WEBVTT

00:06.336 --> 00:13.240
In the German mainstream media, the “social media
ban for minors” is currently a hotly debated topic.

00:13.240 --> 00:20.456
According to a survey conducted by the polling firm
INSA in December 2025, two-thirds of respondents

00:20.456 --> 00:24.635
in Germany reportedly voted in favor of such a ban.

00:24.635 --> 00:30.502
This plays right into the hands of European
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

00:30.502 --> 00:40.558
On May 12, 2026, during a summit in Copenhagen on AI and child
protection, she announced that the EU could propose a Europe-wide

00:40.558 --> 00:45.592
ban on social media for children as early as this summer.

00:45.592 --> 00:54.539
These considerations are reportedly driven by growing pressure
from member states to strengthen online protections for minors.

00:54.539 --> 00:58.072
Protecting minors online is really important!

00:58.072 --> 01:01.225
But at this point, we must also be
allowed to ask the following question:

01:01.225 --> 01:05.098
Why has online protection for
minors only become so important now?

01:05.098 --> 01:13.504
Why wait until millions of children and teenagers have
fallen for the “addictive design,” as von der Leyen put it?

01:13.504 --> 01:20.089
Only now, after 12- to 14-year-old boys have long since
learned how to use AI to create “deepfake nude images” of

01:20.089 --> 01:23.833
their female classmates and share them on social media.

01:23.833 --> 01:31.206
This means that the faces of classmates can be uploaded and
“superimposed” onto pornographic depictions of the human body.

01:31.206 --> 01:33.940
This creates an image that looks deceptively real.

01:33.940 --> 01:38.700
The operators even advertise that
they can "undress" anyone they want.

01:38.700 --> 01:45.847
But instead of banning such sites outright, the
discussion is limited to age verification, digital

01:45.847 --> 01:49.459
IDs, and a required “review” of uploaded photos.

01:49.459 --> 01:52.862
It is precisely this inconsistent behavior that raises doubts.

01:52.862 --> 01:59.461
And now, while many parents are already virtually powerless in
the face of the addictive “social media industry” and

01:59.461 --> 02:06.526
are watching their children literally sink into it,
“protecting children” is suddenly being made a top priority.

02:06.526 --> 02:14.247
In this way, a digital surveillance infrastructure can be
gradually established—as if behind a “moral shield”—which will

02:14.247 --> 02:18.596
inevitably extend far beyond the scope of “protecting minors.”

02:18.596 --> 02:23.646
After all, how are such “protective” age
restrictions supposed to be enforced in the future?

02:23.646 --> 02:31.001
This would require digital identities, age
verification, biometric checks, central user

02:31.001 --> 02:36.000
databases, mandatory proof of identity, and much more.

02:36.000 --> 02:42.912
For the average consumer, this would mean that the
last vestiges of their autonomy online are at stake!

02:42.912 --> 02:49.024
But that's not all! The EU also seems to be
increasingly seeking the legal authority not only to regulate

02:49.024 --> 02:53.113
illegal content, but also to control users' behavior itself.

02:53.113 --> 03:01.478
The Copenhagen summit was hosted by Common Sense
Media, a nonprofit organization dedicated to ensuring the

03:01.478 --> 03:06.126
safety and well-being of children in the digital age.

03:06.126 --> 03:11.547
Families should be supported in using
media and technology in a healthy way.

03:11.547 --> 03:16.214
At the same time, Common Sense Media is
pushing for laws and guidelines designed to

03:16.214 --> 03:20.320
“protect” children and hold technology “accountable.”

03:20.320 --> 03:23.219
Speaking from the stage, von der Leyen said:

03:23.219 --> 03:30.129
“We’re taking action against TikTok and its addictive
design—the endless scrolling, the autoplay feature,

03:30.129 --> 03:34.464
the push notifications—everything that goes with it .“

03:34.464 --> 03:41.028
In other words, the EU wants to regulate which algorithms are
permitted, what content is “healthy,” which

03:41.028 --> 03:47.433
platform features are “dangerous,” and what
information young people are allowed to see.

03:47.433 --> 03:55.740
“The same goes for Meta, because we believe that Instagram and
Facebook are unable to enforce their own age limit of thirteen.”

03:55.740 --> 04:01.106
"We are initiating proceedings against X for its massive
involvement in the production and

04:01.106 --> 04:07.744
distribution of material depicting the sexual
abuse of children ," von der Leyen continued.

04:07.744 --> 04:15.865
A quick look at Common Sense Media's partners, however,
raises doubts that their sole concern is child protection.

04:15.865 --> 04:25.452
Partners include: Apple, OpenAI, TikTok, AT&T, and other
media giants, mobile carriers, and social media platforms.

04:25.452 --> 04:28.288
This is like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.

04:28.288 --> 04:35.237
Are the social media platforms that have captivated young
people and children now suddenly supposed to provide a solution?

04:35.237 --> 04:41.528
Will the very corporations and networks that are
themselves benefiting massively from the AI boom

04:41.528 --> 04:45.568
now also help shape the rules for regulating it?

04:45.568 --> 04:50.133
Things get quite delicate among the
partners in so-called philanthropy.

04:50.133 --> 04:55.982
The Bezos Family Foundation, Bloomberg
Philanthropies, the Gates Foundation, and a number

04:55.982 --> 04:59.293
of other extremely influential foundations.

04:59.293 --> 05:03.116
The latter was founded by high-ranking Freemason Bill Gates .

05:03.116 --> 05:10.194
The so-called “proceedings” against TikTok, Meta, and X appear to
be nothing more than public “show trials” when

05:10.194 --> 05:16.960
these companies simultaneously act as sponsors
and partners of “child protection organizations.”

05:16.960 --> 05:23.608
Under the guise of concepts such as “protecting minors,”
“combating hate,” or “protecting democracy,”

05:23.608 --> 05:30.257
a system of control can be established that
leads humanity straight into a digital prison .

05:30.257 --> 05:37.157
And particularly controversial: The EU is linking real
problems—such as child sexual abuse, child

05:37.157 --> 05:44.399
pornography, and addictive behaviors—to
increasingly drastic and far-reaching control measures.

05:44.399 --> 05:49.550
There's a devious trick behind this: because this
is precisely what makes the desperately needed

05:49.550 --> 05:52.960
resistance more difficult—if not completely undermined.

05:52.960 --> 05:58.528
Anyone who still argues against such measures
of total surveillance runs the risk of being

05:58.528 --> 06:03.127
stigmatized as an opponent of “child protection.”

06:03.127 --> 06:08.100
Let's not be fooled, just like in the fairy
tale "The Wolf and the Seven Little Goats."

06:08.100 --> 06:14.051
The wolf eats the chalk to make his rough
voice sound softer and thus deceive the little

06:14.051 --> 06:17.660
goats—but only so that he can ultimately eat them.

06:17.660 --> 06:25.419
Behind the obviously forced digital ID for every person in the
world are “wolves” such as the Rockefeller Foundation,

06:25.419 --> 06:33.193
Bill Gates, the World Bank, the UN, the IMF, the EU,
and others, whose intentions are by no means “benign.”

06:33.193 --> 06:38.932
Let’s recognize and expose those soft, gentle
voices when they talk about “more child protection”!

06:38.932 --> 06:41.799
Wolves are wolves! Period!

06:41.799 --> 06:48.768
So be sure to check out the top-rated docudrama
“Gemeinsam Einsam” and find out how you can

06:48.768 --> 06:53.320
escape the digital prison today! It’s up to you!

06:53.320 --> 06:58.189
What would you do if, from one moment to the
next, your beloved, ever-essential, and

06:58.189 --> 07:00.914
oh-so-familiar smartphone suddenly turned off?
