Kla.TV has already warned against digital identification of any kind in numerous broadcasts, whether it be the electronic
health card, the digital vaccination record, or an EUDI wallet.
All of these are precursors to a digital prison.
In Germany, the “salami tactics—transparent citizens” approach is now moving on to the next phase:
In Baden-Württemberg, starting in December 2025, every student may or should be assigned an individual digital identification
number for the duration of their entire school career.
Section 113a of the Baden-Württemberg School Act, as amended on August 1, 1983, was amended for this student ID.
Attorney Beate Bahner calls this a precursor to and a massive tightening of the “police clearance certificate” and
says it is even harsher than the Federal Central Register.
The educational radio station AUF1 described this practice as “Big Brother in the classroom.”
But what does this law mean in practice?
The following information is recorded digitally using the student ID: identity and contact information, academic performance and
educational data, health data, behavioral data, including disciplinary and corrective measures, as well as other
behavioral records regarding praise or disapproval of behavior, and administrative and organizational data
And it is important to realize that this is not a traditional student file, such as those
kept by every school for administrative purposes.
A student ID assigned starting in elementary school “ is generated upon the student’s entry into the school system
or retrieved by the school and stored both in a central student database and at the school the student attends.”
Who, then, guarantees that only schools and teachers will be allowed to access the so-called student pool?
Who else could this sensitive, private data be made available to?
Furthermore, these student IDs are not intended for use in Baden-Württemberg alone; they are planned for use nationwide.
Data protection advocates, teachers' associations, and parent groups are warning of a massive encroachment on the
fundamental right to informational self-determination, which could lead to the creation of a “transparent student”:
There is a risk that students' sensitive data could be stored centrally, misused, or stolen through hacker attacks.
A possible link to the planned citizen ID would thus enable “total surveillance through the back door.”
Permanently recording grades or behavioral issues can lead to “pigeonholing.”
Early negative evaluations could have a lasting negative impact on a person's future
educational opportunities or career prospects.
Education researchers criticize the student ID system for reducing learning to measurable metrics and ignoring
character development and non-standardized learning processes.
This reflects a view of humanity that regards children as “human capital” rather than as autonomous individuals.
The actual educational benefits remain unproven, while the administrative burden on teachers could increase significantly.
Be sure to watch the Kla.TV program “Resistance NOW! – The Digital ID and Its Terrible Consequences” .
It states: Between 70 and 90 countries around the world are now working on introducing a digital ID.
These include Germany and all 27 EU member states.
The coalition agreement of the new federal government calls for the introduction of a mandatory citizen
account that provides all citizens with a digital identity.
BundID is essentially a digital ID card designed to store all personal data, ranging from passport and
driver's license information to financial and health records.
The official goal of BundID is to automate administrative processes to a large extent.
That is why it is also intended to function as a digital account through which social benefits—such as
child benefit payments—will be processed in the future.
The so-called EUDI Wallet is intended to serve as a central platform to facilitate
identification, authentication, and payments.
It goes on to say: In some parts of China, the government is already monitoring the
population through a digital social credit system.
Compliant behavior is rewarded with points, while misconduct is punished by point deductions.
In the process, data from social media, online shopping, and browsing behavior is collected and
linked to other sources, such as criminal records.
The surveillance system in Pakistan is also very advanced.
Participants in a demonstration felt the impact of this when the ID cards and passports of all
individuals linked to the riots were suspended.
In Pakistan, this meant they were excluded from key areas of life.
The individuals were identified using tracking programs that monitored mobile devices in the vicinity of the demonstration.
Thus, identity systems can be misused for surveillance and coercion once they are established in society.
These examples show where the introduction of a digital ID—even in the “small-scale student ID” format—can lead:
Lilith Wittmann, a renowned IT security expert, joins data privacy advocates in issuing a strong warning that digital
identity could dramatically expand the scope for surveillance and data collection by both the government and the private sector.
This presents unlimited potential for abuse.
Those deemed “inconvenient” or “useless” could be excluded from public life.
If one takes the words of specialist attorney Bahner seriously, with the requirement for a “police clearance certificate,”
the next step toward dystopian total surveillance—and linking a student ID to a citizen ID—seems like a logical conclusion.
In the Kla.TV program “No Bank Account Without an e-ID” , the following is stated: “In an interview, Israeli
historian and WEF advisor Yuval Noah Harari outlined the foundations of total digital control.”
His statements sound like the unveiling of a global program aimed at introducing a social credit system worldwide.
The social credit system, Harari enthused, is nothing less than the “logical evolution of money.”
While conventional money values only a limited aspect of human activities—such as work, etc.—the social
credit system is intended to evaluate every action that affects everyday social and moral life.
According to Harari, this development could give rise to “the most totalitarian systems in history,” in which access to mobility,
property, or services depends entirely on a digital score.
Harari's statements take on particular significance with the planned introduction of digital identities such as the
e-ID: After all, the e-ID represents the infrastructure that makes such an evaluation system possible in the first place.
"If it is one day linked to a social credit system, every citizen's behavior can be
comprehensively monitored, evaluated, and sanctioned."
And with a student ID, you could get people used to such a system from a young age.
So this is a dangerous step toward total surveillance, starting in elementary school!
But as parents, you are not powerless in the face of this development.
Parents in Baden-Württemberg and beyond should urgently speak out against the amendment to Section 113a.
According to Beate Bahner, you can file a motion for judicial review to challenge this by December 15, 2026, at the latest.
Ms. Bahner advises seeking advice from experts in school law on this matter.
Take action and talk to the parents in your children's classes, and talk to teachers and principals
to make them aware of the dangers of student IDs.
And please share this post on as many social media platforms as possible to encourage parents to get more involved.
Only the public can put an end to this surveillance mania.
kla.tv: free - independent - uncensored.