How do the various international developments and trends in our world come about?
Are they purely random, natural developments, or is there a strategy and some degree of planning behind them?
Kla.TV has already highlighted in many of its programs the wealthy and influential power brokers who
advocate for eugenics and population reduction and are actively working to control the population.
The Freemason World Map, recently published on Vetopedia.org, also shows how many of the institutions
that dominate our world have ties to secret societies.
True to the motto: “It’s a big club, but you’re not in it.”
In this episode, we present another piece of the puzzle that provides evidence of a plan for
international population control and population reduction.
These are the 1988 testimony of Dr. Lawrence Dunegan, a U.S. physician.
Dr. Lawrence Dunegan (1933–2004) was a pediatrician who practiced in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, throughout his life.
One of his professors at the University of Pittsburgh was a man named Dr. Richard Day (1905–1989).
He was present on March 20, 1969, at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society, a society
for pediatric medicine, held at Lamont Restaurant.
Dr. Richard Day was the evening's speaker and spoke for about two hours to the
approximately 80 medical professionals in attendance.
In doing so, he outlined his ambitious plans for the future, which he wanted to share with his audience
so they could better prepare for what was to come.
Before he began, he asked his audience to turn off all recording devices and not to take any notes.
The fact that the contents of the speech have nevertheless been preserved is thanks to Dr.
Lawrence Dunegan, who was in the audience that evening.
According to his own account, he made an effort to remember as much as possible of what was
said and to document it in the years that followed.
In 1988, he recorded his recollections of the speech and his observations regarding Dr.
Richard Day’s predictions that had already come true.
In 1991, he also gave an interview on this topic, which has been recorded.
What is particularly noteworthy about Dr. Richard Day, the prominent guest speaker on
that March evening in 1969 in Pittsburgh?
In addition to his decades-long career at Columbia University in New York—whose medical school was reformed and expanded
by the Rockefellers—he served as medical director of Planned Parenthood USA until shortly before his speech in 1969.
Planned Parenthood was founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger with financial support from eugenicist John D. Rockefeller Jr.
According to the journal *The Journal of Pediatrics*, Dr. Richard Day accepted the position because he was
convinced that “the issue of overpopulation is arguably the most important problem facing the planet.”
Certain statements in his speech about Rockefeller University and his work at institutions affiliated with the
Rockefeller family fuel suspicions that he gained access to exclusive insider knowledge in elite circles.
While some of Dr. Richard Day's predictions have not yet come true, an astonishing number of detailed predictions have
already come true or are in the process of being realized.
This lends particular weight to Dr. Lawrence Dunegan's 1988 testimony.
British investigative author and commentator David Icke discussed Day's prophecies from 1969 on his
"Connecting the Dots" show in April 2022 and compared them to current international developments.
Since this program is becoming increasingly relevant, Kla.TV has translated it and is presenting it below.
Since David Icke’s program covers only a portion of Dr. Richard Day’s statements, we recommend the original
recordings by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan—which we’ve linked below this program—for further self-study.
Hello and welcome to the David Icke Dot-Connector videocast.
Well, I know there are some people who think the COVID hoax is over, so to speak, and that
the battle has been won, but that's not the case.
We are in the midst of a massive agenda aimed at enslaving all of humanity.
And today I'll give you an example of just how long this has been in the works—and that
it won't go away unless we make sure it does.
Of course, you've seen that many of the COVID restrictions have been lifted, but that doesn't mean they can't come back.
Take a look at what's happening in China right now—it's much more far-reaching than COVID.
COVID was a massive deception designed to push this agenda forward very, very quickly over the past two
years, but it's only part of it—it's not the actual goal.
The real goal is far greater than that. And, as I said, today I'm going to give you an example of just how long this has
been in the works—and not just how long, but also how meticulously it has been planned, down to the smallest detail.
So I'm going to take a look at what a man named Richard Day—Dr. Richard Day—said in 1969.
That was 20 years after Orwell published “1984” and nearly 40 years after Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World.”
Officially, these are novels, but as I've been saying for years, they by no means sprang exclusively from her imagination.
It contained a great deal of insight into what was actually to come, and as far as Richard Day
was concerned in 1969, it wasn't a novel at all.
This man was a major Rockefeller insider; he was a professor of pediatrics at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, and he was an
executive at Planned Parenthood, a Rockefeller organization that—as is customary with the
Rockefeller family—had its origins in the eugenics movement.
We've heard Bill Gates say in interviews that his father once headed Planned Parenthood.
This is the Gates family, which is extremely close to the Rockefellers.
Bill Gates is just a puppet of the Rockefellers—the very same Rockefeller family that founded the World Health Organization.
Now this organization is being led by Bill Gates—with the results we’ve seen clearly over the past two years.
And we will continue to see this, because this planned pandemic treaty between the World Health Organization and its member
states will be the next step toward the World Health Organization becoming a full-fledged global dictatorship
in the field of health care, in which whatever it says will apply in all of these countries.
So no one knows why Dr. Richard Day said what he said in that speech, but for my part, I am extremely
grateful to him for what he said, because he revealed so much about what is currently happening.
In 1969, Richard Day, a professor of pediatrics, stood up at a meeting of pediatricians in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
and asked the audience not to take notes or turn on recording devices, as he was about to make some revelations.
Revelations that, as it turned out, described in detail how the world would change—because, essentially, the forces he
represented would change it. And that is what I refer to as the global cult—this global network of secret societies with an
interlocking leadership, a spider at the center that drives this Orwellian, fascist-communist, technocratic agenda for the world.
In my book *Phantom Self*, I write in detail about what Richard Day said that evening, because a pediatrician named Laurence
Dunegan actually took notes. And before he died in 2004, he conducted a series of
interviews that revealed what Dr. Day had said in 1969.
And he did this because he could see at that moment that what Day had predicted was actually coming true.
And, as you'll see, this is even more true today—which is hard to believe.
So, one of the things he said in 1969 is that we can already cure almost every type of cancer today.
And that the relevant information is archived at the Rockefeller Institute—now Rockefeller University.
He said that they don't reveal these cancer cures because people have to die of something anyway, so they
might as well die of cancer, and besides, it's necessary to keep the population down, he said.
This Rockefeller Institute is therefore very interesting and of great significance, because the entire modern theory of viruses
essentially originates from this very Rockefeller Institute. The institute was founded in 1901 by the notorious J. D.
Rockefeller—the very same J. D. Rockefeller who was the instigator and founder of the massive pharmaceutical
cartel that today produces all these fake vaccines, which are causing death and health chaos worldwide.
And the director of the Rockefeller Institute from 1937 to 1956 was a man named Thomas Milton Rivers, who
happens to be known as the father of modern virology.
So let's summarize: There’s the father of modern virology, who worked for the Rockefellers—the Rockefeller family, which founded
the big pharmaceutical cartel, and this cartel, which exploited the so-called virus theory to make enormous sums of money
and amass enormous power: see the COVID era. That says it all.
And all of that is just a coincidence, isn't it? No way.
And Dr. Richard Day was a Rockefeller insider who, in 1969, revealed to those pediatricians in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, what would happen to the world—and it has happened and is happening right now.
The same Rockefeller family that established the World Health Organization as part of the United Nations in 1948—and played a
key role in the founding of the United Nations itself —in fact, the Rockefeller family provided the land on which the
United Nations building in New York stands free of charge.
And the World Health Organization just happened to be the central hub driving the response to what is known as COVID.
This is just a small part—only a fraction—of what Dr. Richard Day told those pediatricians all those
decades ago, in 1969, as reported by Dr. Lawrence Donegan.
Well, in light of recent events, what about this first point?
“We,” he said, “the cult, will make boys and girls equal.” 1969.
He said that part of the plan was to make people gender-neutral, so that boys and girls would be the same, and
reproduction would take place in laboratories without sex.
That is what Aldous Huxley described in *Brave New World*: the parentless reproduction of the species without conception, and
that is exactly what I have been talking about all these years in connection with the creation of a non-reproductive human. All
these artificial, synthetic genetic things—like vaccines—are involved in transforming the human body from Human
1.0 to Human 2.0, which would be a non-reproductive human.
And he went on to talk about politics. He said that very few people really know how the government works.
He said, in essence, that elected officials are influenced in ways they are not even aware of, and that they carry
out plans that have been prepared for them—plans they believe they devised themselves, but which they did not.
That's also something I've been talking about for so long: These people have no idea that this cult
exists. Most of them, anyway—the insiders, of course, do.
And that's why they don't really know where all this politics comes from or the
direction in which the world is actually heading.
But they are led to believe that it somehow comes from within their own circles, even though that is not
the case. “In fact,” Day said, “they are being manipulated in a way they don’t understand.”
He went on to say that most people don't understand how governments work, and that even people in high-ranking government
positions, including those in the U.S. government, don't really understand how and where exactly decisions are made." Exactly!
One of the statements, according to Dunagan, had to do with change.
The statement was: People must get used to the idea of change—so used to it, in fact, that
they come to expect it. Nothing will last forever.
Take a look around—does this look familiar?
According to Dunagan, this was often discussed in the context of a society in which people seem to have no roots or points of
reference, yet would be passively willing to accept change. Simply because these changes were sold to them with a purported
purpose they considered acceptable, while in reality there was a second, true purpose that would advance the goals of
establishing this new order—what is now referred to as the “Great Reset,” this new system, as Day called it.
He said people were too trusting; they didn't ask the right questions.
So this is something I've talked about time and again over the years.
If you look far back in history, there is a real reason why something happens, and then there is the pretext that
people are supposed to believe is the reason—and these two things are almost always the exact opposite of each other.
So if you look at what they call COVID, everything that has happened was supposedly meant to benefit public
health, whereas in reality, the goal was to destroy public health and completely reshape global society.
That's the reason they want you to believe: "We're nice, we care about your health" … The real
reason … Ah … Well, actually, we're not nice at all.
Ukraine—it’s supposed to be a war that’s all about Russia. That’s the reason we’re being given for it.
In reality, the goal is to target the global economy—especially in the West—and bring it crashing down so
that they can introduce this new system that Day spoke of. I call this “creative destruction.”
If you want to introduce something new, you have to destroy the old.
So in 1969, Day spoke of a global economic dictatorship.
The stated plan, as reported by Dunegan, called for assigning different roles in industry and trade to
various parts of the world within a unified global system. Within a unified global system.
The continued dominance of the United States—here it comes—as early as 1969:
The continued dominance of the United States and the relative independence and self-sufficiency
of the United States would have to be eliminated.
If you look at what's happening in America—which is largely a result of the Biden administration—the entire process
was already underway; now it's just shifting into high gear.
They are destroying the economic structure of the United States.
For decades, they have been outsourcing production to China, which has given China control
over supply chains—often for the most basic goods.
And what will happen to fuel prices? Current energy prices are bringing the U.S. economy—and with it, the American people and
Europe as well—to its knees and dismantling the U.S. economy.
Dunegan said that Day had stated on several occasions that, in order to create a new
structure, the old one must first be destroyed.
American industry was an example of this. Look at what has happened to American industry since
that man's speech in 1969—it's all been planned.
Day said that heavy industry in the United States would be particularly hard hit and scaled back, while the
same industries in other countries would be expanded.
Centrally controlled money. Most of this money would be used for loans.
It was already the case that money was primarily a matter of credit. But the exchange of money would no
longer take the form of cash or tangible items, but rather as an electronic credit signal.
People would only carry very small amounts of money on them for things like gum and chocolate bars,
he said—just something to keep in their pockets.
Every purchase of a certain value would be processed electronically; income would be transferred electronically to
one's own account; and there would be a single banking system.
It might seem, he said, as if there were more than one bank, but essentially it would be a single banking system. So it would be
the case that when you received your salary, it would be credited to your bank account, and when you bought something, the
amount would be deducted from your account balance at the point of purchase, and you would not actually carry any cash on you.
This is the cashless society whose arrival I have been warning about since around 1992.
And we have this addendum from Day:
In addition, computer records can be kept of everything you've purchased.
So if you buy too much of a certain item and an official wants to know what you're doing with your money, he could trace
it back, check your purchases, and find out what you bought.
That's exactly what's happening today.
And take a look at the CO₂ credit cards that are just being introduced, which allow you to buy only a certain amount of items
with a “carbon footprint,” as they call it. Once the CO₂ limit is reached, the card won’t work again until the following month.
“Another fascinating thing,” he said in 1969. “The ability to save would be severely limited.”
People simply wouldn't be able to save up any significant assets.
There was a certain notion that wealth equals power, and that wealth in the hands of
many people is not good for those in power.
So if you save too much, you could end up paying taxes. The more you save, the higher the tax rate on your
savings. That means your savings might never really go very far.
Well, look at the negative interest rates and look at inflation. What is inflation if not a tax on
savings, which constantly lose value just by sitting there?
In addition, if you start saving too much, you could have your salary reduced.
You might say: Well, you're saving instead of spending money; you don't really need that money at all.
The idea behind this is to prevent people from accumulating wealth that could have
disruptive effects on the new system in the long term.
And this guaranteed income they're planning—after they've destroyed all the jobs and the remaining ones
have been taken over by AI—is really just about living from one guaranteed income to the next.
"You will own nothing, but you will be happy"—that is the message of Klaus Schwab's organization, the World Economic
Forum, which is, of course, a powerful expression of this idea.
So, back to 1969, when Day went on to explain that people would be implanted with microchips.
The next step, Dunegan reported, would be the "unified card"—a single credit card—and then the next step would be
to replace that single card with an implant under the skin.
Now, in this other statement, he says that electronic payments would initially all be based on various types of credit cards,
but people would have credit cards with magnetic stripes, and once they got used to them, they would be shown
the advantage of combining all of that into a single credit card that serves a single currency system.
And then they wouldn't have to carry all that plastic around with them anymore.
What is he describing? The smartphone! That's exactly what's happening right now.
So the next step after this universal smartphone card would be to replace the universal
card (i.e., the smartphone) with a skin implant.
The universal card could be lost or stolen, which would cause problems, and it could be swapped with
someone else's to conceal one's identity, Day said.
The skin implant, on the other hand, cannot be lost or counterfeited (though it can be
hacked) and is not transferable to another person.
This would ensure that you and your account are identified without any possibility of error.
The skin implants would have to be inserted in a location that is favorable for the skin.
For example, on your right hand or your forehead. For those of you who think along those lines: right there as the third eye.
There was also talk of implants that could be used for monitoring by transmitting radio signals.
1969. Citizens could be identified by a specific frequency on their personal transmitter and tracked
anytime, anywhere by an authority seeking to locate them.
That's exactly what's happening right now in China—and increasingly around the world. Oh, but it's not a
conspiracy. It's not planned. It's all just a coincidence.
That would be especially useful if someone had escaped from prison.
There were further discussions about personal surveillance, and he described what we see all around us on a massive scale today.
Here's something else he said in 1969: The establishment of the world system might require a nuclear war.
If there were too many people in the right places who opposed the global dictatorship, it might become necessary
to use one or two—possibly more—nuclear weapons, he said.
As it was put, this might be necessary to convince people “that we mean business,” followed by the statement that once one or
two were set off, everyone—even the most reluctant—would give in.
By the way, everyone here is exempt, folks!
He said something about how this negotiated peace after the nuclear war would be very convincing, since the
whole thing would have been rehearsed within a certain framework or context, but no one would know about it.
People who heard about it would have been convinced that these were genuine negotiations between hostile parties who had
finally come to realize that peace was better than war. And… oh my God, how long have I been talking about this?
And we have a modern, contemporary version of this: Zelenskyy in Ukraine, Putin in Russia—both controlled by the same people.
And so this charade continues, this stage show. And then they say, “Oh no, we’ve actually come to our senses now and want peace.”
But what will this peace look like? It will be the system that this cult wants. The phrase I believe I
coined in the 1990s: Problem – Reaction – Solution.
Create the problem, provoke the reaction—“Help, do something!”—and then offer solutions to the problems you secretly created.
Staged Terrorism.
In 1969, he said that terrorism was widespread in Europe and other parts of the world.
This was accompanied by a mild rebuke that Americans had it too good anyway.
And a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world really is—or can be—a dangerous
place if we don't hand over control to the relevant authorities. Problem—Reaction—Solution.
Population control and the killing of older people.
“Everyone has a ‘right’ only to a limited lifespan,” Day said. The elderly are no longer useful, he said. They
become a burden. People should be prepared to accept death.
An arbitrary age limit would be set. After all, one is only entitled to a certain number of steak dinners,
orgasms, and a certain number of life’s simple pleasures.
And when you've had enough of it and are no longer productive, no longer working, and no longer contributing,
you should be willing to make way for the next generation.
And he doesn't talk about retirement either. And here's an example of just how meticulously all of this was planned.
Day said that there were a few things that would help people realize they had lived long enough—well,
several things, Dunagan said—that he had mentioned.
He didn't remember them all, but these were some of them.
The use of very faint ink on forms that people have to fill out.
So that older people can't read the pale text as easily and younger people have to ask for help.
That really happens. I see it all the time. The tiny print on bottles and other things that
only people with very good eyesight can make out.
That is the extent of what we are talking about: that this manipulation is taking place, and
ultimately, all of it is psychological in nature.
Day said that traffic management would be geared toward road traffic.
There would be more fast lanes and traffic patterns that would pose difficulties for older people with slower
reflexes, causing them to lose some of their independence.
And one important point that Day raised—and which, according to Donagan, was discussed at length—was that the cost
of medical care was being driven up to unbearable levels.
Health care would be very closely tied to employment, and unless they had a remarkably wealthy family to support
them, older people would simply have to go without care.
And the idea, according to Day, is for everyone to say, “Enough is enough! What a burden this is!”
The burden that the elderly place on the young by trying to take care of them.
Then the boys would be willing to help Mom and Dad on their journey, provided it was done humanely and with
dignity. And then there was the example: it could be like a lovely farewell party, a real celebration.
Mom and Dad did a good job. And then, after the party is over, they take the lethal pill.
So, you live for a certain amount of time, and then, according to the law, you’re out. And now let’s take another look at the COVID
era and the massive, massive culling of the elderly all over the world through drugs like midazolam and remdesivir in
the United States and elsewhere. They’re killing the elderly—that’s what they’re doing with these fake vaccines!
The elderly and the vulnerable need a fourth and fifth dose—that's a culling! Mass murder!
Predicted by this guy because he knew it was coming!
Education. Day said that children spend more time in school but don't learn anything.
Take a look around. And he said that schools would become the center of the community.
To put it another way: Schools would begin to wrest control over a child’s upbringing from the parents, and the school would do so
in the name of the state, which in turn would do so in the name of the sect. Right now, you’re seeing these parents’
organizations stepping forward and demanding that parents be given back the right to decide what happens to their children.
All the injustice involving social services taking children away from their loving parents
worldwide for flimsy reasons—that’s all part of it.
He spoke of putting more and more pressure on children, which would lead to students burning out as a result. Later, in
1969, in the context of drug and alcohol abuse, he suggested that psychiatric services would be drastically expanded.
That’s exactly what happened. Those who couldn’t handle the stress would fall by the wayside and thus
become expendable—“superfluous,” said Dunegan; I think that’s the word I mean or am looking for.
Day also said that computers were being introduced into the education system, and at that time, he said, anyone who wanted
access to computers or books not directly related to their field of study had to have a very good reason for doing so.
Watch to see how this will unfold in the future. Otherwise, access would be denied, and the books that, according
to the authorities, people shouldn't read would be banned.
Hi! And here we go again with all this constant change—back to this topic.
He said that nothing lasts forever; streets are rerouted and renamed, and neighborhoods you
haven't seen in a while become unfamiliar to you.
Among other things, this would help older people feel that it is time to move on.
They felt as though they could no longer keep up with the changes in neighborhoods that were once familiar to them; buildings were
left empty and allowed to fall into disrepair, and the streets created an oppressive atmosphere for those who didn't fit in.
He said that, in a way, the purpose was essentially to create what he called a “jungle society.”
Somewhere in that context, he mentioned that buildings and bridges were built in such a
way that they would collapse after a while.
There would be more accidents involving airplanes, trains, and cars, and all of this is said to
contribute to a sense of insecurity—that nothing is safe.
So that’s the reason behind this atmosphere of fear: That, for example, George Soros—a member of the cult—my goodness, how
blatant—is funding the election of district attorneys across America who, as soon as they take office, drop
criminal charges and let violent people back on the streets. All of this is part of the agenda Day spoke of in 1969.
The Depiction of Violence in Movies and Video Games.
Violence would be depicted more vividly—this is intended to desensitize people to violence—there may come a time
when people witness real violence and become part of it.
It would become clear later where this was leading.
So there would be more realistic depictions of violence in the entertainment industry, which would make it
easier for people to adjust their attitudes toward death. Their attitudes would, in fact, change.
Food inspections and the food supply would be strictly regulated. Stay tuned if you want to see that.
Food shortages would be created in a great hurry, and people would realize the dangers of overpopulation.
Ultimately, the food supply—regardless of whether population growth slows down or not—is to be brought under centralized
control so that people would have enough to eat well, but not enough to support any
refugees fleeing the new system, the Great Reset.
In other words: If you had a friend or relative who didn't want to go along with the “Great
Reset,” growing your own food would be banned.
This would be done under some pretext or another.
Dunegan said—as I mentioned at the beginning—that everything has two purposes: a stated one and a true one.
And the stated purpose here regarding food—to ban growing one's own food—is that growing one's own vegetables is unsafe.
It would cause diseases or spread germs or something like that, so the official justification would be to protect
consumers. But the real intention would be to restrict the food supply and make growing one's own food illegal.
If you continue to engage in illegal activities such as growing your own food, you become a criminal.
Weather monitoring. Richard Day was involved in weather monitoring during World War II, so it was a subject he knew very well.
Dunegan said the topic of the weather had come up. That was another truly memorable moment.
He said we could—or would soon be able to—control the weather. 1969.
He said, "I'm not just referring to spraying iodine crystals into the clouds to induce rain—that's already being done."
That wasn't just a method they used back then—it was actual weather control. The weather was viewed as a
weapon of war, a weapon for influencing public policy.
Human-caused global warming and climate change. Oh, look! We're having this extreme weather—that's climate change!
He spoke about this technology, which could generate or hold back rain in order to influence and control certain areas.
There were two aspects that stood out quite a bit, Dunegan said.
Day said that, on the one hand, it would be possible to cause a drought during the growing season so that nothing grows,
and, on the other hand, to cause very heavy rain during harvest time, making the fields too muddy to bring in the crop.
And in fact, he said, it was possible to do both.
There was no explanation of how this was accomplished. It was stated that this was either already
possible in 1969 or was about to become possible.
And Day also said that, in order to advance this agenda, they would fabricate scientific research.
Well, COVID or man-made climate change, and so on and so forth. They're faking scientific research—that's what they're doing.
Follow the science! No, follow those damn lies!
One more thing: mass movements of people.
Richard Day said there would be mass movements and migrations of people who have no roots in their new locations.
After all, traditions are easier to change in a place with a large immigrant population.
Compared to trying to change traditions in a place where people grew up, had a large family, and had their roots.
That is why people like George Soros have funded organizations that have led to the mass
migration of people from different cultures to the West.
That is why, under the Biden administration—though Biden is merely a figurehead, nothing more—the southern border
of the United States has essentially been thrown wide open.
And about two million people—and the number is rising—cross the border illegally every year.
For this very reason: to destroy a society’s culture. So that people simply lose what defines that society. And
as a result, offer less resistance to this global system.
By the way, they're now targeting the West. And right now, they're primarily targeting
countries with a predominantly white population.
But the idea is that, once these are subjugated, all the others will be targeted. Because what this global system
is supposed to be is a massive, centrally dictated monoculture based on technology. A technocracy.
In which there will no longer be any individual cultures. Not a single one as we know them today.
How did that go again? First they came for the communists. I wasn't a communist, so I didn't do anything.
And finally, they came for the Jews, and I wasn't Jewish, so I didn't do anything.
Then they came for me. And there was no one left who could stand up for me. That is exactly what is happening
right now with the targeted attack on Western culture.
Mind control of the masses. According to Dunegan, at some point in the presentation, Dr. Day made
two statements that I would like to include here.
One statement claimed that people can hold two contradictory ideas in their minds at the same time and act on them.
Provided that these two contradictory ideas are kept far enough apart.
And the other point was that it is possible to know with a fair degree of certainty how rational people will react to
certain circumstances or to certain information they encounter.
So, to determine the desired reaction, one simply needs to control the type of data or information presented to
them and the circumstances in which they find themselves.
And rational people—though I would question that description—will do what is expected of them. They
may not fully understand what they are doing or why.
And what he describes here—which I've written about at length—is cognitive dissonance.
It is possible to hold two contradictory beliefs at the same time without realizing that they contradict each other.
So the government is killing a huge number of people with these counterfeit vaccines. But the
government is doing this to protect our health.
And then there's the second point: All you have to do is monitor the data. That's what
censorship is all about: controlling information.
After all, information shapes perception. And perception determines behavior. If you
control information, you determine behavior.
It's all part of the plan. And that's exactly what the fight against misinformation is all about.
He went on to talk, essentially, about the origins of the Internet. And that was back in 1969.
“One more thing was said,” Dunegan reported. “You’ll be watching TV, and someone will be watching you,” Day said.
At the same time, at a central monitoring station. Televisions would be equipped with a device that makes this possible:
Smart TVs—and these are just the early versions. The TV wouldn't have to be turned on for this to work.
In addition, the TV could be used to monitor what people are watching. It would be possible to see what people
are watching on TV—and how they react to what they see.
And you wouldn't know that you're being watched while you're watching your own TV. It has since
become clear that this actually happens with smart TVs.
How would we get people to accept these things in their homes? Day said:
Well, people would buy them. And when they buy their own TV, they wouldn't know at first that this is possible on their own TV.
This was described as what we know today as cable television—a replacement for over-the-air television.
And if you bought a TV, this surveillance feature would simply be built into the device, and most people wouldn't
initially have enough knowledge to realize it was there.
And then the cable would be the means of transmitting the surveillance data to the surveiller.
Until people found out that this surveillance was taking place, they would have been very dependent on television in many ways.
"Just as people today are dependent on the telephone," Day said.
Well, this brings us to the whole issue of internet predictions. One thing that television would be used for is shopping.
You wouldn't have to leave the house to go shopping.
You simply turn on the TV and would be able to interact with the store where you want to shop through the TV channel.
And you could use a switch to move from one location to another to select a refrigerator or some clothes.
Not only would that be convenient, but it would also make you dependent on the TV or computer.
So the built-in monitoring device would be something you couldn't do without.
We're talking about TVs here, but of course it's now common knowledge that your computer is watching you.
To the point where you can have a conversation about a product or something else even when you're not online on a platform.
And then, when you go to a platform like Facebook or something similar, you'll suddenly see ads
for the things you talked about privately at home.
He predicted that as early as 1969.
In 1948, Orwell spoke of these telescreens and said that every cable connection in your home would be used for surveillance.
And Day spoke of the World Wide Web, which wasn't officially invented until 1996.
And the technology it was based on?
Developed by DARPA, the Pentagon's Office of Defense Advanced Research Projects. And now here's
something that's so relevant to today's world:
Housing developments. Homeownership would be a thing of the past.
The cost of housing and the financing of housing would gradually be driven up to such a level that
most people would no longer be able to afford it.
Hello!! People who already own a home would be allowed to keep it, but as the years go by, it would become
increasingly difficult for young people to buy a house.
Young people are increasingly becoming renters, especially in apartments or housing
complexes. You won't own anything, but you'll be happy.
More and more unsold homes are sitting empty. But people just can't afford to buy them.
However, housing costs would not go down. One might immediately think: Well, the prices of
vacant homes would drop, and people would buy them.
But Day made a statement to the effect that prices would be kept high, even though many properties were
available, so that the free market would not function.
I mean, there's no reason why real estate prices should be skyrocketing right now, given
the current economic conditions, but they are.
So. People wouldn't be able to afford them. And little by little, an ever-larger portion of the
population would be forced into small apartments.
Small apartments that can't accommodate very many children.
These are the so-called micro-apartments. I've been warning about them for decades in my books.
Now we're seeing it happen. All over the world.
Micro-apartments. Tiny, tiny places that are being built. Because that’s where the slaves of the Great Reset will live.
Then, Day said, if the number of actual homeowners were to decline, they would become a minority.
The majority of people living in these tiny apartments would have no sympathy for them, and then these homes could be
taken away from them through higher taxes or other regulations that make it difficult to own property.
And this would be acceptable to the public or the majority within the context of the entire process—in
line, of course, with the “divide and conquer” strategy.
Ultimately—and this is the intended goal—people would be assigned a place to live.
And it would be common for non-family members to live with someone.
This is because you don't know to what extent you can trust someone you live with.
All of this would be under the control of a central housing authority.
"Keep this in mind," he said, "when it comes to things like censuses, where they ask how many bedrooms your house has,
how many bathrooms, and whether you have a finished playroom."
This information is personal and, under our current constitution, is not in the national
interest as far as the government is concerned.
But you will be asked these questions, and you decide how you want to answer them.
And finally, the system as a whole. The disappearance of dissidents.
Day said in 1969. When the new system—the Great Reset—takes over, people will be expected to pledge their allegiance to it,
thereby demonstrating that they have no reservations whatsoever about the entire system and are not hesitant in any way.
There simply won't be any room, he said, for people who don't go along with it.
We don't need people like that. They just take up space. So people like that would be sent to special places.
And there, Dunegan said—I don't remember his exact words anymore, but I gathered from them that they wouldn't
live long in the special places they were being taken to.
He may have said something like “humanely disposed of.” But I don’t remember exactly.
All that remained was the impression that the system would not support them if they did not conform to it;
they would leave, and death would be the only alternative.
In this context, Day said there would be no martyrs.
Dunegan said, “When I first heard that, I thought it meant that people wouldn’t be killed.”
But as the presentation went on, it became clear that what he meant was that they would not be killed or eliminated in a
way that could serve as an inspiration to others, as martyrs do.
Instead, he said something like: People would just disappear.
And then the rollout of the new system. He said that would probably take place on a weekend in the winter.
On a Friday evening, everything would come to a standstill, and on Monday morning, when everyone woke up, there would
be an announcement that the new system had gone into effect.
During the preparatory process, which takes place in advance to prepare the United States for these changes, everyone would be
busier, have less free time, and fewer opportunities to become aware of what was happening and to
really look around and see what was going on around them.
Well, no. It's not over, and these events aren't random. They're planned. Down to the smallest
detail. COVID was a phase in this plan, and it still is.
A phase in this unfolding transformation of human society. But it is only one phase.
And even that isn't over yet. Now they're vaccinating the youngest children with a substance that has been
shown—and continues to be shown—to have killed and maimed an incredible number of people worldwide.
So we are dealing with a form of malice that was articulated there, one that is obviously
difficult for those who are not evil to comprehend.
But we have to understand this, and we have to grapple with it, and we must not fall for the notion that the
battle has somehow been won and is over just because a few measures and restrictions have been lifted
When they lift these restrictions, they do so for a specific reason. And remember: The basis
for everything they do is psychological in nature.
It is control of thoughts that leads to control of behavior, which in turn means control over you.
And we'll see how challenges come at us like a hail of gunfire.
To complete this journey toward unimaginable tyranny.
And we must face these challenges with an unshakable spirit, for that is precisely their goal: to break our
spirit and thus force us into humble submission to their will.
They want to break our spirit, and we must not let that happen, because if we do, what Day
described will come to pass. And so much more will happen.
Take a look around—it's already happening.
A look into the mirror of world events reveals to us:
No one's going to get anywhere with empty gestures here.
How are Ivo Sasek, his family, and the OCG teams coping with these challenging times?
“In other words, we don’t close our eyes to the world’s problems just to block them out and then live as comfortable a
life as possible despite all the obvious crises. Never. No!”
We will defeat the conspiracy with the power within us through God!
"Comparing every enemy to God gives us the strength never to back down!"
It will not be through the might of human armies, nor through human strength; it is through the heavenly powers
within us that the enemy is now completely breaking through!
All truth comes to light; all the deceit of the deceiver is exposed.
Because we are one—truly one—heaven bestows both grace and substance!