the same, except that the blackening had probably not yet been removed.
We will see.
The vaccination campaign was therefore a global field trial.
All of the associated constraints were unlawful and would remain so in the future.
The modRNA vaccination leads to an uncontrolled and uncontrollable production of a foreign protein in the body.
The question of where, how long and how much of this foreign protein is produced has
not yet been answered by the manufacturers.
On the other hand, a high concentration of spike proteins was found in the blood of vaccine-injured
patients, sometimes years after the last vaccination.
Mr. K. is not the only one.
In my opinion, the fact that the medical profession and even scientific and political bodies do not want to understand or
acknowledge these mechanisms is one of the main reasons why vaccine damage is not recognized and therefore not acknowledged.
The underlying pathophysiological processes , these chronic inflammatory and
coagulation processes urgently need to be researched.
Until then, the modRNA vaccines must be withdrawn from the market.
Swiss lawyer Dr. Philipp Kruse, who also took part in the press conference, explained the need for a
moratorium from a legal and international perspective:
Finally, I would like to mention that we are not alone in the world in calling for a moratorium.
There are numerous scientific groups that have already called for such a moratorium with
extremely precise scientific justification.
I will mention just two: the North Group of May 2025, which includes scientists from eleven different
Nordic European countries and which is calling for an immediate moratorium on this modRNA worldwide.
I also mention the petition by Kevin McKernan, Jessica Rose and other scientists, which was submitted to the FDA at the beginning
of 2025 and which contains extremely detailed scientific reasons why this technology in particular must be recalled immediately
- based, among other things, very strongly on the explanations of the plasmid DNA-based production of these substances.
"ABF Switzerland" is therefore calling for an independent review of all approval decisions for modRNA vaccinations.
The approvals were granted in an accelerated procedure and without reliable long-term data.
Despite the massive impact on physical integrity, there is in fact no effective legal control.
On March 2, 2026, Rémy Wyssmann submitted motion "Moratorium on modRNA-based vaccines" to the National Council.
The Federal Council is instructed to suspend the authorization for all vaccines for which the authorization body "Swissmedic"
does not provide evidence of the usual phase III clinical trials for other medicinal products - in
accordance with the standards that applied until 2020.
This is intended to prevent these experimental products from being released before proper authorization
of the safety of the substances has been obtained.
Without a proper scientific and legal review of the past "epidemic emergency", these must not be tacitly
enshrined in law as part of the revisions to the Therapeutic Products Act and the Epidemics Act.
The question arises as to why it is even necessary for a Swiss National Councillor to help the Federal Council with this motion?
Wouldn't it be the task of the responsible Federal Council and the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) to
clarify these pressing issues on their own initiative anyway?
Because the FOPH writes about itself: "Health is important to us.
As part of the Federal Department of Home Affairs, the Federal Office of Public Health FOPH is
responsible for the health of the population."
On 28.5.2024, National Councillor Andreas Gafner submitted the parliamentary initiative "'Corona fakes and
facts'. Reappraisal now" was submitted to the Federal Council.
Gafner referred to the 1st CH Symposium "Corona - Fakes and Facts" in April 2024, which showed that so-called "good medical
practice" was grossly violated in the manufacturing process of the vaccine batches and that people were being forced to accept
an inferior product - contaminated with DNA fragments, among other things - that had
not undergone an appropriate approval process.
Although the Federal Council was informed of the warning voices of various experts, in its response it
steadfastly maintained that the safety, efficacy and quality of Covid-19 vaccines had been proven.
Kla.TV has already reported in countless programs on why this assessment does not correspond to reality.
Here are three examples as a reminder:
Swiss Federal Office of Public Health knew about corona lies (Transition News uncovers) from 23.1.2025 (kla.tv/31796)
A crime against humanity: New mRNA gene injections for all from 5.4.2025 (kla.tv/37038)
Gene-based "vaccines" - the pharmaceutical crime of the century? from 10.6.2023 (kla.tv/26245)
On the surface, the FOPH and the Federal Council claim to be committed to the health of Swiss citizens.
In reality, however, they are hiding behind the false promises of the pharmaceutical companies
and are even defending them from gullible citizens.
Why are the responsible health authorities and Federal Councillor Elisabeth Baume-Schneider burying their
heads in the sand and disregarding the many warning voices?