1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,425 2 00:00:00,425 --> 00:00:05,717 We welcome Prof. Stefan Homburg to our live studio today. 3 00:00:05,717 --> 00:00:15,809 He was Director of the Institute of Public Finance at Leibniz Universität Hannover from 1997 to 2021. Welcome once again. 4 00:00:15,809 --> 00:00:23,543 Back in 2020, you were one of the first to point out the irregularities in the coronavirus narrative. 5 00:00:23,543 --> 00:00:28,668 It is now 2026 and various committees of inquiry are under way. 6 00:00:28,668 --> 00:00:35,092 There is a commission of inquiry in Germany and similar formats in other European countries. 7 00:00:35,092 --> 00:00:41,237 You have been involved in many commissions at home and abroad, have been there as an expert and have made contributions. 8 00:00:41,237 --> 00:00:44,045 Some of these meetings were open to the public, others were not. 9 00:00:44,045 --> 00:00:49,766 That was a little irritating, because a matter that affected such broad sections of the population - virtually 10 00:00:49,766 --> 00:00:53,437 everyone in the country - should also be discussed in public. 11 00:00:53,437 --> 00:00:57,213 That's why we've invited you today to find out about the status of the coronavirus recovery, 12 00:00:57,213 --> 00:00:59,284 which you might not see in front of the cameras. 13 00:00:59,284 --> 00:01:04,801 Perhaps you can briefly summarize (what) where we currently stand. 14 00:01:04,801 --> 00:01:08,117 Yes. Where are we at the moment? 15 00:01:08,117 --> 00:01:16,227 Well, you are right, there is a Bundestag commission of inquiry, of which I am a member as an expert. 16 00:01:16,227 --> 00:01:23,327 And this Enquete Commission, some of its meetings are not public and there are public hearings. 17 00:01:23,327 --> 00:01:28,307 All resolutions are made in closed sessions. 18 00:01:28,307 --> 00:01:33,727 And, yes, if you say you don't like it, I'm with you. 19 00:01:33,727 --> 00:01:40,716 But the majority simply do not want the process to be more transparent. 20 00:01:40,716 --> 00:01:48,237 So there are also things going on in the closed session that you don't want to show people. 21 00:01:48,237 --> 00:01:54,383 Or to put it another way, there are five parliamentary groups in the Enquete Commission. 22 00:01:54,383 --> 00:02:01,547 Of the five political groups, four have actively participated in the lockdown policy and are still 23 00:02:01,547 --> 00:02:06,534 defending it today, including the vaccination policy. 24 00:02:06,534 --> 00:02:11,507 And one group has a different opinion. 25 00:02:11,507 --> 00:02:21,791 And yes, as is so common in our democracy today, everything is simply enforced by majority vote, with a firewall, 26 00:02:21,791 --> 00:02:27,539 so that minority rights are basically only rudimentary. 27 00:02:27,539 --> 00:02:35,717 And here's an example: We once requested that we could also show graphics, just as you like to do. 28 00:02:35,717 --> 00:02:40,943 Because when people somehow say, yes, this and that happened, it's all so vague. 29 00:02:40,943 --> 00:02:48,210 If you look at a graph, somehow from the Federal Statistical Office or the RKI, then you can judge that much better. 30 00:02:48,210 --> 00:02:51,667 Four political groups said: "No, you can't show any graphics." 31 00:02:51,667 --> 00:02:54,304 Did you give any reasons for that? 32 00:02:54,304 --> 00:03:02,790 So originally it was said that it was not legally possible because of copyright infringement. 33 00:03:02,790 --> 00:03:09,090 I said: "We are not violating copyright law if we, as the Bundestag, as the highest constitutional body, 34 00:03:09,090 --> 00:03:15,090 show graphics from the federal authority Destatis (Federal Statistical Office) or the RKI." 35 00:03:15,090 --> 00:03:18,343 I think they then had it checked for two months. 36 00:03:18,343 --> 00:03:24,437 And then they said: "Yes, you're right, let's just vote on whether graphics can be shown." 37 00:03:24,437 --> 00:03:29,143 Zack - firewall, four factions, no, must not be shown. 38 00:03:29,143 --> 00:03:31,877 And that is a major obstacle to enlightenment. 39 00:03:31,877 --> 00:03:38,232 Because you can't get it across as well as in a real reappraisal with just arms and legs and a 40 00:03:38,232 --> 00:03:41,743 very short speaking time in five-minute slots. 41 00:03:41,743 --> 00:03:46,517 Yes, that's what your program is all about, where you show a lot of graphics. 42 00:03:46,517 --> 00:03:51,837 They are very instructive , so at this point I can only recommend your entire channel. 43 00:03:51,837 --> 00:03:57,277 They also always quote the sources. This, too, is always criminally omitted in the so-called quality media. 44 00:03:57,277 --> 00:04:01,140 I recently read another review and then things are just put out there. 45 00:04:01,140 --> 00:04:06,862 And in the end they don't give any sources either. So it's always a tactic. 46 00:04:06,862 --> 00:04:13,010 Is that also the case in the Enquete Commission, where you are ultimately driven into a corner, so to speak, by arguments? 47 00:04:13,010 --> 00:04:17,967 No, the Enquete Commission does not argue at all. 48 00:04:17,967 --> 00:04:22,174 So we haven't discussed it for a second. 49 00:04:22,174 --> 00:04:28,639 There is no discussion, but the closed meeting is about procedural issues. 50 00:04:28,639 --> 00:04:34,143 When do we make which appointments? Which experts will be invited? 51 00:04:34,143 --> 00:04:39,463 How long may each group speak? That concludes it. 52 00:04:39,463 --> 00:04:43,543 And then comes the hearing. I don't know if anyone has seen this before. 53 00:04:43,543 --> 00:04:54,103 The hearing works in such a way that the expert invited by parliamentary group XY says something and is then questioned. 54 00:04:54,103 --> 00:05:03,090 And then the next group asks. Always in 5-minute slots with a stopwatch hanging ostentatiously under the ceiling. 55 00:05:03,090 --> 00:05:07,357 And yes, after three hours the session is over. 56 00:05:07,357 --> 00:05:10,027 I recently made an attempt to discuss this. 57 00:05:10,027 --> 00:05:18,743 I have written an e-mail to all members of the Enquete Commission with a substantive point. 58 00:05:18,743 --> 00:05:24,170 And then another professor from a different group also replied to me. 59 00:05:24,170 --> 00:05:29,397 This was the first approach to a substantive discussion. 60 00:05:29,397 --> 00:05:36,014 And then the Chairwoman, Ms. Hoppermann, announced via the Bundestag distribution list that it was 61 00:05:36,014 --> 00:05:40,743 undesirable to discuss via this e-mail distribution list. 62 00:05:40,743 --> 00:05:44,722 In other words, we can't discuss it in the meeting, and we're not supposed to discuss it 63 00:05:44,722 --> 00:05:47,437 by email either - which I ignore, of course. 64 00:05:47,437 --> 00:05:55,788 But no exchange is desired. The matter is too clear for that. 65 00:05:55,788 --> 00:06:01,048 You can only find the truth by discussing things and relating something to yourself, to the other person. 66 00:06:01,048 --> 00:06:04,424 Everyone presents their opinion, which they already had beforehand, and leaves with their opinion. 67 00:06:04,424 --> 00:06:08,183 Yes. It's completely unproductive. 68 00:06:08,183 --> 00:06:14,239 Now there are people who said at the beginning: "Yes, this Enquete Commission, it's no good at all!" 69 00:06:14,239 --> 00:06:20,343 And as far as, let's say, discussions are concerned, that's absolutely right. 70 00:06:20,343 --> 00:06:27,301 Nevertheless, I think that the Enquete Commission, together with the RKI files that were exposed at the time, is 71 00:06:27,301 --> 00:06:31,957 basically the most important element of the clarification. 72 00:06:31,957 --> 00:06:38,039 When former Federal Minister Spahn says in the hearing that vaccination was never 73 00:06:38,039 --> 00:06:42,930 intended to protect others, that was never the aim. 74 00:06:42,930 --> 00:06:48,734 So many people reacted with such shock and then wrote me letters. 75 00:06:48,734 --> 00:06:57,068 "It was never the aim, not even of the WHO, when developing vaccines, to protect third parties from infection. 76 00:06:57,068 --> 00:07:01,410 That is crystal clear. Vaccination makes a difference, you protect yourself and others. 77 00:07:01,410 --> 00:07:07,730 Those who are vaccinated or have recovered will no longer experience contact restrictions and curfews." 78 00:07:07,730 --> 00:07:12,490 In retrospect, Spahn acts as if external protection was never the goal. 79 00:07:12,490 --> 00:07:21,075 But this facility-based compulsory vaccination, the compulsory vaccination for soldiers, this 2G and 3G rule, i.e. 80 00:07:21,075 --> 00:07:29,848 this exclusion of unvaccinated people, was all based on the assertion that vaccination protects others. 81 00:07:29,848 --> 00:07:37,068 And anyone who doesn't get vaccinated doesn't have this external protection, is basically an asocial element, or 82 00:07:37,068 --> 00:07:42,556 as one prime minister put it so well, is out of society. 83 00:07:42,556 --> 00:07:45,680 And that's a very big eye-opener. 84 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:52,248 Or Prof. Scheibenbogen, Carmen Scheibenbogen, who is one of the fiercest advocates of 85 00:07:52,248 --> 00:07:57,063 vaccination, was asked about the spike protein. 86 00:07:57,063 --> 00:08:06,343 The spike protein in corona is the one that settles on the mucous membrane and somehow makes you ill. 87 00:08:06,343 --> 00:08:11,850 And with the vaccination, you have it injected into your body - in other words, the instructions. 88 00:08:11,850 --> 00:08:18,665 And she was asked about this, and then she said: "Yes, the spike protein, that's dangerous. 89 00:08:18,665 --> 00:08:24,863 And unfortunately, this remains in the body longer after the vaccination than we thought." 90 00:08:24,863 --> 00:08:29,663 That's all, of course, it's all on the Bundestag server, yes. 91 00:08:29,663 --> 00:08:36,809 This is all properly documented and, in my view, invaluable. 92 00:08:36,809 --> 00:08:43,929 Last example: Mr. Drosten had said in March 2020 that Corona is a cold, you won't even notice it. 93 00:08:43,929 --> 00:08:50,783 A week later, he said we would see scenes like those from movies - so many people dying. 94 00:08:50,783 --> 00:08:58,985 I then asked him on what data he based this change of opinion in one week. 95 00:08:58,985 --> 00:09:06,276 He couldn't answer it. He then said, "Your questions are too confusing and too complex," although I really don't 96 00:09:06,276 --> 00:09:10,303 speak in a way that is perceived as confusing and complex. 97 00:09:10,303 --> 00:09:18,479 So everyone has seen - basically - Drosten had no substantive arguments at all for his change of opinion, 98 00:09:18,479 --> 00:09:25,903 but has said this way and that about masks, tests, vaccinations and the danger of the virus. 99 00:09:25,903 --> 00:09:31,477 You can find an opinion and a counter-opinion on the Internet for every issue he raises. 100 00:09:31,477 --> 00:09:38,661 Yes. That's the reappraisal in Germany now, but it's good to hear you say that it does bring something, in the long 101 00:09:38,661 --> 00:09:42,727 run, that they then betray themselves through their own words. 102 00:09:42,727 --> 00:09:43,487 Yes. 103 00:09:43,487 --> 00:09:45,191 What is it like in other European countries? 104 00:09:45,191 --> 00:09:50,481 You've also been to Austria, Switzerland and Italy. Is it different there? 105 00:09:50,481 --> 00:09:59,597 You have similar mechanisms everywhere, only sometimes some countries are luckier than others. 106 00:09:59,597 --> 00:10:02,954 So we've just been incredibly lucky in Germany. 107 00:10:02,954 --> 00:10:13,701 We are number one worldwide because an employee of the RKI took heart and gave us 10 gigabytes of 108 00:10:13,701 --> 00:10:21,757 internal material that should never see the light of day. 109 00:10:21,757 --> 00:10:33,903 Then you read that the RKI wanted to sue the Ministry of Health because they didn't think all this scaremongering made sense. 110 00:10:33,903 --> 00:10:42,783 You can see how the RKI is shocked internally about vaccine damage, especially at AstraZeneca. 111 00:10:42,783 --> 00:10:49,637 Eight weeks later, Mr. Spahn issues a press release stating that he has been vaccinated by AstraZeneca. 112 00:10:49,637 --> 00:10:54,077 Of course, nobody believes that. So we're ahead of the game. 113 00:10:54,077 --> 00:10:58,307 And at number two, I would clearly put the USA. 114 00:10:58,307 --> 00:11:08,903 So the USA has also achieved an incredible amount through its technique of Senate hearings, which are also largely public. 115 00:11:08,903 --> 00:11:17,707 At the moment, the issue is that Mr. Fauci and his health administration have partly falsified, but above all 116 00:11:17,707 --> 00:11:26,437 destroyed and suppressed documents and have not answered requests under the Freedom of Information Act. 117 00:11:26,437 --> 00:11:32,103 As a result, we now have the first indictment from a public prosecutor. 118 00:11:32,103 --> 00:11:37,063 So things are progressing slowly and slowly, step by step. 119 00:11:37,063 --> 00:11:43,090 But think back to 1945, when not everything was clear in 1946. 120 00:11:43,090 --> 00:11:51,303 First of all, nothing happened in Germany for 20 years. And then things slowly picked up speed. 121 00:11:51,303 --> 00:11:54,957 And people were still being sentenced 50 or 60 years later. 122 00:11:54,957 --> 00:12:06,870 Yes. And do you assume that the material that is now coming to the public will lead to convictions later? 123 00:12:06,870 --> 00:12:14,133 Well, it's difficult to say in Germany, because we - I think we have a very clear disadvantage as Germany, because unlike 124 00:12:14,133 --> 00:12:19,236 practically in the rest of the civilized world, we have this obligation of the public 125 00:12:19,236 --> 00:12:23,406 prosecutor's office to follow instructions. 126 00:12:23,406 --> 00:12:31,220 It is well known that the European Court of Justice said at some point that German public prosecutors are not allowed to issue 127 00:12:31,220 --> 00:12:39,782 European arrest warrants because they are not independent as in other countries, but are subject to political instructions. 128 00:12:39,782 --> 00:12:45,113 It is quite clear that as long as there is no political change in Germany, the 129 00:12:45,113 --> 00:12:49,992 instruction will be that no one will be charged at all. 130 00:12:49,992 --> 00:12:54,903 In the event of a political change, where of course we don't know whether this will ever 131 00:12:54,903 --> 00:12:58,598 happen, the situation could change fundamentally. 132 00:12:58,598 --> 00:13:05,670 That's what Mr. Blome, the former Spiegel author, said so well. 133 00:13:05,670 --> 00:13:15,620 He said on television - against the background that he said at the time: "I wish unvaccinated people all kinds of disadvantages." 134 00:13:15,620 --> 00:13:24,783 And he said that if there was a change of government, even he could suddenly be persecuted for what he said. 135 00:13:24,783 --> 00:13:34,840 And that is why he would prefer the firewall parties to remain in power, even if they are running our country into the ground. 136 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:39,008 Let's come back to these other criminal machinations that are in the background. 137 00:13:39,008 --> 00:13:45,802 You recently reported in a few programs about what interesting things came out of the 138 00:13:45,802 --> 00:13:50,320 Epstein Files as "by-catch", as you called it. 139 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:58,349 Among other things, it showed that he had worked with Bill Gates back in 2011 to harness the WHO for 140 00:13:58,349 --> 00:14:02,870 their financial juggling, if you want to put it nicely. 141 00:14:02,870 --> 00:14:11,154 Well, not quite, but the funny thing is that from 2011, as you rightly say, they started talking about pandemics 142 00:14:11,154 --> 00:14:20,088 and vaccinations and offshore vaccine financing companies and all sorts of things in purely economic terms. 143 00:14:20,088 --> 00:14:27,636 And then years later you find an e-mail where Epstein says that we now also have to get the WHO on board. 144 00:14:27,636 --> 00:14:35,129 Yes, just like now with our so-called 2020 pandemic, doctors are basically largely left out in the cold. 145 00:14:35,129 --> 00:14:40,814 The whole thing is a business for economists, lawyers, psychologists and sociologists. 146 00:14:40,814 --> 00:14:49,179 And they basically spent years, Gates and Epstein, thinking about how to make money from pandemics. 147 00:14:49,179 --> 00:14:59,136 Then we had a big conference in 2015 with JP Morgan, which was the biggest bank in the world at the time. 148 00:14:59,136 --> 00:15:09,239 For example, the president of the World Bank, the head of JP Morgan and all sorts of people, 149 00:15:09,239 --> 00:15:16,132 except doctors, spoke about pandemic preparedness. 150 00:15:16,132 --> 00:15:24,199 And from the further course of events, there is a strong suspicion that incredible financial incentives 151 00:15:24,199 --> 00:15:29,144 have been created for a pandemic to really break out. 152 00:15:29,144 --> 00:15:36,908 And the nice thing was that because the WHO was practically completely under control financially, they 153 00:15:36,908 --> 00:15:41,313 were able to tell the WHO in 2009 to declare swine flu. 154 00:15:41,313 --> 00:15:49,324 Unfortunately, that was a shot in the arm. And in 2020, the WHO was told to declare a pandemic. 155 00:15:49,324 --> 00:15:59,740 And that really hit the spot, but from a medical point of view it was similar to 2009. 156 00:15:59,740 --> 00:16:09,291 For example, we have a mortality rate in Germany in 2020 that lies between 2018 and 2019. 157 00:16:09,291 --> 00:16:15,962 So in 2018 we had a strong flu epidemic, relatively high mortality. Very low in 2019. 158 00:16:15,962 --> 00:16:22,688 2020 in between - nobody would think that anything bad had happened. 159 00:16:22,688 --> 00:16:28,489 We will only see an increase in the number of deaths in the vaccination years 2021 and 2022. 160 00:16:28,489 --> 00:16:36,440 Of course, many people will immediately think, yes, but only because the schools were closed and we were in lockdown. 161 00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:46,122 But there is also a study from the top journal Lancet, on how mortality has developed in all European 162 00:16:46,122 --> 00:16:52,674 countries during this so-called pandemic from 2020 to 2023. 163 00:16:52,674 --> 00:17:01,684 And the result, as was to be expected, was that Sweden came out on top - because it was the only country to stick to what was 164 00:17:01,684 --> 00:17:07,884 written in textbooks, guidelines and directives, while all the others basically caused 165 00:17:07,884 --> 00:17:12,761 collateral damage by pursuing the wrong policies. 166 00:17:12,761 --> 00:17:14,689 So again, that I understand this correctly. 167 00:17:14,689 --> 00:17:22,071 There are no doctors sitting there who specialize in clinical pictures, courses of disease, biological processes, but 168 00:17:22,071 --> 00:17:29,676 people who are primarily interested in how to market this to the public and others who want to make money from it. 169 00:17:29,676 --> 00:17:33,795 Yes, a good example is the following. 170 00:17:33,795 --> 00:17:42,028 All the textbooks say that when a really dangerous pandemic comes, even a layperson can see that you have to 171 00:17:42,028 --> 00:17:47,540 reassure people so that there is no collateral damage. 172 00:17:47,540 --> 00:17:52,048 So what did the then Federal Minister of the Interior Seehofer do? 173 00:17:52,048 --> 00:18:02,960 In March 2020, he put together a special group with the task of writing a shock paper. This was then also leaked. 174 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:09,886 It says, for example, that it is important to make children aware that if they do not wash their hands, they will 175 00:18:09,886 --> 00:18:14,420 infect their parents, who will then suffocate in agony at home. 176 00:18:14,420 --> 00:18:18,400 At home, because all the clinics are already overcrowded. 177 00:18:18,400 --> 00:18:22,580 That's how people were briefed via the press. 178 00:18:22,580 --> 00:18:27,700 So, and now you ask, who sat, which doctors sat on this commission? 179 00:18:27,700 --> 00:18:35,779 The head of the commission was a German studies doctoral student, then there was a sociologist and, I'm sorry 180 00:18:35,779 --> 00:18:41,312 to say, a few economists. Not a single medical doctor. 181 00:18:41,312 --> 00:18:48,517 At the same time, Stefan Kohn, the official responsible for crises at the Federal Ministry of the Interior, who 182 00:18:48,517 --> 00:18:56,374 had 20 years of experience, wrote a paper saying that lockdowns, school closures and so on were excessive. 183 00:18:56,374 --> 00:19:00,850 As a result, Seehofer immediately suspended and then dismissed him. 184 00:19:00,850 --> 00:19:10,826 He was dismissed as a civil servant for life because he basically said what almost everyone now considers to be true, at least off 185 00:19:10,826 --> 00:19:17,248 the record, namely that the measures were terribly excessive. 186 00:19:17,248 --> 00:19:20,476 Then why do such things have no legal consequences? 187 00:19:20,476 --> 00:19:23,135 So it is an abuse of office, for example by Seehofer. 188 00:19:23,135 --> 00:19:27,055 He is authorized to do so, but it was not justified. 189 00:19:27,055 --> 00:19:30,849 It was also an abuse of power within the WHO. 190 00:19:30,849 --> 00:19:37,016 In other words, just because they have the financial upper hand, they are not allowed to use it to carry out 191 00:19:37,016 --> 00:19:40,296 their transactions, so to speak. It was insider trading. 192 00:19:40,296 --> 00:19:49,871 You also reported that Bill Gates is investing heavily in this completely run-down company BioNTech - 55 million, if I remember 193 00:19:49,871 --> 00:19:57,410 correctly - and then selling it off at a profit in 2021 after the hype is over, and then mocking the 194 00:19:57,410 --> 00:20:02,041 other investors for holding such a piece of junk. 195 00:20:02,041 --> 00:20:08,243 And when things like this come out, or what you just said, this panic paper, is it only because of this 196 00:20:08,243 --> 00:20:13,251 public prosecutor's office, which is bound by instructions, that nothing happens there? 197 00:20:13,251 --> 00:20:17,044 No, there are several. For example, you can't do anything about the WHO. 198 00:20:17,044 --> 00:20:24,226 It is based in Geneva and has immunity for everything it does. 199 00:20:24,226 --> 00:20:27,434 In other words, God knows what they could do. 200 00:20:27,434 --> 00:20:32,004 Even if everything is crystal clear, you can't do anything about them. 201 00:20:32,004 --> 00:20:37,484 This is similar to the exemption from liability for vaccine manufacturers. 202 00:20:37,484 --> 00:20:46,262 This means that there is basically only one option with the WHO, which Trump has used, namely to withdraw from it. 203 00:20:46,262 --> 00:20:55,320 It is true, as you say, that the WHO is basically an instrument of insider trading. 204 00:20:55,320 --> 00:21:03,620 If you know the WHO, you know which diseases will be declared next, which pandemics and so on, and you can 205 00:21:03,620 --> 00:21:09,133 prepare for them by making purchases and buying companies. 206 00:21:09,133 --> 00:21:14,196 But insider trading is still prohibited under international criminal law. 207 00:21:14,196 --> 00:21:19,644 No, but the WHO is immune under Swiss law. 208 00:21:19,644 --> 00:21:25,787 And then you would have to send soldiers to Switzerland somehow, which we don't want. 209 00:21:25,787 --> 00:21:31,203 No, Switzerland has given them immunity. That's nothing unique, by the way. 210 00:21:31,203 --> 00:21:42,790 This European stability mechanism, which serves to bail out bankrupt states, also has such immunity. 211 00:21:42,790 --> 00:21:50,156 And as soon as I see a legal institution being given immunity in a way that no federal ministry or 212 00:21:50,156 --> 00:21:55,286 chancellery has, I become suspicious and think to myself. 213 00:21:55,286 --> 00:22:04,140 Well, rightly so. So, the question for me is also, is this mainly a business model so that the super-rich can 214 00:22:04,140 --> 00:22:09,440 enrich themselves even more? Or is there more to it than that? 215 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:11,451 I don't know. 216 00:22:11,451 --> 00:22:19,859 I am often asked when I have shown someone figures and graphs and they are completely convinced that this lockdown and 217 00:22:19,859 --> 00:22:29,129 vaccination policy was wrong, I end up being asked the question, what motive did they have for doing it? 218 00:22:29,129 --> 00:22:33,875 And then I always have to say, firstly, I don't know. And secondly, what kind of question. 219 00:22:33,875 --> 00:22:38,560 Who asks what motive Mao, Stalin or Pol Pot had? 220 00:22:38,560 --> 00:22:43,338 We don't know. It could be greed, domination, sadism. 221 00:22:43,338 --> 00:22:52,048 But it doesn't matter. As long as the deeds are clear, you can assess them and, in the best case, bring charges. 222 00:22:52,048 --> 00:22:55,860 Yes. So that would be the next question. 223 00:22:55,860 --> 00:22:59,278 So why are these crimes not punished? 224 00:22:59,278 --> 00:23:02,205 Yes, it's difficult. So for several reasons. 225 00:23:02,205 --> 00:23:06,702 One point is that the public prosecutor's office is bound by instructions. 226 00:23:06,702 --> 00:23:14,273 But there is something even more difficult. The main problem is that too many people have taken part. 227 00:23:14,273 --> 00:23:22,268 So, they can always prosecute criminals if there are few criminals and many non-criminals. 228 00:23:22,268 --> 00:23:30,780 The non-criminals are in the vast majority, and that is now somehow the case with assault, theft and so on, of course. 229 00:23:30,780 --> 00:23:35,445 But if you think about it, who has been involved here during the coronavirus pandemic? 230 00:23:35,445 --> 00:23:39,937 It wasn't just the Minister Presidents and the Federal Chancellor. 231 00:23:39,937 --> 00:23:49,528 Basically every university president, every principal, every hospital director has taken part. 232 00:23:49,528 --> 00:23:57,597 Basically, almost every restaurant operator who has basically allowed himself to be used as a block guard and then told guests 233 00:23:57,597 --> 00:24:02,888 that if you are not triple vaccinated, you will not come in here. 234 00:24:02,888 --> 00:24:10,088 In other words, there are so many people who now basically have a guilty conscience and also have 235 00:24:10,088 --> 00:24:14,685 a strong interest in this simply being forgotten. 236 00:24:14,685 --> 00:24:24,105 It's similar to 1945, when there were trials, but they were conducted by the Allies and not by us. 237 00:24:24,105 --> 00:24:32,602 So the Nuremberg trials. And that makes the whole thing difficult, so that only in individual cases, 238 00:24:32,602 --> 00:24:37,696 with really extreme people, is a conviction plausible. 239 00:24:37,696 --> 00:24:43,288 The Fauci, Anthony Fauci, for example, is very interesting. 240 00:24:43,288 --> 00:24:47,893 Now his closest employee has been charged. 241 00:24:47,893 --> 00:24:54,454 For him, the statute of limitations will expire in ten days. 242 00:24:54,454 --> 00:25:01,696 And nobody knows how it works. And for new deeds. 243 00:25:01,696 --> 00:25:11,043 After all, he had been pardoned by both, the Fauci, in a unique and unprecedented way that must 244 00:25:11,043 --> 00:25:16,612 ring alarm bells for anyone with an ounce of sense. 245 00:25:16,612 --> 00:25:27,726 Namely, Biden has pardoned Fauci as the world's number one of this fake pandemic, for all sorts of deeds. 246 00:25:27,726 --> 00:25:31,265 So not specifically for everything he did. 247 00:25:31,265 --> 00:25:33,218 Where he wasn't even convicted yet. 248 00:25:33,218 --> 00:25:37,475 Yes, wasn't even charged yet. There wasn't even a preliminary investigation. 249 00:25:37,475 --> 00:25:45,295 Biden pardoned him, but only until the day Biden left office. 250 00:25:45,295 --> 00:25:53,050 And now it would be possible to charge Fauci with perjury, with new offenses, because he testified falsely. 251 00:25:53,050 --> 00:26:01,903 Or, in the best-case scenario, it is discovered that Biden's pardon only comes from a signature machine and is invalid. 252 00:26:01,903 --> 00:26:05,795 But that's legally controversial and I'm not involved. 253 00:26:05,795 --> 00:26:14,090 Yes. This inclusion of several perpetrators is interesting, because the - here we actually come back to this Epstein network, 254 00:26:14,090 --> 00:26:19,199 which is obviously very typical there, that they turn the former victims into 255 00:26:19,199 --> 00:26:22,940 perpetrators and thus make their network impenetrable. 256 00:26:22,940 --> 00:26:24,806 There are then individuals who can break out. 257 00:26:24,806 --> 00:26:30,117 We've brought that up in many programs about all this ritual abuse. And it's very reminiscent of that. 258 00:26:30,117 --> 00:26:35,412 It's actually interesting that this man is also involved in these things, because that's a certain 259 00:26:35,412 --> 00:26:38,600 way of thinking, how you make yourself unassailable. 260 00:26:38,600 --> 00:26:43,103 Yes, it is a pattern. It's basically the actions of the powerful. 261 00:26:43,103 --> 00:26:51,440 If you ask yourself, why does the US law say Trump has to release all the Epstein files, with only the victims' names 262 00:26:51,440 --> 00:27:00,871 blacked out, and then you see that it's all perpetrators' names, so almost all the perpetrators' names are blacked out. 263 00:27:00,871 --> 00:27:08,195 Then you can see that there is an "esprit de corps" , so they stick together and cover for each other. 264 00:27:08,195 --> 00:27:19,533 So that only individual people in Norway or Prince Andrew in the UK or this Ms. 265 00:27:19,533 --> 00:27:28,128 Sigl-Glöckner from the SPD suddenly appear unblackened. 266 00:27:28,128 --> 00:27:36,785 While most of the worst correspondence is simply unknown. 267 00:27:36,785 --> 00:27:43,670 What would you say, in summary, what can the person on the street do, what can you do, 268 00:27:43,670 --> 00:27:48,113 if it's all so clumsy, legally unassailable? 269 00:27:48,113 --> 00:27:53,162 Only individual offenders, some insignificant people might be arrested or dragged before the press. 270 00:27:53,162 --> 00:27:59,791 They are also in the hands of the powerful. What do you do then? 271 00:27:59,791 --> 00:28:01,900 So you shouldn't be so pessimistic. 272 00:28:01,900 --> 00:28:10,027 So, a lot has happened in the last six years. A lot of people have woken up. 273 00:28:10,027 --> 00:28:23,225 In my view, it is very important to be aware of manipulation by governments and their media. So in particular the ÖRR . 274 00:28:23,225 --> 00:28:30,063 Because these manipulations: By manipulations, I specifically mean that they published 275 00:28:30,063 --> 00:28:36,078 PCR figures in 2020 that never existed before. 276 00:28:36,078 --> 00:28:41,997 Internally, the RKI has written that the hospitals are severely understaffed. 277 00:28:41,997 --> 00:28:50,279 But to the outside world they said these PCR figures are so bad, we have to keep schools and stores closed, otherwise there will 278 00:28:50,279 --> 00:28:56,250 be exponential growth. So people have been totally manipulated. 279 00:28:56,250 --> 00:29:05,925 What is interesting now is the spring of 2022, when this 7-day incidence was 50 times higher than during the lockdown. 280 00:29:05,925 --> 00:29:10,181 But there was no lockdown and the whole thing didn't make the news. Why? 281 00:29:10,181 --> 00:29:15,888 Because the war in Ukraine had just broken out and they had other things to do. 282 00:29:15,888 --> 00:29:19,925 So the whole thing was purely a media fiction. 283 00:29:19,925 --> 00:29:24,261 And my point is that there are many of these media fictions. 284 00:29:24,261 --> 00:29:29,223 And the more people who are mentally prepared for this, the better. 285 00:29:29,223 --> 00:29:36,371 After all, a government can only implement such a course if most people go along with it. 286 00:29:36,371 --> 00:29:45,448 And the issue of manipulation is not peculiar to corona, but we have the same with climate, we also have 287 00:29:45,448 --> 00:29:51,436 the same with war and these are of course major dangers. 288 00:29:51,436 --> 00:30:00,147 If I may say so, climate too, we're here in Lower Saxony, but it's like this all over Germany, I looked at my 289 00:30:00,147 --> 00:30:05,751 display on Monday and saw sunshine forecast for the whole week. 290 00:30:05,751 --> 00:30:10,363 In the past, I would have just been happy about it. 291 00:30:10,363 --> 00:30:18,752 But because I'm a quick thinker, I thought, oh boy, the drought propaganda will be back this week. 292 00:30:18,752 --> 00:30:26,271 And yesterday, weather before eight, Germany predominantly gray-brown. 293 00:30:26,271 --> 00:30:32,317 Here comes the drought again. And no matter how green it is outside. 294 00:30:32,317 --> 00:30:41,593 Last year they took the first quarter and said that the first quarter is always right because it's the driest in living memory. 295 00:30:41,593 --> 00:30:47,349 There was the Tagesschau, Lake Constance running dry and so on. 296 00:30:47,349 --> 00:30:53,661 Not a word this year in the first quarter because it rained a lot. 297 00:30:53,661 --> 00:31:02,076 But now it has rained less in April and last night on April 30 they come with the news of drought again. 298 00:31:02,076 --> 00:31:06,272 Simply to enforce this climate ideology. 299 00:31:06,272 --> 00:31:10,962 Basically, the only thing more dangerous is anything to do with wars. 300 00:31:10,962 --> 00:31:17,834 Wherever it is said that we are under total threat and must now rearm, rearm, rearm. 301 00:31:17,834 --> 00:31:26,496 According to the SIPRI, Germany is now number four in the world in terms of military spending. 302 00:31:26,496 --> 00:31:28,406 Absolute or relative? 303 00:31:28,406 --> 00:31:34,837 Absolutely. So in terms of military spending, we are only topped by the USA, China and Russia. 304 00:31:34,837 --> 00:31:42,740 And this despite the fact that we are surrounded by friendly and militarily very strong states, i.e. Scandinavia, 305 00:31:42,740 --> 00:31:47,629 Poland and so on, France, none of whom want to attack us. 306 00:31:47,629 --> 00:31:54,245 Nevertheless, the narrative that Russia wants to attack us is simply being maintained. 307 00:31:54,245 --> 00:32:01,815 Russia, which has been trying for four years to conquer the Donbass - an area with the economic importance of roughly the 308 00:32:01,815 --> 00:32:08,696 Saarland - and has failed to do so for four years, is then told that yes, they will also overrun the remaining 309 00:32:08,696 --> 00:32:15,777 thousand kilometers of Ukraine and then they will overrun Poland and then they will be on our border. 310 00:32:15,777 --> 00:32:22,561 Yes, that's such a very strange narrative, that on the one hand they say, yes, the Russians are too weak to ... 311 00:32:22,561 --> 00:32:23,461 Always alternating, yes. 312 00:32:23,461 --> 00:32:27,565 Always alternating. And that's how it seems to me, then there's a pandemic, then there's war, then 313 00:32:27,565 --> 00:32:29,985 there's another financial crisis, then there's ... 314 00:32:29,985 --> 00:32:39,071 Absolutely, it's coming off. And it's so hypocritical when our government members somehow say, yes, we're having a 315 00:32:39,071 --> 00:32:48,342 really hard time, nobody has experienced so many crises in a row, but it's basically all of our own doing. 316 00:32:48,342 --> 00:32:54,198 Next, as you indirectly mentioned in your last sentence, comes the financial crisis, this time 317 00:32:54,198 --> 00:32:58,751 not with Greece, but with Germany at the center. 318 00:33:00,328 --> 00:33:02,950 So, you're arguing that you should ... 319 00:33:02,950 --> 00:33:06,377 ... talks a lot, writes a lot, e-mails a lot. 320 00:33:06,377 --> 00:33:14,715 I think the WhatsApp status is a very good tool, even if some people say it's dangerous. 321 00:33:14,715 --> 00:33:20,882 Because your programs, for example, are only watched by people who already have a certain level of open-mindedness. 322 00:33:20,882 --> 00:33:26,453 The others say, no, I don't want to watch it, I only watch Tagesschau and Heute. 323 00:33:26,453 --> 00:33:32,960 If you put a graphic or something like that or an insight in your WhatsApp status, people who 324 00:33:32,960 --> 00:33:37,581 don't actually want to see it will see it too. 325 00:33:37,581 --> 00:33:46,283 So, the electrician who was at your house the other day, your daughter's teacher, all the people you have in your 326 00:33:46,283 --> 00:33:54,439 contact list see something like this, which is why it's basically a very effective method of dissemination. 327 00:33:54,439 --> 00:33:59,627 However, I have to say that some people also say that this would have led to your dismissal. 328 00:33:59,627 --> 00:34:02,262 So you also have to think about who will see it. 329 00:34:02,262 --> 00:34:07,153 Yes. But of course you're also the sort, as we've noticed, you're not intimidated by that. 330 00:34:07,153 --> 00:34:13,949 So thank you very much for the good work you do with your own channel, for always stepping into the breach and 331 00:34:13,949 --> 00:34:20,050 giving people reliable information that can be passed on without having to hang any propaganda on it! 332 00:34:20,050 --> 00:34:23,659 The figures, data and graphics speak for themselves. 333 00:34:23,659 --> 00:34:25,168 And right, yes. 334 00:34:25,168 --> 00:34:28,166 Then thank you very much for that and thank you very much for this interview! 335 00:34:28,166 --> 00:34:30,718 Thank you too! 336 00:34:30,718 --> 00:34:37,699 Give your fellow human beings the chance to form their own opinion by spreading our news.