WEBVTT

00:00.240 --> 00:09.843
An exposure level 76 times higher than the radiation
limit would cause exactly the same genetic damage as

00:09.843 --> 00:14.759
this relatively low-power transmitter in a village.

00:14.759 --> 00:17.120
You have to imagine what that means:

00:17.120 --> 00:25.679
When it comes to radioactivity, health and safety
regulations are in place for good reason—it is prohibited.

00:25.679 --> 00:29.039
It is permitted for mobile phones.

00:29.039 --> 00:36.920
But when there’s cell phone radiation, it’s not
just for a moment—it goes on for a long time.

00:36.920 --> 00:39.520
And then you can imagine what happens.

00:39.520 --> 00:45.079
The muscles, especially those around the arteries, spasm.

00:45.079 --> 00:55.240
Nerve cells transmit impulses; if it happens to be
a pain nerve, you will experience constant pain.

00:55.240 --> 01:02.672
This chronic pain can—unfortunately, I have to
say—become so severe that, in extreme cases, people have

01:02.672 --> 01:07.560
been unable to bear it and have taken their own lives.

01:07.560 --> 01:11.280
Thank you very much for the kind introduction.

01:11.280 --> 01:13.159
That's very nice.

01:13.159 --> 01:22.075
Even a science program on Bavarian Radio claimed: “Mobile phone
radiation can’t possibly be harmful, because

01:22.075 --> 01:30.200
the energy—meaning quantum energy, as we’ve
heard—is far too low to break down chemical bonds.”

01:30.200 --> 01:32.400
So it can't be harmful.

01:32.400 --> 01:43.120
Excuse me, but even our state-run media spreads this
kind of nonsense. And it’s not just Bavarian Broadcasting.

01:43.120 --> 01:53.945
It is important to realize that biological effects do not stem
solely from chemistry, but that certain substances—such

01:53.945 --> 02:04.319
as proteins—are biologically active simply because
of their physical structure and their physical effects.

02:04.319 --> 02:12.871
And for the physicists among you: You might find the term “van der
Waals forces” interesting, as their energy lies precisely within

02:12.871 --> 02:17.120
the range of the mobile communications we’re discussing here.

02:17.120 --> 02:22.960
But even without any knowledge of physics,
you can still understand what’s happening.

02:22.960 --> 02:25.479
Let's take a look at a cell.

02:25.479 --> 02:35.599
This is a blue sphere in the
picture—a cell surrounded by a cell membrane.

02:35.599 --> 02:45.680
This cell membrane separates the external region outside the
cell, which is mostly filled with positively charged particles.

02:45.680 --> 02:50.984
Here I’ve marked the calcium ions with small
yellow spheres, but they’re not just

02:50.984 --> 02:54.680
calcium—there’s potassium and several others as well.

02:54.680 --> 03:01.439
The cell contains mostly negative particles, such as chlorine.

03:01.439 --> 03:08.095
And just like with “royal children,” the negatively charged
particles want to move toward the positively

03:08.095 --> 03:14.319
charged ones and vice versa, but they can’t
reach each other because of the cell membrane.

03:14.319 --> 03:17.159
But the cell membrane has holes in it.

03:17.159 --> 03:22.520
Holes that allow only one type of particle to pass through.

03:22.520 --> 03:28.039
The red dots here are holes that allow calcium to pass through.

03:28.039 --> 03:35.080
There are others that allow potassium to pass
through, and still others for different substances,

03:35.080 --> 03:38.639
and so on, but these pores are usually blocked.

03:38.639 --> 03:51.400
Blocked by complex molecules—proteins
that prevent the calcium ions from entering.

03:51.400 --> 04:03.120
If you take a closer look at how these holes are clogged,
you'll see that they're made up of spiral-shaped particles.

04:03.120 --> 04:13.080
And the spirals maintain their shape because the
charges are not evenly distributed but attract each other.

04:13.080 --> 04:17.319
And so the spiral cannot unwind.

04:17.319 --> 04:22.622
But if we expose it to radiation now, the
spiral starts to vibrate—or, in

04:22.622 --> 04:26.040
physicists’ terms, to undergo torsional vibrations.

04:26.040 --> 04:35.703
And then it can happen that the vibration becomes so strong
that the charged particles are too far apart to attract

04:35.703 --> 04:40.800
each other sufficiently, meaning that the spiral breaks apart.

04:40.800 --> 04:43.439
This is shown here.

04:43.439 --> 04:51.279
In the cell membrane—specifically in
these calcium channels—it looks like this:

04:51.279 --> 04:59.240
In a channel like this, there are spirals; I've
only drawn two here, but in reality there are four.

04:59.240 --> 05:08.431
When the radiation strikes them, these spirals may, under certain
conditions—if the radiation is strong

05:08.431 --> 05:17.800
enough—unravel, lose their rigidity, and allow calcium
ions—the positively charged particles—to flow in.

05:17.800 --> 05:31.879
Well, that’s not an unusual process in itself; for example,
when you contract a muscle, calcium flows into the muscle cells.

05:31.879 --> 05:38.279
In other words, calcium causes muscle cells to contract.

05:38.279 --> 05:46.399
In nerve cells, calcium triggers the transmission
of a nerve impulse, so there’s no problem there.

05:46.399 --> 05:54.279
But when there is cell phone radiation, it’s
not just for a moment—it goes on for a long time.

05:54.279 --> 05:56.519
And then you can imagine what happens.

05:56.519 --> 06:02.439
The muscles, especially those around the arteries, spasm.

06:02.439 --> 06:12.519
Nerve cells transmit impulses; if it happens to be
a pain nerve, you will experience constant pain.

06:12.519 --> 06:19.846
This chronic pain can—unfortunately, I have to
say—become so severe that, in extreme cases, people have

06:19.846 --> 06:24.120
been unable to bear it and have taken their own lives.

06:24.120 --> 06:30.519
Unfortunately, that's true; I know of
several cases like that—it's terrible.

06:30.519 --> 06:38.879
Okay, so what happens now when the calcium enters the cell?

06:38.879 --> 06:43.360
Then a whole chain of reactions takes place.

06:43.360 --> 06:49.199
These reactions—I've shown only one of
the chains here, but there are several.

06:49.199 --> 06:53.000
The endpoint of the blue boxes is important.

06:53.000 --> 06:59.319
As you can see, free radicals and oxidative stress are present.

06:59.319 --> 07:11.000
And this oxidative stress consists of highly reactive chemical
compounds that, among other things, attack genetic material—DNA.

07:11.000 --> 07:19.439
Incidentally, the end result of this has already been
studied in numerous experiments many, many years ago.

07:19.439 --> 07:26.439
I believe there are well over 100
scientific studies that examine this effect.

07:26.439 --> 07:32.514
And right now we're in the midst of another
boom period, with new research on this topic

07:32.514 --> 07:36.160
being published constantly, almost every week.

07:36.160 --> 07:45.607
The best-known study was the so-called “Reflex Study,”
commissioned by the EU, which subsequently garnered

07:45.607 --> 07:56.480
significant public attention and was vigorously opposed by the
industry—with outrageous smears and other terrible things.

07:56.480 --> 08:03.399
We won't go into that now—maybe my
neighbor, Mr. Scheidsteger, will.

08:03.399 --> 08:11.970
Well, as I said, these chemical reactions lead,
among other things, to genetic changes, and

08:11.970 --> 08:16.839
these genetic changes have two possible outcomes.

08:16.839 --> 08:26.560
Either cancer or poor genetics for the next generation.

08:26.560 --> 08:37.000
Let’s first take a closer look at
how we can quantify genetic damage.

08:37.000 --> 08:43.960
Of course, you can examine the DNA in
individual cells to look for damage.

08:43.960 --> 08:52.759
We've recently achieved something
that people didn't think was possible.

08:52.759 --> 08:59.799
As you know, before cell division, the
genetic material organizes itself into chromosomes.

08:59.799 --> 09:10.720
If DNA, the genetic material, is
damaged, damaged chromosomes are also produced.

09:10.720 --> 09:18.840
And there’s one type that’s particularly
interesting: the so-called dicentric chromosomes.

09:18.840 --> 09:30.600
They are used in radiation exposure assessments to
determine the amount of radiation a person has been exposed to.

09:30.600 --> 09:38.409
You should know that: Dizentric chromosomes are caused
almost exclusively by radiation—not by chemical factors,

09:38.409 --> 09:42.559
not by other environmental factors, but only by radiation.

09:42.559 --> 09:51.526
And that is why it is legally recognized that
the number or frequency of dicentric

09:51.526 --> 09:58.399
chromosomes is a reliable measure of radiation exposure.

09:58.399 --> 10:07.039
We—that is, a group of which several of
us are members—have compared two villages.

10:07.039 --> 10:15.399
One village had a cell tower—not even a
particularly tall one—and the other had none.

10:15.399 --> 10:22.229
Otherwise, the population or the segment of
the population under study was compared in

10:22.229 --> 10:26.279
minute detail, just as is done with radioactivity.

10:26.279 --> 10:34.158
In other words, they wanted to be as precise as
possible about everything—from people’s medical

10:34.158 --> 10:39.399
history and eating habits to their cheese consumption.

10:39.399 --> 10:45.399
And he just picked out a corresponding number of people.

10:45.399 --> 10:56.681
In the people exposed to the radiation—as I said, a perfectly
ordinary, not particularly powerful cell phone tower on the roof

10:56.681 --> 11:06.978
of a house in the village—it caused anaberrant chromosomes,
the kind that would result from exposure to radioactive

11:06.978 --> 11:12.440
radiation at the threshold level over a period of 76 years.

11:12.440 --> 11:14.480
In other words:

11:14.480 --> 11:25.826
Since the (radioactive) radiation was present in very high levels
for only one year—a level 76 times higher than the

11:25.826 --> 11:36.879
radiation limit—it would cause exactly the same genetic
damage as this relatively weak transmitter in a village.

11:36.879 --> 11:39.200
You have to imagine what that means.

11:39.200 --> 11:47.840
When it comes to radioactivity, health and safety
regulations are in place for good reason—it is prohibited.

11:47.840 --> 11:53.080
It is permitted for mobile phones.

11:53.080 --> 11:57.279
Let's go back to that—what does that mean in practice?

11:57.279 --> 12:02.480
One outcome is cancer; we've already talked about that.

12:02.480 --> 12:11.480
There are countless studies examining the
link between cell phone use and cancer.

12:11.480 --> 12:16.639
I've just picked out a few of the most
important ones—perhaps the most famous ones.

12:16.639 --> 12:25.893
The first study is by Hardell, who specifically investigated
whether there is an increased incidence of

12:25.893 --> 12:33.080
brain tumors among people who talk on the
phone with a mobile device held to their ear.

12:33.080 --> 12:35.200
And he found out:

12:35.200 --> 12:43.109
There is an increased incidence of brain tumors: specifically, if
you hold the phone in your right hand, the tumor

12:43.109 --> 12:50.879
tends to develop on the right side, and if you hold it in
your left hand, it tends to develop on the left side.

12:50.879 --> 12:55.320
The second point here from the National Toxicology Program.

12:55.320 --> 13:03.759
It is also a study that was commissioned by the
government—specifically, the U.S. government.

13:03.759 --> 13:12.828
Researchers exposed several thousand mice
and rats to radiation and found that certain

13:12.828 --> 13:17.679
types of cancer were caused by the radiation.

13:17.679 --> 13:20.759
Statistically sound and well-documented.

13:20.759 --> 13:26.120
However, the radiation levels in
these studies were relatively high.

13:26.120 --> 13:30.480
Then we said, “Well, the radiation levels are much lower here.”

13:30.480 --> 13:40.265
That is why Ms. Belpoggi conducted the same studies in
Italy using radiation levels slightly above our limit and also

13:40.265 --> 13:45.639
well below our limit, and she reached the same conclusion.

13:45.639 --> 13:54.425
In other words, even at levels well below our threshold,
it has been shown that cancer develops in animals—specifically

13:54.425 --> 13:59.159
in rats—albeit only certain types of cancer, but still.

13:59.159 --> 14:05.720
And Professor Lin originally worked
in the mobile communications industry.

14:05.720 --> 14:14.159
Based on these experiments, he said, “It is now
beyond doubt: Cell phone radiation causes cancer!”

14:14.159 --> 14:22.279
You can also look at this in another study,
which again uses official English-language data.

14:22.279 --> 14:29.720
In the UK, the roles differ here...

14:29.720 --> 14:34.600
Sorry, I almost forgot—we're still going to Belpoggi:

14:34.600 --> 14:45.639
The dose people were exposed to even correlates linearly
with the likelihood that the animals developed cancer.

14:45.639 --> 14:53.480
But now back to the British study—this data
comes from the UK Health Security Agency.

14:53.480 --> 15:05.840
They studied grade 4 gliomas—which are particularly aggressive
brain tumors—specifically tumors that are almost always fatal.

15:05.840 --> 15:09.919
They are classified according to
the different regions of the brain.

15:09.919 --> 15:18.559
The green curve represents the majority of brain
regions that have not changed much over the years.

15:18.559 --> 15:27.559
The red curve refers only to the frontal lobe,
which extends laterally into the temporal lobe.

15:27.559 --> 15:34.159
And since the introduction of mobile
communications, that number has risen rapidly.

15:34.159 --> 15:38.879
Unfortunately, my statistics stop relatively early on.

15:38.879 --> 15:46.720
It's because I've been lazy that I haven't kept
the data up to date since then, but I'll keep at it.

15:46.720 --> 15:50.159
Okay, those were the cancer cases.

15:50.159 --> 15:56.274
Now, one could say that if someone wants to be exposed to
electromagnetic radiation—and since it’s

15:56.274 --> 16:02.879
possible to avoid at least some of it, though only
some—then it’s their own fault if they get cancer.

16:02.879 --> 16:08.399
It's cynical, but it's something people often throw in your face.

16:08.399 --> 16:16.919
One thing for which there is certainly no
excuse is the harm done to the next generation.

16:16.919 --> 16:28.360
We conducted a study involving 7,000 irradiated
piglets and approximately 10,000 non-irradiated piglets.

16:28.360 --> 16:37.974
Exactly in that month—really, in that very
month—when the radiation began, the pregnant

16:37.974 --> 16:43.679
sows started giving birth to malformed piglets.

16:43.679 --> 16:48.080
I've recorded a few here.

16:48.080 --> 16:50.960
That's very reminiscent of "Contergan."

16:50.960 --> 16:58.868
It is important to note that this radiation—which averaged
several hundred microwatts per square

16:58.868 --> 17:07.720
meter—reached a maximum of 1,200 microwatts per square
meter, a figure that was even officially measured.

17:07.720 --> 17:11.920
Our threshold is 10 million!

17:11.920 --> 17:16.799
But even with this low level of
radiation, they develop these deformities.

17:16.799 --> 17:25.396
And if I only count the ones that are visibly affected at
birth—not those with internal organ damage, but the ones that are

17:25.396 --> 17:30.680
immediately visible—then we have a 1% rate of damaged piglets.

17:30.680 --> 17:37.039
You should know that, genetically
speaking, pigs are very similar to humans.

17:37.039 --> 17:45.400
And this isn't just about pigs; we're
seeing deformities in cattle as well.

17:45.400 --> 17:47.759
In other words, it spans the animal kingdom.

17:47.759 --> 17:50.200
We've observed this in plants as well.

17:50.200 --> 17:52.640
I don't have any pictures of that here.

17:52.640 --> 17:56.200
Now I’d like to ask you to consider:

17:56.200 --> 18:02.960
We could have a mobile network that
uses only a fraction of the radiation.

18:02.960 --> 18:12.079
Will anyone here explain how that works in practice?

18:12.079 --> 18:18.640
The current method is cheaper and
generates higher profits for the operators.

18:18.640 --> 18:20.480
Is that really what we want?

18:20.480 --> 18:32.759
In other words, are we willing to risk 1% of our
offspring having visible defects just to save money?

18:32.759 --> 18:39.039
Please keep in mind that this only applies to visible damage.

18:39.039 --> 18:43.000
They aren't born in humans.

18:43.000 --> 18:48.599
It's awful to say, but it's
true—these children are being aborted.

18:48.599 --> 18:51.519
You won't find them in any statistics.

18:51.519 --> 18:53.200
But is that what we want?

18:53.200 --> 18:57.400
Is that really what we want, just so it can be cheap?

18:57.400 --> 18:59.559
Thank you very much for your attention.
