1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,898


2
00:00:00,898 --> 00:00:08,017
The parents' council and the Wolfhalden school in the canton
of Appenzell, Switzerland, took up the topic of "WLAN in

3
00:00:08,017 --> 00:00:11,500
schools" and invited Mr. Dominik Rollé to give a presentation.

4
00:00:11,500 --> 00:00:17,462
Here in brief are the 12 most important
points why WLAN in schools must be stopped:

5
00:00:17,462 --> 00:00:25,507
1. Swisscom's patent application on WLAN
mentions indications of an increased risk of cancer

6
00:00:25,507 --> 00:00:32,425
"Irradiation of human blood cells with electromagnetic
fields has been shown to damage the genetic material.

7
00:00:32,425 --> 00:00:36,475
There are indications of an increased risk of cancer."

8
00:00:36,475 --> 00:00:43,293
2. the Radiation Ordinance was formulated
in favor of the telecommunications industry

9
00:00:43,293 --> 00:00:50,723
Former Federal Councillor Moritz Leuenberger said at
a delegates' meeting of the SP Schaffhausen (2004):

10
00:00:50,723 --> 00:00:56,097
"It was demanded that we formulate the NIR
Ordinance, i.e. the Radiation Ordinance, in such a way that

11
00:00:56,097 --> 00:01:00,426
the telecommunications company could develop freely."

12
00:01:00,426 --> 00:01:07,124
In 2000, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court already stated that
limits for mobile phone radiation should not be

13
00:01:07,124 --> 00:01:14,195
set according to medical criteria, but according
to economic viability and technical feasibility.

14
00:01:14,195 --> 00:01:23,796
3. the REFLEX study has shown that non-ionizing
radiation (e.g. WLAN) damages the genetic material

15
00:01:23,796 --> 00:01:34,661
The electron scanning microscope image of DNA was examined
after a 24-hour exposure to a normal cell phone at 1,600 MHz.

16
00:01:34,661 --> 00:01:39,013
The radiation value used was far below the permitted maximum.

17
00:01:39,013 --> 00:01:46,281
The image showed cell strand breaks in the DNA
as if after irradiation with 1,600 X-ray images.

18
00:01:46,281 --> 00:01:53,800
4. the thermal penetration depth in a
child is much deeper than in an adult

19
00:01:53,800 --> 00:02:01,081
A signal penetrates much deeper into the brain of a
five-year-old than into the brain of a ten-year-old or an adult.

20
00:02:01,081 --> 00:02:12,073
5. Professor Dr. med. Karl Hecht has discovered that EMF
radio waves slowly degrade the myelin sheaths of the nerves

21
00:02:12,073 --> 00:02:15,643
Quote from Professor Karl Hecht:

22
00:02:15,643 --> 00:02:22,000
"Radiation from radar, mobile communications -
including 5G and 2G and everything in between, including Wi-Fi

23
00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:25,471
- can slowly break down the insulation of the nerves.

24
00:02:25,471 --> 00:02:28,666
Then your nerves are literally on edge."

25
00:02:28,666 --> 00:02:35,041
6. pulsed waves interfere deeply with biological processes

26
00:02:35,041 --> 00:02:39,572
A quote from Prof. Dr. W. Ross Adey.

27
00:02:39,572 --> 00:02:45,095
"We know very well that pulsed signals have a
stronger effect on people than non-pulsed signals.

28
00:02:45,095 --> 00:02:50,854
Pulsed microwaves have a profound
effect on biological processes."

29
00:02:50,854 --> 00:02:59,890
In genetic engineering, low-intensity pulsed microwaves
are used to introduce genes and specifically modify cells.

30
00:02:59,890 --> 00:03:11,534
7. George Carlo found a clear increase in the tumor rate with the
use of cell phones in the largest American mobile phone study

31
00:03:11,534 --> 00:03:19,296
8. dark field microscope shows blood
changes after a short cell phone call

32
00:03:19,296 --> 00:03:27,067
German high school students rented a dark-field microscope
system and examined blood from their ears after cell phone use.

33
00:03:27,067 --> 00:03:33,984
After just two minutes of talking on the cell phone, many
red blood cells were stuck together instead of moving freely.

34
00:03:33,984 --> 00:03:40,600
Even the blood of the test person standing two
meters away from the cell phone showed the same effect.

35
00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:47,486
9. The WHO has classified cell phone
radiation as possibly carcinogenic

36
00:03:47,486 --> 00:03:53,240
This is the same hazard level as
pesticides, DDT, chloroform and heavy metals.

37
00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:59,977
If you use WLAN in schools, you could also let the pupils
work with DDT or pesticides in biology lessons, which

38
00:03:59,977 --> 00:04:04,696
the WHO classifies in the same way as cell phone radiation.

39
00:04:04,696 --> 00:04:13,961
10. According to building biologists and environmental
medicine, more than 100 microwatts per square meter is too much

40
00:04:13,961 --> 00:04:17,953
The law allows 60,000 microwatts per square meter.

41
00:04:17,953 --> 00:04:20,562
That is 600 times as much!

42
00:04:20,562 --> 00:04:31,375
11. The ICNIRP determines the limit values, and only
people close to the mobile phone industry belong to it.

43
00:04:31,375 --> 00:04:37,258
This is comparable to the car racing club, which
is allowed to set the speed limit in urban areas.

44
00:04:37,258 --> 00:04:43,511
According to the Bernese Administrative Court:
"The population is not entitled to zero risk.

45
00:04:43,511 --> 00:04:49,175
Limit values merely serve to keep
the damage within reasonable limits."

46
00:04:49,175 --> 00:04:58,053
How many cases of cancer or other secondary diseases are needed
that are justifiable or no longer justifiable is not defined.

47
00:04:58,053 --> 00:05:11,142
12. Biologist Isabel Wilke has summarized over 100 studies
over 30 years in the Electrosmog Report that show damage

48
00:05:11,142 --> 00:05:19,505
Based on this data, 180 doctors and scientists warn
against health damage caused by non-ionizing radiation.

49
00:05:19,505 --> 00:05:23,098
After these 12 serious facts, the question arises:

50
00:05:23,098 --> 00:05:30,481
Why are high-ranking scientists consistently
muzzled and their work exposed to futility?

51
00:05:30,481 --> 00:05:34,539
And why do all these studies not
find their way into our governments?

52
00:05:34,539 --> 00:05:41,625
Why just as little in the formation of public
opinion, on TV, radio, in the press and the like?

53
00:05:41,625 --> 00:05:47,325
Dominik Rollé concludes that WLAN is a cause of
learning difficulties and aggression among

54
00:05:47,325 --> 00:05:51,534
pupils, which he also proves with practical examples!

55
00:05:51,534 --> 00:05:56,663
Parents and teachers are called upon to inform
local school administrators and school authorities

56
00:05:56,663 --> 00:05:59,850
of the facts and encourage them to take action!

57
00:05:59,850 --> 00:06:03,795
You can find the complete presentation under the link below.

58
00:06:03,795 --> 00:06:10,006
And the film "the digital dilemma" by Klaus
Scheidsteger also offers in-depth insights.

59
00:06:10,006 --> 00:06:13,595
We conclude with a quote from Dominik Rollé:

60
00:06:13,595 --> 00:06:17,954
"We can't just close our eyes.

61
00:06:17,954 --> 00:06:31,176
And I am now coming to this point, which is why
WLANs should not be set up in schools or at home.

62
00:06:31,176 --> 00:06:33,066
The first is child protection."

