Why no WLAN.
The 10-Hertz rhythm from a WLAN hotspot activates the adrenal glands and that's the fatal thing.
At the beginning you get the impression, wow, I have more energy.
This WLAN can't be a problem.
Why do you have more energy?
Because more adrenaline and cortisol is released.
Adrenaline is the power hormone that really gives you strength.
So many schools noticed that the moment they set up WLAN, the aggression threshold went way up.
much more aggression among the children, no more understanding for each other.
And then comes the problem, which is the duration.
You notice this after two, three, maybe five years, when the adrenal gland is constantly activated, then it sucks once.
And then exhaustion is the result.
First 2G, 3G, 4G, now 5G mobile technology.
The majority of the population is now aware that the short-wave radiation from antennas is harmful to health.
But what about self-installed Wi-Fi at home or Wi-Fi at schools, to which our schoolchildren are inevitably exposed?
The parents' council and the Wolfhalden school in the canton of Appenzell, Switzerland,
have addressed this issue and invited Mr. Rollé.
Dominik Rollé worked for several years as a secondary school teacher and later in various creative professions.
Today, he heads one of the most comprehensive consultant training programs in Switzerland.
In this lecture, he shows how WLAN can damage the cell to the core.
This results in exhaustion, weakness and an increased susceptibility to illness.
Listen to this entertaining, practice-oriented presentation. It is well worth it.
Good evening, everyone. A bit scattered, but I think it's good that you've found your way to this exciting topic.
When it comes to electricity, voltage is involved.
And that's what I hope I can get across with the slides I've prepared for you.
So, is WLAN at school unproblematic or questionable?
And I would like to start right away with a survey so that we have a bit of an idea of
who is in the room and how it is divided up.
The first question is, is WLAN safe?
So, if you find yes, I'd appreciate a show of hands. So that we can assign it a bit.
It may be a clear hand signal. I don't see a hand.
Ah, yes, one. Thank you for having the courage to break the ice.
Then the second question. Surely WLAN is OK?
Who would raise their hand there?
These are yes, we have one hand, half a hand there, two and a half, that's good.
Third question: WLAN gives me symptoms.
I'm curious about that. Who has the impression?
Oh, that's the vast majority. I wouldn't have thought that now.
What if we go even further? We have WLAN at home.
Yes, that's also a majority. Just over half.
And the last question is, does WLAN also work at night?
There are fewer of them. So some turn it off, don't use it at night or only turn it on when they use it.
And I think it will probably be clear after the lecture if you can get to the heart of the matter. Okay.
I would like to briefly recount my first encounter with WLAN. I think it was in 2002.
I was invited to an electrosmog congress just to see what topics were being discussed there.
And like you now, I was sitting in the auditorium and I felt worse and worse. I've never experienced that before.
And I had just recently bought an electrosmog meter for high frequency and happened to have it in my bag.
I then took the device out. It wasn't that, this is a successor.
And then I was amazed that there was a device above me near my seat that clocked in a 10-Hertz rhythm.
So it let off a staccato like a machine gun.
And then I thought, okay. Now I know what WLAN is. I've read about it, but I haven't felt it yet.
And at this electrosmog congress I felt it.
And here comes the amazing observation. I then walked home.
And what I noticed was that every time I closed my eyes, I had a strobe flash like in a disco, in the same staccato.
Dadadadadada, the light has gone on and off.
My brain took over the rhythm and continued to replicate it for more than half an hour -
even though I was in nature, already outside.
That was the first amazing encounter for me.
This means that a rhythm from a device has entered my brainwaves.
I had about half an hour before I no longer had these light effects.
I didn't know whether it would still have been possible to measure it, the brainwave, because I didn't take such a measurement.
So, let's take a look at what WLAN actually is. I don't know if everyone is on the same page about this.
When it comes to computers, laptops, tablets and smartphones that need to be connected to the
Internet, in many cases this is done using a WLAN.
This is a wireless technology, so we don't have to plug in a cable.
The technical progress is, you don't need to plug it in. That's what we have here.
However, there are now more and more devices that have WLAN built in.
And since I have been measuring electrosmog for over 30 years, helping people to make their environment more
harmonious and electrobiologically tolerable, I have already found things that you would not think.
So, a woman who could no longer sleep and then claimed that the neighbor had a WLAN, it must be from him.
She is electrosensitive and I simply went through her apartment with the device. After all, that's part of my job.
Then I actually saw, behind the wall of her bed, it was quite strong just in this staccato with the meter.
So I went out of the bedroom and asked, what kind of room is this?
Yes, that's just the storeroom.
I said there must be a signal in here and there was a small cordless vacuum cleaner.
Don't ask me why a cordless vacuum cleaner has to be connected to the Internet.
They didn't know that. So they hung it up near their bed - just on the other side of the wall - to charge it.
And of course the woman felt that first and foremost, the man said less that it bothered him.
Unfortunately, it's often the case that not everyone is affected in the same way. But the woman could no longer sleep.
Also had the impression that it was the neighbor downstairs causing the problem. It was her cordless vacuum cleaner.
Who would think that a small cordless vacuum cleaner, which you can also use for the table, has a WLAN built in?
When you buy a refrigerator or a kitchen appliance, it usually comes with WLAN.
So much so that there are refrigerators that have sensors in them.
If there is not enough milk, it can be reordered directly. So it's supposed to make our lives easier, that's how it's sold.
Printers are installed in many houses, even if they are plugged in, have a WLAN installed, and it is always on.
And if the office is somewhere adjacent to the bedroom, then we have an effect that can disturb sleep.
Sound systems that are not taken off overnight and then hammer in a Bluetooth mode, which is comparable to
WLAN mode, they then also hammer all over the apartment.
And in an average apartment that I analyze somewhere today, we have between three and eight, sometimes up to twelve devices.
One by one, I have to disconnect the power or disconnect the battery until I really have peace and quiet on my meter.
And experience shows that people then call me and say, hey, that's so brilliant, thank you for showing us that.
I already have neighbors of people I've advised - one of them called me and said it was brilliant, luckily I came over and said
that the WLAN was disturbing his neighbors' quality of sleep.
Since he always turns it off, he no longer needs sleeping pills. Okay.
So you can of course remove the disorder with medicine.
Let's see how it pulsates. Let me try to visualize this staccato.
Now you can hear it relatively well. So this is a WLAN that is up on the ceiling.
If I now move a little, I now have the transmission of the images here, which in this case is wireless.
That is the data exchange. You can almost only hear it like snow.
But this tatatatata is almost more extreme than the data exchange that is taking place.
And we will find out why this is the case.
So we have 10 swings per second and we can see that this is clearly stronger than the data exchange.
And these blows are the ones that cause a problem.
They run at around 10 hertz. And we'll see what that does.
Let's take a practical example. A teacher calls me.
You do electrosmog measurements. Yes, okay. I have a problem.
Two months ago they put a WLAN in my classroom and I haven't been able to go to school quietly since then.
And then I thought, okay, I'll come by so we can measure it.
And then she told me what came out of it.
I've heard a lot about electrosmog, but I was really amazed by this teacher.
She told me she has concentration problems.
She has been teaching for 20 years, has never had any difficulties and since this thing has been hanging in her room, she can
no longer concentrate properly and has a headache every evening.
So when the body gives a signal, we should listen to it.
This is important so that we don't end up with even more serious problems.
She has constant tension. She needs massage baths or something else so that her body can relax again.
And then the most amazing thing she told me was that she had put on 15 kilos in those two months.
You have to know in the background that fatty tissue is like an insulator for the much more
sensitive organs, so the body reacts intelligently.
It is understandable that he suddenly accumulates as much fat as he needs to protect himself in such an extreme situation.
When she then told me what happened with the pupils, and as I said, she has 20 years of experience, she said that
she had never experienced such learning blocks in any class.
And she hardly ever has a day when all the pupils are there.
So there's an increased sickness rate, there's a lot more aggression, as soon as the break bell
rings, there's arguing, shouting and she somehow feels she can no longer keep up the energy.
And then there was even more aggression and spontaneous vomiting.
The school authorities then said that there must be a virus in circulation. But in an extreme case, such a signal can disrupt
the nervous system to such an extent that a child then vomits.
And it has happened repeatedly that a child has then simply surrendered via the exercise books.
And yes, of course there was a lot of work involved in cleaning up again.
I was then quite perplexed. First, luckily I have aluminum foil in my measuring case, then I wrapped
the antennas and saw that the value was much better.
The next day I received an angry phone call from the head of this school.
I then turned the tables during the phone call and said that it was so irresponsible what he was
putting this teacher, this school class through.
At the very least, this thing would have to go out of the room into the corridor, as far away from the
classrooms as possible, to at least cushion the biggest thing.
And the absurd thing was, maybe you can see it here, there's one element and then there's the second.
One of them has an antenna, which I then wrapped in aluminum.
She has two WLANs, one for the kindergarten.
I then asked him, so tell me honestly, which kindergarteners have to check their e-mails when they arrive at kindergarten?
Or are they really already going online?
Why do you do something like this for an age group that really isn't appropriate?
So there was a bit of an argument, but the teacher called me a few weeks later, thanking me that the principal
had reacted and taken the stuff out as far away from her as possible so that she could recover.
Well, that's just a practical example.
Let's see what this quote says here.
"Irradiation of human blood cells with electromagnetic fields has been shown to damage the genetic material.
There is evidence of an increased risk of cancer." It's not just about headaches, it's about cancer.
And where do you think this quote is from?
In a Swisscom patent application for WLAN.
So it is well known and yet it is still put up. That is irresponsibility beyond compare.
And you will hear other things along these lines tonight.
Another quote that made me very memorable.
"It was demanded that we formulate the NIR Ordinance, i.e. the Radiation Ordinance, in such a way that
the telecommunications company could develop freely.
The more electrosmog, the more confused people are and the more they use their cell phones, which is
healthy, at least for the telecommunications industry."
So there's a big dose of sarcasm in there. And who was it?
It was former Federal Councillor Moritz Leuenberger at a meeting of delegates of the Schaffhausen
S-Bahn in 2004. Nothing has happened since then.
And as you know, he then handed over his department to Doris Leuthard and she got on so well with Swisscom that
every effort that Moritz Leuenberger made was then nullified.
So there are different views. That is important to understand.
Let's think outside the box. Nuclear explosion.
What we see is that grandstands have been erected so that people can watch this event.
And of course we knew that there was a certain risk to the eyes.
So special glasses are needed to shield the gamma radiation or X-rays.
We knew that a certain distance was needed so that the pressure wave and the heat wave would
not be critical. That could all be calculated.
But what you haven't thought about is this gamma radiation.
And gamma radiation is exactly what causes a body or a cell to have a problem, that there can be cell strand breaks and
that there is a degeneration that can develop into cancer.
And I bring up this example because we know just as little about electrosmog, about these pulse frequencies and about
the frequencies that are used for this wireless technology.
We always have a technology mania somewhere and think, wow, that's great.
Yes, who wouldn't want to be there somewhere during such an explosion? That's what you thought at the beginning.
The question somewhere is how this will develop.
And I bring up this example because I would like to refer to a study, the REFLEX study.
This is the electron scanning microscope image of our DNA, i.e. our genetic material. It should almost look like a star.
If it is now irradiated with gamma rays, and that is an irradiation that would be 1,600 X-ray images - i.e. no one
is normally X-rayed that much - then the cell strand breaks cause the DNA to break apart and then it looks like this.
We knew that. That's why it's called ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is dangerous.
Then came the shock for science that a 24-hour exposure with a normal cell phone with 1,600 MHz and a SAR value not
even at the maximum, namely 2 watts per kilogram, but at 1.3 watts per kilogram gave this picture - similar to this.
And they say that this is non-ionizing radiation and yet it has damaged the genetic material.
And then there is the question of how long it will take before a tumor forms somewhere.
It was the REFLEX study that showed this.
It showed a genotoxic effect of UMTS, then called UMTS, now SS3-G, at low field strengths.
The study has been confirmed several times. This is science.
If studies can be confirmed multiple times, then you have to look there.
We are obliged by scientific ethics to take a closer look at this.
What has happened? And you don't believe it, but it has.
Professor Lerchl, former chairman of the German Commission on Radiological Protection - I always thought that
the Commission on Radiological Protection was there to protect the population from radiation.
But what has happened here is that it was the other way round, namely that the radiation is
protected, that it is allowed to continue to radiate.
He launched a character assassination campaign against the researchers, claiming that
the study was falsified - the lowest drawer.
He then claimed that the assistant was in love with the professor who had carried out the reflex study.
And he then let it roll through the press.
In other words, something that has nothing whatsoever to do with scientifically sound work; he simply hit below the belt.
And it took years before it was leaked to the media that Professor Lerchl had been charged. Slander of the highest order.
But then people believed it. They said, yes, an assistant in love falsified the study results.
And that was not the case. It was proven. But it took years, through all the court instances. That's how it works.
And if we look one step further, we know what can actually happen in the cell itself and why these cell strand breaks occur.
This is from the research of Prof. Dr. Martin Pall.
So, we have the cell membrane here. The bottom is inside, the top is outside.
Calcium with a double plus charge should hardly ever come in.
Sodium and magnesium, for example, should come in because they are important building blocks
of the cell. But calcium should stay outside.
When calcium comes in, that's when the problems start. And that is what Martin Pall has pointed out.
Superoxide and nitric oxide are then produced. And these then combine to form peroxinitrite. This is the most violent radical.
This is so strong that it simply knocks electrons out of the cells somewhere. And then part of the cell disintegrates.
And this can then be in the cell membrane. It can be in the mitochondria. It can determine the proteins.
This can also be in the stem cells or in the DNA.
So this is the reason why even non-ionizing radiation can cause damage to our genetic material.
This means that the higher the frequency, the shorter the cycle - I'll come to that later - the more oxidative
stress we have, this very dangerous nitrosative stress, which really reduces the body.
Why are the statistics already at 50% with cancer as the cause of death?
I mean, that's common among people who work with cell phones.
That's not the case with natives somewhere who might still be able to use an Internet station at the post office or something.
Why with us? I mean, it's just a question of whether you want to look or not. And I don't think we can look away for much longer.
A major field trial is underway. We actually have federal agencies or commissions that would protect against this.
I will now take the example from Germany, the Federal Office for Radiation Protection.
It is committed to keeping radiation levels as low as possible.
And then one of the heads of this BfS comes along and tells a journalist: "You have to research the
risks of 5G, but only after it has been rolled out."
This is field testing, this is guinea pig.
We will monitor and observe the effects of the new type of antenna on the exposure of the population in research projects.
You are the research project that is being monitored and observed - the Radiation Protection Commission!
Unfortunately, it's not much different in Switzerland.
If we now look at the legal situation in this regard, there are certain articles in the Federal
Constitution that say, for example, that everyone has the right to physical and mental integrity.
Unfortunately, this is no longer the case with this technology.
Children and young people are entitled to special protection of their integrity.
So why the idea of setting up WLAN in schools and kindergartens when young people should enjoy
special protection? There's something wrong with that.
And we have no idea what that means. The Federal Constitution should actually be above all else.
Let's look further into the research. This is from Karl Hecht.
We see a nerve cell. This is the cell that then connects to another cell via the tail.
And for a signal to be transmitted, it needs an insulating layer.
This insulating layer are these Schwann cells and they are made of myelin.
Myelin is built up with vitamin B12.
This is one of the reasons why vegans and vegetarians have an even more difficult time
with electrosmog than carnivores, you could say.
So if we have enough B12, we can make a good isolation and we are less affected.
What Karl Hecht has now discovered, however, is that the myelin sheaths are slowly destroyed by the EMF radio wave radiation,
these electromagnetic fields - then the nerves are exposed.
So let's be clear, quote from Professor Karl Hecht: "Radiation from radar, mobile communications - there's 5G and
2G and everything in between, including WLAN - can slowly break down the insulation of the nerves.
Then your nerves are literally on edge."
And there he is, Karl Hecht. And it's important to know how much good research is being held back in this field.
I mean, I told you about the law.
We actually have enough evidence that this needs to be reduced.
That is the difficult part. So what is being done? They try to cover it up.
I then look at how this comes about, for example.
Professor Karl Hecht examined various studies on behalf of a telecommunications authority and was able to prove
the most serious health damage caused by mobile telephony.
What happened? His work disappeared without trace in the cellar of the authorities, he was not allowed to hand it over.
He found out, but he wasn't allowed to give it out.
Or in America, George Carlo found a clear increase in the tumor rate with the use of cell
phones in the largest American mobile phone study.
The sponsors forbade publication. Dr. Carlo did not comply. He lost his job.
His house was set on fire - it was proven to be arson - and his reputation discredited.
So then you are fighting against a person on a level that is actually completely unjust.
This is what happens to people who act conscientiously and with an ethical, correct
attitude. And I have many more examples like that.
A quote from Prof. Dr. W. Ross Adey. "We know very well that pulsed signals have a stronger effect on
humans than unpulsed signals. Pulsed microwaves interfere deeply with biological processes."
So that's this pulse signal. And here's what Dr. Carlo actually found out.
He carried out experiments with animals, of course, and also with cell clusters and looked at what
this radiation does to the animals and the cells.
He let this pulsed radiation onto the objects and then saw, yes, this happens relatively
quickly, degenerations that go into cancer.
Then he came up with the idea of filling the gaps with an atmospheric noise that he simply took from the earth.
Communication was not interrupted as a result. The system still worked perfectly.
But what happened was that his mice survived, that the cells in his petri dishes no longer formed tumors.
He has found the solution to what we could do. You really have to keep that in mind.
And that's why he was discredited. That's why his laboratory was set on fire, his house was set on fire.
You might ask yourself why, what is behind it?
And maybe I can help a little, give you a leg up.
In genetic engineering, low-intensity pulsed microwaves are used to introduce genes and modify specific cells.
What you see here on the right is a normal fern.
And the gene of a glow worm was implanted in this fern. That's why it became a glowing fern.
That is scientifically exciting. It's like reassembling Lego. It remains to be seen how much sense it makes.
But the amazing thing is that with these impulse sequences, our organism is more open to change.
And at a time when we have RNA vaccines circulating, this pulsing is really not the order of
the day. It's really something we should avoid.
And we can only avoid it in our own environment.
We can only avoid it in schools and kindergartens. So that difficulties don't arise there too.
Because foreign genes are then introduced more quickly. It is the technique used in the laboratory.
And that just reminds me of the Nuremberg Code. Experiments on humans are forbidden.
Since pulsed microwaves have not been researched for long-term safety, this principle is violated.
Voluntary consent is absolutely essential for experiments on humans.
The Nuremberg Code was issued after the Second World War to prevent further human experimentation by the Nazis.
But that is exactly what is actually being done globally now, unfortunately.
And we simply have to learn to understand this system and then learn to protect ourselves
properly. We won't get through the years any other way.
And I would like to tell you something here that is technically important to understand. This is the slope of a signal.
We have a less steep slope. So it is almost similar to a natural sine wave that propagates like this.
So the less steep the angle, the more biologically compatible the signal is.
The electronics are slow and need more power. We noticed that. They said, okay, we'll shorten the sequence duration.
So if I can then only give a short, very short pulse, I need much less power.
This is then - but then a steep slope develops and this is precisely what is biologically much more
harmful. And that is what can very quickly disrupt our DNA.
WLAN and Bluetooth are in this order of magnitude. It makes a difference whether you have a WLAN
running at 2.45 GHz or at 5 GHz. At 5 GHz it goes higher.
And Bluetooth signals sometimes have an extreme edge steepness. And the greater the edge steepness, i.e.
the sharper this output, the more difficult it becomes.
And now comes the associated problem. When we measure this, the peak value is what is important.
However, we can also determine the mean value.
And with the first signal, they are still relatively close together and with the second, the
problem is that very fast measuring devices are needed.
There is not yet a measuring device that is fast enough for 5G. You have to look at 5G, you can only look at it mathematically.
And I'll show you that briefly somehow.
France has forced 5G to measure how strong the exposure is.
And no measuring device can detect these short pulses.
They said, okay, then the pulse will be frozen so that it lasts long enough to be measured. And that was 24,000 watts.
But then only 300 watts were mentioned in the planning application. Why? Because the average value is very low.
So that's where we enter the realm of deceptive packaging. You can actually use this technology to sell quite
a lot of cheating products these days, you could say.
And I'll illustrate this with a very simple example.
Everyone has hammered a nail into a wall at some point.
And we're doing the beating there now. That's the hammer coming down.
We have pressure and time as the two components that come into play.
And if we now measure a blow here on the nail, then we are at around 800 kilograms in a fraction of a second.
So you could say that the peak value is 800 kilograms.
But if we now take the average value and average down the pauses between the individual strokes, which are
also present here, then we are at a maximum of 2 kilos.
So, if you now bridge the gap and look at the measurement technology - I've told you, we can only measure
5G, for example, and fast Wi-Fi with the top devices to see how strongly they affect the body.
And my question is, what hurts the thumb when slipping, the peak value or the mean value?
So if you press on the thumb with 2 kilos, the thumb doesn't care. But with 800 kilos it becomes very blue.
And by extension to electrosmog exposure, it is clear that the peak value is the problem there too and not the average value.
Let's just take a look at the Federal Palace and what has happened there in recent years.
December 2016, the Council of States says "No to the limit increase".
And this increase in limit values was important for the mobile communications industry because, if they did
their calculations correctly, they realized that 5G would no longer work with the current limit values.
Even if you can cheat a bit with the mean value.
In 2018, the Council of States repeated: "No, limit increase". So they tried again and again, couldn't we raise it a little?
In April 2020, the Federal Council itself says that it does not want to relax the limit values.
In July 2020, 85% of the population do not want a relaxation of limits.
In February 2021, the FOEN will then come and make an implementation recommendation to make 5G possible at all.
And this will then be legalized by the Federal Council in December 2021.
And enables ten times more powerful transmitters because of this tricky averaging calculation.
So with 5G, this means that two and a half to ten times more radiation is possible.
Okay, now I'm coming back to the thumb.
If you press the 2 kilos on your thumb, at 20 kilos it gets a bit stronger.
So that's what effectively happens. And then they are also allowed to take the 6-minute average.
So you can measure for 6 minutes and then everything is averaged.
I'll come back to this acid test.
This would mean that the nail is pushed in with 2 kilos. Which is definitely not possible.
The Federal Council then comments: "The limit values of the NIR Ordinance will not be relaxed with this amendment.
Precautionary health protection is therefore maintained." Which is not true.
This is technically, biologically speaking, a big lie.
The quote from Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker fits in with this:
"The physical worldview is not wrong in what it claims, but in what it prescribes."
He said of his scientific colleagues that they all know that you are researching something and
that what must not come out is simply excluded.
And that is unfortunately common practice in science today.
That prompted a German high school student, I think near Munich, to say: "Okay, we'll do our own research.
If science can be corrupted like this, then we'll do it ourselves."
Rented a dark-field microscope system and took follow-up tests, simply blood from the ear. Always in the same place.
Science means you always have to be able to replicate it, so you have to establish a clear rule.
And they asked the question, what does a cell phone call do?
Here we see the dark field image. Here we see the red blood platelets, which are actually very clear before cell phone use.
And after a brief cell phone conversation, the blood of these young people has changed.
Just two minutes on the cell phone and the blood was already different.
And what was amazing was not only the blood of the person who had the cell phone to his ear, but by chance they also tested
someone who was two meters away and his blood was also sticky.
So it wasn't even just the distance, but simply the signal that caused the blood to make this money roll.
And when that happens, we have a poorer supply to the whole body and there are more and more serious problems.
This means that we really can't go to the thermal limit.
We see here the explanation of the usual limit values as they are represented.
After 15 minutes on the phone, the body must not be heated significantly more than 2 degrees, as far as I know.
This is a thermophotograph with which you can clearly see this.
So you only look at the limit values to see if the whole thing is heating up too much.
And if we now come back to this study, i.e. Jugend forscht, you have again on the left-hand side, the cell phone
call has not yet taken place, so the blood is still nice.
And after three minutes on the phone you have this roll of money.
And not only for the person who has their cell phone to their ear, but also for others around them.
It doesn't need such a strong signal that the body is disturbed. That is sobering.
This is why the WHO classified cell phone radiation as possibly carcinogenic in 2011.
This is the same level of danger as pesticides, DDT, chloroform and heavy metals.
So if you put WLANs in classrooms or schools, you could also have them work with DDT or pesticides in biology lessons.
That is comparable. And it's not me saying that, it's the WHO. Because it's the same risk level.
What do the limit values protect? That is the question. The next question.
I have tried to illustrate this with a very simple drawing.
It is only ever a short-term burden.
So the cells after the thermal effects may heat up by about one or two degrees.
That doesn't give you a bad fever. So you can put up with it.
But the effects of long-term exposure are not integrated into this.
This is called the non-thermal effects. And it is precisely these that cause discomfort.
It is precisely these that then disturb the biological balance. That is the problem.
Measuring gives clarity; that's one part that's important. That's really exciting.
So, when I walk through the house with my simple measuring devices, especially looking at the bed spaces, and
there's a router in the next room, a WLAN router, it easily reaches 1000 microwatts per square meter through the wall.
This is the power flux density that is on this side.
If we look at the building biologists now, they say it has been under extreme stress for a long time.
Together with the environmental physicians, they investigated what is still acceptable for the body and what is too much.
And have seen that over 100 microwatts per square meter is already too much.
So if the neighbor has his office on the other side of the children's room, then it looks like this.
The law allows 60,000 microwatts per square meter.
If I now use this device I am now well over 1,000.
This is still a relatively gentle one, if I were to climb up there, I would have greater exposure.
So, in this room we are very quickly over 100 microwatts per square meter.
And this is of course a list that is important for the bed space, i.e. for permanent residence.
I have no fears for you now, nor do I have any fears for myself with this device.
I may have a bit of a headache, but that will go away.
If I don't expose my body to this all the time, then there shouldn't be a problem.
And now we ask, how do these limits come about?
And then there are, for example, emission limits, i.e. workplaces, which then have 9
million on them. So, they are allowed to do that.
And the limit values are set by the so-called "ICNIRP" (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection).
The WHO in turn passes these on to the various state authorities, which adopt them without checking including the courts.
And the interesting thing is that this is a private association.
We don't just get in there. You are invited there and you are especially invited if you are close to the mobile
communications industry. Like our Swiss Martin Röösli.
And these limit values are then simply adopted.
It's actually comparable to the rally club or the car racing club, which is allowed to set the
highest limit in town. That's the short version of it.
So, the Swiss limit values are also based on ICNIRP.
The population has 5 to 6 volts per meter.
That gives us the 60,000 microwatts per square meter and that gives us the 9 million
microwatts per square meter for the workplaces.
And because they then found that this was not enough for 5G, they then increased the factor to 15 for the population.
This is then simply the milk book calculation. Without really looking at the study situation.
That is what is actually happening with this ICNIRP association.
In 2000, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court already stated that limit values should not be set according to medical criteria,
but according to economic viability and technical feasibility.
So what the mobile phone industry says is more important than whether four children get cancer over time because of a WLAN.
And the Bernese Administrative Court has gone one better.
The population is not entitled to zero risk.
Limit values only serve to keep the damage within acceptable limits.
So, your own headache is a reasonable limit.
How many cases of cancer are then needed that are justifiable or no longer justifiable is not written down here.
It is important to understand that not everyone suffers from this. That is really crucial.
In medical terms, this is known as the buffering capacity. Every body can buffer a problem.
I now do the electrosmog in the form of drops. And if you have a good constitution or a good
buffering capacity, you say it's not a problem.
Now comes my measuring practice, for over 30 years.
I've met a lot of people who have told me that I've never had a problem.
And then from one month to the next, I can no longer hold the thing in my hand, I can no longer stand
the WLAN in the apartment. I don't know what happened.
Medically speaking, its buffering capacity has been exhausted.
And the interesting thing is that symptoms only arise when the buffer capacity is exhausted or the barrel is overflowing.
I accompany people with the rule of the 4 A's. The first one stands for switching off.
A WLAN is constantly transmitting. If you can't switch it off, it really has no place in a home or a school. That's my opinion.
Distance is the second thing. That's what I tried to initiate with this teacher with the
head teacher, that the WLAN then goes far away.
That is one possibility, and it does provide some relief. It is difficult to say whether it will be enough in the long term.
Shielding/absorbing is then a third A. That's where it gets expensive.
So shielding a house can quickly cost somewhere in the region of 50,000 to 100,000 francs.
If you then paint the outside with a protective coating and then apply another color, the whole thing is expertly
grounded. Shielding the windows somehow also costs something.
And the fourth A is anabolic body resistance, so that the buffering capacity is
maintained and does not shrink. That is important.
And to cut a long story short, for you, we've all bumped into a child on the swing.
And what we have noticed is that it takes a lot of strength at the beginning and then the slightest impulse is enough.
And that is exactly what happens with electrosmog.
In the beginning we have a strong exposure, I have heard this from all people who have become electrosensitive,
that they were too close to strong antennas for too long.
Whether it's WLAN, a mobile phone antenna or your own cell phone.
If the signal is too strong for too long, you hammer this foreign signal into your own organism and then the
smallest signal is enough. A weak impulse is then enough.
I used to write a book about electrosmog, I can tell you that it wasn't a big hit, but it was important to me.
At the time, I tried to understand studies, at least in summary form, and summarized them all in one picture.
And that is the fatal thing. It hits everyone in their weak spot.
If everyone had the same headache or the same tumor, it would be long gone.
But because everyone has a different vulnerability, it's not easy to prove scientifically. That's the unfortunate thing.
And you can see that everything from headaches, mental blocks, loss of performance, concentration problems to allergies,
neurodermatitis, muscle tissue, tissue hyperacidity, migratory pain, soft tissue rheumatism or cardiovascular arrhythmia, heart
attacks - I didn't make that up, I simply summarized what the studies have shown is either
triggered or massively aggravated by electrosmog.
Why are we doing this to ourselves? Why are our health insurance premiums rising so massively every year?
So I think it's important to look at this cross-connection.
This was done by a woman, Isabel Wilke, who worked for the electrosmog report and spent 30 years looking at one study after
another and trying to understand it, as a biologist she also has the biological background to do this and has summarized it all.
180 doctors and scientists were so touched by this study that she did. So this is an overview study.
She didn't do any research herself, she just took research apart and evaluated it.
You then realized that yes, you really have to react to it.
And when so many doctors sign up to this, they say, hey, we need to take a closer look.
We can't just close our eyes.
And I am now coming to this point, which is why WLANs should not be set up in schools or at home.
The first is child protection.
So we see here that a five-year-old gets a signal much deeper into the brain than a
ten-year-old or an adult. So we have to protect children.
Point. The thermal penetration depth is massively greater in a child than in an adult.
We cannot draw conclusions about what the child is going through based on our experiences.
I spoke to two children today and asked them how they were feeling. And it was clear to me that they were feeling it.
But if nobody asks them, then they simply try to balance it out within themselves. The question is at what price.
Not thermal cell change. A scientist had rats make phone calls for 20 minutes a day.
No, they didn't do it themselves, not independently.
But they were irradiated well below the permitted limit.
And how did the brain react to this? So, all the dark spots a beginning of a tumor.
Why no WLAN? This is about the adrenal gland, that's from my observation, what I've seen.
And many of you can probably support that.
The 10-Hertz rhythm from a WLAN hotspot activates the adrenal gland.
And that's the fatal thing: at the beginning you have the impression that, wow, I
have more energy. I finally have energy again.
This WLAN can't be a problem. I have more energy. Why do you have more energy?
Because more adrenaline and cortisol is released.
Adrenaline is the power hormone that really gives you strength.
And if you can't let your strength out somewhere in the gym, then the best way to let it out is by fighting.
So many schools have noticed that the moment they set up WLAN, the aggression threshold has gone way up, much more aggression
among the children, no more understanding for each other.
There's no more discussion, it's just something that's fought out with fists.
So it has to do with this adrenaline.
And then comes the problem: it's the duration.
And you don't realize that when you buy the WLAN.
You realize that after two, three, maybe five years.
If the adrenal gland is constantly activated, then it sucks once. And then exhaustion is the result.
So I maintain, and this is based on 30 years of observation, I maintain that everyone ends up in exhaustion with a WLAN.
So for those of you who don't switch off at night, please remember this.
And you don't notice that from one week to the next.
But in the long run you will damage the adrenal glands to such an extent that these burnouts will occur.
I don't know what percentage of burnouts today are due to our cell phone and WLAN technology, but it will be a high percentage.
And then we also have cortisol in the adrenal glands, which promotes the breakdown of the body.
Breakdown of the body means that amino acids are broken down somewhere.
If this is in a blood vessel, yes, then the breakthrough of the blood is obvious.
But you can also use it to degrade the brain. Degradation is not something that should be a goal.
It's not about the fat reserves around the stomach, it's really about important substances that are then
broken down. In the long term, this is the task of cortisol.
In the beginning, cortisol is used in such a way that it breaks down what is inflamed. But when
there is nothing left, it continues to break down.
Why no WLAN? It's all about brainwaves. And that's really something that's important.
The main frequencies in the brain change depending on the activity and phase of the day.
This can be visualized with the electroencephalogram.
We have an important brain wave, which is alpha. We are between 8 and 12 hertz. This is
a waking state, but a relaxed waking state.
In the middle of it all are now the 10-Hertz rhythms from a WLAN device.
Above that is beta. That's when we get into the activity. I'm in the activity now. I'm guaranteed to be in beta now.
And if I carry on like this, I will also enter the gamma state. So that can be measured in the brain.
If you get somewhere in the conviction, then you make the threshold from beta to gamma over the 30 Hertz.
But that's not the only thing. It also needs the theta waves underneath. That is 4 to 7 hertz.
That's where we go when we enter the sleep dream phase. And the ideal situation is when we also come down into the delta.
Delta is then deep sleep. And it is precisely in this delta area that the body's repair processes take place.
If we now constantly have a 10-Hertz rhythm nearby at night, then we prevent the brain from coming down into theta and delta.
We prevent the body from regenerating itself, from experiencing healing within itself.
And this is something from Diagnose Funk that I found the day before yesterday. I was completely fascinated by it.
A patient with a self-diagnosis of headaches during and after working in an open-plan office, i.e.
with WLAN and probably an indoor mobile phone antenna.
We displayed the 10-Hertz rhythm. And you can see in the brainwave patterns that these 10-Hertz rhythms were there.
That's what I said at the beginning. In my case, it was in the eye with this strobe flash, i.e. with these 10 hertz.
The brain absorbs this frequency. And it learns this frequency.
But the brain has neuroplasticity. This means lifelong learning, if we can go through all the brainwave patterns.
And if we now set up a device that forces us into these alpha brainwaves and outshines the others, then a problem must arise.
And what shocked me was that the measurement here is 30 hours after the last exposure.
For me, this is almost impossible, unless she has become electrosensitive.
And then she also picks up the Wi-Fi, just like I did with the swing. If you then only keep your little finger on the
swing, she will notice the WLANs from the surroundings and no longer the strong WLAN in her open-plan office.
Then she can't get out of the rhythm.
And what it looks like when you list the frequencies of their brainwaves, we have 10
hertz in particular. That's what the WLAN did.
But the brain should map the whole range. If we want to stay healthy, we need that.
A WLAN is something that puts every body under pressure in the long term, so that a problem
simply has to arise. That is the logical consequence.
Why no WLAN? It's about the natural frequency.
Whether mobile radio or WLAN, if we have an external frequency, it is a question of time and the strength
and proximity of the antenna that interference occurs.
And then we have a picture like the one of this woman in this open-plan office. And then the difficulties begin.
And I'll just ask officially, is it worth not plugging in your own computer or laptop? Simply because it's more practical?
Once you have landed like this, you have a relatively long time to do until your body regains its balance.
Okay. Health is about keeping your own tone. And keeping your own tone means that we all bring in brainwaves.
So I don't think I need to go into much detail about that.
There are many studies on digital dementia, i.e. cell phone addiction.
I just read a report the other day about a weaning treatment that they wanted to do and they had to stop it because the children
got so desperate because they had to give up their cell phones.
That is addiction in the extreme. And methadone is no longer enough.
They see how I'm doing in terms of time. That works quite well.
Why no WLAN? That's a Pandora's box.
That really amazed me. All the parents who work at Google and Facebook don't allow their children to use the
products they develop themselves. You have to imagine that.
Son comes to mom and says: "I want a cell phone too." "No, Dad made it.
You can't have it. It's too dangerous."
It's interesting. They know why they do it that way.
The kids in Silicon Valley all don't get cell phones and aren't allowed to sit in front of a screen until
they're 18, for many. I saw that in the last article.
Why no WLAN? Let's take a look at the warnings.
This is from Telekom, from the Speedport router in the chapter "Security instructions and data security":
"The integrated antennas of your Speedport, i.e. your WLAN router, send and receive
radio signals, for example to provide your WLAN.
Avoid setting up your Speedport in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms, children's rooms and recreation rooms in order to
keep exposure to electromagnetic fields as low as possible."
So it's actually where you can afford to do that now.
Why no WLAN? Surveillance, control.
This is a contribution from Kla.TV. Unfortunately it is very blurred.
These are people in a room who have been computerized with the signal, with the radiation signal of the WLAN.
WLAN makes it possible not only to scan a room to see what is in it, but also the movements of bodies in the room.
This can be read out and then made visible using a computer program.
It is not an image as we are used to from the television, but it has to be generated using computer technology.
This contribution was from two American universities.
Recently, a German university had 200 people move around a room with the help of AI and they were able to match them
all with almost 100% accuracy. So you have to imagine that.
So we have a reflection, this reflected radiation, which can be analyzed with a computer program.
With AI, it can then be clearly assigned whether they are sleeping together or whether they are somehow
arguing together. It can be read out via the Wi-Fi signal.
I don't think they're already doing that across the board today, but if you become like someone who is perhaps not
necessarily that popular with the state, then it's relatively likely that they'll look at how to control that.
And this will be expanded sooner or later.
The control neurosis has actually been around for a relatively long time.
Why no WLAN? Because there are alternatives.
And one of the best alternatives is the cable network.
That just means we have to wire it in. Is that so bad?
I think that's even good for a child. It is a conscious act.
I am now making a connection with the world by setting this.
So cable network, they're called Ethernet cables, that would be the simplest.
And then there are now also technologies with LiFi. This is a light connection that is
wireless. So there are different versions.
There is via LED, but there is also via infrared.
You then have it in a lamp in the room, for example. And you also have a receiver transmitter next to your device.
And then it is transported via light. This is guaranteed to be biologically less
critical than what we usually do with electrosmog.
Infrared light is definitely the easiest from my point of view. So there are companies where you can already order this.
Yes, others switch off. Why do they switch off? I only do it briefly.
Bavarian state parliament advises schools against WLAN, even in 2007. They want wired networks.
This is to rule out possible health hazards caused by radiation, according to the justification.
So we know that it's dangerous. So we want to eliminate the danger. That's actually logical.
Others are switching off, Paris, that's what happened in 2007.
They equipped all the libraries with WLAN. And then 40% of employees complained of headaches.
And that they no longer wanted to work under these circumstances. The WLANs were then switched off.
And it was then decided to somehow wait until more detailed studies were available. I don't know how they are included today.
Haifa, for example: The mayor of Haifa, Yona Yahav, then said: "If there is any doubt
concerning our children, there is no more doubt."
Hey, remember this sentence. It's actually the key to the whole discussion: Wi-Fi in schools, yes or no?
And what is the city of Bern doing? 2017: 2.5 million credit to equip all 88 schools with WLAN.
I wonder who has the courage to examine these schools to see what has changed since these WLANs were switched on in 2017.
Yes, I'm slowly coming to the end. We are in a world where our brain is between two worlds.
And the question is how we want to develop further.
Natural evolution has actually done everything well so far. And now comes the technical frequencies and AI.
And the question is: Yes, what is being changed in our being, in our biology, with these things?
Digital natives versus digital dementia, that's what we're facing if there are already such dangers of addiction.
A brain that is underchallenged loses capacity and creativity, which is important.
And I believe we should ask ourselves how we should hand over the earth to the next generations.
The Indians had the motto: every decision must be weighed up until the seventh generation.
Does it still make sense in seven generations?
Who of the people who propagate WLAN in this way thinks about it?
Can we survive for seven generations with WLAN in school buildings?
This question is justified! The presentation has given enough facts to make you rethink.
There are solutions that could be implemented in schools without significant difficulties.
This raises another question: Are schools prepared to put the welfare of children above financial interests?
Parents and teachers are called upon to inform local school administrators and school authorities
of the facts and encourage them to take action!