WEBVTT

00:23.680 --> 00:26.780
Things are getting tighter and tighter for freedom-loving people:

00:26.780 --> 00:31.920
In various countries around the
world, control over people is increasing.

00:31.920 --> 00:35.360
Here is a recent example from the United Kingdom.

00:35.360 --> 00:42.854
The British Labour government, led by Prime Minister Keir
Starmer, has paved the way for local governments to implement

00:42.854 --> 00:47.045
the concept of so-called “15-minute cities” nationwide.

00:47.045 --> 00:54.573
Under the pretext of climate neutrality and
decarbonization—that is, reducing carbon emissions—the British

00:54.573 --> 00:59.400
public’s freedom of movement can now be quite easily curtailed.

00:59.400 --> 01:05.075
Oxford is set to launch the program this year
already: The city will be divided into six 15-minute zones.

01:05.075 --> 01:10.605
Travel between the zones is free for
residents on only 100 days a year.

01:10.605 --> 01:15.829
A monitoring system consisting of cameras, barriers, and
automatic license plate recognition is designed

01:15.829 --> 01:21.460
to ensure that every resident complies with
the rules. Failure to do so may result in fines.

01:21.460 --> 01:26.140
What is presented under the guise of climate or
environmental protection is ultimately nothing but

01:26.140 --> 01:28.780
a surveillance state with the aid of technology!

01:28.780 --> 01:35.008
Such a dictatorial form of government has long been
the goal by self-proclaimed would-be world rulers.

01:35.008 --> 01:40.940
For decades, they have been working on a new
form of government, so-called technocracy.

01:40.940 --> 01:48.000
Today's broadcast exposes the driving forces behind this
technocratic movement, its dangerous plans and insidious methods.

01:48.000 --> 01:54.534
Let's start with the founding and
goals of the technocracy movement.

01:54.534 --> 02:01.439
In the winter of 1918, the American Howard
Scott founded the so-called Technical Alliance.

02:01.439 --> 02:08.263
The members of the Technical Alliance shared the conviction that
democracy, national sovereignty, and market

02:08.263 --> 02:14.856
economy had failed and had to be replaced by an
unelected rule of engineers and technical experts.

02:14.856 --> 02:19.700
They called for the reshaping of society in
accordance with the principles of science and technology.

02:19.700 --> 02:28.032
Their new economic and monetary system was to be based on the
controlled distribution and regulated consumption of energy.

02:28.032 --> 02:33.780
To this end, they developed “energy
certificates,” also known as “energy rationing cards."

02:33.780 --> 02:41.023
These were to include all personal data for each citizen—that is,
their age, gender, occupation, place of residence,

02:41.023 --> 02:48.212
an energy allocation, an overview of purchases made,
and the issue and expiry dates of the certificates.

02:48.212 --> 02:54.080
Energy certificates would serve as the new currency.

02:54.080 --> 03:00.626
That sounds very much like a precursor of the
globally envisioned E-ID for every citizen, linked

03:00.626 --> 03:04.320
to a basic income in digital central bank money.

03:04.320 --> 03:09.846
This system was intended to abolish elections
and party politics and replace them with

03:09.846 --> 03:13.020
centralized control of production and resources.

03:13.020 --> 03:18.385
Ultimately, the goal was to establish a North
American technate: “The Technate of America.”

03:18.385 --> 03:24.000
The idea is that this technate would form an
“independent, self-sustaining geographical unit.”

03:24.000 --> 03:31.193
The government would then have control over all raw materials,
companies, factories, and industries within the technate,

03:31.193 --> 03:37.620
as well as comprehensive access to the population's property.

03:37.620 --> 03:40.800
But who initiated the Technical Alliance?

03:40.800 --> 03:48.040
Let's take a closer look at Howard
Scott. Was he a visionary or rather a puppet?

03:48.040 --> 03:50.818
Little is known about Howard Scott's (1890–1970) early years.

03:50.818 --> 03:54.983
He suddenly “appeared” in Greenwich Village, New York, in 1918.

03:54.983 --> 04:01.600
Even though he had only a 9th-grade diploma,
Scott saw himself as a “bohemian engineer” .

04:01.600 --> 04:10.840
In 1933, Howard Scott founded Technocracy
Incorporated, an organization he led until his death in 1970.

04:10.840 --> 04:16.833
A contemporary witness reports that Howard Scott
is said to have had a vivid imagination and

04:16.833 --> 04:22.208
acted as a “prophet,” as the following quote shows:

04:22.208 --> 04:27.733
“Howard explained to me that he knew the kind of
society he was advocating could not yet come into being.”

04:27.733 --> 04:34.848
"First, experiments by those from the left-wing and
those from the right-wing would have to take place ..."

04:34.848 --> 04:42.552
How did Scott know, around 1920, what would happen next in
history? At that time, those events were still in the future.

04:42.552 --> 04:50.286
In the book *Words and Wisdom of Howard Scott*,
Scott said the following in a speech in 1961:

04:50.286 --> 04:57.887
“…One of the big troubles with all of this is that your computer
is going to do away with your accountants and your engineers, and

04:57.887 --> 05:04.084
it is also going to do away with your executives, as
well as the blue collar and the white collar, so more

05:04.084 --> 05:09.280
power to all of the computer and control mechanisms.”

05:09.280 --> 05:14.816
Could Scott have known back in 1961 where
things were heading in the current time?

05:14.816 --> 05:19.093
Did he perhaps have unknown benefactors
who had helped him rise to his position?

05:19.093 --> 05:24.800
Was the technocracy movement connected to high finance?

05:24.800 --> 05:34.780
Composed primarily of engineers and scientists, the technocracy
movement was founded at Columbia University in New York.

05:34.780 --> 05:41.382
According to technocracy expert Patrick Wood, Columbia
University was already a “progressive think tank”

05:41.382 --> 05:45.560
back then. It had close ties to the Rockefeller dynasty.

05:45.560 --> 05:51.259
So, amongst others, Columbia university has
played a role in the conquest and transformation of

05:51.259 --> 05:54.866
the medical sector through the Rockefeller family.

05:54.866 --> 05:59.480
Replacing natural remedies by
chemical products of the pharma industry

05:59.480 --> 06:05.647
With this the Rockefellers created a massive
market for their chemical, petroleum-based

06:05.647 --> 06:09.580
products in the medical field, starting in 1910.

06:09.580 --> 06:16.387
Starting in 1959, a key figure among today’s world leaders was
also active at that very same Columbia

06:16.387 --> 06:24.512
University: the influential global strategist and close
friend of David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzeziński.

06:24.512 --> 06:28.020
He taught there as a professor of political science.

06:28.020 --> 06:34.718
In addition to the Rockefellers, Brzeziński was also closely
connected to Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild, a scion of the

06:34.718 --> 06:40.242
Rothschild dynasty—which, like the Rockefellers, is
a dynasty of high finance that ranks at the very

06:40.242 --> 06:44.780
top of the freemasonry hierarchy. More on that later.

06:46.528 --> 06:54.088
In 1970, Brzeziński published the book *Between
Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era*.

06:54.088 --> 06:59.347
In it, he reveals himself to be a die-hard
technocrat. This book lays bare the

06:59.347 --> 07:02.720
technocratic goals for establishing world domination.

07:02.720 --> 07:06.954
What dangerous goals did Brzeziński & Co. pursue?

07:06.954 --> 07:15.190
In their pamphlet “Technocracy in Plain Terms,” published in
1939, the early technocrats wrote:

07:15.190 --> 07:26.144
“Technocracy stands for [...] a new form of control
operated and directed by a Continental Control, […]”

07:26.144 --> 07:29.760
What claims do they make regarding technocracy?:

07:29.760 --> 07:40.512
“It is a new method of governing society, (…) Only technocracy
can do it —the scientific control of all social functions.”

07:40.512 --> 07:45.518
“Technocracy is the science of social engineering …”

07:47.952 --> 07:55.366
Social engineering refers to manipulation techniques
designed to bring about specific behaviors in people.

07:55.366 --> 08:01.989
According to Technocracy Inc., the end product is
“a continental system of human conditioning.” This

08:01.989 --> 08:05.400
means the learning of stimulus-response patterns.

08:05.400 --> 08:12.921
The plan, therefore, was to deliberately “train” the technocratic
citizen through a system of rewards and punishments.

08:12.921 --> 08:18.499
Efforts in China to establish a social credit system are moving
in the same direction: behavior that is

08:18.499 --> 08:24.888
politically desirable—that is, conformist behavior—is
rewarded, while nonconformist behavior is punished.

08:24.888 --> 08:32.517
A little later, Zbigniew Brzeziński
writes in his 1970 book *Between Two Ages*:

08:32.517 --> 08:39.236
“The technotronic era involves the gradual
appearance of a more controlled society.”

08:39.236 --> 08:47.201
"Such a society would be dominated by an
elite, unrestrained by traditional values."

08:47.201 --> 08:51.360
How does the elite control the citizens? Brzeziński explains:

08:51.360 --> 09:00.292
“Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this
elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using

09:00.292 --> 09:10.620
the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior
and keeping society under close surveillance and control."

09:10.620 --> 09:17.088
In his 1968 article “America in the
Technetronic Age,” Brzeziński wrote:

09:17.088 --> 09:25.122
“As I have already noted, it will soon be possible to assert
almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and to maintain

09:25.122 --> 09:30.755
up-to-date, complete files, containing even most
personal information about the health or personal

09:30.755 --> 09:34.616
behaviour of the citizen, in addition to more customary data.”

09:34.616 --> 09:41.824
"These files will be subject to
instantaneous retrieval by the authorities."

09:41.824 --> 09:45.384
In his article Brzeziński went on to write:

09:45.384 --> 09:53.944
“Power will gravitate into the hands of those who
control the information, and can correlate it most rapidly”

09:55.720 --> 10:01.819
So far, we can say that the technocrats, as well as Brzeziński
and “his friends,” openly sought to build a

10:01.819 --> 10:07.883
society in which citizens are constantly and
deliberately manipulated, controlled, and directed.

10:07.883 --> 10:14.927
And all of this is done using the latest
psychological insights and state-of-the-art technology.

10:14.927 --> 10:21.215
How is it that the implementation of such plans has
already advanced so far and that the introduction of

10:21.215 --> 10:26.040
“15-minute cities” is already being publicly debated?!

10:34.752 --> 10:39.294
If one considers the connections between
Brzeziński, Rockefeller, and Rothschild to

10:39.294 --> 10:42.120
high-degree freemasonry, the answer is obvious.

10:42.120 --> 10:50.242
They are part of a global conspiracy. David
Rockefeller confidently admits this in his memoirs:

10:50.242 --> 11:00.847
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against
the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family

11:00.847 --> 11:09.738
and me as internationalists and of conspiring with
others around the world to build a more integrated, global

11:09.738 --> 11:14.603
political and economic structure, one world if you will.”

11:14.603 --> 11:21.540
"If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I'm proud of it."

11:21.540 --> 11:26.400
What does this secret conspiracy
consist of? David Rockefeller says:

11:26.400 --> 11:31.905
“It would have been impossible for us to develop
our plan for the world if we had been subject to

11:31.905 --> 11:35.760
the bright lights of publicity during those years.

11:35.760 --> 11:41.088
But, the world is now much more sophisticated
and prepared to march towards a world government.

11:41.088 --> 11:47.956
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual
elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the

11:47.956 --> 11:54.300
national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

11:54.300 --> 12:02.155
David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzeziński and so on spent
their entire lives working to build this “one world”

12:02.155 --> 12:07.168
under the rule of a parasitic “elite” and “global bankers.”

12:07.168 --> 12:12.973
To this end, Brzeziński & Co. founded many
organizations and institutions that now, like a

12:12.973 --> 12:16.512
spider's web, extend across the entire world.

12:16.512 --> 12:24.318
These institutions—whether they are banks, universities,
think tanks, or global organizations such as the United

12:24.318 --> 12:29.024
Nations—now control nearly every area of life in our world.

12:29.024 --> 12:34.285
Among other things, Brzeziński was a key
figure in the Trilateral Commission, the Atlantic

12:34.285 --> 12:37.471
Council, and the Council on Foreign Relations.

12:37.471 --> 12:43.126
These are freemasonry organisations that serve as their hub.

12:45.725 --> 12:51.089
Volunteer Kla.TV staff members have documented
well-known institutions and their ties to

12:51.089 --> 12:54.798
high-degree freemasonry on the website vetopedia.org.

12:54.798 --> 13:00.438
It soon becomes clear that there really is a
conspiracy—namely, a conspiracy by high-ranking

13:00.438 --> 13:03.882
freemasons to own and control the entire world.

13:03.882 --> 13:10.603
Zbigniew Brzeziński and David
Rockefeller were also high-degree freemasons:

13:10.603 --> 13:19.193
Brzeziński founded the masonic lodge “Lux ad Orientem”
(Light Toward the East) in 1967 and the "Maat" lodge in 2004.

13:19.193 --> 13:26.446
Together with high financier David Rockefeller, global strategist
Henry Kissinger, and Edmond Adolphe de

13:26.446 --> 13:33.940
Rothschild, a scion of the Rothschild dynasty,
Brzeziński founded the “Three Eyes” lodge in 1968.

13:33.940 --> 13:37.740
David Rockefeller was also a member of the “Horus Lodge.”

13:37.740 --> 13:42.967
The Rothschilds and Rockefellers, along with
the Windsors—that is, the British royal

13:42.967 --> 13:46.739
family—are at the very top of the masonic pyramid:

13:46.739 --> 13:54.080
The freemasons on this level openly profess
their belief in Satan as the “god of this world.”

13:56.353 --> 13:59.673
So much for the network and its intentions.

13:59.673 --> 14:04.960
Of course, it is difficult to explain these plans aiming
at world domination to a freedom-loving global population.

14:04.960 --> 14:12.880
The high-degree freemasons therefore sought and found a way
to gradually steer the world's population toward technocracy.

14:17.385 --> 14:25.101
By misusing sustainability as deception and a business
model, they exploit people’s longing for a healthy planet.

14:25.101 --> 14:30.237
After all, everyone will agree that we cannot
continue down this path of destroying the Earth.

14:30.237 --> 14:34.717
However, the only solution that is offered
over and over again is “sustainability.”

14:34.717 --> 14:39.743
This term, which carries very positive connotations,
set people’s efforts to save the planet on the wrong

14:39.743 --> 14:43.219
track, from the very beginning. More on that in a moment.

14:43.219 --> 14:47.552
The term sustainability also traces its origins
back to an idea put forward by the early technocrats.

14:47.552 --> 14:54.460
Patrick Wood explains the connection between
technocracy and “sustainable development” as follows:

14:56.340 --> 15:03.344
“It is true that the literal term of ‘sustainable
development’ was not coined by the original technocrats [...].

15:03.344 --> 15:11.593
The fact of the matter is that "sustainable development"
is conceptually identical to technocracy's “balanced load”.

15:11.593 --> 15:16.611
In short, the heartbeat of
Technocracy is Sustainable Development.

15:16.611 --> 15:26.163
"It calls for an engineered society where the needs of
mankind are in perfect balance with the resources of nature."

15:26.163 --> 15:33.745
The “perfect balance” between human needs and natural
resources is, in fact, the very definition of sustainability.

15:33.745 --> 15:38.563
The connection between technocracy and
sustainability becomes even clearer by taking a

15:38.563 --> 15:43.776
closer look at the co-founder of Technocracy Inc.:

15:43.776 --> 15:53.333
Marion King Hubbert (1903–1989). Hubbert worked for the Amerada
Petroleum Company, taught at Columbia University, and held an

15:53.333 --> 15:58.800
executive position with the oil and natural gas company Shell.

15:58.800 --> 16:06.522
In 1974, as part of his “Peak Oil Theory,” he
predicted that, assuming production levels remained

16:06.522 --> 16:12.640
constant, global oil reserves would be exhausted by 1995.

16:14.835 --> 16:21.079
Although this prediction did not come true, it nevertheless
instilled fear and panic among the population and gave

16:21.079 --> 16:25.121
oil magnates the opportunity for rising oil prices and wars.

16:25.121 --> 16:31.875
With his predictions, Hubbert, for example, played right
into the Rockefellers’ hands, since the Rockefeller

16:31.875 --> 16:36.803
dynasty had controlled most of the global oil market since 1891.

16:36.803 --> 16:43.260
Hubbert's theories and predictions led to calls
for a "green" economy and an energy transition.

16:43.260 --> 16:48.160
Since then, he himself has been regarded as the
founding father of the environmental sustainability movement.

16:48.160 --> 16:52.864
However, what is the snag with this whole sustainability thing?

16:52.864 --> 17:00.810
The Rockefeller Foundation's 1969 annual report highlighted
the insidious ideology behind the alleged scarcity of

17:00.810 --> 17:05.881
resources and the concept of sustainability derived from it:

17:05.881 --> 17:11.655
This report concludes that humans are causing
massive destruction of their own environment.

17:11.655 --> 17:17.804
In this way all of humanity is held responsible for
environmental destruction and is made to feel guilty for

17:17.804 --> 17:21.725
being responsible for the destruction of their own habitat.

17:21.725 --> 17:29.800
Isn't this an insidious form of mass manipulation designed
to then steer people toward the new sustainability agenda?

17:31.620 --> 17:37.750
After all, why haven't the biggest contributors to and ruthless
profiteers of environmental destruction—the large

17:37.750 --> 17:44.100
multinational corporations and their shareholders—
been investigated and held accountable up to this day?

17:44.100 --> 17:50.165
How is it possible that the largest shareholders of mining and
natural resource companies—causing massive environmental

17:50.165 --> 17:55.619
destruction and exploiting resources—are not held accountable,
but instead the environmental destruction is

17:55.619 --> 18:02.016
denounced as part of the ideology of sustainability
and the blame is being passed on to everyone else?

18:02.016 --> 18:07.035
Why aren't large defense contractors held
accountable for their massive environmental destruction, which

18:07.035 --> 18:09.840
has serious consequences for all life on the planet?

18:09.840 --> 18:14.208
As we all know, war is one of the
greatest destroyers of habitats!

18:14.208 --> 18:20.416
Why aren't the big tech companies, with their
gigantic data centers, being scrutinized more closely?

18:20.416 --> 18:29.216
Their energy needs far exceed those of ordinary people. A single
data center alone consumes as much energy as a major city.

18:29.216 --> 18:35.486
Why isn't there a public discussion about the endless demand for
resources required for all kinds of high-tech projects,

18:35.486 --> 18:42.048
such as the construction of robots or the tens of thousands
of satellites in space launched by technocrat Elon Musk?

18:42.048 --> 18:44.896
For such endeavours, entire regions are being devastated.

18:44.896 --> 18:50.113
Why doesn't the mainstream press report on the
massive weather manipulation by the military

18:50.113 --> 18:52.544
and on the resulting environmental pollution?

18:52.544 --> 18:59.063
Instead, we are continuously exposed to
this hypocritical talk of “sustainability.”

19:02.600 --> 19:10.136
Let’s get back to the Rockefeller Dynasty. How did this family
manage to establish the “sustainability ideology”

19:10.136 --> 19:18.432
as the foundation for the concepts of “green”
economy, climate policy, UN Agenda 21, and Agenda 2030?

19:18.432 --> 19:25.367
The family turned to its various family foundations, such as the
Rockefeller Foundation or the Rockefeller Family Fund, which,

19:25.367 --> 19:33.068
under the guise of philanthropy and bypassing the state, provided
financial support to individual actors and organizations.

19:33.068 --> 19:38.111
Here are a few examples, though they
represent only a small fraction of the many

19:38.111 --> 19:42.148
financial contributions made by the Rockefellers.

19:42.148 --> 19:50.699
First, in 1969, the Rockefeller Foundation invested $2.1
million in new research and education programs to promote its

19:50.699 --> 19:56.126
ideology of supposedly “man-made” environmental destruction.

19:56.126 --> 20:04.234
Second, in 1974, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund provided $500,000
for the founding of the “Environmental Research Organization

20:04.234 --> 20:09.764
for Sustainable Development,” the Worldwatch Institute.

20:09.764 --> 20:16.909
Third, in 1987, the Rockefeller Family Fund established the
Environmental Grantmakers Association (EGA). This

20:16.909 --> 20:24.580
organization coordinates funding from foundations
and distributes it to environmental advocacy groups.

20:24.580 --> 20:33.264
The website influencewatch.org notes that the EGA has become “a
powerful consortium of agenda-setting foundations” that today

20:33.264 --> 20:38.540
supports a large number of environmental activist organizations.

20:38.540 --> 20:43.919
Over the past 50 years, the environmentalists supported by the
Rockefellers in this way have skillfully

20:43.919 --> 20:49.420
instilled a sense of both individual and
collective guilt regarding environmental damage.

20:49.420 --> 20:54.231
For example, they warned that the
Earth would soon be struck by an ice age.

20:54.231 --> 21:00.498
Later, they claimed that driving vehicles with internal
combustion engines and producing too much carbon dioxide

21:00.498 --> 21:04.560
would lead to a dangerous rise in the earth's temperature.

21:04.560 --> 21:11.075
Fourth: At the Rockefellers' initiative
think-tanks and global organizations were founded —for

21:11.075 --> 21:15.008
example, the Club of Rome and the United Nations.

21:15.008 --> 21:21.660
In 1939, the Rockefeller Foundation provided
$350,000 in funding for studies that, among other

21:21.660 --> 21:27.380
things, led to the founding of the United Nations.

21:27.380 --> 21:34.189
Anyone spending that much money to establish
the UN naturally expects to benefit from it:

21:34.189 --> 21:38.163
The United Nations launched Agenda 21 in 1992.

21:38.163 --> 21:44.732
The purpose of Agenda 21 is to promote the
ideology of sustainability in all areas.

21:44.732 --> 21:52.384
Agenda 21 is followed by Agenda 2030. Here’s
what educator Tim Gielen has to say about it:

21:52.384 --> 22:00.940
“In 2015, the UN presented its controversial Agenda 2030,
which is almost identical to Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset.

22:00.940 --> 22:06.647
In their own words, the UN, like Schwab, wants to
ensure that by 2030, poverty, hunger,

22:06.647 --> 22:12.068
environmental pollution, and disease no longer exist on Earth.

22:12.068 --> 22:16.881
It sounds like a sympathetic plan—until you read the fine print.

22:16.881 --> 22:24.269
You see, the idea is, that Agenda 2030 is
going to be paid for by us, the citizens."

22:24.269 --> 22:31.542
At this point, it is worth recalling the technocrats’ goal. In
order to establish a technocracy, they planned to gain

22:31.542 --> 22:38.752
control over all raw materials, companies, factories,
industries—indeed, even all property owned by citizens.

22:38.752 --> 22:41.600
The sustainability agenda makes it possible.

22:41.600 --> 22:48.880
Rosa Koire, author of *Behind the
Green Mask*, sums it up like this.

22:48.880 --> 22:58.951
“UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan. It's
the blueprint to inventory and control all land, all water, all

22:58.951 --> 23:06.784
plants, all minerals, all animals, all construction,
all means of production, all information, all

23:06.784 --> 23:11.891
energy, all education, and all human beings in the world.”

23:11.891 --> 23:16.640
"INVENTORY AND CONTROL."

23:16.640 --> 23:21.368
All this goes together well with the oft-cited vision for the
future put forth by the World Economic Forum

23:21.368 --> 23:26.290
(WEF)—the lobbying organization representing
the world’s most powerful and wealthiest people:

23:26.290 --> 23:30.816
"By the year 2030, you will own nothing and be happy."

23:30.816 --> 23:36.160
By this, the WEF refers, of course, to the
world's population and not their own kind.

23:36.160 --> 23:40.243
So what is the ultimate purpose of the concept of sustainability?

23:40.243 --> 23:48.992
Ottmar Edenhofer, former co-chair of the UN Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change , provided the answer in 2010:

23:48.992 --> 23:53.611
“First of all, developed countries have basically
expropriated the atmosphere of the world community.

23:53.611 --> 24:00.178
But one must say clearly that we redistribute
de facto the world's wealth by climate policy.

24:00.178 --> 24:05.846
One has to free oneself from the illusion that
international climate policy is environmental policy.

24:05.846 --> 24:14.912
This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy
anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole."

24:14.912 --> 24:22.173
In conclusion, it must be noted: Whenever there is talk of
sustainability or sustainable development—whether it is sold to

24:22.173 --> 24:30.029
the public as climate policy, the green economy, UN Agenda 21, or
Agenda 2030—it is actually about total control of global resources

24:30.029 --> 24:34.512
and the redistribution of wealth from the poor to the rich.

24:34.512 --> 24:41.577
Sustainability is the means of dispossessing most people
and placing all resources and all land in the hands of high

24:41.577 --> 24:45.769
finance, in order to subsequently establish a technocracy.

24:45.769 --> 24:52.009
According to technocracy expert Jesse Smith,
“Technocracy and technology are like a hand and a glove of

24:52.009 --> 24:55.968
the new order that is established around the world.”

24:55.968 --> 25:02.361
Dear viewers, no matter how insidious their plan for world
domination—which was devised and is being carried out

25:02.361 --> 25:09.376
by high-degree freemasons—it still requires the general
public, who can either go along with it or resist it.

25:09.376 --> 25:14.998
Canadian propaganda researcher
Jason Christoff said in an interview:

25:14.998 --> 25:22.380
“This group we’re dealing with has notoriously low
IQ; they don’t have any new tricks in their bag.”

25:22.380 --> 25:27.029
It's all the same old tricks. They're not creative.

25:27.029 --> 25:34.880
They do have flaws. And their main flaw is that they
don't have the power to do anything to us by force.

25:34.880 --> 25:43.466
[...] They have to psychologically manipulate us and poison us
into a state of weakness where we volunteer for our own slavery.

25:43.466 --> 25:49.611
[...] "The only power they have is the power
we give them, and it can be siphoned off easy."
