WEBVTT

00:00.144 --> 00:08.134
Scientific reviews (known as systematic reviews) are
considered the gold standard in evidence-based medicine.

00:08.134 --> 00:13.931
They are often used as a source to gain an
overview of the current state of research on the

00:13.931 --> 00:18.526
effectiveness of pharmaceutical products, such as vaccines.

00:18.526 --> 00:25.968
The Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), whose vaccination
recommendations are considered authoritative by many in Germany,

00:25.968 --> 00:30.025
also uses such reviews to issue vaccination recommendations.

00:30.025 --> 00:39.598
A recently published study has now shown: Over 91%—or more than
nine out of ten—of such reviews have a “critically low”

00:39.598 --> 00:50.048
level of reliability in terms of reporting quality and therefore
do not meet the standards for methodological reliability.

00:50.048 --> 00:57.056
The study was conducted, of all
places, by the RKI, which houses STIKO.

00:57.056 --> 01:02.344
Does the RKI currently feel compelled to take a
critical stance in response to growing

01:02.344 --> 01:06.486
criticism of STIKO and its vaccination recommendations?

01:06.486 --> 01:12.112
Dr. Alexander Konietzky, spokesperson
for the ÄFI Executive Board, explains:

01:12.112 --> 01:19.824
“STIKO always bases its vaccination recommendations on scientific
evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of vaccines.”

01:19.824 --> 01:24.337
The study now presented by the RKI
and the WHO proves the opposite:

01:24.337 --> 01:28.642
The low level of credibility of the vast majority
of vaccine studies contradicts this expectation—an

01:28.642 --> 01:31.337
expectation that the public is, however, entitled to.

01:31.337 --> 01:34.115
Vaccination recommendations must be
based on the highest level of evidence.

01:34.115 --> 01:39.427
After all, vaccinations involve the preventive
administration of substances to healthy people (…).

01:39.427 --> 01:44.852
"All of STIKO's vaccination recommendations, which are based
solely on its own testing methods, would have

01:44.852 --> 01:51.832
failed to meet the standards set by the current
study. They all therefore need to be re-evaluated."

01:51.832 --> 01:57.177
Kla.TV – The world's largest news
network for suppressed dissenting voices.