The mainstream media has reported almost daily in recent weeks about the deceased patients on a cruise
ship who were allegedly infected with the hantavirus.
Four days after the WHO's announcement, Austria responded by amending its legislation on the early detection and isolation of
infected persons - hantavirus cases are now being isolated again.
But how dangerous is the hantavirus really for the world's population?
And is global panic reporting justified?
Here is just a brief look at the statistics:
According to Wikipedia, around 690 hantavirus infections occur in Germany every year out of a population of more than 80 million.
In Switzerland, hantavirus cases have so far only been described as isolated cases.
The figures show that Germany, like Switzerland, is a long way from a hantavirus pandemic.
Even Argentina is reporting a total of 101 confirmed hantavirus cases across the country in the current, slightly
higher 2025/26 season, out of a population of 47 million.
This corresponds to an annual infection rate of around two cases per million inhabitants.
When we talk about the danger of hantaviruses, it comes from a completely different source.
After all, what happens to people who are inundated daily with reports about these dangerous viruses and the deaths
on the cruise ship that are supposedly associated with them?
The US virologist Dr. Robert Malone describes this as psychological bioterrorism!
He explains what psychological bioterrorism is and why it works as follows:
According to Dr. Malone, the causative agent of a disease is less important in this case
than the emotional message associated with it.
Because fear spreads faster than facts!
Campaigns with supposedly dangerous viruses work so well because humans are biologically programmed to fear invisible threats.
A wolf in front of the cave is scary.
But an invisible virus floating through the air activates something much deeper in the human nervous system.
You can't see it. You can't smell it.
Every stranger becomes a potential threat. Every cough becomes suspicious.
This loss of control is the crux of the matter.
Psychological bioterrorism is successful in humans because it evokes four strong emotional states simultaneously.
Firstly, speed. Thanks to modern means of communication, fear can spread worldwide in real time.
Secondly: vulnerability. Most people feel helpless in the face of infectious diseases.
Thirdly: confusion. During supposed outbreaks, contradictory information floods the public.
And fourthly: social pressure. As soon as fear takes hold, following rules becomes a kind of
tribal ritual, e.g. wearing masks and vaccinations.
What is the way out so that the world's population does not succumb to psychological bioterrorism?
According to Dr. Robert Malone, the goal is not to become fearless.
The challenge and opportunity lies in becoming more difficult to manipulate.
This requires foresight, resilience and the willingness to ask prudent questions in moments of artificially created urgency.
Who benefits from the panic? What evidence is actually available?
What is certain and what is speculative?
Applied to the current example of hantavirus infections, the question arises:
Who benefits from scaremongering about the hantavirus?
The following is known: - The global vaccination alliance GAVI published an article in
2021 entitled: "The Next Pandemic: Hantavirus?"
Eleven viruses have the potential to cause the next pandemic, one of them the hantavirus.
- Several patents on mRNA vaccines against hantaviruses have been in place since 2022.
- Since September 2023, Moderna has been collaborating with Korea University for the
development of an mRNA-based hantavirus vaccine.
- According to Prof. Homburg, it is striking that Moderna's share price has risen by 20% in a very short space of time.
This is reminiscent of Dr. Wodarg's assessment, who stated in the Kla.TV interview that the WHO
is an institution for preparing insider trading.
In his opinion, the WHO is being used by people who spread waves of fear and buy shares in
good time because they know this in advance.
You always see these waves in the Börsenblatt.
- TKP, the science and policy blog, reported on May 7 that 13 hantavirus vaccine and gene therapy programs are currently in
development - including six DNA "vaccines" from the U.S. Army!
Do you see who would benefit from hantavirus scaremongering and a global fear of hantavirus infection?
It becomes clear why the first question in any kind of threatening reporting must always be:
Who benefits from this?
The second question should be:
Who benefits from the measures that are being pushed through as part of a global scare campaign?
During the coronavirus pandemic, it became clear in retrospect who benefited from the lockdown.
It was the big companies such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft that benefited from business closures and working
from home with increasing digitalization and became even richer as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
Hantavirus reporting has calmed down again, but we are already reading about an alleged Ebola outbreak in Africa.
On May 19, 2026, the FAZ reported that the WHO is examining whether existing vaccines or drugs
"could be useful" in containing this outbreak.
The question therefore arises once again:
Who is behind the WHO and the regular new reports about dangerous viruses and thus this psychological bioterrorism?
Kla.TV reported on this in an inserted program and shows how high-grade freemasonry has been controlling medicine, the
pharmaceutical industry and also the WHO for many decades.
On the one hand, this leads to great economic profit for everyone involved.
And in the form of international laws, attempts are constantly being made to establish a worldwide health
dictatorship through globally applicable health regulations and compulsory vaccinations.
Dear Sir or Madam, In conclusion, we can summarize the following:
Psychological bioterrorism is far more dangerous than the alleged viral diseases.
It is therefore important to see through and expose the strategies of psychological
bioterrorism through media coverage worldwide.
According to Robert Malone, the main thing is to recognize when it is no longer the disease but the
fear itself that has become the marketed product.
Because as soon as societies accept the permanent state of emergency as normal, freedom begins to
dwindle a little more with every disturbing headline.