1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,992


2
00:00:00,992 --> 00:00:05,831
Dr. Brian Hooker is the Senior Director of
Science and Research at Children's Health Defense

3
00:00:05,831 --> 00:00:10,555
Children’s Health Defense is a nonprofit
organization based in the United States.

4
00:00:10,555 --> 00:00:17,420
Its mission is to protect the health of children
worldwide, to identify the causes of health problems

5
00:00:17,420 --> 00:00:22,281
among children, and hold those responsible to account.

6
00:00:22,281 --> 00:00:33,746
On April 29, 2026, Brian Hooker gave a lecture in
Switzerland, presented by AUF1 host Thomas Eglinski.

7
00:00:33,746 --> 00:00:40,377
A personal experience led Brian Hooker to begin
exploring the topic of vaccinations in

8
00:00:40,377 --> 00:00:45,525
relation to chronic childhood illnesses 28 years ago.

9
00:00:45,525 --> 00:00:53,149
Even back then, he saw that the number of
chronically ill children worldwide had risen significantly.

10
00:00:53,149 --> 00:00:59,375
Today, one in five children in the
United States has a developmental disorder.

11
00:00:59,375 --> 00:01:07,207
His scientific studies—in which he compares vaccinated and
unvaccinated children with regard to chronic

12
00:01:07,207 --> 00:01:16,811
diseases—as well as similar studies by his colleagues, are
dismissed out of hand for publication by medical journals.

13
00:01:16,811 --> 00:01:19,429
This raises the question:

14
00:01:19,429 --> 00:01:25,806
Why are these very elaborate vaccine studies being
categorically suppressed by highly professional experts in their

15
00:01:25,806 --> 00:01:29,823
field, and why are the dramatic connections being kept secret?

16
00:01:29,823 --> 00:01:36,469
Who has an interest that the medical community at large
and the world's population never find out about this?

17
00:01:36,469 --> 00:01:42,050
Learn more about Brian Hooker's scientific
work and the overwhelming findings of

18
00:01:42,050 --> 00:01:48,033
his scientific studies in this presentation.

19
00:01:48,033 --> 00:01:55,905
So, let's get started. So, I am the Chief
Scientific Officer of Children's Health Defense.

20
00:01:55,905 --> 00:02:03,695
And I started as an associate of
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in about 2015.

21
00:02:05,796 --> 00:02:12,070
And ended up working directly as an
employee of Children's Health Defense in 2021.

22
00:02:17,773 --> 00:02:22,218
So, my background is that I have a vaccine-injured child.

23
00:02:24,093 --> 00:02:33,288
He was injured at 15 months, and had
three vaccines with an active ear infection.

24
00:02:33,288 --> 00:02:43,302
And then he regressed very, very quickly into neuro
developmental disabilities. He was diagnosed with autism.

25
00:02:43,302 --> 00:02:49,005
So, what I found, that is 28 years ago, what I found
is that the number of sick children in the United

26
00:02:49,005 --> 00:02:53,859
States and really in the world has increased significantly.

27
00:02:58,523 --> 00:03:06,851
So, within one in six children, now it's one in five
children, in the United States has a developmental disability.

28
00:03:06,851 --> 00:03:13,522
At least one in 31 children have
autism, have an autism diagnosis.

29
00:03:13,522 --> 00:03:17,239
And in my home state, California, it's one in 19.

30
00:03:17,239 --> 00:03:22,268
And in Los Angeles, Los Angeles
County, it is now one in ten boys.

31
00:03:22,268 --> 00:03:30,455
And if you saw the movie Vaxxed,
predictably, three in ten African-American boys.

32
00:03:30,455 --> 00:03:37,925
So, 30% of African-American boys in L. A.
County have an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis.

33
00:03:37,925 --> 00:03:45,057
So, all of these have increased
since the late 1980s, early 1990s.

34
00:03:47,162 --> 00:03:54,215
And we also know that many times mainstream practitioners,
pharmaceutical representatives, government representatives

35
00:03:54,215 --> 00:03:58,696
tell us that vaccine injury is rare, that it's one in a million.

36
00:03:58,696 --> 00:04:04,972
Only one in a million people have a
vaccine reaction. But that's not true.

37
00:04:04,972 --> 00:04:11,636
We know that the CDC commissioned a
study. This study was commissioned in 2010.

38
00:04:11,636 --> 00:04:19,945
And in this study, they looked at 1.4 million
vaccines given over a three-year time period.

39
00:04:19,945 --> 00:04:24,984
And out of that, they had 35,000
potentially serious adverse events.

40
00:04:24,984 --> 00:04:31,058
So, to me, that's not one in a million,
that's 35,000 in a million, which is a very

41
00:04:31,058 --> 00:04:35,545
different number. Or it worked out to about 2.6%.

42
00:04:35,545 --> 00:04:41,940
And then, when you count the fact that individuals get more than
one vaccine, see, this original number was for one

43
00:04:41,940 --> 00:04:48,936
vaccine. But if you get more than one vaccine, then
your chances of having a vaccine injury go up to 10%.

44
00:04:48,936 --> 00:04:52,336
So, this is potentially serious.

45
00:04:54,053 --> 00:05:00,831
And, in their own fashion, the CDC refused to move
forward with this grant and did not renew the grant.

46
00:05:00,831 --> 00:05:05,700
And this would have automated our
adverse events reporting system.

47
00:05:05,700 --> 00:05:12,763
But they, rather than move into the future and
really understand vaccine injury, they took a pass.

48
00:05:16,345 --> 00:05:22,241
So, what happens, when we look at
vaccinated versus unvaccinated children?

49
00:05:22,241 --> 00:05:27,615
Well, we know already that the CDC
simply did not want to know the information.

50
00:05:27,615 --> 00:05:34,599
They cut off all contact with these researchers. They would
not return their emails, would not return their phone calls.

51
00:05:34,599 --> 00:05:42,476
But I started looking at the outcomes of
vaccinated versus unvaccinated children in 2017.

52
00:05:46,329 --> 00:05:52,256
When a child receives a single vaccine, that
makes them vaccinated. If a child receives no

53
00:05:52,256 --> 00:05:58,094
vaccines, then that makes them unvaccinated.

54
00:05:58,094 --> 00:06:04,122
So that's how in the following slides we
differentiate between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.

55
00:06:04,122 --> 00:06:12,916
So these aren't necessarily fully vaccinated children,
but just one or more makes them vaccinated children.

56
00:06:12,916 --> 00:06:22,265
But when we look at this, this was a study that was
done in 2017 by a good colleague of mine, Anthony Mawson.

57
00:06:22,265 --> 00:06:30,233
And the red bars are the vaccinated children.
The blue bars are the unvaccinated children.

58
00:06:30,233 --> 00:06:39,467
And you can see consistently allergic rhinitis, that's
nasal allergies, 30 times greater in the vaccinated group.

59
00:06:41,193 --> 00:06:45,688
And by and large, these were partially vaccinated children.

60
00:06:45,688 --> 00:06:50,319
These happened to be home school children in this sample.

61
00:06:50,319 --> 00:06:57,322
And then when you look at the rest of the conditions that were
studied, these were by and large autoimmune disorders or

62
00:06:57,322 --> 00:07:06,638
developmental disorders, that they were anywhere between
3.9 to about 5 times higher in the vaccinated children.

63
00:07:06,638 --> 00:07:10,356
I'm encouraged to see more people come.

64
00:07:10,356 --> 00:07:18,361
We get more bodies in this small room, it gets hotter,
but the families that sweat together, stick together.

65
00:07:18,361 --> 00:07:25,963
So when you look at then the same study, they looked at
actual infections in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.

66
00:07:25,963 --> 00:07:31,107
And they saw about five times as much pneumonia.

67
00:07:31,107 --> 00:07:37,660
This was pneumonia that generally required hospitalization.

68
00:07:37,660 --> 00:07:42,489
And then about 20% of all the children that
were vaccinated experienced chronic ear

69
00:07:42,489 --> 00:07:47,520
infections and only less than 6% of the unvaccinated.

70
00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:55,317
Now we know that not all babies are born equal. Okay,
sometimes babies are born less healthy than others.

71
00:07:55,317 --> 00:08:03,242
And in this case, the researchers looked at
pre-term birth. So these were premature children.

72
00:08:03,242 --> 00:08:07,339
And looking at vaccinated versus unvaccinated,

73
00:08:09,718 --> 00:08:16,618
so if they were vaccinated and preterm, their chances of having a
neurodevelopmental disorder, this would be like autism, tics,

74
00:08:16,618 --> 00:08:22,322
ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger's syndrome - their
chances of having that diagnosis if they were

75
00:08:22,322 --> 00:08:29,038
preterm and vaccinated were 14.5 times higher
than if they were regular term and unvaccinated.

76
00:08:35,725 --> 00:08:42,783
So in this same group of individuals, if they were regular
term and vaccinated, then they had a chance of having

77
00:08:42,783 --> 00:08:49,080
that diagnosis 2.7 times greater than the unvaccinated group.

78
00:08:49,080 --> 00:09:02,122
Okay, then, to get this type of research published in mainstream
scientific or medical literature is, we should get contact...

79
00:09:02,122 --> 00:09:07,928
It's a very, very difficult
process. It is what we call contact sport.

80
00:09:07,928 --> 00:09:17,299
And this paper was first published and, well, was accepted
for publication in a journal called Frontiers in Public Health.

81
00:09:17,299 --> 00:09:25,026
Once it was accepted, and the abstract, just the
abstract of the paper was posted, it made a big splash.

82
00:09:25,026 --> 00:09:30,414
There were 80,000 downloads of just the
abstract in the first weekend in which this

83
00:09:30,414 --> 00:09:34,709
paper was featured on the journal's website.

84
00:09:38,151 --> 00:09:43,447
Ultimately, well, actually that afternoon,
Monday afternoon after the weekend, the paper

85
00:09:43,447 --> 00:09:47,338
was pulled down from Frontiers in Pediatrics.

86
00:09:47,338 --> 00:09:53,373
And they said, oh, we didn't retract the
paper. We weren't finished with the review.

87
00:09:53,373 --> 00:09:58,731
- Yeah, that's right. - We weren't finished with the review.

88
00:09:58,731 --> 00:10:04,171
And we re -reviewed it, and this
time, we decided to reject the paper.

89
00:10:04,171 --> 00:10:07,868
So fortunately, this paper was republished.

90
00:10:07,868 --> 00:10:12,022
It was republished in a more independent journal.

91
00:10:12,022 --> 00:10:17,855
But the whole process then ended up with
the lead author, Anthony Mawson, at that point

92
00:10:17,855 --> 00:10:22,697
in time being suspended by his university.

93
00:10:22,697 --> 00:10:27,092
So at least the research was published.

94
00:10:27,092 --> 00:10:38,576
Now I came along with a medical journalist, Neil Miller, in
2020 and we actually started this research early in 2018.

95
00:10:38,576 --> 00:10:44,013
We were looking at children who are vaccinated
in their first year of life versus children who

96
00:10:44,013 --> 00:10:47,993
were not vaccinated in their first year of life.

97
00:10:47,993 --> 00:10:58,516
So we were only looking at infant vaccinations, at the time
that constituted about 24 shots. Difference between the two.

98
00:10:58,516 --> 00:11:04,357
But like the Mawson study, the majority of our
vaccinated children did not follow the entire schedule.

99
00:11:04,357 --> 00:11:09,692
So maybe on average they got eight to
nine vaccines over that first year.

100
00:11:09,692 --> 00:11:18,885
Well, even looking at that first year of life where vaccination
is intense, children are getting as many as six to seven vaccines

101
00:11:18,885 --> 00:11:26,226
at a time, developmental delays were doubled. And so
they actually doubled, asthma was up at 4. 5 times

102
00:11:26,226 --> 00:11:31,456
greater in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated group,

103
00:11:31,456 --> 00:11:35,530
remember these red bars are just partially vaccinated.

104
00:11:35,530 --> 00:11:43,108
And then ear infections were double the
vaccinated versus the unvaccinated group.

105
00:11:43,108 --> 00:11:51,158
And then when we looked at gastrointestinal disorders
we saw something very close to developmental delays too,

106
00:11:51,158 --> 00:11:53,628
so to me that was very interesting.

107
00:11:53,628 --> 00:11:59,161
So children that were vaccinated had 2.5 times as many
gastrointestinal disorders as unvaccinated children.

108
00:11:59,161 --> 00:12:04,880
But boy did we have a hard time getting this paper published.

109
00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:13,389
Okay, so we submitted this paper to five
different peer-reviewed reputable medical journals.

110
00:12:13,389 --> 00:12:21,471
So you would think that one of the journals would at
least review it, okay, not just dismiss it summarily.

111
00:12:21,471 --> 00:12:29,292
But typically, they would reject the paper
within 24 hours of us submitting the paper.

112
00:12:29,292 --> 00:12:36,365
In fact, one reviewer wrote, Brian Hooker is an
anti-vaxxer, end of sentence, I reject this paper.

113
00:12:36,365 --> 00:12:41,124
So it was an attack on me, it was not an attack on the work.

114
00:12:41,124 --> 00:12:45,138
We finally found the journal SAGE Open Medicine,

115
00:12:45,138 --> 00:12:53,310
and it's typical that scientific journals
review a paper once and then they accept or reject.

116
00:12:53,310 --> 00:12:59,316
Okay, in this case, they had four different peer
reviewers and they reviewed the paper three

117
00:12:59,316 --> 00:13:04,088
separate times with comments each time over 11 months.

118
00:13:04,088 --> 00:13:09,007
So it was longer than a pregnancy, birthing this paper.

119
00:13:09,007 --> 00:13:16,586
Okay, the paper was finally accepted by SAGE and it was
published in May 2020, just in time for the pandemic.

120
00:13:16,586 --> 00:13:24,616
And it's been viewed, or downloaded about
300,000 times. It's a very, very popular paper.

121
00:13:24,616 --> 00:13:30,559
About every five to six months, I will receive
an email from the journal of somebody complaining

122
00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:33,809
about the paper that it needs to be taken down.

123
00:13:33,809 --> 00:13:38,897
So far, six years later, they're still sticking with us.

124
00:13:40,827 --> 00:13:49,786
So this was an important stake in the ground, because not only is
this an important paper, an important journal, but the journal

125
00:13:49,786 --> 00:13:57,205
was indexed in the US National Institutes of Health, National
Library of Medicine, okay. So it is a target

126
00:13:57,205 --> 00:14:05,259
that Pro-vax, scientists, executives,
doctors, whomever, try to take down periodically.

127
00:14:05,259 --> 00:14:12,182
We, undeterred, we started a new
paper, and that was published in 2021,

128
00:14:14,844 --> 00:14:22,890
and we grew our cohort, or our group of children
that we studied, to double of the original paper.

129
00:14:22,890 --> 00:14:29,552
Now, at this point, we are comparing fully vaccinated
patients, following the schedule, versus fully

130
00:14:29,552 --> 00:14:34,615
unvaccinated patients, and when we do that, our red bars grow.

131
00:14:34,615 --> 00:14:44,689
So you look at allergies, gastrointestinal
disorders, asthma, autism, ADHD, and chronic ear infections,

132
00:14:44,689 --> 00:14:51,722
and some of these differences, okay, so chronic ear
infections almost 28 times higher in the vaccinated group,

133
00:14:51,722 --> 00:14:56,760
fully vaccinated group, versus the unvaccinated group.

134
00:14:56,760 --> 00:15:03,183
ADHD, one in ten children in the United
States has an ADHD diagnosis, 20 times higher in

135
00:15:03,183 --> 00:15:08,040
the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated group.

136
00:15:09,825 --> 00:15:15,685
We also found out some interesting things about autism.

137
00:15:15,685 --> 00:15:25,329
So, when we looked at those children who were breastfed or not,
and vaccinated or not, we saw something very, very interesting.

138
00:15:25,329 --> 00:15:28,900
The least risk was if you had an unvaccinated child.

139
00:15:28,900 --> 00:15:34,664
This was all vaccines regardless of where
they were before or after their first birthday.

140
00:15:34,664 --> 00:15:37,768
So, they didn't receive any vaccines.

141
00:15:37,768 --> 00:15:41,488
If they were breastfed, then their risk was the lowest.

142
00:15:41,488 --> 00:15:52,116
If you go to unvaxxed but they were bottle-fed or formula-fed,
they were 2.5 times more likely to get an autism diagnosis.

143
00:15:52,116 --> 00:16:00,640
If they're vaxxed, and breastfed, so the opposite, then
they're 6.7 times more likely to get an autism diagnosis.

144
00:16:00,640 --> 00:16:06,850
And then finally, those that fared the
worst at 12.5 times greater were vaccinated.

145
00:16:06,850 --> 00:16:10,384
These are fully vaccinated children and they were not breastfed.

146
00:16:10,384 --> 00:16:17,351
And we qualified breastfed, for a child to be considered
breastfed, they had to get breast milk consistently over

147
00:16:17,351 --> 00:16:22,488
at least a six -month period before their second birthday.

148
00:16:25,370 --> 00:16:30,179
And so, you know, I know there are
situations that are difficult for having a new baby.

149
00:16:30,179 --> 00:16:36,159
And I want to have compassion for that
regarding the ability to consistently breastfeed.

150
00:16:36,159 --> 00:16:42,042
Also, we want to look at vaccinated versus
unvaccinated and type of birth, whether it was

151
00:16:42,042 --> 00:16:46,432
a normal birth or it was a C-section birth.

152
00:16:46,432 --> 00:16:52,525
And again, I realize that there are certain
emergency situations where it's very, very difficult.

153
00:16:52,525 --> 00:16:59,226
It's a very difficult choice for a family
to decide to have a cesarean section birth.

154
00:16:59,226 --> 00:17:03,732
The utmost of health is having a healthy living child.

155
00:17:03,732 --> 00:17:06,532
So, you know, I completely understand that.

156
00:17:08,382 --> 00:17:13,772
But when we look at the least risk, again, it
was unvaccinated, but it was a normal birth,

157
00:17:13,772 --> 00:17:20,862
the chances of having an autism diagnosis if you
had a C-section, that went up to 4.6 times greater.

158
00:17:20,862 --> 00:17:24,172
And that's really the hygiene hypothesis.

159
00:17:24,172 --> 00:17:29,926
There's a lot of inoculation of vital
microbes associated with vaginal birth.

160
00:17:29,926 --> 00:17:32,905
And in a C-section, those are not replenished.

161
00:17:32,905 --> 00:17:36,555
So that has been shown to be very, very vital.

162
00:17:36,555 --> 00:17:41,623
There are alternatives for C-section to
be able to inoculate an unborn child.

163
00:17:41,623 --> 00:17:49,616
But then if we flip-flop, if they're vaccinated
with a normal birth, then we saw a 9.2 times higher.

164
00:17:49,616 --> 00:17:55,841
And then the worst, one of the worst outcomes
we saw in the study - my son - vaccinated

165
00:17:55,841 --> 00:18:01,766
and C-section birth at 18.7 times greater risk.

166
00:18:01,766 --> 00:18:07,920
And this particular paper was published in
2021 in the Journal of Translational Science.

167
00:18:07,920 --> 00:18:13,506
I want to feature a couple of other
papers before I go back to my own research.

168
00:18:13,506 --> 00:18:18,754
This is the results of a study by
James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Paul Thomas.

169
00:18:18,754 --> 00:18:21,267
It was published in 2020.

170
00:18:21,267 --> 00:18:23,700
And you can see something very, very similar.

171
00:18:23,700 --> 00:18:26,762
They looked at actual office visits.

172
00:18:26,762 --> 00:18:34,528
How many office visits did these children have in Dr. Thomas's
practice when they were vaccinated red versus unvaccinated blue?

173
00:18:34,528 --> 00:18:39,932
And in those office visits, did they
receive these particular diagnoses?

174
00:18:39,932 --> 00:18:42,810
And again, we saw something very, very similar.

175
00:18:42,810 --> 00:18:46,381
But you notice autism is absent.

176
00:18:48,210 --> 00:18:54,349
And in fact, in Dr. Thomas's practice, because these
red bars, they were typically partially vaccinated,

177
00:18:54,349 --> 00:18:58,769
there were not enough autistic kids to do statistics.

178
00:18:58,769 --> 00:19:05,692
In fact, the rate of autism in his practice was about 1 in 250.

179
00:19:05,692 --> 00:19:10,684
So, again, publishing this research is
dangerous. It's very, very difficult.

180
00:19:10,684 --> 00:19:17,394
And what happened in this particular case was that the
paper was published in a very reputable journal, international

181
00:19:17,394 --> 00:19:22,035
journal of environmental research and public health in 2020.

182
00:19:22,035 --> 00:19:30,620
Almost immediately after the paper hit the press and was
published, Dr. Paul Thomas's medical license was revoked.

183
00:19:34,093 --> 00:19:37,993
And so he could no longer - in fact, it was an
emergency suspension - he could no longer practice

184
00:19:37,993 --> 00:19:41,008
medicine, period. In the state of Oregon. Okay.

185
00:19:42,808 --> 00:19:47,313
Then this was then followed by an
alone anonymous complaint to the journal.

186
00:19:47,313 --> 00:19:51,429
The paper was retracted in 2021.

187
00:19:51,429 --> 00:19:54,548
The journal called me,

188
00:19:54,548 --> 00:19:59,785
I was one of the original reviewers in the paper and
said, oh, we were considering retracting the paper.

189
00:19:59,785 --> 00:20:04,866
We're afraid that it came from a single practitioner's practice.

190
00:20:06,407 --> 00:20:14,801
And we think that unvaccinated children are too
different than vaccinated children in order to do a valid study.

191
00:20:17,000 --> 00:20:21,989
And they always paint these children -
adults, people that question the safety and

192
00:20:21,989 --> 00:20:25,401
efficacy of vaccines - they paint you into a corner

193
00:20:25,401 --> 00:20:35,585
where they say you're different, you're weird, you go to the
doctor less, you stay at home if you have a cerebral hemorrhage.

194
00:20:35,585 --> 00:20:40,638
You know, any preposterous thing
to disqualify this type of study.

195
00:20:40,638 --> 00:20:43,952
That's what they did.

196
00:20:43,952 --> 00:20:47,303
So the journal calls me and I say, hello,

197
00:20:47,303 --> 00:20:50,125
you know, I reviewed the paper,

198
00:20:50,125 --> 00:20:57,296
I stand by my review and I happen to know that Dr.
Thomas's patients are very, very satisfied with him.

199
00:20:57,296 --> 00:21:02,641
And so this again was differences in healthcare
seeking behavior, which means that vaccinated children

200
00:21:02,641 --> 00:21:06,781
don't go to the doctor, which was definitely not the case.

201
00:21:06,781 --> 00:21:11,147
So Dr. Thomas's license was
reinstated with very onerous conditions.

202
00:21:11,147 --> 00:21:13,357
He could not talk about vaccines.

203
00:21:13,357 --> 00:21:16,932
They took away his First Amendment rights.

204
00:21:16,932 --> 00:21:21,553
He could only see certain patients and he
could not be involved in major decision making.

205
00:21:21,553 --> 00:21:25,784
He has filed a federal lawsuit against the Oregon Medical Board.

206
00:21:25,784 --> 00:21:29,099
I wish him all the best for that.

207
00:21:31,618 --> 00:21:40,014
So at that point, I was very, very proud that Dr. Lyons-Weiler,
the researcher, the first author on this paper, fires back.

208
00:21:42,008 --> 00:21:50,851
And he actually did an analysis with another medical doctor, same
data, and showed that parents who were getting informed

209
00:21:50,851 --> 00:21:58,431
consent and getting straight answers from their
pediatrician, Dr. Thomas, actually liked going to the doctor.

210
00:21:58,431 --> 00:22:03,423
Imagine that, you get straight answers, you go back.

211
00:22:04,989 --> 00:22:14,384
And so they split the practice in three groups:
high healthcare utilization, medium, and low.

212
00:22:14,384 --> 00:22:19,923
So high healthcare, they go to the doctor a
lot. Low, they go to the doctor not as much.

213
00:22:19,923 --> 00:22:22,384
And then somewhere in the middle.

214
00:22:22,384 --> 00:22:26,413
And so the vaccinated group is actually
the line in blue, or the curve in blue.

215
00:22:26,413 --> 00:22:28,843
And the unvaccinated group is the line in yellow.

216
00:22:28,843 --> 00:22:33,202
I do apologize for the clarity of the slide.

217
00:22:33,202 --> 00:22:40,067
And what they found was that consistently the unvaccinated
children were visiting their practitioner more, regardless

218
00:22:40,067 --> 00:22:43,851
of whether they were high or medium healthcare utilization.

219
00:22:43,851 --> 00:22:47,960
And then the lowest healthcare utilization, it was the same.

220
00:22:47,960 --> 00:22:52,785
So in other words, unvaccinated children, when they
are seeing their practitioner and they're getting

221
00:22:52,785 --> 00:22:56,592
straight answers, they're not going to the doctor less.

222
00:22:56,592 --> 00:23:01,850
They want to get their baby checked up. They
trust their doctor. They have a good relationship.

223
00:23:01,850 --> 00:23:05,991
And therefore, they go at least the same normal way.

224
00:23:08,234 --> 00:23:15,897
And then I want to go to a study that came out
in 2022 by the Centers for Disease Control, okay,

225
00:23:20,304 --> 00:23:30,327
and what they found was actually a relationship between the
aluminum salt adjuvant that is in vaccines and persistent asthma.

226
00:23:30,327 --> 00:23:36,046
So they looked at vaccines before 24 months of
age and then they were looking at asthma

227
00:23:36,046 --> 00:23:40,899
diagnosed between 24 months and five years of age.

228
00:23:42,640 --> 00:23:50,679
And what they found was if the child had eczema,
eczema is a marker or an indication of autoimmune disorder,

229
00:23:52,468 --> 00:23:57,884
so if the child had eczema and they got the
highest level of aluminum that they could in

230
00:23:57,884 --> 00:24:02,533
vaccines there were 63 percent higher levels of asthma.

231
00:24:04,447 --> 00:24:08,113
And this is what's called early infantile or childhood asthma.

232
00:24:08,113 --> 00:24:12,218
It‘s diagnosed very very early and not in a typical time period.

233
00:24:12,218 --> 00:24:15,620
So this is another marker of an autoimmune disorder.

234
00:24:15,620 --> 00:24:21,431
So if they had eczema, their risk was higher
especially if they got the highest vaccine level.

235
00:24:21,431 --> 00:24:27,733
But the CDC will never do a zero exposure control. So it turns
out that the sort of bluish bar here is a high

236
00:24:27,733 --> 00:24:33,888
level of aluminum and then the orange bar is
just a little less aluminum, okay, that's cheating.

237
00:24:33,888 --> 00:24:41,410
That's called a cheat. They should have a zero
exposure group - we would see a much more profound

238
00:24:41,410 --> 00:24:48,806
difference there if they actually did a controlled study.

239
00:24:48,806 --> 00:24:55,798
Now if they, had they looked at children that had not been
diagnosed with eczema then they still had a higher asthma risk.

240
00:24:58,313 --> 00:25:05,030
If you have a child who is presenting something like
eczema, something that is obviously autoimmune, it

241
00:25:05,030 --> 00:25:10,646
makes sense to forego or delay the vaccination schedule.

242
00:25:10,646 --> 00:25:17,521
These children were vaccinated before 24
months and the outcomes caused more asthma.

243
00:25:17,521 --> 00:25:25,651
If you break down the study - again the first two years of life
... but it was a monumental concession, CDC never

244
00:25:25,651 --> 00:25:32,782
comes down on the side of saying that vaccines
cause anything except for happiness and sunshine.

245
00:25:32,782 --> 00:25:38,195
But they conceded that persistent asthma, this
was defined as three severe asthma diagnoses

246
00:25:38,195 --> 00:25:42,967
within the period from two years to five years of age.

247
00:25:45,099 --> 00:25:47,474
So they did concede

248
00:25:47,474 --> 00:25:55,368
and oddly enough Dr. Frank DeStefano, he's an interesting
researcher. He had actually participated in

249
00:25:55,368 --> 00:26:04,777
the cover-up of the relationship between
vaccines and autism that led to the movie Vaxxed.

250
00:26:04,777 --> 00:26:11,251
He also had participated in the cover up regarding
Vietnam veterans and the compound patient warrant.

251
00:26:11,251 --> 00:26:21,422
So he had a history of maybe being a little looser with the truth
but he published his paper and then he subsequently retired.

252
00:26:21,422 --> 00:26:24,468
So this was his last word.

253
00:26:26,398 --> 00:26:29,695
So you're ready for some more bar graphs?

254
00:26:29,695 --> 00:26:39,710
This is the straight stuff, this is the … we're mainlining
the heroine of vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies.

255
00:26:39,710 --> 00:26:45,556
I want to show a very very stark
contrast and I do that for a reason.

256
00:26:45,556 --> 00:26:52,141
I want people to really understand that by doing this type of
analysis, the analysis that only happens from independent

257
00:26:52,141 --> 00:26:57,564
researchers does not happen from universities
funded by the government, it doesn't happen directly

258
00:26:57,564 --> 00:27:01,271
by the CDC or the National Institutes of Health.

259
00:27:01,271 --> 00:27:07,115
This is independent scientists
and this is what they come up with.

260
00:27:07,115 --> 00:27:14,603
And when we publish this we don‘t have anything to
gain, in fact we can lose our livelihood, we can go to

261
00:27:14,603 --> 00:27:20,838
court, we can lose our medical licenses etc. etc. etc.

262
00:27:20,838 --> 00:27:26,127
So in a lot of ways it gives me no joy to show
the amount of damage and then also risk my

263
00:27:26,127 --> 00:27:31,133
livelihood not so much anymore and my family's well-being.

264
00:27:33,282 --> 00:27:40,975
But when you look at… Dr. Mawson did another
study using the Florida Medicaid database,

265
00:27:40,975 --> 00:27:47,686
again autism spectrum disorder, hyperkinetic syndrome, ADHD,
epilepsy and seizures, learning disorders,

266
00:27:47,686 --> 00:27:55,421
encephalopathy, tick disorders and at least one of
the four mentioned neurodevelopmental disorders.

267
00:27:55,421 --> 00:28:04,507
So the risks are anywhere between above 2%, above
2.5 % all the way to almost 7% for learning disorders.

268
00:28:06,518 --> 00:28:11,305
Moving further at the same time he looked
at pre-term birth and all these risks

269
00:28:11,305 --> 00:28:15,896
increase so at pre-term birth we see a higher rate

270
00:28:18,589 --> 00:28:25,137
and then we at Children's Health
Defense, we bolstered our efforts,

271
00:28:25,137 --> 00:28:30,767
we've been working directly with wonderful anonymous
individual practitioners, they have vaccinated children in their

272
00:28:30,767 --> 00:28:35,298
practices, they have unvaccinated children in their practices.

273
00:28:39,866 --> 00:28:47,926
At last count, we have had 10 different practitioners where we've
used their these are identified, these are all very, very

274
00:28:47,926 --> 00:28:59,022
secure medical practices, we keep the data very, very secure, do
not ever release anything that will dare identify the patients.

275
00:28:59,022 --> 00:29:06,842
And we've seen this grow to now over, this is
outdated, we now have over 100,000 patients.

276
00:29:06,842 --> 00:29:17,110
Now we shouldn't have to do this, because the CDC has their own
database that has not 100,000 children, but 3 million children.

277
00:29:17,110 --> 00:29:25,198
But they will not release those records, they will
not even, and I'm kind of loathe to say this, they will

278
00:29:25,198 --> 00:29:29,689
not even release those records to Secretary Kennedy,

279
00:29:29,689 --> 00:29:37,331
they keep on trying to hide it in different locations, and behind
different legal barriers. But in this cohort we have

280
00:29:37,331 --> 00:29:45,656
4,000 completely unvaccinated patients, and we've been
following them from birth to a minimum of four years.

281
00:29:45,656 --> 00:29:50,188
The older children in this group are
anywhere between 13 to 15 years old,

282
00:29:50,188 --> 00:29:55,537
but the youngest that you can be, because we
want to have diagnoses under developmental delays,

283
00:29:55,537 --> 00:29:58,964
autism, ticks, whatever, by four years of age.

284
00:29:58,964 --> 00:30:03,461
And then the rest of the group, these are
primarily partially vaccinated children,

285
00:30:03,461 --> 00:30:12,036
and this was sort of the basis for my previous publications, but
we've grown the group and we will continue to grow the group.

286
00:30:14,192 --> 00:30:21,208
So, just to show you, this is hot off the press, this
is in the process of being published, this information.

287
00:30:21,208 --> 00:30:26,987
So, we wanted to look, you know, we looked at
neurodevelopmental disabilities, we looked at

288
00:30:26,987 --> 00:30:32,079
autoimmune disorders, now let's look at infections,

289
00:30:32,079 --> 00:30:37,685
because vaccines are supposed to keep you
healthy, they are supposed to prevent infections,

290
00:30:37,685 --> 00:30:44,765
but what we saw in this cohort that… and these recurring
infections were defined as having at least three

291
00:30:44,765 --> 00:30:53,696
different diagnoses over a rolling 12-month period in the time
that the child was enrolled in that pediatric practice.

292
00:30:53,696 --> 00:31:00,796
Ear infections, respiratory disease,
strep infection were all much, much greater.

293
00:31:00,796 --> 00:31:09,518
And then, if we looked at the number of vaccines that were given,
we added then the unvaccinated, and this is in the

294
00:31:09,518 --> 00:31:18,352
first year of life, one to three in the first year of
life, four to six, six to nine, and then ten or more.

295
00:31:18,352 --> 00:31:24,310
And what you see is that overall, and in almost
every case, the unvaccinated fare much better.

296
00:31:24,310 --> 00:31:27,880
They‘re just healthier kids.

297
00:31:30,401 --> 00:31:36,578
There is one lower bar for ten or more vaccines for respiratory
disease, and that's really, I would attribute that to

298
00:31:36,578 --> 00:31:43,888
the fact that when a child is healthy, if you're
vaccinating the child is healthy, then you keep on vaccinating.

299
00:31:43,888 --> 00:31:47,493
We call that the healthy vaccine-e effect.

300
00:31:47,493 --> 00:31:51,067
And we typically see information like that.

301
00:31:51,067 --> 00:31:54,491
We do not take that information lightly.

302
00:31:54,491 --> 00:31:57,590
And I do want to also show my commitment

303
00:31:57,590 --> 00:32:04,335
that if vaccines win, if vaccines are giving a better
outcome, we want to give them every benefit of the doubt.

304
00:32:04,335 --> 00:32:13,285
It only behooves us to make sure that we are absolutely fair and
that we are absolutely showing the truth in our publications.

305
00:32:14,926 --> 00:32:21,302
So overall, when we look at vaccinated versus
unvaccinated children, it is very, very clear.

306
00:32:21,302 --> 00:32:24,289
The vaccinated children are suffering in some way, shape or form.

307
00:32:24,289 --> 00:32:28,616
We do not know what the specific disorder might be.

308
00:32:28,616 --> 00:32:37,609
But we also know that the technology and the tools are
available to anticipate these particular vaccine injuries.

309
00:32:37,609 --> 00:32:43,427
I'm going to skip a few slides here just to go to the conclusion.

310
00:32:43,427 --> 00:32:47,938
So they have less developmental delay and neurological diagnoses.

311
00:32:47,938 --> 00:32:54,019
They have less asthma, ear infections,
autoimmune disorders and allergies, respiratory

312
00:32:54,019 --> 00:32:57,797
infections, strep, and they're healthier overall.

313
00:32:57,797 --> 00:32:59,430
So this is conclusive.

314
00:32:59,430 --> 00:33:12,567
We are not playing a shell game, and we are supported by 11
independent studies that show very, very similar results.

315
00:33:12,567 --> 00:33:19,870
I've shown you the results of just Anthony Mawson, Children's
Health Defense, and James Lyons-Weiler and Paul Thomas.

316
00:33:19,870 --> 00:33:30,122
So that's just three of the research groups that are doing this
type of study, and we consistently see ... this type of effect,

317
00:33:30,122 --> 00:33:38,759
and this is, you know, obviously, this is very
personal for me, and it's very personal for many individuals

318
00:33:38,759 --> 00:33:44,806
that work for and support Children's Health Defense.

319
00:33:44,806 --> 00:33:52,387
But again, we're not looking at telling people what to do.

320
00:33:52,387 --> 00:33:58,829
We are looking at educating individuals and making sure that they
have the right tools, in their hands, in order to make an

321
00:33:58,829 --> 00:34:03,909
informed choice regarding any intervention,
especially those interventions in early childhood and

322
00:34:03,909 --> 00:34:07,398
within these very, very vulnerable developmental periods.

323
00:34:07,398 --> 00:34:09,041
Thank you very much.

324
00:34:09,041 --> 00:34:12,218
Dr. Brian Hooker, “Children’s Health Defense”