We are pleased to welcome Dr. Ute Krüger to Kla.tv today for an online interview. Hello, Ms. Krüger.
Hello, thank you very much for inviting me to this interview.
You're welcome. Thanks for being here.
There was an increase in aggressively growing breast tumors following the mRNA injections.
And she was the first pathologist to refer to it as "turbo cancer."
They coined the term.
But "turbo cancer" doesn't just occur in patients who have been diagnosed with breast cancer
and who have received the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.
Could you please briefly explain to us again what "turbo cancer" means?
Of course. So “turbo cancer” isn’t a scientific term; rather, it refers to the characteristics of the tumor.
In other words, how fast the tumors grow and, consequently, how large they are.
And this so-called "turbo cancer" can occur in any organ in the body.
So it's not just in the chest—it can occur anywhere.
And under the microscope, you can see that the tumor cells are much larger, and there are many more tumor cells dividing.
So there is a specific staining technique used in pathology that reveals proliferative activity—in other
words, it shows how many of these tumor cells are dividing.
And there are just so many of them in this turbo crab.
Dr. Krüger, it is also thanks to you that we have a histopathological atlas today.
This study demonstrates, at the highest scientific level, the tissue damage caused in
humans by the COVID-19 mRNA gene injections.
Of course, we—and the audience—would also be very interested to know what happened after the atlas was published
in 2024, and what impact your book had internationally.
In the meantime, your book has also been translated into other languages.
So this book here, “Vaccinated—Died,” is the world’s first book on this topic.
And so there are histopathological—that is, pathological—changes in the tissue that prove that people died
after receiving these COVID-19 mRNA gene injections.
And it's been on the market for about two years. And in German-speaking countries, it's now a bestseller.
The fourth revised edition is sold out, and the fifth edition is now in print.
A year ago, it was translated into English and also into Swedish.
And now it has been translated into French and Spanish and is currently being printed in those two languages.
And I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to all the sponsors, because without
them, this work would not have been possible.
And I want this book to reach as many people as possible around the world, which is why I chose the major world languages.
I chose the Swedish translation mainly because, of course, I've been living in Sweden for a good 20 years.
For example, an English copy was also sent to U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
And internationally, I receive many invitations to conferences or interviews.
So far, I've conducted interviews with people in Australia, the U.S., Italy, Switzerland, Iceland, Austria,
Germany, the Czech Republic, and, of course, Sweden.
And this year, I’ve given talks in Germany, the Czech Republic, and Iceland, and I’ll be traveling to the Czech Republic
again, as well as to Hungary and, in late fall, back to Austria.
So Vienna, Salzburg, and Krems are being considered.
And to Germany as well—Frankfurt/Oder, Leipzig, and Dresden are being considered again.
And these recent presentations can be viewed on the website for this atlas.
I would have liked to see, however, that the authorities—not only in Germany but also internationally—do much more.
Because these highly dangerous COVID-19 mRNA gene injections must be withdrawn from the market immediately: on
the one hand, based on the evidence presented in this book.
So this shows that they are highly dangerous substances.
On the other hand, we have been aware of these so-called RKI protocols since the summer of 2024.
So the Robert Koch Institute had to approve these protocols.
And these clearly show that these are not medical indications—that is, based on medical
grounds—but rather purely political decisions.
And all of this without any medical basis whatsoever.
And by the way, I also think this book should be on every bookshelf because it's a historical document.
And you can't just wipe away anything that's printed on paper.
You can fake a lot of things on the Internet. But that's why I think it's important that it's a historical document.
Yes, very good. Thank you for taking the initiative like that.
Now you've published these extremely important findings in the form of an atlas.
So how did the doctors and pathologists actually react to that?
And one more question: conventional medicine in general?
Now you have presented this evidence showing that these very COVID-19 mRNA gene injections are extremely harmful to people.
And what was the conventional medical community's response? How did they react?
Yes, so I sent the book to colleagues in pathology, for example, as well as to my former boss in the pathology department
at the hospital in Kalmar, but I never received any feedback.
I also invited some of my former colleagues who were pathologists to my lectures—for example, in Germany—but no one showed up.
And the press release announcing the publication of this book was also sent to the German Society of Pathology
and, here in Sweden, to the Swedish Society of Pathology.
But here, too, I never received any response.
On the positive side, however, there are some family doctors in German-speaking countries who have the
book on display in the waiting room of their practices.
And that, of course, is progress.
Then the patients can see: "Ah, okay, now there's something interesting here."
So that the information actually gets out.
Yeah, so we really need to illustrate that again and make it clear, too.
They have truly proven that this massive damage exists, but conventional medicine shows no interest in it.
This whole industry—politics, the pharmaceutical industry—just carries on as if nothing had happened.
That's right. And here you can clearly see that this isn't a medical indication at all—it's purely about making money.
Okay, yes. Perhaps you could explain to our viewers—and to us as well—once again why mRNA vaccines are what they are;
why can’t we really call them “vaccines” anymore, but instead have to refer to them as “mRNA gene injections”?
What's so harmful about it?
So, during vaccination, vaccines—or so-called “vakzine”—are administered with the goal of
immunizing the body against an infectious disease.
So that means the body recognizes, "Okay, there's a disease here; we need to respond immediately."
And these COVID-19 RNA gene injections do not protect against COVID-19, nor do they protect against
severe cases, as we have always been told in the media.
So it's not a vaccine.
And so people refer to it as an mRNA gene injection—or, more precisely, a mod-RNA gene
injection, since the RNA has been modified.
So that it lasts longer.
That's actually what sets them apart.
And healthy body cells are reprogrammed to produce this spike protein.
And there's no off switch here.
Well, we don't know how long the body produces this spike protein.
It is also important to note that these gene injections contained plasmid DNA.
So this is bacterial DNA—that is, residual molecules from the manufacturing process, as we were told.
I don't know if that's true.
And this creates the risk that this bacterial DNA will be integrated into our genetic material—our genome.
And in my view, this is a form of gene therapy.
Wow, yeah.
You also told us during the COVID-19 pandemic that you had examined a batch of the
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine under a dark-field microscope.
And you've even brought us a few pictures today. Thank you.
You're about to show them to us. What exactly did you discover there, and what can you tell us about it?
Yes, so here’s what happened: three or four years ago, my colleague from the U.S., Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, showed
images of what she had found in these so-called vaccines.
And she also illustrated this with images in her presentation from July 2025—exactly one year
ago—on self-organizing nanotechnology in the blood.
And I still can't really believe what I see in the media; I'd much rather see it for myself.
So I took a look at one of these so-called COVID-19 vaccines myself under a dark-field microscope,
and I'd be happy to show you a few pictures here.
So, here you can see my dark-field microscope, which I normally use to examine live blood
to identify any imbalances in the human body.
Dark-field, because a slightly different technique is used here—there’s a different condenser down here that refracts the
light, and as a result, you can see here in the background—those are the blood cells, the red blood cells—and
the light is refracted at the edge, at the membrane, which is why they appear so bright here.
And that's why it's called the "dark field."
So I took a look at a Comirnaty vaccine injection—that's this little vial right here.
So here you can see the batch number 1F1052A.
And I observed the blood for over three days.
And now here are a few pictures from the microscope.
So here's what it looked like right at the beginning—it's this needle-like structure.
I think you can see here that this is a real highlight.
And this structure is a good 0.1 mm in size.
And when you think about what these kinds of materials are normally supposed to contain,
you shouldn't see materials like that here.
If you look at the next one—which is also very interesting—you'll see this little structure here.
And then this little add-on here, almost like an antenna.
And that was after just under three hours.
Then another photo after about seven hours.
So, basically, it was like that from the very beginning—it was sparkling really brightly in that dark area.
And it was a powerful movement here.
In other words, it was also difficult to get sharp images.
And so here you can see these little—you always see a little line and then a dot next to it. Line, dot.
And in some places, they've already gotten together.
Line, dot, line, dot. So, that looks like antenna-like structures.
Here, too. You can see that here as well.
And then, there were also some very abstract forms.
This is what it looked like here after seven hours.
Well, to me, that doesn't look like anything that's normally supposed to be in a vaccine.
To me, that looks like one of those little robots.
And that—if you convert it to millimeters—means it's just under 0.02 millimeters in size.
And then here, too—after eight hours, the material was glowing brightly.
Something like this. These must be metals.
Because anything that shines that brightly isn't organic.
And that's also very interesting to see.
And here, too, you see these small structures time and again—they’re visible everywhere in the background—which
have then come together to form other structures.
And since that's kind of the case—you can see it here, for example, with these antenna-like structures.
So let them all gather here.
Dash, period, dash, period. You can see that pretty clearly here, too.
And then, after 27 hours, I finally drew this sketch because it was really difficult to get good
images due to the intense movement under the microscope.
And when I look at it that way, I have to say it looks more like a pile of junk than a vaccine solution.
And here you can see these assembled parts again. Here are the individual parts.
Then there are these small, chip-like structures that come together to form other structures. Or here, too.
And then there are these little spheres here, too. I think those are the lipid nanoparticles.
And then there are some things here that I can't figure out at all. I don't know what they are. Here, too.
So these are things, and I found these same structures here in the living blood, too.
Well, it's not like I only found it in the so-called vaccine solution—it's also present in the
people who were injected with these solutions.
And then the Corminaty safety data sheet states that these substances are classified as exposure class 5.
So that means it has a very high toxic potential—in other words, it's very harmful to health and poisonous.
There are six classes in total.
And if you take this result—that is, the AI’s safety data sheet—and tell it to generate an image of what the
people administering this COVID-19 vaccine to others should look like, this is the image it produces.
And so I ask you, if the doctor had looked like that, who would have let him give them that shot?
Wow, wow, wow. Thank you for your work, Dr. Krüger.
So we can say that, even though there is crystal-clear evidence of how harmful mRNA injections are to humans,
the pharmaceutical industry is still continuing to bring new mRNA gene injections to market.
That really is a scandal, actually.
That's what people can expect.
What would you recommend to our viewers, or if someone finds themselves in this
situation, how can they defend themselves against it?
What would you recommend there?
Well, I would recommend that you do your own research. Look it up online yourself.
And the more questions you ask, the more answers you get.
The most pressing question is: Are these substances effective—that is, do they work, and are they safe?
And that's not the case here.
And both the manufacturers of these liquids and the politicians knew that—I believe as early as November 2020.
So it was clear from the start that it was neither effective nor safe.
And yet they're still coming onto the market.
And this is also administered to many people.
In that case, I would advise you to ask your doctor if there is an independent double-blind study.
That means independent—not conducted by the pharmaceutical industry, but by an independent party.
A double-blind study is a study in which neither the participants—that is, those in the control group—nor those in the
experimental group know which group they have been assigned to.
And the experimenter doesn't know that either.
And if there were one—which I don't believe there is—take a close look at the result.
So we really need to develop a sense of self-efficacy.
We can't just keep getting information over and over again and then say, "Okay, that's how it is now."
Instead, don't blindly believe, for example, politicians, the media, or doctors.
And as for what I'm saying, look it up online—search for Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea and check
out her website to see what she's published.
That's very important.
And then I would advise you to be careful with any products that are advertised.
Really question everything, listen to your intuition, and follow your heart.
And then there are also numerous good, informative websites, such as the one run by the MWGFD.
So this is the association for medical professionals and scientists, dedicated to health, freedom, and democracy.
He has a great website; it also offers a referral service for people who have suffered harm from these injections.
Or the Vetopedia website.
Yes, thank you, Dr. Krüger, for that as well—for the tips.
Now, of course, we'd also be interested to know how things have been going for you personally.
Yes, well, I had worked in pathology for 25 years and resigned in the fall of 2023 because I could no longer be
part of this healthcare system—it’s clear that it doesn’t act primarily for the good of the people.
And I became a doctor because I want to help people.
And after completing numerous continuing education courses and spending two years running my own private
medical practice, I have now founded a scientific association dedicated to promoting healthcare.
This is the Active Health Institute.
And within this association, there are various projects in which members can participate.
For example, the saying about the "dark field" means: "His blood doesn't lie."
And then you can see what’s in your blood, and I can recommend things to help people get back to
good health—so their bodies can regain their balance.
And now I can follow my heart.
That's great—we're happy for you, too.
Yes, Dr. Krüger, we’d like to thank you once again from the bottom of our hearts for the
wonderful work you’re doing. Keep up the good work.
We'll also keep pushing to make sure these things are exposed and that this harmful mRNA injection is stopped.
This really has to stop.
And we're doing our part, too.
All the best to you, and see you again soon.
Thank you very much.