Welcome, ladies and gentlemen.
My last show was about Jeffrey Epstein's business, as shown here on the left.
You will find almost nothing about this in the newspapers - for reasons.
However, due to the explosive nature of the topic, my program received more than 250,000 views in a very short
time and there were questions for additional information.
I am providing these today, specifically on the important business area of pandemics and vaccines.
Sit back and listen to the unbelievable.
If you're new to me, the special feature of the "homburgshintergrund" series is that, unlike the "tagesschau"
and many other influencers, I don't just post theses, opinions or even rumors, but provide detailed evidence for everything.
Although this is a lot of work, it increases your benefit because you can check everything immediately
using the Internet links in the video description.
Simply click on the "more" text marked with an arrow below the video.
The WHO is undoubtedly the most important player in pandemics.
The history of this institution, which is somewhat tragic, must be known in order to
understand what has happened in recent years.
I have linked to an essay by a senior WHO staff member.
The WHO was founded after the Second World War.
Their primary goal was to fight pandemics in a coordinated way, and their tragedy was that no pandemics came.
This is the most important sentence of this program: There have been no pandemics outside of cinemas in all these decades.
Perhaps there were some in the distant past, but that is debatable.
Perhaps some could come, just as a meteor could strike in the future. But nothing has happened in recent years.
As a result, the WHO member states reduced their contribution payments in nominal terms, which
naturally meant a real shrinkage in the face of inflation.
While initially four-fifths of the funding came from compulsory contributions from the member states and
only one-fifth from third-party funding, this ratio was reversed from the 1970s onwards.
Private sponsors became increasingly influential, and they did not give money for free research, but only
for specific projects whose content they determined.
In this way, the Gates Foundation became the second largest donor, surpassed only by the
USA, which recently terminated its membership.
Incidentally, "Gates Foundation" is the correct name because the former co-founder Melinda has retired.
She also divorced her husband Bill and referred to the Epstein scandal in interviews.
Anyone with financial worries is easy to corrupt.
The WHO therefore made a big mistake in 2009 by wrongly declaring swine flu a pandemic.
The WHO employee speaks of unfortunate handling.
In reality, the WHO deliberately fueled vaccine sales with a false alarm and later tried to cover it up by
changing the characterization of a pandemic on its website.
While until 2009 it was said that a pandemic was characterized by many sick and dead
people, the WHO simply removed these prerequisites.
Many resented this maneuver by the WHO.
I personally know a high-ranking politician who, contrary to his own convictions, invested millions in the procurement
of the Pandemrix vaccine and later had to destroy most of it.
And I know a mother whose child suffered serious permanent damage to her health as a result.
As you can see here, Der Spiegel then sharply criticized doctors, politicians and the media for their
failures. But the main culprit was undoubtedly the WHO.
Contrary to the request at the end of the article shown, the world has learned nothing from the failure of
swine flu, but has repeated - and even magnified - the mistakes made during the coronavirus crisis.
It is therefore not surprising that several countries, particularly the USA and
Argentina, have withdrawn indignantly from the WHO.
In a recent press release, the WHO writes apologetically that it has never recommended lockdowns.
I think that's really cheeky. Because take a look here:
In its November 2020 guideline, the WHO listed curfews and contact bans, closures of businesses, stores and schools
as well as bans on visiting care homes, in other words everything that is colloquially referred to as "lockdown".
Although it did not actively call for such measures, the WHO let the dog off the chain, so to speak, with its evidence-free
guideline, and most governments eagerly took up its suggestions.
Only a few voices praise the WHO, RKI and leading media for their objectivity. Listen for yourself:
"Trust the health authorities!
Trust the World Health Organization!
Trust common sense and journalistic diligence in the quality media!
Those who spread false reports want to harm you!
Disinformation can cost lives, but together we can fight fake news!"
No comment on this ... Let's summarize so far:
Due to the lack of real pandemics, the WHO got into financial difficulties 50 years ago and became dependent on private donors.
It repeatedly declared international emergencies, starting with swine flu and most recently with
monkeypox. As a result, the WHO has squandered its reputation.
And I cannot understand why Germany wants to give it more powers and, together with the Gates
Foundation, wants to become the WHO's biggest donor.
Against this backdrop, it is clear why cunning financial jugglers sensed a pandemic and vaccination business as early as 2011.
I have really learned a lot from the publication of the Epstein files.
I used to think that a university dropout was behind the pandemic ideas.
Now I know, no, it was two dropouts, Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein.
Let's start the analysis with an e-mail exchange between Epstein and JPMorgan Chase, the largest US bank.
What I am about to show you later cost the bank 290 million dollars, which it had to pay to
over 100 of Epstein's victims after a settlement.
The judge called the settlement "excellent" because it would deter banks from promoting human sex trafficking. Unbelievable!
The year is 2011, swine flu is over and Epstein has been released from prison, where he was
serving time for sexual offenses against minors.
He corresponds with two high-ranking managers, Jes Staley and Mary Erdoes.
Both find it normal to seek advice from an offender.
In the text below, an Epstein employee first asks for information because the bank wants to
present fresh ideas to its client Bill Gates.
Epstein answers the complex list of questions on the same day by proposing a DAF (Donor Advised Fund).
Under US law, this is a charitable fund with the following characteristics:
Donations to him are immediately tax-deductible, but remain under the control of the donor.
In particular, this can stipulate that the funds are not to be used for charitable purposes for the time
being, but are to be invested on the capital market.
The income is completely tax-free and there is no time limit for actual charitable use.
In my view, this is an unparalleled tax-saving model.
Jes Staley thinks the ideas are so good that he replies above: "We need to talk." This email is Epstein's entry ticket.
In the further exchange, Epstein presents his core idea, which is to "make money with a
non-profit organization" - I have framed this text in red.
At the end of the operation, the proceeds are to be reaped by Highbridge, a hedge fund of the
bank. According to Epstein, this is "not a problem".
Next, the head of asset management comes forward and asks about the role of the Gates Foundation in this financial construct.
Epstein's answer is complex. Among other things, he proposes an offshore arm for vaccines, i.e.
outsourcing part of the activities to tax havens.
In his second e-mail to Mary Erdoes, Epstein emphasizes that the "feelings of Bill Gates must be
taken into account" because he is very sensitive.
Gates has invested billions in vaccines, largely without success.
Then he writes: "Bill is terribly frustrated."
No wonder, as vaccine development has been in crisis for decades.
There were many promises, but hardly any tangible successes.
It's strange how the largest US bank lets a convicted felon explain the emotional sensitivities of a multi-billionaire ...
And Epstein uses his intimate knowledge.
In this email to the bank and to Boris Nikolic, Gates' right-hand man, he comes back to the DAF, the Donor Advised Fund, and
supplements this idea with a proposal that would bring Bill more money for vaccines. That's what it says here, verbatim.
Epstein's efforts are crowned by this high-level conference at the offices of JPMorgan Chase, which, according
to the title, is about a "Global Health Investment Fund".
Contrary to appearances, the term global health requires some explanation. Health simply means health.
At health conferences, you meet medical professionals, with the audience usually made up of doctors in
private practice or hospital doctors, while professors of medicine give the presentations.
It is about treatment methods, surgical techniques, new medicines and the like.
Things are quite different at conferences held under the cover of "Global Health".
This is not about health, but about money.
The participants are also not medical professionals - as you can see from this list.
Jamie Dimon, the top boss of Staley and Erdoes and probably the best-known man on Wall Street, is an economist and psychologist.
Matthew Bishop is a political scientist and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair is a lawyer.
Rajiv Shah is an economist and MD without a medical degree.
Mary Erdoes is a mathematician with an MBA and Fareed Zakaria is a political scientist. No physicians among them.
You could write a whole doctoral thesis about the conferences and e-mail correspondence,
but not a medical one, but an economic one.
It's never about health, it's about investment funds, offshore constructs for vaccines, reinsurance products
for pandemics and even a parametric trigger for pandemics.
Using this trigger, the World Bank Group set up a pandemic fund - a kind of call option on pandemics.
Payment was made in April 2020 due to coronavirus.
The trigger was activated because, among other things, the defined number of PCR deaths was reached.
All these operations, ladies and gentlemen, were only possible because Gates got the WHO and other health organizations, which
are financially dependent on him, on board, as can be seen here.
The topic of the exchange is: "Pandemic preparation".
They recognize names that are blacked out, even though they certainly do not come from victims of abuse.
At the bottom, it says in passing that the WHO and the International Red Cross could be involved
and a brand partnership entered into with them.
Since the WHO was financially dependent on Gates, I can well imagine how these talks went.
In any case, the strategies were ready before the WHO found out about them.
Epstein's entourage was known to have no fear of being held accountable for child abuse and
other abominations. It's much the same with Gates.
In 2019, he invested 55 million dollars in BioNTech, a company that had never launched a product on the market before.
At the end of 2019, he boasted on Platform X that vaccines were the "best buy in global health".
When the WHO declared a pandemic at the beginning of 2020, i.e. shortly afterwards, without there being any
medical reasons for doing so, BioNTech went through the roof.
Of course, the emergency approval at the end of 2020 also went smoothly, even though there was no emergency.
Gates sold his BioNTech shares at the end of 2021 and made a profit of over 200 million dollars.
His frustration had come to an end. But that was not all.
Shortly after the exit, he mocked all those who continued to hold these shares, stating that the product unfortunately offered no
protection against transmission or external protection and that completely different manufacturing
methods were therefore needed. Listen for yourself:
"We don't yet have any vaccines that prevent transmission.
We have vaccines to help with health, but they offer little protection from others.
We need a new way of producing vaccines.
It's not only Gates' audacity that is unbelievable, but also the fact that the interview was broadcast in November 2021.
Five months later, in April 2022, four parliamentary groups in the Bundestag tried to
push through a "general vaccination obligation".
They blathered on about "transmission protection" and "herd immunity", although not only researchers but even
Gates had established that these claims were not true.
Fortunately, the plan failed by a narrow margin because the political groups had different ideas.
What can we conclude from all this, ladies and gentlemen?
What you read about pandemics in Epstein's book was not deliberately published, but was accidental by-catch in
files that were released for completely different crimes.
The content is all the more remarkable. Pandemics increasingly remind me of wars - the more preparations are made and
the more magnates invest and develop financial vested interests, the more likely it is that an outbreak will occur.
And regardless of whether it's coronavirus, war or the climate, it's always the same players who stir up
sentiment, deceive the public and profit themselves.
You won't hear anything about this mechanism in the news, but that's why you have my program.
Thank you for your interest and, as always, I remain your Stefan Homburg.