WEBVTT

00:00.413 --> 00:11.094
“And as we stated from a legal standpoint at the outset, it is,
of course, necessary that the safety of such lipid nanoparticles

00:11.094 --> 00:15.270
be established before they are placed on the market.”

00:15.270 --> 00:19.440
And that didn't happen. That was
the first phase leading up to 2024.

00:19.440 --> 00:23.166
So that had been, at the very least, gross negligence.

00:23.166 --> 00:30.044
"Starting in 2024, when scientific evidence has established that
they are dangerous and toxic, it will ultimately no

00:30.044 --> 00:37.681
longer be considered negligence; rather, one must say that
this constitutes, at the very least, conditional intent, …"

00:37.681 --> 00:39.748
Watch a clip from the interview now: Prof. Dr. Bhakdi:
"The greatest organized crime against humanity" (full

00:39.748 --> 00:41.480
interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhJrO8nVKks )

00:41.480 --> 00:47.106
Ladies and gentlemen, today I am
speaking with Professor Sucharit Bhakdi.

00:47.106 --> 00:52.746
Everyone in Germany knows him, and anyone
who doesn't will get to know him today.

00:52.746 --> 00:58.867
Today, we wanted to talk together about
his new book and the implications it has.

00:58.867 --> 01:06.380
It's called "mRNA Vaccines: The Greatest
Organized Crime Against Humanity and the New Evidence."

01:06.380 --> 01:14.223
And so I thought to myself, from a lawyer’s perspective to a
doctor’s, let’s talk about what the new evidence is, what the new

01:14.223 --> 01:21.257
findings are, why this should be considered a crime, and
what needs to be done legally—as a criminal lawyer, as a

01:21.257 --> 01:25.546
prosecutor, and as the judicial system—to solve these crimes.

01:25.546 --> 01:28.400
Why is it the greatest crime against humanity?

01:28.400 --> 01:36.286
The reasons are explained in this book
in a way that anyone can understand.

01:36.286 --> 01:47.759
And based on this presentation of evidence, I have come to have
some very pressing questions that I would like to ask a lawyer.

01:47.759 --> 01:55.273
And you are, of course, the person in Germany who
is probably best suited to answer my questions.

01:55.273 --> 01:56.980
First question:

01:56.980 --> 02:05.998
Isn't it generally prohibited to inject a substance known
to be life-threateningly toxic into the bodies of

02:05.998 --> 02:11.374
healthy people, whether for self-defense or to protect others?

02:11.374 --> 02:14.080
The answer to this question is, of course, essentially “yes.”

02:14.080 --> 02:19.981
Therefore, a toxic substance must not be
injected into the body of a healthy person.

02:19.981 --> 02:26.845
Even if the healthy person insists, this would
ultimately lead to intentional, unethical self-harm—and

02:26.845 --> 02:31.101
even suicide, if that is what the affected person wants.

02:31.101 --> 02:39.013
And everyone knows that assisted suicide—and while
there may be exceptions—is generally a criminal offense.

02:39.013 --> 02:44.239
And what I'm observing here, Professor Bhakdi,
is that it's obviously—or do you see it

02:44.239 --> 02:47.673
differently?—that we're dealing with a toxic substance.

02:47.673 --> 02:52.285
And we're talking here about mRNA vaccines
in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

02:52.285 --> 02:59.669
A toxic substance that was "administered"—though "administered"
probably needs to be put in quotation marks—was injected,

02:59.669 --> 03:03.339
and people were led to believe something completely false.

03:03.339 --> 03:06.506
At least as far as the background of this substance is concerned.

03:06.506 --> 03:12.466
Yes, that's the point. But before I elaborate
on that, I'd like to ask the second question.

03:12.466 --> 03:18.962
Don't regulatory agencies have a mandate from the
government—and thus from the people—to prevent

03:18.962 --> 03:23.008
this from happening through appropriate oversight?

03:23.008 --> 03:29.591
It goes without saying that government agencies,
particularly those in the pharmaceutical sector, are

03:29.591 --> 03:32.746
tasked with regulating the marketing of substances.

03:32.746 --> 03:41.333
We have strict regulatory standards in Germany, in Europe—and one
could almost say worldwide—that stipulate that

03:41.333 --> 03:49.746
substances may only be made available to consumers
once the government has determined that they are safe.

03:49.746 --> 03:51.685
Two questions, and then I'll get started.

03:51.685 --> 03:58.119
Third: If the authorities fail to do so and
serious harm results to the public, isn't that a

03:58.119 --> 04:01.990
gross, criminal breach of their duty of supervision?

04:01.990 --> 04:10.775
The fact is that, as I said, the authorities are required under
pharmaceutical law and other legal instruments to

04:10.775 --> 04:19.183
regulate the marketing of substances and to prevent
toxic substances from being placed on the market.

04:19.183 --> 04:27.072
If they fail to monitor this, but the authorities nonetheless
knowingly and intentionally allow this substance to be placed on

04:27.072 --> 04:33.709
the market—that is, if the authorities permit it—then
this is, of course, a reprehensible act and must, of

04:33.709 --> 04:37.356
course, have consequences for the officials involved.

04:37.356 --> 04:44.748
Fourth: Don't manufacturers have a legal
obligation to disclose such a hazard in their

04:44.748 --> 04:49.659
products and recall the product once it becomes known?

04:49.659 --> 04:52.373
That actually applies to all products that are brought to market.

04:52.373 --> 04:58.675
You surely remember the many product recalls in supermarkets when
expired food or food that wasn't produced under

04:58.675 --> 05:04.446
proper sanitary conditions is put on the market, and
people later say that this constitutes a violation.

05:04.446 --> 05:11.433
If it is discovered after the fact that this has
happened, all the substances, foods, and products are recalled.

05:11.433 --> 05:13.800
This applies all the more to pharmaceutical law.

05:13.800 --> 05:18.471
It is clear that if a substance is
hazardous and this is determined after the fact, the

05:18.471 --> 05:20.840
substance must be removed from the market.

05:20.840 --> 05:25.952
We saw this in the thalidomide case in the early 1960s,
and it happens time and again in other cases as well.

05:25.952 --> 05:31.774
Isn't it a violation of the Nuremberg Code to
administer substances of unknown efficacy

05:31.774 --> 05:35.026
and safety without providing informed consent?

05:35.026 --> 05:38.306
Certainly. That is precisely what the
Nuremberg Code is intended to prevent.

05:38.306 --> 05:45.246
After all, the Nuremberg Code was developed in response to
the human experiments conducted by the Nazis in the 1940s.

05:45.246 --> 05:54.900
Doctors must never treat people as guinea pigs or as
subjects of medical research. That should be ruled out entirely.

05:54.900 --> 06:03.233
All right, now I'll get to the facts. And there are
no grounds for suspicion here—these are the facts.

06:03.233 --> 06:06.966
With these vaccines—they're all packaged, aren't they?

06:06.966 --> 06:12.495
These mRNA vaccines are packaged, and
the packaging process takes place …

06:12.495 --> 06:14.240
… in Fetten, right?

06:14.240 --> 06:24.933
In fats. These fats were never
approved for use in healthy people. Never.

06:24.933 --> 06:32.988
Under the so-called emergency use authorization in
the United States, it is permitted to use untested

06:32.988 --> 06:38.386
substances—that is, on an experimental basis, so to speak.

06:38.386 --> 06:46.779
And it is widely assumed in Europe—and in Germany in
particular—that conditional approval is identical

06:46.779 --> 06:51.746
to emergency use authorization in the United States.

06:51.746 --> 06:56.439
But I want to emphasize that this does not reflect reality.

06:56.439 --> 07:05.792
After all, there is no regulation, no law—in
fact, no way at all—that would allow a

07:05.792 --> 07:11.779
substance to be used once it is known to be dangerous.

07:11.779 --> 07:18.260
That's why I asked you: if something is known to
be toxic, shouldn't it be prohibited from use?

07:18.260 --> 07:30.268
Well, as for these fats—these nano-lipid
particles—it was not known at the time of approval, which was

07:30.268 --> 07:36.800
in 2020, that the packaging itself is highly toxic.

07:36.800 --> 07:40.200
Because this discovery was made in 2024.

07:40.200 --> 07:51.733
In 2024, it was discovered that this substance has a property
that originates from bacteria in cases of blood poisoning.

07:51.733 --> 07:57.548
And this substance stimulates the immune system to
such an extent that inflammation occurs everywhere.

07:57.548 --> 08:03.479
It's basically like a sparkler. That's what
sets the sparklers off in the immune system.

08:03.479 --> 08:06.140
Those aren't the antibodies—it doesn't matter what they are.

08:06.140 --> 08:14.637
However, for this reason, these bacterial
toxins—endotoxins—must under no circumstances be present in

08:14.637 --> 08:19.573
any injectable medication. It is strictly prohibited.

08:19.573 --> 08:27.966
And then, two years ago, it was discovered that
these very man-made fats have the same property.

08:27.966 --> 08:33.186
That has been published. And we have also
cited it in our book, giving the source.

08:33.186 --> 08:37.393
Anyone can read about it. This
discovery has been confirmed time and again.

08:37.393 --> 08:43.080
It has never been disputed or retracted. And
the publication is cited in the literature.

08:43.080 --> 08:48.129
And yet the authorities have not responded.

08:48.129 --> 08:54.020
Nevertheless, the company has not responded. After all,
the company really should have announced this immediately.

08:54.020 --> 08:57.446
And we don't need to discuss this
any further, because that's a fact.

08:57.446 --> 09:09.146
Before 2024, nothing was known about the toxicity of
these nanoparticles—these lipid nanoparticles. Exactly.

09:09.146 --> 09:20.137
That wasn't known yet. But people were aware that they hadn't
been fully investigated. They didn't know the consequences.

09:20.137 --> 09:30.483
And as we noted at the outset from a legal perspective, it is,
of course, necessary that the safety of such lipid nanoparticles

09:30.483 --> 09:35.046
be established before they are placed on the market.

09:35.046 --> 09:39.170
And that didn't happen. That was
the first phase leading up to 2024.

09:39.170 --> 09:42.933
So that had been, at the very least, gross negligence.

09:42.933 --> 09:51.780
Starting in 2024, when scientific evidence has established that
they are dangerous, and toxic, it is ultimately no longer a

09:51.780 --> 09:59.332
matter of negligence; rather, one must say that
bringing these lipid nanoparticles to market as so-called

09:59.332 --> 10:04.046
“vaccine carriers” constitutes at least conditional intent.

10:04.046 --> 10:10.947
So that means that any side effect that occurs—or any effect,
including a toxic effect—is ultimately the fault of

10:10.947 --> 10:17.186
the people who allow these particles to be produced
and brought to market, rather than being recalled.

10:17.186 --> 10:22.526
These particles have the property that they know no boundaries.

10:22.526 --> 10:27.413
They travel from the bloodstream
to all organs, including the brain.

10:27.413 --> 10:31.873
And the brain is full of these sparklers that get lit.

10:31.873 --> 10:38.176
And that's why sparks—the damage—immediately occur in the brain.

10:38.176 --> 10:44.333
And inflammation of the brain is called encephalitis.

10:44.333 --> 10:51.575
And any form of encephalitis is life-threatening
and can lead to all sorts of terrible complications.

10:51.575 --> 10:59.086
Professor Bhakdi, can you explain why this
happens to some people but not to many others?

10:59.086 --> 11:06.340
So, these substances are obviously particularly
toxic to some people but not to others. How can that be?

11:06.340 --> 11:10.000
Yes, there are so many reasons why that might be the case.

11:10.000 --> 11:20.260
As for the toxicity of these lipid nanoparticles, they are equally
toxic to everyone. The only thing is, they have to get there.

11:20.260 --> 11:25.596
And that's a problem for these lipid
nanoparticles, just as it is for all vaccines.

11:25.596 --> 11:34.277
Because if the vaccine wasn't stored properly, if it
wasn't handled correctly, or if it sat around for too long,

11:34.277 --> 11:38.760
then those lipid nanoparticles will break down as well.

11:38.760 --> 11:45.900
And then they don't reach the brain. It's almost trivial.

11:45.900 --> 11:53.789
Well, speaking as a layperson—I’m neither a
toxicologist nor a doctor—this is how I imagine it: If

11:53.789 --> 11:58.280
you give a person arsenic, they’ll probably die.

11:58.280 --> 12:03.472
Whether you're a man or a woman, 90 years old or 2 years old.

12:03.472 --> 12:12.065
As I understand it now, the issue with lipid
nanoparticles is that they are fundamentally capable of

12:12.065 --> 12:16.874
causing extremely severe side effects in all people.

12:16.874 --> 12:22.853
But it depends, for example, on how the
substance is stored and how it is then injected.

12:22.853 --> 12:27.673
In some cases, this can lead to
encephalitis, or inflammation of the brain.

12:27.673 --> 12:30.113
Not meningitis, but encephalitis.

12:30.113 --> 12:37.127
Oh, I see—it can lead to encephalitis.
And the other one just gets off easy.

12:37.127 --> 12:40.213
Yes, exactly.

12:40.213 --> 12:42.646
It's a kind of toxic Russian roulette.

12:42.646 --> 12:48.386
Yes, exactly, exactly right. That's
exactly what Helmut Sterz wrote, too.

12:48.386 --> 12:51.586
And no one can predict that.

12:51.586 --> 12:59.533
That's funny—there was a Thai study in which my
colleagues in Thailand conducted a statistical survey.

12:59.533 --> 13:09.107
Specifically, in which cities the
most side effects were reported.

13:09.107 --> 13:12.833
And then there were all kinds of curves.

13:12.833 --> 13:20.685
The ones that were really steep—that is, the more vaccinations
were administered, the steeper these trends

13:20.685 --> 13:29.329
became—so that in some cities, the side-effect rate was
around 10 percent—yes, of all side effects combined.

13:29.329 --> 13:32.893
And then, with others, almost nothing.

13:32.893 --> 13:39.875
And then it turned out that the cities with the vaccination sites
that reported the highest rates of side

13:39.875 --> 13:47.442
effects among all major cities—Bangkok, yes—were,
of course, the ones with good refrigerators.

13:47.442 --> 13:52.744
And the fewest side effects were
in rural areas, in small hospitals.

13:52.744 --> 13:57.000
So, yeah, in the tropics. That's all I need to say.

13:57.000 --> 14:03.400
In other words, it can sometimes actually be a good thing
if medical care isn’t as top-notch as it is in the capital.

14:03.400 --> 14:11.233
Yes, of course. Thankfully, people in
rural areas have fared much better.

14:11.233 --> 14:17.378
We can already see that these lipid
nanoparticles alone are a reason to take action.

14:17.378 --> 14:24.014
And you have to realize that these lipid
nanoparticles know no boundaries. They can even

14:24.014 --> 14:28.073
pass through the placenta—from mother to child.

14:28.073 --> 14:33.073
And that is something the German group has now discovered.

14:33.073 --> 14:40.129
It has also been published. It has been published that
these lipid nanoparticles cross the placental barrier.

14:40.129 --> 14:47.606
And that those foreign genes are then
inside the child. In the womb. It's terrible.

14:47.606 --> 14:48.860
It really is terrible.

14:48.860 --> 14:54.366
Right now, I'm just thinking about the book Mr.
Sterz wrote a while back about the vaccine mafia.

14:54.366 --> 15:01.920
I believe he also discussed the fact that this
placental barrier between mother and child can be crossed.

15:01.920 --> 15:10.949
And there were obviously no tests at all conducted
prior to the emergency authorization of this so-called

15:10.949 --> 15:16.159
“vaccine” for COVID-19—the mRNA vaccine—there were none.

15:16.159 --> 15:23.019
That means they administered something and had no idea at
the time what the consequences would be. Or did they know?

15:23.019 --> 15:27.440
No. Other groups have conducted
preliminary studies that have shown this.

15:27.440 --> 15:31.160
But it wasn't mentioned. And it wasn't rigorously tested.

15:31.160 --> 15:39.313
Actually, this book by Helmut Sterz was
what inspired me to publish this latest book.

15:39.313 --> 15:46.211
Because in this latest book that Helmut and I
edited together—we’re the editors, not the

15:46.211 --> 15:50.640
authors—we put all the pieces of the mosaic together.

15:50.640 --> 15:55.333
And that all comes together to form a
complete mosaic that everyone can understand.

15:55.333 --> 16:02.220
With all the evidence showing why now is
the time for the lawyers to take over.

16:02.220 --> 16:09.010
And why the public is now in a
position to push things in that direction.

16:09.010 --> 16:13.320
Let me follow up on that for a
moment. That question was important to me.

16:13.320 --> 16:20.506
When the vaccine received emergency authorization, did
people know about the possible consequences for

16:20.506 --> 16:24.747
children—that is, for unborn children? Did they know that?

16:24.747 --> 16:30.880
Or did they say, “Just close your eyes and go for it—we don’t
know, but it’ll all work out”? Or did they ultimately not care?

16:30.880 --> 16:33.143
Should people have known that for sure? Or did they know it?

16:33.143 --> 16:37.540
Absolutely. And, Mr. Maaßen, now hold on to your seat.

16:37.540 --> 16:40.940
We have now covered lipid nanoparticles.

16:40.940 --> 16:53.717
But we know that this vaccine itself—the mRNA—was developed in
such a way that, when the manufacturing process was submitted for

16:53.717 --> 17:01.754
review and approval, the process submitted was relatively sound.

17:01.754 --> 17:05.027
We don't need to discuss right now why that was okay.

17:05.027 --> 17:12.495
But it was clean. And the product—manufactured using this clean
process—was actually used in the first

17:12.495 --> 17:19.540
large-scale clinical trial. There was only one. That
was in mid-2020. It involved 20,000 participants.

17:19.540 --> 17:26.975
And this vaccine was tolerated relatively
well. Relatively. Not very well, but relatively.

17:26.975 --> 17:31.967
And the procedure has, after all,
been approved. Approved. Approved.

17:31.967 --> 17:43.139
But when Ms. von der Leyen purchased these vaccine doses for all
of Europe and awarded the contract to BioNTech—the purchase was

17:43.139 --> 17:51.781
made before the product was even available—they were
unable to manufacture the product according to

17:51.781 --> 17:57.484
proper procedures because it was too expensive for them.

17:57.484 --> 18:03.443
That would have resulted in a loss rather than a
profit. And that's why they changed the procedure.

18:03.443 --> 18:10.126
And they changed the manufacturing process for the first billion
doses, which were then administered starting in December.

18:10.126 --> 18:15.012
This revised procedure has never been formally approved.

18:15.012 --> 18:20.168
Since they also didn't provide any details about
what was in it, what had changed, and what the

18:20.168 --> 18:23.111
product looked like, they didn't provide anything at all.

18:23.111 --> 18:32.183
Does that mean that the product granted emergency authorization
was different from the one that was ultimately administered? Yes.

18:32.183 --> 18:36.810
So that means the emergency authorization doesn't
actually cover the product that was subsequently sold,

18:36.810 --> 18:39.246
because it was produced under different conditions.

18:39.246 --> 18:47.746
Yes, that's exactly right. The key step in being able to
produce it cheaply is that they used bacterial chromosomes.

18:47.746 --> 18:50.133
They used these bacterial chromosomes as a template.

18:50.133 --> 18:56.560
Not artificial genes, but actual,
real genes. Specifically, from bacteria.

18:56.560 --> 19:04.406
And then they ran into a problem that couldn't
be solved—and still can't be solved, even today.

19:04.406 --> 19:11.461
Namely, if you take these giant chromosomes—they’re
enormous compared to the artificial genes they

19:11.461 --> 19:18.120
needed for the clinical… …approval. For approval, yes.

19:18.120 --> 19:26.685
In that case, it is impossible to completely
remove these bacterial chromosome fragments.

19:26.685 --> 19:29.740
It's just not possible. There's no way to do that.

19:29.740 --> 19:33.581
Or it would end up being so expensive
that it would, in turn, result in a loss.

19:33.581 --> 19:38.894
So. And they didn't do that either. And that's why
these remnants of bacterial chromosomes have been found.

19:38.894 --> 19:42.389
Every single time. Anyone who looked for them found them.

19:42.389 --> 19:49.425
And the first finding came three years ago. That's
something to think about. Three years ago, Mr. Maaßen.

19:49.425 --> 19:55.135
By one of today's leading molecular biologists: Kevin McKinnon.

19:55.135 --> 19:58.886
He was a project manager on the Human Genome Project.

19:58.886 --> 20:06.153
This is the man who played a key role
in decoding the entire human genome.

20:06.153 --> 20:12.613
Well, if anyone knows how to identify
DNA and how to sequence it, it's Kevin.

20:12.613 --> 20:16.091
And he found it. He said so, too.

20:16.091 --> 20:23.378
But the authorities—yes, the Paul Ehrlich Institute—turned a
blind eye. The EMA turned a blind eye. Oh well, it’ll be fine.

20:23.378 --> 20:28.355
Isn't that like when the government enters into a
contract—let's say, with a contractor—and the

20:28.355 --> 20:31.821
contractor is supposed to build a highway with overpasses?

20:31.821 --> 20:34.946
And the contract specifies exactly what must be provided.

20:34.946 --> 20:40.203
And then later on, the contractor says to himself, “Well, that’s
all too expensive for me; I won’t make much profit

20:40.203 --> 20:44.935
on that, so I’d rather use the low-quality
concrete.” Yeah, because I can really save money that way.

20:44.935 --> 20:48.846
And then the road and the bridge are built with
poor-quality concrete, and the bridge collapses.

20:48.846 --> 20:54.554
Well, then it would be up to the client—the government—to conduct
inspections to ensure the bridge doesn't

20:54.554 --> 21:00.376
collapse, to check whether this concrete meets the
requirements or not. Is that a fair way to look at it?

21:00.376 --> 21:03.894
Yes, of course. Exactly. And that's what
the Paul Ehrlich Institute is there for.

21:03.894 --> 21:07.993
And that one wriggles away and wants nothing to do with it.

21:07.993 --> 21:10.519
The EMA was responsible for that. That can't be right.

21:10.519 --> 21:13.460
The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the German people.

21:13.460 --> 21:19.320
I mean, when I hear that, I think, where are
we, anyway? Are we in Germany? Where are we?

21:19.320 --> 21:25.749
Because they said, “A little bacterial
chromosomal DNA—what’s the big deal?”

21:25.749 --> 21:33.291
Yes. There were even experts—my fellow experts—who said, “Guys,
don’t get so worked up. You eat so much bacterial chromosomal

21:33.291 --> 21:37.237
DNA in your food every day. And it doesn’t do any harm.”

21:37.237 --> 21:41.218
In the stomach. But it does make a difference
whether it’s absorbed in the stomach or

21:41.218 --> 21:43.933
injected directly into the bloodstream, doesn’t it?

21:43.933 --> 21:49.376
Yes, sir, of course. And you don't even have to inject it
directly into the bloodstream. You inject it into the muscles.

21:49.376 --> 21:50.493
Into the muscles, yes.

21:50.493 --> 21:52.568
It always enters the bloodstream.

21:52.568 --> 21:58.480
And from the bloodstream, it reaches all the
organs. I mean, we've already covered that. Okay, now.

21:58.480 --> 22:07.958
And I told Helmut—this was in December—“If only we could put a
lid on this by having someone show and prove that

22:07.958 --> 22:16.624
this stuff—these bacterial chromosomes—is toxic
and deadly, then we’ll write a book or publish one.”

22:16.624 --> 22:20.904
And that's what happened. And that's
why this book is out now, Mr. Maaßen.

22:20.904 --> 22:23.280
Because anyone can read in it what happened.

22:23.280 --> 22:31.383
First, it has been proven that these
chromosome fragments—very short sequences—can be

22:31.383 --> 22:36.790
incorporated into human chromosomes and cause cancer.

22:36.790 --> 22:41.486
So this discovery was made in a
woman with aggressive bladder cancer.

22:41.486 --> 22:52.833
And they found embedded spike
sequences in the bladder cancer chromosome.

22:52.833 --> 22:56.260
Wait a minute, can I ask for
clarification? I'm not sure I understand correctly.

22:56.260 --> 23:00.693
Should we talk about these lipid nanoparticles now? No.

23:00.693 --> 23:06.180
So, the packaging—that was the one thing they found
that indicated the lipid nanoparticles posed a risk. Yes.

23:06.180 --> 23:13.120
The other issue now is this
contamination of the mRNA with bacterial DNA.

23:13.120 --> 23:20.266
Which arose due to the… … mass
production that was not certified. Yes.

23:20.266 --> 23:27.879
And the third point is really the question of to
what extent the mod-RNA—the mRNA—is itself, that

23:27.879 --> 23:32.086
is, to what extent the vaccine itself is toxic.

23:32.086 --> 23:35.175
Is it true that, essentially, we have
to distinguish between three levels?

23:35.175 --> 23:44.000
But I would now like to draw the audience’s
attention to the fact that DNA—specifically,

23:44.000 --> 23:49.758
bacterial DNA—is life-threatening and can cause cancer.

23:49.758 --> 23:58.243
The insertion of this sequence into human DNA caused the cancer.

23:58.243 --> 24:01.693
That is stated in this paper; it is
substantiated, and it is perfectly clear.

24:01.693 --> 24:08.652
Surely that must lead to an immediate ban on
the continued administration of these injections.

24:08.652 --> 24:12.750
So, Professor Bhakdi, I now see two new leads here.

24:12.750 --> 24:17.478
So the first question was, is mod-mRNA toxic in and of itself?

24:17.478 --> 24:24.563
And I think that's generally true, based on
the experiences of the last five or six years.

24:24.563 --> 24:33.836
The second point you made today—or rather, the first point you
highlighted today—concerned lipid nanoparticles: that these lipid

24:33.836 --> 24:42.819
nanoparticles are toxic because they also cross the blood-brain
barrier and the blood-placenta barrier, which can ultimately

24:42.819 --> 24:47.552
be very dangerous for the unborn child and lead to encephalitis.

24:47.552 --> 24:53.680
And you also said that it depends on storage
conditions or other factors whether the

24:53.680 --> 24:57.906
virulence—that is, the toxicity—is higher or lower.

24:57.906 --> 25:06.655
And the third point—and this, I believe, is really the most
crucial message of all: a product was sold to the states by the

25:06.655 --> 25:14.408
big pharmaceutical companies that does not correspond to what was
purchased—that is, what is specified in the

25:14.408 --> 25:22.706
contract and what was licensed by the authorities—but is,
in essence, cheaply contaminated with bacterial DNA.

25:22.706 --> 25:30.577
And this bacterial DNA has had incredible consequences—namely,
that it was also incorporated into human DNA and led to serious

25:30.577 --> 25:38.560
and even life-threatening diseases, as you just mentioned:
bladder cancer in one case and many, many other cases as well.

25:38.560 --> 25:43.044
And that reminds me, Professor Bhakdi, that
the pharmaceutical companies have always said,

25:43.044 --> 25:46.226
“We’ve signed contracts, so we’re off the hook.”

25:46.226 --> 25:53.013
Yeah, it always says that—we don't take any responsibility
for anything. We've been absolved of liability, so to speak.

25:53.013 --> 25:58.364
But I have to say, if they delivered something completely
different from what was ordered, and if that doesn't

25:58.364 --> 26:03.539
even fall under the emergency approval, then they
are liable—under civil and criminal law, at any rate.

26:03.539 --> 26:09.193
It must be the case that everyone's
immunity has been eliminated, right?

26:09.193 --> 26:15.748
Yes, well, after that, anyway. But what you said
actually made it clear to me why there are

26:15.748 --> 26:19.553
groups of people who get sick and others who don't.

26:19.553 --> 26:23.127
Then it's simply because they had some bad luck.

26:23.127 --> 26:30.350
For example, with regard to the storage of the
packaging—that is, the lipid nanoparticles—or with regard to

26:30.350 --> 26:34.020
the contamination of the substance by bacterial DNA.

26:34.020 --> 26:35.399
And the others had just gotten lucky.

26:35.399 --> 26:37.052
Roulette. Russian roulette.

26:37.052 --> 26:39.820
Russian roulette, yes. That’s how it is.

26:39.820 --> 26:49.955
And I think that we must now demand that all those who
knowingly participated be prosecuted. That’s how it has to be.

26:49.955 --> 26:56.253
From manufacturers all the way to the
organizing bodies in politics, scientific

26:56.253 --> 27:00.293
associations, advocacy groups, and the media.

27:00.293 --> 27:13.770
And I mean, if someone had even a little bit of sense, I'd turn
around and say, "My God, I really didn't know that back then."

27:13.770 --> 27:22.292
And that would actually work even today. Because the
things I just told you about—no one knew about them.

27:22.292 --> 27:24.950
They've all become well-known over the past two years.

27:24.950 --> 27:30.036
And it's not widely known because no one has
really explained it. But now it's all in the book.

27:30.036 --> 27:34.162
And now no one can say that this
wasn't known or that I wasn't aware of it.

27:34.162 --> 27:40.843
But when you say it wasn’t known, that can only apply to the
general public—and perhaps to the judiciary as well—but

27:40.843 --> 27:47.712
not to the manufacturers, nor to those who put it on the
market, nor to those who granted emergency authorization.

27:47.712 --> 27:51.126
We can't let those slide—we weren't aware of that.

27:51.126 --> 27:55.214
No. Correct. They were either knowingly
aware of it, or they should have known about

27:55.214 --> 27:57.806
it, and yet they put it on the market anyway.

27:57.806 --> 28:05.099
And when they later saw what the consequences were, they
didn't withdraw it; instead, they continued to market it.

28:05.099 --> 28:08.146
Yes. That is why it remains a crime to this day.

28:08.146 --> 28:16.780
And a moratorium must now also be imposed on all mRNA
vaccinations for healthy people. That’s essential, too.

28:16.780 --> 28:24.861
What I've been saying for the past two years is
well known: the toxicity of the nanoparticles and

28:24.861 --> 28:29.006
the DNA contamination that was present in them.

28:29.006 --> 28:35.045
If it's not possible today, can't the
government or the buyer cancel the purchase

28:35.045 --> 28:38.701
agreements from the last two years or three years?

28:38.701 --> 28:44.591
That is, of course, an entirely different question, separate from
the issue of criminal liability and from the

28:44.591 --> 28:51.053
question of to what extent these mRNA substances—in
quotation marks—will even be “administered” in the future.

28:51.053 --> 28:58.838
I believe that if what was delivered is not what was
ordered, then it is not covered by the sales contract at all.

28:58.838 --> 29:07.930
So that means that when you placed an order, the sample you had
seen, the one you had tested—and as you said, the

29:07.930 --> 29:17.036
sample you had tested that was then granted emergency
certification—was a substance without bacterial DNA.

29:17.036 --> 29:23.536
This substance has, so to speak, been
certified. This substance has been purchased.

29:23.536 --> 29:25.873
And now something completely new has been delivered.

29:25.873 --> 29:32.526
And as a lawyer, I have to ask: Is this even still
covered by this contract, or is this a breach of contract?

29:32.526 --> 29:37.024
I'd say that's not covered by the contract—after
all, they haven't fulfilled the contract at all.

29:37.024 --> 29:41.905
And that’s why you have to not only cancel
it—that is, the service… Give me my money

29:41.905 --> 29:45.327
back. Please give the money back—exactly. Yes.

29:45.327 --> 29:47.249
How did we end up here?

29:47.249 --> 29:54.213
Just imagine: BioNTech has 15 billion
tucked away. That's common knowledge.

29:54.213 --> 30:00.893
It wouldn't be difficult for you to pay back a
few billion—three, four, or five billion—right now.

30:00.893 --> 30:10.733
And then we could set up a relief fund for vaccine-injured
people. Oh yes. And pay out compensation very easily.

30:10.733 --> 30:16.468
And you don't need to go through any courts
to do that—you can do it quickly and easily.

30:16.468 --> 30:23.713
I have to tell you that Thailand was the first
country to provide this compensation. That was in 2022.

30:23.713 --> 30:30.206
In the millions, tens of millions.
And it's still paying off today.

30:30.206 --> 30:32.894
And I know how the Thais did it. It was great.

30:32.894 --> 30:37.426
In Germany, I'm afraid, far too many people have
profited from this, and far too many have gone along with it.

30:37.426 --> 30:41.911
I have to say, we have a network of
accomplices, of people who simply stood by and

30:41.911 --> 30:45.256
watched and, contrary to their duty, did nothing.

30:45.256 --> 30:47.193
It's going to be very, very difficult.

30:47.193 --> 30:51.586
That's why we haven't yet had any kind of review of
all these COVID-19 measures and the vaccination period.

30:51.586 --> 30:58.720
That’s why I’m saying this. If you realize now that you
should turn back, turn around, and stop participating—because

30:58.720 --> 31:02.256
anyone who continues to participate is part of it.

31:02.256 --> 31:09.088
Yes. And there’s no mercy for that. There’s no
forgiveness. Isn’t that right? That’s right.

31:09.088 --> 31:17.066
But what if they seize this opportunity now and say, “We really
didn’t know; if we had known, we wouldn’t have done it either.”

31:17.066 --> 31:18.073
But those days are over.

31:18.073 --> 31:24.061
We would support not only the cancellation of the
sales contracts, but also the payment—the

31:24.061 --> 31:27.466
refund—of the money. It’s so simple for them, after all.

31:27.466 --> 31:32.060
Even the members of Parliament. Why? I don't
think most of them knew anything about it.

31:32.060 --> 31:34.473
They were just the henchmen who went along with it.

31:34.473 --> 31:42.155
But what if, right now, the lawmakers themselves in the Bundestag
and the state legislatures all stood up and said, “Folks,

31:42.155 --> 31:46.230
it’s really true. The money has to go back to the people.”

31:46.230 --> 31:50.777
Yes. And it's so easy to do. Why shouldn't you do it?

31:50.777 --> 31:53.792
I think it would be difficult to
push that through in political Berlin.

31:53.792 --> 31:59.556
Is there a way for the public to bring this
issue or this motion before the Bundestag?

31:59.556 --> 32:05.128
Well, I don’t see any significant willingness to come to terms
with the past among the parliamentary groups

32:05.128 --> 32:09.764
in the Bundestag that have formed the
government to date—the CDU, CSU, SPD, or Greens.

32:09.764 --> 32:11.592
That's not coming to terms with the past. We want our money back.

32:11.592 --> 32:20.013
No, no. All right. Coming to terms with the past, insofar as that
would mean acknowledging that mistakes were made in the past.

32:20.013 --> 32:25.000
No one is willing. I can truly say,… No one
is willing to admit that mistakes were made.

32:25.000 --> 32:31.674
Let me remind you that two months ago I appeared before the
Bundestag’s fact-finding commission on COVID-19 measures.

32:31.674 --> 32:37.871
And sitting next to me were my former boss, Thomas
de Maizière, who was then the Federal Minister of

32:37.871 --> 32:41.660
the Interior, and Nancy Faeser, one of his successors.

32:41.660 --> 32:46.154
And both of them said in unison, “Actually, we’ve
come through this period—the COVID-19

32:46.154 --> 32:49.406
period—very well, and we haven’t really made any mistakes.”

32:49.406 --> 32:52.730
Thanks, praise, and gratitude to the federal government.

32:52.730 --> 32:55.590
And now, let's stop looking back and start looking ahead.

32:55.590 --> 33:00.540
And it had already become clear to me that they didn't want
to admit that mistakes had been made. They should know better.

33:00.540 --> 33:04.033
Even a blind person with a cane
can see how badly things went wrong.

33:04.033 --> 33:13.026
You don't even have to have read her new book to understand
what a disaster has taken place—and that it's still happening.

33:13.026 --> 33:18.622
My impression is that these parties don't want to do it. We
have to get them to do it. We have to put pressure on them.

33:18.622 --> 33:24.446
I'm glad that the AfD is exerting pressure in the
Bundestag. I can only hope that this pressure continues to grow.

33:24.446 --> 33:33.664
We need to address this issue. We need a complete halt—not
just a moratorium—a general halt and ban on the administration

33:33.664 --> 33:37.987
of these lipid nanoparticles and contaminated mRNA.

33:37.987 --> 33:46.689
I think what we should do first is set up a
legal task force to work out the legal aspects of

33:46.689 --> 33:51.520
all this and, if necessary, file criminal charges.

33:51.520 --> 33:56.455
Because what we've discussed here today,
Professor Bhakdi, are by no means minor offenses.

33:56.455 --> 34:02.769
These are serious and very serious crimes. That
is why you were right to use the term “crimes.”

34:02.769 --> 34:05.590
And crime is always accompanied by intent.

34:05.590 --> 34:12.885
And in the case of specific crimes—such as murder,
which, as we must keep in mind here, involves the killing

34:12.885 --> 34:17.046
of people—the question arises as to intent and motive.

34:17.046 --> 34:24.861
Was it just a desire for profit, greed? Or were there
other motives at play that led to these substances

34:24.861 --> 34:28.966
being “administered”—in quotes—against better judgment?

34:28.966 --> 34:33.984
Prof. Bhakdi, I don't just have hope—I am confident
that we will come to terms with what happened and

34:33.984 --> 34:36.733
also put a stop to this insane vaccination campaign.

34:36.733 --> 34:38.688
But we'll probably need a little more time.

34:38.688 --> 34:46.020
We simply cannot let up on the pressure. We must
not let up. And we need to educate the public.

34:46.020 --> 34:50.897
People need to be shaken out of their
complacency because there are simply still too many

34:50.897 --> 34:53.653
people who fall for these mainstream slogans.

34:53.653 --> 34:57.970
People need to keep getting booster
shots. I saw an ad like that again recently.

34:57.970 --> 35:00.973
So, raising awareness, raising
awareness, raising awareness is essential.

35:00.973 --> 35:06.705
Yes, but it’s not enough just to raise
awareness—it must be banned. Yes, certainly.

35:06.705 --> 35:12.486
This "vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate"—it must
be banned. It must be made a criminal offense.

35:12.486 --> 35:16.709
People are dying like flies. Really. They're getting so sick.

35:16.709 --> 35:23.723
I had brought up so many issues. I'm
completely at my wits' end. So are the victims.

35:23.723 --> 35:33.286
Too many people are dying right now. This can't be happening.
And who's going to help them? Who's going to help them?

35:33.286 --> 35:39.674
We are fighting. We are fighting to ensure that these
contaminated vaccines—these mRNA lipid

35:39.674 --> 35:48.430
nanoparticles—are banned, and that no more vaccinations are
administered using them. We are campaigning for a ban.

35:48.430 --> 35:56.036
And what we need is for the victims to
be compensated. They must be protected.

35:56.036 --> 35:59.319
We need to help them. I agree with you on that, too.

35:59.319 --> 36:10.606
The profits these companies have made in recent years—from
taxpayer money—must be made available for victim protection.

36:10.606 --> 36:15.920
Mr. Maaßen, thank you for your time.
You’re very welcome. We’ll keep fighting…