WEBVTT 00:00.992 --> 00:05.831 Dr. Brian Hooker is the Senior Director of Science and Research at Children's Health Defense 00:05.831 --> 00:10.555 Children’s Health Defense is a nonprofit organization based in the United States. 00:10.555 --> 00:17.420 Its mission is to protect the health of children worldwide, to identify the causes of health problems 00:17.420 --> 00:22.281 among children, and hold those responsible to account. 00:22.281 --> 00:33.746 On April 29, 2026, Brian Hooker gave a lecture in Switzerland, presented by AUF1 host Thomas Eglinski. 00:33.746 --> 00:40.377 A personal experience led Brian Hooker to begin exploring the topic of vaccinations in 00:40.377 --> 00:45.525 relation to chronic childhood illnesses 28 years ago. 00:45.525 --> 00:53.149 Even back then, he saw that the number of chronically ill children worldwide had risen significantly. 00:53.149 --> 00:59.375 Today, one in five children in the United States has a developmental disorder. 00:59.375 --> 01:07.207 His scientific studies—in which he compares vaccinated and unvaccinated children with regard to chronic 01:07.207 --> 01:16.811 diseases—as well as similar studies by his colleagues, are dismissed out of hand for publication by medical journals. 01:16.811 --> 01:19.429 This raises the question: 01:19.429 --> 01:25.806 Why are these very elaborate vaccine studies being categorically suppressed by highly professional experts in their 01:25.806 --> 01:29.823 field, and why are the dramatic connections being kept secret? 01:29.823 --> 01:36.469 Who has an interest that the medical community at large and the world's population never find out about this? 01:36.469 --> 01:42.050 Learn more about Brian Hooker's scientific work and the overwhelming findings of 01:42.050 --> 01:48.033 his scientific studies in this presentation. 01:48.033 --> 01:55.905 So, let's get started. So, I am the Chief Scientific Officer of Children's Health Defense. 01:55.905 --> 02:03.695 And I started as an associate of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in about 2015. 02:05.796 --> 02:12.070 And ended up working directly as an employee of Children's Health Defense in 2021. 02:17.773 --> 02:22.218 So, my background is that I have a vaccine-injured child. 02:24.093 --> 02:33.288 He was injured at 15 months, and had three vaccines with an active ear infection. 02:33.288 --> 02:43.302 And then he regressed very, very quickly into neuro developmental disabilities. He was diagnosed with autism. 02:43.302 --> 02:49.005 So, what I found, that is 28 years ago, what I found is that the number of sick children in the United 02:49.005 --> 02:53.859 States and really in the world has increased significantly. 02:58.523 --> 03:06.851 So, within one in six children, now it's one in five children, in the United States has a developmental disability. 03:06.851 --> 03:13.522 At least one in 31 children have autism, have an autism diagnosis. 03:13.522 --> 03:17.239 And in my home state, California, it's one in 19. 03:17.239 --> 03:22.268 And in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, it is now one in ten boys. 03:22.268 --> 03:30.455 And if you saw the movie Vaxxed, predictably, three in ten African-American boys. 03:30.455 --> 03:37.925 So, 30% of African-American boys in L. A. County have an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis. 03:37.925 --> 03:45.057 So, all of these have increased since the late 1980s, early 1990s. 03:47.162 --> 03:54.215 And we also know that many times mainstream practitioners, pharmaceutical representatives, government representatives 03:54.215 --> 03:58.696 tell us that vaccine injury is rare, that it's one in a million. 03:58.696 --> 04:04.972 Only one in a million people have a vaccine reaction. But that's not true. 04:04.972 --> 04:11.636 We know that the CDC commissioned a study. This study was commissioned in 2010. 04:11.636 --> 04:19.945 And in this study, they looked at 1.4 million vaccines given over a three-year time period. 04:19.945 --> 04:24.984 And out of that, they had 35,000 potentially serious adverse events. 04:24.984 --> 04:31.058 So, to me, that's not one in a million, that's 35,000 in a million, which is a very 04:31.058 --> 04:35.545 different number. Or it worked out to about 2.6%. 04:35.545 --> 04:41.940 And then, when you count the fact that individuals get more than one vaccine, see, this original number was for one 04:41.940 --> 04:48.936 vaccine. But if you get more than one vaccine, then your chances of having a vaccine injury go up to 10%. 04:48.936 --> 04:52.336 So, this is potentially serious. 04:54.053 --> 05:00.831 And, in their own fashion, the CDC refused to move forward with this grant and did not renew the grant. 05:00.831 --> 05:05.700 And this would have automated our adverse events reporting system. 05:05.700 --> 05:12.763 But they, rather than move into the future and really understand vaccine injury, they took a pass. 05:16.345 --> 05:22.241 So, what happens, when we look at vaccinated versus unvaccinated children? 05:22.241 --> 05:27.615 Well, we know already that the CDC simply did not want to know the information. 05:27.615 --> 05:34.599 They cut off all contact with these researchers. They would not return their emails, would not return their phone calls. 05:34.599 --> 05:42.476 But I started looking at the outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children in 2017. 05:46.329 --> 05:52.256 When a child receives a single vaccine, that makes them vaccinated. If a child receives no 05:52.256 --> 05:58.094 vaccines, then that makes them unvaccinated. 05:58.094 --> 06:04.122 So that's how in the following slides we differentiate between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. 06:04.122 --> 06:12.916 So these aren't necessarily fully vaccinated children, but just one or more makes them vaccinated children. 06:12.916 --> 06:22.265 But when we look at this, this was a study that was done in 2017 by a good colleague of mine, Anthony Mawson. 06:22.265 --> 06:30.233 And the red bars are the vaccinated children. The blue bars are the unvaccinated children. 06:30.233 --> 06:39.467 And you can see consistently allergic rhinitis, that's nasal allergies, 30 times greater in the vaccinated group. 06:41.193 --> 06:45.688 And by and large, these were partially vaccinated children. 06:45.688 --> 06:50.319 These happened to be home school children in this sample. 06:50.319 --> 06:57.322 And then when you look at the rest of the conditions that were studied, these were by and large autoimmune disorders or 06:57.322 --> 07:06.638 developmental disorders, that they were anywhere between 3.9 to about 5 times higher in the vaccinated children. 07:06.638 --> 07:10.356 I'm encouraged to see more people come. 07:10.356 --> 07:18.361 We get more bodies in this small room, it gets hotter, but the families that sweat together, stick together. 07:18.361 --> 07:25.963 So when you look at then the same study, they looked at actual infections in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. 07:25.963 --> 07:31.107 And they saw about five times as much pneumonia. 07:31.107 --> 07:37.660 This was pneumonia that generally required hospitalization. 07:37.660 --> 07:42.489 And then about 20% of all the children that were vaccinated experienced chronic ear 07:42.489 --> 07:47.520 infections and only less than 6% of the unvaccinated. 07:47.520 --> 07:55.317 Now we know that not all babies are born equal. Okay, sometimes babies are born less healthy than others. 07:55.317 --> 08:03.242 And in this case, the researchers looked at pre-term birth. So these were premature children. 08:03.242 --> 08:07.339 And looking at vaccinated versus unvaccinated, 08:09.718 --> 08:16.618 so if they were vaccinated and preterm, their chances of having a neurodevelopmental disorder, this would be like autism, tics, 08:16.618 --> 08:22.322 ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger's syndrome - their chances of having that diagnosis if they were 08:22.322 --> 08:29.038 preterm and vaccinated were 14.5 times higher than if they were regular term and unvaccinated. 08:35.725 --> 08:42.783 So in this same group of individuals, if they were regular term and vaccinated, then they had a chance of having 08:42.783 --> 08:49.080 that diagnosis 2.7 times greater than the unvaccinated group. 08:49.080 --> 09:02.122 Okay, then, to get this type of research published in mainstream scientific or medical literature is, we should get contact... 09:02.122 --> 09:07.928 It's a very, very difficult process. It is what we call contact sport. 09:07.928 --> 09:17.299 And this paper was first published and, well, was accepted for publication in a journal called Frontiers in Public Health. 09:17.299 --> 09:25.026 Once it was accepted, and the abstract, just the abstract of the paper was posted, it made a big splash. 09:25.026 --> 09:30.414 There were 80,000 downloads of just the abstract in the first weekend in which this 09:30.414 --> 09:34.709 paper was featured on the journal's website. 09:38.151 --> 09:43.447 Ultimately, well, actually that afternoon, Monday afternoon after the weekend, the paper 09:43.447 --> 09:47.338 was pulled down from Frontiers in Pediatrics. 09:47.338 --> 09:53.373 And they said, oh, we didn't retract the paper. We weren't finished with the review. 09:53.373 --> 09:58.731 - Yeah, that's right. - We weren't finished with the review. 09:58.731 --> 10:04.171 And we re -reviewed it, and this time, we decided to reject the paper. 10:04.171 --> 10:07.868 So fortunately, this paper was republished. 10:07.868 --> 10:12.022 It was republished in a more independent journal. 10:12.022 --> 10:17.855 But the whole process then ended up with the lead author, Anthony Mawson, at that point 10:17.855 --> 10:22.697 in time being suspended by his university. 10:22.697 --> 10:27.092 So at least the research was published. 10:27.092 --> 10:38.576 Now I came along with a medical journalist, Neil Miller, in 2020 and we actually started this research early in 2018. 10:38.576 --> 10:44.013 We were looking at children who are vaccinated in their first year of life versus children who 10:44.013 --> 10:47.993 were not vaccinated in their first year of life. 10:47.993 --> 10:58.516 So we were only looking at infant vaccinations, at the time that constituted about 24 shots. Difference between the two. 10:58.516 --> 11:04.357 But like the Mawson study, the majority of our vaccinated children did not follow the entire schedule. 11:04.357 --> 11:09.692 So maybe on average they got eight to nine vaccines over that first year. 11:09.692 --> 11:18.885 Well, even looking at that first year of life where vaccination is intense, children are getting as many as six to seven vaccines 11:18.885 --> 11:26.226 at a time, developmental delays were doubled. And so they actually doubled, asthma was up at 4. 5 times 11:26.226 --> 11:31.456 greater in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated group, 11:31.456 --> 11:35.530 remember these red bars are just partially vaccinated. 11:35.530 --> 11:43.108 And then ear infections were double the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated group. 11:43.108 --> 11:51.158 And then when we looked at gastrointestinal disorders we saw something very close to developmental delays too, 11:51.158 --> 11:53.628 so to me that was very interesting. 11:53.628 --> 11:59.161 So children that were vaccinated had 2.5 times as many gastrointestinal disorders as unvaccinated children. 11:59.161 --> 12:04.880 But boy did we have a hard time getting this paper published. 12:04.880 --> 12:13.389 Okay, so we submitted this paper to five different peer-reviewed reputable medical journals. 12:13.389 --> 12:21.471 So you would think that one of the journals would at least review it, okay, not just dismiss it summarily. 12:21.471 --> 12:29.292 But typically, they would reject the paper within 24 hours of us submitting the paper. 12:29.292 --> 12:36.365 In fact, one reviewer wrote, Brian Hooker is an anti-vaxxer, end of sentence, I reject this paper. 12:36.365 --> 12:41.124 So it was an attack on me, it was not an attack on the work. 12:41.124 --> 12:45.138 We finally found the journal SAGE Open Medicine, 12:45.138 --> 12:53.310 and it's typical that scientific journals review a paper once and then they accept or reject. 12:53.310 --> 12:59.316 Okay, in this case, they had four different peer reviewers and they reviewed the paper three 12:59.316 --> 13:04.088 separate times with comments each time over 11 months. 13:04.088 --> 13:09.007 So it was longer than a pregnancy, birthing this paper. 13:09.007 --> 13:16.586 Okay, the paper was finally accepted by SAGE and it was published in May 2020, just in time for the pandemic. 13:16.586 --> 13:24.616 And it's been viewed, or downloaded about 300,000 times. It's a very, very popular paper. 13:24.616 --> 13:30.559 About every five to six months, I will receive an email from the journal of somebody complaining 13:30.559 --> 13:33.809 about the paper that it needs to be taken down. 13:33.809 --> 13:38.897 So far, six years later, they're still sticking with us. 13:40.827 --> 13:49.786 So this was an important stake in the ground, because not only is this an important paper, an important journal, but the journal 13:49.786 --> 13:57.205 was indexed in the US National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, okay. So it is a target 13:57.205 --> 14:05.259 that Pro-vax, scientists, executives, doctors, whomever, try to take down periodically. 14:05.259 --> 14:12.182 We, undeterred, we started a new paper, and that was published in 2021, 14:14.844 --> 14:22.890 and we grew our cohort, or our group of children that we studied, to double of the original paper. 14:22.890 --> 14:29.552 Now, at this point, we are comparing fully vaccinated patients, following the schedule, versus fully 14:29.552 --> 14:34.615 unvaccinated patients, and when we do that, our red bars grow. 14:34.615 --> 14:44.689 So you look at allergies, gastrointestinal disorders, asthma, autism, ADHD, and chronic ear infections, 14:44.689 --> 14:51.722 and some of these differences, okay, so chronic ear infections almost 28 times higher in the vaccinated group, 14:51.722 --> 14:56.760 fully vaccinated group, versus the unvaccinated group. 14:56.760 --> 15:03.183 ADHD, one in ten children in the United States has an ADHD diagnosis, 20 times higher in 15:03.183 --> 15:08.040 the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated group. 15:09.825 --> 15:15.685 We also found out some interesting things about autism. 15:15.685 --> 15:25.329 So, when we looked at those children who were breastfed or not, and vaccinated or not, we saw something very, very interesting. 15:25.329 --> 15:28.900 The least risk was if you had an unvaccinated child. 15:28.900 --> 15:34.664 This was all vaccines regardless of where they were before or after their first birthday. 15:34.664 --> 15:37.768 So, they didn't receive any vaccines. 15:37.768 --> 15:41.488 If they were breastfed, then their risk was the lowest. 15:41.488 --> 15:52.116 If you go to unvaxxed but they were bottle-fed or formula-fed, they were 2.5 times more likely to get an autism diagnosis. 15:52.116 --> 16:00.640 If they're vaxxed, and breastfed, so the opposite, then they're 6.7 times more likely to get an autism diagnosis. 16:00.640 --> 16:06.850 And then finally, those that fared the worst at 12.5 times greater were vaccinated. 16:06.850 --> 16:10.384 These are fully vaccinated children and they were not breastfed. 16:10.384 --> 16:17.351 And we qualified breastfed, for a child to be considered breastfed, they had to get breast milk consistently over 16:17.351 --> 16:22.488 at least a six -month period before their second birthday. 16:25.370 --> 16:30.179 And so, you know, I know there are situations that are difficult for having a new baby. 16:30.179 --> 16:36.159 And I want to have compassion for that regarding the ability to consistently breastfeed. 16:36.159 --> 16:42.042 Also, we want to look at vaccinated versus unvaccinated and type of birth, whether it was 16:42.042 --> 16:46.432 a normal birth or it was a C-section birth. 16:46.432 --> 16:52.525 And again, I realize that there are certain emergency situations where it's very, very difficult. 16:52.525 --> 16:59.226 It's a very difficult choice for a family to decide to have a cesarean section birth. 16:59.226 --> 17:03.732 The utmost of health is having a healthy living child. 17:03.732 --> 17:06.532 So, you know, I completely understand that. 17:08.382 --> 17:13.772 But when we look at the least risk, again, it was unvaccinated, but it was a normal birth, 17:13.772 --> 17:20.862 the chances of having an autism diagnosis if you had a C-section, that went up to 4.6 times greater. 17:20.862 --> 17:24.172 And that's really the hygiene hypothesis. 17:24.172 --> 17:29.926 There's a lot of inoculation of vital microbes associated with vaginal birth. 17:29.926 --> 17:32.905 And in a C-section, those are not replenished. 17:32.905 --> 17:36.555 So that has been shown to be very, very vital. 17:36.555 --> 17:41.623 There are alternatives for C-section to be able to inoculate an unborn child. 17:41.623 --> 17:49.616 But then if we flip-flop, if they're vaccinated with a normal birth, then we saw a 9.2 times higher. 17:49.616 --> 17:55.841 And then the worst, one of the worst outcomes we saw in the study - my son - vaccinated 17:55.841 --> 18:01.766 and C-section birth at 18.7 times greater risk. 18:01.766 --> 18:07.920 And this particular paper was published in 2021 in the Journal of Translational Science. 18:07.920 --> 18:13.506 I want to feature a couple of other papers before I go back to my own research. 18:13.506 --> 18:18.754 This is the results of a study by James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Paul Thomas. 18:18.754 --> 18:21.267 It was published in 2020. 18:21.267 --> 18:23.700 And you can see something very, very similar. 18:23.700 --> 18:26.762 They looked at actual office visits. 18:26.762 --> 18:34.528 How many office visits did these children have in Dr. Thomas's practice when they were vaccinated red versus unvaccinated blue? 18:34.528 --> 18:39.932 And in those office visits, did they receive these particular diagnoses? 18:39.932 --> 18:42.810 And again, we saw something very, very similar. 18:42.810 --> 18:46.381 But you notice autism is absent. 18:48.210 --> 18:54.349 And in fact, in Dr. Thomas's practice, because these red bars, they were typically partially vaccinated, 18:54.349 --> 18:58.769 there were not enough autistic kids to do statistics. 18:58.769 --> 19:05.692 In fact, the rate of autism in his practice was about 1 in 250. 19:05.692 --> 19:10.684 So, again, publishing this research is dangerous. It's very, very difficult. 19:10.684 --> 19:17.394 And what happened in this particular case was that the paper was published in a very reputable journal, international 19:17.394 --> 19:22.035 journal of environmental research and public health in 2020. 19:22.035 --> 19:30.620 Almost immediately after the paper hit the press and was published, Dr. Paul Thomas's medical license was revoked. 19:34.093 --> 19:37.993 And so he could no longer - in fact, it was an emergency suspension - he could no longer practice 19:37.993 --> 19:41.008 medicine, period. In the state of Oregon. Okay. 19:42.808 --> 19:47.313 Then this was then followed by an alone anonymous complaint to the journal. 19:47.313 --> 19:51.429 The paper was retracted in 2021. 19:51.429 --> 19:54.548 The journal called me, 19:54.548 --> 19:59.785 I was one of the original reviewers in the paper and said, oh, we were considering retracting the paper. 19:59.785 --> 20:04.866 We're afraid that it came from a single practitioner's practice. 20:06.407 --> 20:14.801 And we think that unvaccinated children are too different than vaccinated children in order to do a valid study. 20:17.000 --> 20:21.989 And they always paint these children - adults, people that question the safety and 20:21.989 --> 20:25.401 efficacy of vaccines - they paint you into a corner 20:25.401 --> 20:35.585 where they say you're different, you're weird, you go to the doctor less, you stay at home if you have a cerebral hemorrhage. 20:35.585 --> 20:40.638 You know, any preposterous thing to disqualify this type of study. 20:40.638 --> 20:43.952 That's what they did. 20:43.952 --> 20:47.303 So the journal calls me and I say, hello, 20:47.303 --> 20:50.125 you know, I reviewed the paper, 20:50.125 --> 20:57.296 I stand by my review and I happen to know that Dr. Thomas's patients are very, very satisfied with him. 20:57.296 --> 21:02.641 And so this again was differences in healthcare seeking behavior, which means that vaccinated children 21:02.641 --> 21:06.781 don't go to the doctor, which was definitely not the case. 21:06.781 --> 21:11.147 So Dr. Thomas's license was reinstated with very onerous conditions. 21:11.147 --> 21:13.357 He could not talk about vaccines. 21:13.357 --> 21:16.932 They took away his First Amendment rights. 21:16.932 --> 21:21.553 He could only see certain patients and he could not be involved in major decision making. 21:21.553 --> 21:25.784 He has filed a federal lawsuit against the Oregon Medical Board. 21:25.784 --> 21:29.099 I wish him all the best for that. 21:31.618 --> 21:40.014 So at that point, I was very, very proud that Dr. Lyons-Weiler, the researcher, the first author on this paper, fires back. 21:42.008 --> 21:50.851 And he actually did an analysis with another medical doctor, same data, and showed that parents who were getting informed 21:50.851 --> 21:58.431 consent and getting straight answers from their pediatrician, Dr. Thomas, actually liked going to the doctor. 21:58.431 --> 22:03.423 Imagine that, you get straight answers, you go back. 22:04.989 --> 22:14.384 And so they split the practice in three groups: high healthcare utilization, medium, and low. 22:14.384 --> 22:19.923 So high healthcare, they go to the doctor a lot. Low, they go to the doctor not as much. 22:19.923 --> 22:22.384 And then somewhere in the middle. 22:22.384 --> 22:26.413 And so the vaccinated group is actually the line in blue, or the curve in blue. 22:26.413 --> 22:28.843 And the unvaccinated group is the line in yellow. 22:28.843 --> 22:33.202 I do apologize for the clarity of the slide. 22:33.202 --> 22:40.067 And what they found was that consistently the unvaccinated children were visiting their practitioner more, regardless 22:40.067 --> 22:43.851 of whether they were high or medium healthcare utilization. 22:43.851 --> 22:47.960 And then the lowest healthcare utilization, it was the same. 22:47.960 --> 22:52.785 So in other words, unvaccinated children, when they are seeing their practitioner and they're getting 22:52.785 --> 22:56.592 straight answers, they're not going to the doctor less. 22:56.592 --> 23:01.850 They want to get their baby checked up. They trust their doctor. They have a good relationship. 23:01.850 --> 23:05.991 And therefore, they go at least the same normal way. 23:08.234 --> 23:15.897 And then I want to go to a study that came out in 2022 by the Centers for Disease Control, okay, 23:20.304 --> 23:30.327 and what they found was actually a relationship between the aluminum salt adjuvant that is in vaccines and persistent asthma. 23:30.327 --> 23:36.046 So they looked at vaccines before 24 months of age and then they were looking at asthma 23:36.046 --> 23:40.899 diagnosed between 24 months and five years of age. 23:42.640 --> 23:50.679 And what they found was if the child had eczema, eczema is a marker or an indication of autoimmune disorder, 23:52.468 --> 23:57.884 so if the child had eczema and they got the highest level of aluminum that they could in 23:57.884 --> 24:02.533 vaccines there were 63 percent higher levels of asthma. 24:04.447 --> 24:08.113 And this is what's called early infantile or childhood asthma. 24:08.113 --> 24:12.218 It‘s diagnosed very very early and not in a typical time period. 24:12.218 --> 24:15.620 So this is another marker of an autoimmune disorder. 24:15.620 --> 24:21.431 So if they had eczema, their risk was higher especially if they got the highest vaccine level. 24:21.431 --> 24:27.733 But the CDC will never do a zero exposure control. So it turns out that the sort of bluish bar here is a high 24:27.733 --> 24:33.888 level of aluminum and then the orange bar is just a little less aluminum, okay, that's cheating. 24:33.888 --> 24:41.410 That's called a cheat. They should have a zero exposure group - we would see a much more profound 24:41.410 --> 24:48.806 difference there if they actually did a controlled study. 24:48.806 --> 24:55.798 Now if they, had they looked at children that had not been diagnosed with eczema then they still had a higher asthma risk. 24:58.313 --> 25:05.030 If you have a child who is presenting something like eczema, something that is obviously autoimmune, it 25:05.030 --> 25:10.646 makes sense to forego or delay the vaccination schedule. 25:10.646 --> 25:17.521 These children were vaccinated before 24 months and the outcomes caused more asthma. 25:17.521 --> 25:25.651 If you break down the study - again the first two years of life ... but it was a monumental concession, CDC never 25:25.651 --> 25:32.782 comes down on the side of saying that vaccines cause anything except for happiness and sunshine. 25:32.782 --> 25:38.195 But they conceded that persistent asthma, this was defined as three severe asthma diagnoses 25:38.195 --> 25:42.967 within the period from two years to five years of age. 25:45.099 --> 25:47.474 So they did concede 25:47.474 --> 25:55.368 and oddly enough Dr. Frank DeStefano, he's an interesting researcher. He had actually participated in 25:55.368 --> 26:04.777 the cover-up of the relationship between vaccines and autism that led to the movie Vaxxed. 26:04.777 --> 26:11.251 He also had participated in the cover up regarding Vietnam veterans and the compound patient warrant. 26:11.251 --> 26:21.422 So he had a history of maybe being a little looser with the truth but he published his paper and then he subsequently retired. 26:21.422 --> 26:24.468 So this was his last word. 26:26.398 --> 26:29.695 So you're ready for some more bar graphs? 26:29.695 --> 26:39.710 This is the straight stuff, this is the … we're mainlining the heroine of vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies. 26:39.710 --> 26:45.556 I want to show a very very stark contrast and I do that for a reason. 26:45.556 --> 26:52.141 I want people to really understand that by doing this type of analysis, the analysis that only happens from independent 26:52.141 --> 26:57.564 researchers does not happen from universities funded by the government, it doesn't happen directly 26:57.564 --> 27:01.271 by the CDC or the National Institutes of Health. 27:01.271 --> 27:07.115 This is independent scientists and this is what they come up with. 27:07.115 --> 27:14.603 And when we publish this we don‘t have anything to gain, in fact we can lose our livelihood, we can go to 27:14.603 --> 27:20.838 court, we can lose our medical licenses etc. etc. etc. 27:20.838 --> 27:26.127 So in a lot of ways it gives me no joy to show the amount of damage and then also risk my 27:26.127 --> 27:31.133 livelihood not so much anymore and my family's well-being. 27:33.282 --> 27:40.975 But when you look at… Dr. Mawson did another study using the Florida Medicaid database, 27:40.975 --> 27:47.686 again autism spectrum disorder, hyperkinetic syndrome, ADHD, epilepsy and seizures, learning disorders, 27:47.686 --> 27:55.421 encephalopathy, tick disorders and at least one of the four mentioned neurodevelopmental disorders. 27:55.421 --> 28:04.507 So the risks are anywhere between above 2%, above 2.5 % all the way to almost 7% for learning disorders. 28:06.518 --> 28:11.305 Moving further at the same time he looked at pre-term birth and all these risks 28:11.305 --> 28:15.896 increase so at pre-term birth we see a higher rate 28:18.589 --> 28:25.137 and then we at Children's Health Defense, we bolstered our efforts, 28:25.137 --> 28:30.767 we've been working directly with wonderful anonymous individual practitioners, they have vaccinated children in their 28:30.767 --> 28:35.298 practices, they have unvaccinated children in their practices. 28:39.866 --> 28:47.926 At last count, we have had 10 different practitioners where we've used their these are identified, these are all very, very 28:47.926 --> 28:59.022 secure medical practices, we keep the data very, very secure, do not ever release anything that will dare identify the patients. 28:59.022 --> 29:06.842 And we've seen this grow to now over, this is outdated, we now have over 100,000 patients. 29:06.842 --> 29:17.110 Now we shouldn't have to do this, because the CDC has their own database that has not 100,000 children, but 3 million children. 29:17.110 --> 29:25.198 But they will not release those records, they will not even, and I'm kind of loathe to say this, they will 29:25.198 --> 29:29.689 not even release those records to Secretary Kennedy, 29:29.689 --> 29:37.331 they keep on trying to hide it in different locations, and behind different legal barriers. But in this cohort we have 29:37.331 --> 29:45.656 4,000 completely unvaccinated patients, and we've been following them from birth to a minimum of four years. 29:45.656 --> 29:50.188 The older children in this group are anywhere between 13 to 15 years old, 29:50.188 --> 29:55.537 but the youngest that you can be, because we want to have diagnoses under developmental delays, 29:55.537 --> 29:58.964 autism, ticks, whatever, by four years of age. 29:58.964 --> 30:03.461 And then the rest of the group, these are primarily partially vaccinated children, 30:03.461 --> 30:12.036 and this was sort of the basis for my previous publications, but we've grown the group and we will continue to grow the group. 30:14.192 --> 30:21.208 So, just to show you, this is hot off the press, this is in the process of being published, this information. 30:21.208 --> 30:26.987 So, we wanted to look, you know, we looked at neurodevelopmental disabilities, we looked at 30:26.987 --> 30:32.079 autoimmune disorders, now let's look at infections, 30:32.079 --> 30:37.685 because vaccines are supposed to keep you healthy, they are supposed to prevent infections, 30:37.685 --> 30:44.765 but what we saw in this cohort that… and these recurring infections were defined as having at least three 30:44.765 --> 30:53.696 different diagnoses over a rolling 12-month period in the time that the child was enrolled in that pediatric practice. 30:53.696 --> 31:00.796 Ear infections, respiratory disease, strep infection were all much, much greater. 31:00.796 --> 31:09.518 And then, if we looked at the number of vaccines that were given, we added then the unvaccinated, and this is in the 31:09.518 --> 31:18.352 first year of life, one to three in the first year of life, four to six, six to nine, and then ten or more. 31:18.352 --> 31:24.310 And what you see is that overall, and in almost every case, the unvaccinated fare much better. 31:24.310 --> 31:27.880 They‘re just healthier kids. 31:30.401 --> 31:36.578 There is one lower bar for ten or more vaccines for respiratory disease, and that's really, I would attribute that to 31:36.578 --> 31:43.888 the fact that when a child is healthy, if you're vaccinating the child is healthy, then you keep on vaccinating. 31:43.888 --> 31:47.493 We call that the healthy vaccine-e effect. 31:47.493 --> 31:51.067 And we typically see information like that. 31:51.067 --> 31:54.491 We do not take that information lightly. 31:54.491 --> 31:57.590 And I do want to also show my commitment 31:57.590 --> 32:04.335 that if vaccines win, if vaccines are giving a better outcome, we want to give them every benefit of the doubt. 32:04.335 --> 32:13.285 It only behooves us to make sure that we are absolutely fair and that we are absolutely showing the truth in our publications. 32:14.926 --> 32:21.302 So overall, when we look at vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, it is very, very clear. 32:21.302 --> 32:24.289 The vaccinated children are suffering in some way, shape or form. 32:24.289 --> 32:28.616 We do not know what the specific disorder might be. 32:28.616 --> 32:37.609 But we also know that the technology and the tools are available to anticipate these particular vaccine injuries. 32:37.609 --> 32:43.427 I'm going to skip a few slides here just to go to the conclusion. 32:43.427 --> 32:47.938 So they have less developmental delay and neurological diagnoses. 32:47.938 --> 32:54.019 They have less asthma, ear infections, autoimmune disorders and allergies, respiratory 32:54.019 --> 32:57.797 infections, strep, and they're healthier overall. 32:57.797 --> 32:59.430 So this is conclusive. 32:59.430 --> 33:12.567 We are not playing a shell game, and we are supported by 11 independent studies that show very, very similar results. 33:12.567 --> 33:19.870 I've shown you the results of just Anthony Mawson, Children's Health Defense, and James Lyons-Weiler and Paul Thomas. 33:19.870 --> 33:30.122 So that's just three of the research groups that are doing this type of study, and we consistently see ... this type of effect, 33:30.122 --> 33:38.759 and this is, you know, obviously, this is very personal for me, and it's very personal for many individuals 33:38.759 --> 33:44.806 that work for and support Children's Health Defense. 33:44.806 --> 33:52.387 But again, we're not looking at telling people what to do. 33:52.387 --> 33:58.829 We are looking at educating individuals and making sure that they have the right tools, in their hands, in order to make an 33:58.829 --> 34:03.909 informed choice regarding any intervention, especially those interventions in early childhood and 34:03.909 --> 34:07.398 within these very, very vulnerable developmental periods. 34:07.398 --> 34:09.041 Thank you very much. 34:09.041 --> 34:12.218 Dr. Brian Hooker, “Children’s Health Defense”