1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,273


2
00:00:00,273 --> 00:00:03,859
Professor Hecht—who, sadly, has since
passed away—said as far back as 15 years ago:

3
00:00:03,859 --> 00:00:08,625
A distinction between ionizing and
non-ionizing radiation is no longer justified.

4
00:00:08,625 --> 00:00:11,620
The damage is actually the same. It's just a matter of time.

5
00:00:11,620 --> 00:00:19,244
Now I would like to introduce the next
speaker, my colleague Dr. med. dent., dentist Claus

6
00:00:19,244 --> 00:00:23,956
Scheingraber, a dentist and electrobiologist.

7
00:00:23,956 --> 00:00:30,030
And Claus Scheingraber studied
mineralogy and dentistry in Munich.

8
00:00:30,030 --> 00:00:34,904
He paid for his college education by working as a nurse.

9
00:00:34,904 --> 00:00:41,789
He has been a dentist since 1977 and
ran his own practice from 1981 to 2018.

10
00:00:41,789 --> 00:00:48,097
His focus has always been on holistic and biological
dentistry, and on avoiding and eliminating toxic

11
00:00:48,097 --> 00:00:52,414
substances in dental treatment—such as amalgam and the like.

12
00:00:52,414 --> 00:00:56,688
He has also been actively involved in
providing dental care to various nursing homes and

13
00:00:56,688 --> 00:00:59,532
residential facilities in the greater Munich area.

14
00:00:59,532 --> 00:01:01,789
And, incidentally, he has made a name
for himself as a building biologist.

15
00:01:01,789 --> 00:01:10,962
In 1990, he founded his own construction and electrobiological
consulting firm specializing in physical environmental hazards.

16
00:01:10,962 --> 00:01:15,527
There, he conducted surveys of residential and work settings.

17
00:01:15,527 --> 00:01:23,007
He is a founding member of the Arbeitskreis
Elektrobiologie e. V., which was established in 1986.

18
00:01:23,007 --> 00:01:30,742
And since 1991, he has been the president of
this important association, known as AEB for short.

19
00:01:30,742 --> 00:01:36,783
He has authored several articles in professional
journals on the topics of electrobiology and building biology.

20
00:01:36,783 --> 00:01:41,846
He has given lectures and presentations on the topics of
electrobiology and environmental medicine at universities,

21
00:01:41,846 --> 00:01:46,997
universities of applied sciences, adult education centers, and
other adult education institutions both in Germany and

22
00:01:46,997 --> 00:01:53,180
abroad, and has also conducted independent research on the
effects of electromagnetic fields on humans and the environment.

23
00:01:53,180 --> 00:01:58,212
He was a member of the DGUHT (German Society for
Environmental and Human Toxicology) from 2011 to 2025 and

24
00:01:58,212 --> 00:02:01,585
chaired the Working Group on Physical Environmental Pollutants.

25
00:02:01,585 --> 00:02:06,020
He has been a member of EuroPAM since 2016.

26
00:02:06,020 --> 00:02:13,202
And in 2002, he helped launch the Freiburg
Appeal and other appeals regarding the use of

27
00:02:13,202 --> 00:02:17,990
cellular communications and electromagnetic fields.

28
00:02:17,990 --> 00:02:26,381
In 2014, he was awarded the EVA—the Electrosmog Prevention
Award—for his work combating physical environmental pollution.

29
00:02:26,381 --> 00:02:31,906
And since 2020, he has been working on his book
project: “Electrobiology,” ... which will be finished when?

30
00:02:31,906 --> 00:02:35,256
You'll probably tell us about it later.

31
00:02:35,256 --> 00:02:41,203
His goal is always to have electromagnetic
hypersensitivity recognized as an environmental hazard.

32
00:02:41,203 --> 00:02:46,598
He advocates for the establishment of exposure limits and the
introduction of precautionary thresholds for preventive

33
00:02:46,598 --> 00:02:50,095
health protection, and argues that these limits must be lowered.

34
00:02:50,095 --> 00:02:55,024
And he's also in favor of establishing programs at
educational institutions in fields such as

35
00:02:55,024 --> 00:02:58,496
physical stress in environmental medicine... and so on.

36
00:02:58,496 --> 00:03:04,358
And we are pleased to say that we were able
to secure his participation in today's event.

37
00:03:04,358 --> 00:03:09,657
We also met during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021.

38
00:03:09,657 --> 00:03:16,229
And I'm glad, dear Claus, that you're here today
at the press symposium to share your expertise.

39
00:03:16,229 --> 00:03:23,982
And I can’t help but get everyone in the audience excited
about your presentation on mobile communications and the

40
00:03:23,982 --> 00:03:29,766
increased health risks posed by 5G. The floor is yours, Claus.

41
00:03:34,519 --> 00:03:36,436
Dear Ronny, thank you very much for the introduction.

42
00:03:36,436 --> 00:03:42,322
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, in my presentation today, I would like
to inform you about the physiological and

43
00:03:42,322 --> 00:03:48,828
health-related issues associated with cellular
communications, with a special focus on 5G.

44
00:03:50,463 --> 00:03:54,663
Professor Bergholz has already
explained it very well. Why do we need 5G?

45
00:03:54,663 --> 00:04:01,465
Ultimately, it is the latency—the
transmission of signals from the sensor to the effector.

46
00:04:01,465 --> 00:04:03,851
Today, that's still in the millisecond range.

47
00:04:03,851 --> 00:04:09,469
The millisecond range is far too slow to
ultimately enable autonomous driving and the

48
00:04:09,469 --> 00:04:13,125
autonomous control of devices without any issues.

49
00:04:13,125 --> 00:04:16,632
That's why we need 5G—and even 5G isn't enough.

50
00:04:16,632 --> 00:04:23,584
6G is already in development and will
replace the 5G network after the 2030s.

51
00:04:25,843 --> 00:04:31,294
When we discuss cellular communications, the first
thing we need to consider is the field strengths and

52
00:04:31,294 --> 00:04:34,643
energy densities associated with cellular communications.

53
00:04:34,643 --> 00:04:39,128
The current limit value, which is based on
the Federal Government's 26th Ordinance on the

54
00:04:39,128 --> 00:04:41,977
Control of Environmental Pollution, is 61 V/m.

55
00:04:41,977 --> 00:04:47,104
Or, as Mr. Buchner has already aptly pointed
out, we have just under 10 watts per square meter.

56
00:04:47,104 --> 00:04:52,330
The values here are in milliwatts
because those are the biological units.

57
00:04:52,330 --> 00:04:57,881
As Professor Bergholz has aptly pointed out, the attenuation of
high-frequency waves in the gigahertz range is

58
00:04:57,881 --> 00:05:04,167
significantly greater than in the megahertz range, so we
need either more transmitting stations or longer ranges.

59
00:05:04,167 --> 00:05:12,927
ICNIRP is considering whether to increase the field
strength and, consequently, raise the limit to 120 V/m.

60
00:05:12,927 --> 00:05:17,865
Please look at the remaining lines. In other words,
starting from 10 watts per square meter, this means

61
00:05:17,865 --> 00:05:20,915
an increase to 40 watts per square meter for the body.

62
00:05:20,915 --> 00:05:26,851
Irresponsible with regard to human biology and human health.

63
00:05:29,765 --> 00:05:35,638
Well, what does it look like? How many
transmission towers do we need in Germany if we want to

64
00:05:35,638 --> 00:05:39,051
provide nationwide 5G coverage for our population?

65
00:05:39,051 --> 00:05:41,559
A comparison with China is in order here.

66
00:05:41,559 --> 00:05:49,345
Shenzhen, a major city with a population of 13 million,
needs 35,000 base stations to provide adequate 5G coverage

67
00:05:49,345 --> 00:05:54,910
throughout the city. Germany has a population of 84 million.

68
00:05:54,910 --> 00:06:03,377
As of 2019, 72,000 sites were needed to
provide 3G and 4G coverage on the existing networks.

69
00:06:03,377 --> 00:06:11,628
Once 5G is fully rolled out, more than 300,000 base
stations will be needed—as of today, there are 222,000.

70
00:06:11,628 --> 00:06:14,956
So we'll be reaching the 300,000 mark soon.

71
00:06:14,956 --> 00:06:19,565
By the way, with 6G, we can expect a
further increase in the number of installations.

72
00:06:19,565 --> 00:06:25,546
It will get to the point where there will be a transmitter
under every manhole cover, in every electrical distribution

73
00:06:25,546 --> 00:06:28,547
box, on every streetlight, and on every traffic light.

74
00:06:28,547 --> 00:06:36,935
That's the outlook for 2030 and beyond. All I can say
is, from my perspective, "Cheers—here's to what's coming."

75
00:06:38,695 --> 00:06:42,086
Yes, do we have any alternatives to radio communication?

76
00:06:42,086 --> 00:06:44,816
I'd have to say, yes and no. We have to make a distinction.

77
00:06:44,816 --> 00:06:48,182
Industry, commerce, and the government cannot coexist.

78
00:06:48,182 --> 00:06:54,860
As already explained, industry and commerce require lower
latency—latency that will be in the microsecond range

79
00:06:54,860 --> 00:06:59,377
with 5G, and perhaps even in the nanosecond range with 6G.

80
00:06:59,377 --> 00:07:04,851
What's not shown on this slide: this is very
important, and the military is heavily involved in it.

81
00:07:04,851 --> 00:07:09,030
After all, you can sum it up in one
sentence: Whoever shoots faster lives longer.

82
00:07:09,030 --> 00:07:16,398
But, of course, they deliberately avoid telling the public that
the military is a major driving force behind this technology.

83
00:07:16,398 --> 00:07:20,766
Yes, there are definitely alternatives
available to the general public in the private sector.

84
00:07:20,766 --> 00:07:29,536
Above all, as I just mentioned, we could reduce indoor private
communication by 90% if we replaced Wi-Fi with LAN networks—that

85
00:07:29,536 --> 00:07:37,254
is, wired networks—and replaced standard cell phone
or cordless phone communication with optical communication.

86
00:07:37,254 --> 00:07:39,549
As we all know, light doesn't pass through walls.

87
00:07:39,549 --> 00:07:42,440
From a technical standpoint, everything has been
prepared, developed, and is available on the market.

88
00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:46,281
However, it is not being introduced for deliberate reasons.

89
00:07:47,847 --> 00:07:53,207
Yes, I'm now going to duplicate the image
that Professor Bergholz has already shown.

90
00:07:53,207 --> 00:07:55,558
In my opinion, the slide on the right is very important.

91
00:07:55,558 --> 00:07:59,404
After all, the mobile communications industry
would have us believe that, in the double-digit

92
00:07:59,404 --> 00:08:02,256
gigahertz range, microwaves no longer penetrate the body.

93
00:08:02,256 --> 00:08:06,992
To do this, please take a look at the black box on the left.

94
00:08:06,992 --> 00:08:14,099
If you've read the text there, you'll see that Professor
Alexander Pressmann conducted experiments on rats as early as

95
00:08:14,099 --> 00:08:17,678
the 1970s to determine the dose required to reach an LD50.

96
00:08:17,678 --> 00:08:22,578
LD50 (lethal dose) refers to a lethal dose. It is a
measure used in experiments in physics, chemistry, and

97
00:08:22,578 --> 00:08:25,331
other fields, where it is generally considered equivalent.

98
00:08:25,331 --> 00:08:31,027
When 50% of the test animals have died, maximum
toxicity has been reached and the experiment is terminated.

99
00:08:31,027 --> 00:08:39,329
So, let's take a look at the figures. At 40 MHz,
20 W/m² was required to ultimately kill half of

100
00:08:39,329 --> 00:08:44,484
the test animals. At 40 GHz, it was only 40 mW/m².

101
00:08:44,484 --> 00:08:51,559
So, if you compare the graph on the right with the box on the
left, you'll see a discrepancy here that cannot be reconciled.

102
00:08:51,559 --> 00:08:54,732
And we want to take a closer look at that.

103
00:08:56,902 --> 00:09:03,720
As Professor Bergholz has aptly explained, it is the
energy that is carried by an electromagnetic wave.

104
00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:10,553
Every housewife knows that electromagnetic waves carry
energy—after all, she uses a microwave oven to cook food.

105
00:09:10,553 --> 00:09:15,154
Well, there's no need to go into that in
detail. Which EM wave causes the most damage?

106
00:09:15,154 --> 00:09:20,598
Yes, everyone is familiar with sunburn. The
wavelength range associated with sunburn—that is, UVB light—is

107
00:09:20,598 --> 00:09:23,279
between 315 µm and 280 µm (in the micrometer range).

108
00:09:23,279 --> 00:09:27,793
If we look at the frequency range, it
lies between 900 and 1,000 terahertz (THz).

109
00:09:27,793 --> 00:09:30,843
The penetration depth is now only a few micrometers.

110
00:09:30,843 --> 00:09:35,254
If we compare the penetration depths at 500
megahertz (MHz) and 2.4 gigahertz (GHz), they

111
00:09:35,254 --> 00:09:38,077
are still 1.5 and 0.5 centimeters, respectively.

112
00:09:38,077 --> 00:09:43,009
So, the industry's claim that microwaves in
the gigahertz range aren't harmful to us is

113
00:09:43,009 --> 00:09:46,945
absolute nonsense and biologically irresponsible.

114
00:09:48,713 --> 00:09:55,185
Yes, what do we need to take into account if we
assume that electromagnetic waves are hazardous?

115
00:09:55,185 --> 00:09:58,350
First and foremost: The dose is a crucial factor.

116
00:09:58,350 --> 00:10:02,580
Ultimately, dose is nothing more than intensity times time.

117
00:10:02,580 --> 00:10:06,208
Professor Hecht—who, sadly, has since
passed away—said as far back as 15 years ago:

118
00:10:06,208 --> 00:10:10,956
A distinction between ionizing radiation and
non-ionizing radiation is no longer justified.

119
00:10:10,956 --> 00:10:14,312
The damage is actually the same. It's just a matter of time.

120
00:10:14,312 --> 00:10:19,853
If I take a high dose, it doesn't take
long to cause biological and health damage.

121
00:10:19,853 --> 00:10:25,820
If I take a low dose, it lasts a
long time—sometimes even decades.

122
00:10:28,295 --> 00:10:31,965
However, as I said, there are other factors that
are not always taken into account today and

123
00:10:31,965 --> 00:10:34,360
that many scientists are unwilling to investigate.

124
00:10:34,360 --> 00:10:39,424
The first three terms—frequency, wavelength, and
power density—are actually characterized by dose.

125
00:10:39,424 --> 00:10:45,796
But it’s just as important to consider the type of
modulation—pulsed or non-pulsed—the frequency bandwidth, as

126
00:10:45,796 --> 00:10:51,879
Professor Bergholz aptly explained, the pulse rate, the
polarization—whether the wave is more vertical or

127
00:10:51,879 --> 00:10:59,007
horizontal—which affects us more while we’re sleeping or
standing, something like that—and the rise time of a signal.

128
00:10:59,007 --> 00:11:03,802
How fast—how many dB are reached in milliseconds?

129
00:11:03,802 --> 00:11:12,607
It is well known that science even uses high-frequency
holes in membranes today, and this is supposedly not harmful.

130
00:11:12,607 --> 00:11:19,747
Back in 1995, Professor Silny had
already posited the following in his lectures:

131
00:11:19,747 --> 00:11:25,621
A high-frequency wave that penetrates the body is attenuated.

132
00:11:25,621 --> 00:11:28,902
The wavelength and speed of propagation change in the process.

133
00:11:28,902 --> 00:11:34,645
Unfortunately, he couldn't quantify it; the AEB tried to do so.

134
00:11:34,645 --> 00:11:43,627
Here is a graph. We used ourselves as test subjects and
ran through a frequency range from 400 MHz to 2.2 GHz.

135
00:11:43,627 --> 00:11:53,824
In the process, we found that 90% of the radiation is absorbed in
the 400 MHz to 900 MHz range and in the 900 to 2,000 MHz range.

136
00:11:53,824 --> 00:12:02,815
That's 99%, and from 2,000 to 3,000 MHz, it's actually 99.9%.

137
00:12:02,815 --> 00:12:08,877
This means that the higher the frequency of the wave,
the more intensely it remains in our body—and thus the more

138
00:12:08,877 --> 00:12:12,147
intense the energy that affects our body and our cells.

139
00:12:12,147 --> 00:12:19,381
And Professor Buchner aptly said: “The actual mechanism of
destruction is the destabilization of the cell membrane.”

140
00:12:19,381 --> 00:12:22,865
When the cell membrane can no longer maintain the
balance between the inside and outside, cell

141
00:12:22,865 --> 00:12:27,568
damage begins. And that is when the disease begins.

142
00:12:27,568 --> 00:12:32,420
Yes, but Professor Klitzing (Dr. Klaus von
Klitzing) also conducted experiments as early as 1999:

143
00:12:32,420 --> 00:12:38,047
So how does cell phone radiation ultimately
affect our brains? And here you can see two charts.

144
00:12:38,047 --> 00:12:43,017
The graph on the left shows the data for a
healthy, young person who sleeps well in a room

145
00:12:43,017 --> 00:12:45,614
free of cell phone signals—a field-free room.

146
00:12:45,614 --> 00:12:51,803
The graph on the right shows the same subject who was
exposed to a cellular frequency for only three

147
00:12:51,803 --> 00:12:56,158
minutes and at only 1 μW/m², i.e., a very low power density.

148
00:12:56,158 --> 00:12:59,901
In the image on the right, you can see a huge signal at 10 hertz.

149
00:12:59,901 --> 00:13:04,013
In an EEG, 10 hertz is the signal that
characterizes a patient who is waking up.

150
00:13:04,013 --> 00:13:07,590
This patient will say the next day that he didn't sleep well.

151
00:13:07,590 --> 00:13:09,760
Well, a bad night's sleep doesn't necessarily make you sick.

152
00:13:09,760 --> 00:13:15,334
But if you sleep poorly for many
years, there will be consequences.

153
00:13:15,334 --> 00:13:19,297
And that's what we tried to track using nighttime sleep profiles.

154
00:13:19,297 --> 00:13:24,369
Over the years, the AEB has studied a number of
people to determine what their sleep patterns look like.

155
00:13:24,369 --> 00:13:28,521
Unfortunately, I don't have time to
explain a sleep profile to you in detail.

156
00:13:28,521 --> 00:13:36,775
But I just want to tell you this much: There are five
stages of sleep, ranging from Stage 1 (awake) to Stage 5.

157
00:13:36,775 --> 00:13:40,807
During this time, our sleep stages
ultimately alternate back and forth.

158
00:13:40,807 --> 00:13:44,547
During the middle part of the sleep
cycle, the deep sleep phases become shallower.

159
00:13:44,547 --> 00:13:47,216
Only moderate sleep phases occur now.

160
00:13:47,216 --> 00:13:50,375
And during the waking phase, sleep is
actually mostly just light sleep. REM sleep is the

161
00:13:50,375 --> 00:13:52,410
most common type of sleep during this phase.

162
00:13:52,410 --> 00:13:58,006
This image shows a healthy person
sleeping in a field-free environment.

163
00:13:58,006 --> 00:14:02,418
And now I'm going to show you a
picture of a terminally ill person.

164
00:14:02,418 --> 00:14:08,476
I don't think I need to explain to you—even as a layperson—that
this sleep profile has nothing to do with what was shown earlier.

165
00:14:08,476 --> 00:14:12,026
Nothing is the same anymore. There
is no longer a deep sleep phase.

166
00:14:12,026 --> 00:14:15,621
There are only sleep phases between the
wakefulness phase and the deep sleep phase.

167
00:14:15,621 --> 00:14:22,592
This is actually called regulatory rigidity. You can also
observe this phenomenon in HRV, or heart rate variability.

168
00:14:22,592 --> 00:14:28,082
This situation is life-threatening. I hate to say
it, but I'm saying it publicly for the first time now.

169
00:14:28,082 --> 00:14:32,072
Some of these patients died within half a year.

170
00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:37,956
Yes, the effect of 5G radiation on the blood.

171
00:14:37,956 --> 00:14:41,084
Due to time constraints, I won't go into
detail about the individual studies here.

172
00:14:41,084 --> 00:14:43,500
I just want to show you that there are plenty of studies.

173
00:14:43,500 --> 00:14:45,718
You can read all of them for yourself online.

174
00:14:45,718 --> 00:14:49,422
I'd like to show you what the consequences of this are.

175
00:14:49,422 --> 00:14:53,809
This is an American study, specifically one
conducted prior to the introduction of

176
00:14:53,809 --> 00:14:56,842
radio-based meters—in this case, electricity meters.

177
00:14:56,842 --> 00:15:01,330
Blood samples were taken from the participants beforehand
and analyzed, specifically to examine the red blood cells.

178
00:15:01,330 --> 00:15:05,375
Specifically, whether any morphological changes
have occurred in these blood cells. You can see the

179
00:15:05,375 --> 00:15:07,079
top row, which shows the condition before admission.

180
00:15:07,079 --> 00:15:12,593
You can see beautiful, round erythrocytes—that
is, red blood cells—under a dark-field microscope.

181
00:15:12,593 --> 00:15:16,222
Then the radio measurement devices were
installed, and then blood samples were taken from

182
00:15:16,222 --> 00:15:18,525
them again. Now take a look at the bottom row.

183
00:15:18,525 --> 00:15:22,488
This means that the rounding has broken down; in some
places, the cell wall is cracking open, and in the image

184
00:15:22,488 --> 00:15:24,287
on the far right, we see the formation of money rolls.

185
00:15:24,287 --> 00:15:26,580
That might be an absolutely pathological finding.

186
00:15:26,580 --> 00:15:32,909
The formation of fat rolls is also an
indicator of a tendency to have a heart attack.

187
00:15:32,909 --> 00:15:36,043
Yes, the impact of 5G radiation on the studies.

188
00:15:36,043 --> 00:15:40,997
I don't want to go into detail about
the slide; it would just take up my time.

189
00:15:40,997 --> 00:15:47,347
You can research and look up everything
yourself online and then make your own judgment.

190
00:15:47,347 --> 00:15:52,048
An important study that I would like to discuss in
detail is one from Salford, specifically from 2003.

191
00:15:52,048 --> 00:15:55,827
He studied rats and wanted to see
what effects radiation would have.

192
00:15:55,827 --> 00:16:01,887
He irradiated rats with three different doses and
then examined them. But he did something unusual.

193
00:16:01,887 --> 00:16:06,986
In such scientific experiments, the rats—or
mice—are usually killed after the exposure period

194
00:16:06,986 --> 00:16:10,240
ends, and their brains or organ samples are examined.

195
00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:12,177
And then, of course, you don't find anything. Why?

196
00:16:12,177 --> 00:16:16,100
After all, it's not ionizing
radiation. Salford came up with the key idea.

197
00:16:16,100 --> 00:16:19,202
He said that you actually have to wait
out what's called a "degeneration period."

198
00:16:19,202 --> 00:16:22,790
Because weak radiation takes a
certain amount of time to cause damage.

199
00:16:22,790 --> 00:16:25,467
That's exactly what he did. He left the rats there for 50 days.

200
00:16:25,467 --> 00:16:30,379
And then you'll see something like the
image on the right. The image on the right.

201
00:16:33,788 --> 00:16:36,776
Here you can see the pathological brains of rats.

202
00:16:36,776 --> 00:16:41,204
These dark spots are what are known as
necrotic foci. They are areas of brain damage.

203
00:16:41,204 --> 00:16:45,612
It is interesting to note that the rats did
not exhibit any behavioral abnormalities.

204
00:16:45,612 --> 00:16:50,730
You can certainly observe the same thing in people as well.

205
00:16:50,730 --> 00:16:53,843
Yes. Freedom of research is important to me.

206
00:16:53,843 --> 00:17:00,185
I had the opportunity to read an
interesting interview with Prof. Maike Mevissen.

207
00:17:00,185 --> 00:17:07,314
There, a journalist—(the print is so small I can't even read
it myself anymore)—as I said, a journalist asked Prof.

208
00:17:07,314 --> 00:17:13,024
Mevissen some questions and interviewed her about her research.

209
00:17:13,024 --> 00:17:17,889
You can read on your own, more or less. (Because,
well… my glasses aren't strong enough anymore.)

210
00:17:17,889 --> 00:17:19,577
Should I help out quickly? I'll read it aloud.)

211
00:17:19,577 --> 00:17:24,558
So, in response to the first question about academic freedom, my
colleague says, “What bothers me is that

212
00:17:24,558 --> 00:17:29,435
institutions like the German Federal Office for
Radiation Protection constantly dismiss everything.”

213
00:17:29,435 --> 00:17:37,019
Research is highly political, and we are constantly
confronted with the view that there must be no health risks.

214
00:17:37,019 --> 00:17:41,623
And then there's a question about interference.
Yes, what bothered me the most was that people were

215
00:17:41,623 --> 00:17:44,470
constantly trying to tell us how to do our jobs.

216
00:17:44,470 --> 00:17:49,376
The WHO expert in charge wanted to decide
for us which studies were even eligible for the

217
00:17:49,376 --> 00:17:52,241
assessment. We had to constantly push back.

218
00:17:52,241 --> 00:17:59,122
"And as for the study design—I know one thing about animal
studies: you can set them up in such a way that

219
00:17:59,122 --> 00:18:06,724
you find nothing by creating statistical noise
that masks relevant effects." That's shocking.

220
00:18:09,951 --> 00:18:15,030
I just realized I need to see the eye
doctor again—I need stronger glasses.

221
00:18:15,030 --> 00:18:20,877
Yes, I would like to introduce you to another
significant category of noxious substances .

222
00:18:20,877 --> 00:18:24,850
Specifically, the synergistic effects
of various environmental pollutants.

223
00:18:24,850 --> 00:18:29,764
The oldest pollutants we know of are smoke
and asbestos. Today, we would say microfibers.

224
00:18:29,764 --> 00:18:36,240
We all know that someone who has smoked for 20 years
has a six times higher risk of developing lung cancer.

225
00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:42,465
Anyone who has worked with microfibers for 20
years without protection has an 11-fold higher risk.

226
00:18:42,465 --> 00:18:46,540
Now, one might think that if someone has taken
both risks, then their risk is 17 times higher.

227
00:18:46,540 --> 00:18:54,836
No, I'm sure you've already read that. He has a 60-fold
higher risk of developing one of these types of tumors.

228
00:18:54,836 --> 00:18:59,785
With this slide, I'd like to show you—it
actually comes from Professor Witte in Oldenburg.

229
00:18:59,785 --> 00:19:03,708
These are the main environmental
factors and pollutants that affect us.

230
00:19:03,708 --> 00:19:08,225
How people deal with this depends in part on genetics.

231
00:19:08,225 --> 00:19:13,667
There are people who are very good at detoxifying on
their own, without seeking medical or naturopathic help.

232
00:19:13,667 --> 00:19:15,905
However, there are people who are completely unable to detoxify.

233
00:19:15,905 --> 00:19:21,408
But the consequences are generally
nitrosative or oxidative stress.

234
00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:30,254
I would like to summarize the six main factors that
are causing us humans to become increasingly sick today.

235
00:19:30,254 --> 00:19:33,493
It is the physical environmental stressors.

236
00:19:33,493 --> 00:19:38,455
This includes not only cellular radiation, but
ultimately also low-frequency and static magnetic field

237
00:19:38,455 --> 00:19:41,217
exposure, geoengineering, and weather modification.

238
00:19:41,217 --> 00:19:46,196
Here, microaerosols—toxic microaerosols in
nanoform—are sprayed into the air, eventually

239
00:19:46,196 --> 00:19:49,668
settling on us and being ingested along with our food.

240
00:19:49,668 --> 00:19:56,364
And finally, food. Genetic
engineering is becoming more and more...

241
00:19:56,364 --> 00:20:01,390
Right now, the EU is trying to push through a
regulation that would obscure the identification of

242
00:20:01,390 --> 00:20:04,862
genetically modified organisms in food—which is irresponsible.

243
00:20:04,862 --> 00:20:10,231
Then there are the vaccines. By that, I don't just
mean the mRNA vaccine, but also traditional vaccines.

244
00:20:10,231 --> 00:20:14,430
It is irresponsible to do this when we
consider that these products contain toxic substances

245
00:20:14,430 --> 00:20:16,736
such as thiomersal, a toxic mercury compound.

246
00:20:16,736 --> 00:20:20,106
And, of course, chemical exposure.

247
00:20:20,106 --> 00:20:24,902
Let's consider insecticides,
pesticides, and even mechanical stress.

248
00:20:24,902 --> 00:20:29,425
These are dust particles and microplastics.
Microplastics in nanoform can penetrate cells.

249
00:20:29,425 --> 00:20:39,359
All of these interactions will ensure—to put it sarcastically—that
socially acceptable early retirement is guaranteed.

250
00:20:44,378 --> 00:20:46,607
We are slowly coming to the end of my presentation.

251
00:20:46,607 --> 00:20:54,300
I'd like to give you another example of just how much our
government cares about research into environmental pollutants.

252
00:20:54,300 --> 00:20:58,317
In Germany, there are only ten
institutions that deal with such issues.

253
00:20:58,317 --> 00:21:05,382
But if you've already read the second line, you'll see that
there are 163 research institutes dedicated to gender studies.

254
00:21:05,382 --> 00:21:07,278
Now I ask you, what is actually more important?

255
00:21:07,278 --> 00:21:14,560
Well, you can judge for yourself how much our
government values the health of its citizens—namely, nothing.

256
00:21:16,171 --> 00:21:22,241
Yes, here's a summary again. I don't want to
read it out in detail because I'm short on time.

257
00:21:22,241 --> 00:21:29,470
The source is listed below. You can read it for
yourself and extract more detailed information from it.

258
00:21:31,811 --> 00:21:36,537
Yes, Mr. Weikl asked me to say a
few more things about prevention.

259
00:21:36,537 --> 00:21:40,581
So, outdoors, there's really nothing you can do
to avoid it, because the field strengths are

260
00:21:40,581 --> 00:21:42,949
simply present everywhere due to technical antennas.

261
00:21:42,949 --> 00:21:51,372
But whether you stay healthy for a long time
really depends on how you manage your indoor stressors.

262
00:21:51,372 --> 00:21:57,584
Even today, I still find that the main sources of
exposure come from indoors—namely, cordless phones

263
00:21:57,584 --> 00:22:01,949
and Wi-Fi. People often don't want to believe it.

264
00:22:01,949 --> 00:22:06,522
They come to pick me up, then I take measurements, and then I
find that while the external exposure might only be in the

265
00:22:06,522 --> 00:22:11,745
three-digit microwatt range, your own sources of exposure—Wi-Fi
and cordless phones—are causing milliwatt-level exposure.

266
00:22:11,745 --> 00:22:17,473
So if you want to reduce radiation exposure, you
should actually measure your indoor exposure

267
00:22:17,473 --> 00:22:21,095
first before you start reducing radiation outdoors.

268
00:22:21,095 --> 00:22:28,841
I'm not saying that it isn't desirable to
significantly reduce external radiation.

269
00:22:28,841 --> 00:22:31,065
Yes, that brings me to the end of my presentation.

270
00:22:31,065 --> 00:22:33,846
Thank you for your attention. I know this raises some questions.

271
00:22:33,846 --> 00:22:36,759
I will, of course, be available to
participate in the discussion. Thank you.