For weeks now, coverage of this year's heat wave by the so-called leading media has
been keeping people on the edge of their seats.
Reports of dried-up rivers and the resulting restrictions on inland waterway shipping, forest fires in Southern
Europe, and the threat of crop losses in agriculture are leaving people in a state of utter shock.
Across all media outlets, climate change-allegedly caused by CO2 is consistently cited
as the cause of these extreme temperatures.
Time and again, the media instills in the public a supposed connection to this constantly propagated CO2 agenda.
This naturally raises the question: Is the intention here to cause climate panic among the public?
The program “Not CO2! – Secret Military Weapons and Toxic Spraying Operations Threaten the World Climate!”
demonstrates that this connection is even being systematically programmed by the so–called leading media:
January 2025: Forest fires rage in Southern California.
And the result of this study is that climate change has increased the risk of devastating forest fires.
The hot, dry and windy conditions that have led to the massive size of the fires are 35
percent attributable to man–made climate change.
January 23, 2025: Storm Eowyn rages over Ireland.
There are plausible links between extreme storms like today and climate change and we will see more severe storms due to warming.
May 28, 2025: The Swiss mountain village of Blatten is largely destroyed by an avalanche of debris and ice.
Professor Michael Krautblatter heads the Chair of Landslide Research at the Technical University of Munich.
He suspects that the event in Valais is linked to climate change.
Gigantic floods in Texas in the beginning of July 2025.
Was climate change to blame?
Climate change is making tropical storms more dangerous not only in this way.
It is to be expected that more extreme, potentially deadly storms will become more frequent as a result of climate change.
July 27, 2025: Greece and Turkey battle record heat and forest fires.
Climate change as a fire accelerator.
Scientists see climate change as the decisive factor behind the increasingly extreme conditions.
This documentary raises the serious question of whether this is a deliberate deception based on an extremely questionable CO2
theory, designed to ensure that the actual causes of climate change remain hidden and are not exposed to public scrutiny.
Given the current heat wave and the associated highly questionable coverage by the mainstream media, the
serious questions raised by this thought–provoking documentary must be asked now more urgently than ever.
For this reason, we are presenting the rest of this insightful documentary film here:
These were just a few examples of how the system media reported on natural disasters this year.
Did you recognize the common thread?
The scapegoat for these disasters is always climate change allegedly caused by CO₂.
The ZDF broadcasting corporation defines the cause of this climate change on its website as follows.
Climate change is progressing. It will be mitigated if we emit less CO₂ and other greenhouse gases.
However, this absolute statement by the ZDF and other media that climate change is only caused by greenhouse gases is shaken to
its foundations if, in addition to the so–called mainstream, free, alternative information platforms are
also allowed to have their say as dissenting voices.
Here are two examples.
First. The kla.tv documentary “Climate Consensus Under the Microscope” refutes the claim that 97% of
scientists agree that climate change is caused by CO₂.
This is scientific fraud with cheap sleight of hand tricks.
Secondly. The kla.tv documentary “Updates for Greta” uses facts and figures to prove that completely
different causes are responsible for climate change.
In numerous other documentaries, kla.tv has broadcast rebuttals to the CO₂ thesis.
Well-founded expert presentations, which are withheld from viewers of ARD, ZDF etc., also
show other possible causes of climate change.
The following three facts should make any objective observer suspicious of this controversial CO₂ theory.
Fact 1: Composition of air The volume percentage of CO2 in the air is 0.04%
Fact 2: The proportion of CO2 in the air that humans can actually influence is around 4% This means that humans can only influence
4% of the 0.04% CO2 content of the air, which is approx. 0.0016% of the total amount of air!
This is approx. 0.0016% of the total air volume.
Fact 3: Germany's share of global CO₂ emissions is a maximum of 2%.
This means that Germany's citizens only influence approx. 0.000032% of the total amount of air via CO₂.
Can the sixth digit after the decimal point really save the climate?
Who can still fully understand the CO₂ climate issue based on these figures? Especially as billions are
pumped into carbon offsetting projects every year?
However, as the above examples from the year 2025 show, ARD, ZDF and Co. continue to sell the CO₂ theory as fact to their
millions of viewers despite all the evidence to the contrary.
What is important in this context is that there are publicly accessible documents that prove that the
military in particular can actually influence the climate on a large scale with weather weapon systems.
Evidence for the existence of climate-altering weapon systems
1. The European Parliament
The European Parliament confirms in a report dated January 14, 1999 entitled HAARP – A climate-damaging
weapon system. The existence of dangerous weather weapons.
Here are brief excerpts from this highly explosive report.
HAARP can be used for many purposes.
By manipulating the electrical properties in the atmosphere, enormous forces can be controlled.
If this is used as a military weapon, the consequences can be disastrous for the enemy.
HAARP can charge a clearly defined area with millions of times more energy than any other conventional energy.
HAARP can cause changes in climatic conditions.
The system can also affect the entire ecosystem.
Another serious consequence of HAARP is the holes in the ionosphere caused by the strong waves directed upwards.
2. The UN–NMOD Convention Known as the United Nations Convention on Environmental Warfare.
Here is an excerpt from the UN NMOD Convention from 1976, which illustrates the possibilities that can be
caused by the use of environmental manipulation techniques.
Earthquakes, tidal waves, disruption of the ecological balance of a region, changes in weather structures, clouds, precipitation,
hurricanes of various kinds and tornadoes, changes in climate structures, changes in ocean currents, changes in the state
of the ozone layer, and changes in the state of the ionosphere.
3. Former US Secretary of Defense Dr. William Cohen
Cohen confirmed the existence of these climate-altering weapons on April 28, 1997 at a conference on terrorism in Athens.
Others even engage in a kind of eco-terrorism, changing the climate, creating earthquakes and, opening
volcanoes through the use of electromagnetic waves.
It is real, and that is why we need to intensify our counter-terrorism efforts.
4. Numerous patents confirm the existence of climate weapons
There are hundreds of US weather patents for weather manipulation technologies.
Numerous patents, for example US patent 4.412.654, confirm that highly toxic substances, such as aluminum,
barium or lead, can be sprayed as fine dust by aircraft and thus have a massive impact on the weather.
Should all of these very expensive US patents really only have been applied for but never be used?
Hardly, because 110 weather manipulation programs were approved by the US Senate between 1947 and 1978.
A US Air Force document from 1996 clearly states the goal.
We will own the weather by 2025.
These documents prove beyond doubt that secret military weapons have been in existence for decades that can
trigger storms, severe weather, but also extreme drought and demonstrably change our climate.
Specifically, the HAARP antenna systems already mentioned are one of the issues here.
Such facilities have been in place for decades in a number of countries, as the world map shows.
The USA in particular has also demonstrably manipulated the climate and weather with one of its largest
plants in Alaska, which has required vast amounts of energy to operate since the 1990s.
In order to use these weapons even more effectively, some of them also require the
spraying of highly toxic substances by aircraft.
The fact that this actually happens and is by no means a conspiracy theory is confirmed by none other than
former FBI chief Ted Gunderson shortly before his death.
The American educational pioneer, Dr. Anthony Hilder, reported with reference to medical evidence that
Gunderson did not die of natural causes, but was poisoned.
The documents cited by Gunderson and his personal statement shed a new light on the omnipresent climate debate of recent years.
And certainly, not every natural disaster has been triggered by weather weapons.
However, the following two questions need to be asked urgently with regard to mass media reporting.
1. Why is a CO₂ theory constantly being sold to the population as proven science?
2. Why, on the other hand, are secret military climate weapons, which demonstrably damage our climate,
completely ignored or even denied in the climate debate?
The following scenario provides a conclusive explanation for these two extremely explosive questions:
High–ranking military officers have always had a great interest in the weather, because the
power over the weather can be decisive for war.
It was not without reason that former US President Lindon B. Johnson said: "He who
controls the weather will control the world".
However, the military was aware from the outset that the use of these secret military weather weapons and the associated
spraying of highly toxic metal oxide particles into the atmosphere would inevitably change the climate in the long term.
To avoid being exposed as the cause of serious climate change themselves, they have launched
the CO₂ thesis by supporting media campaigns.
Suddenly there were warnings of a climate horror scenario in which entire cities would sink into the sea and only
Cologne Cathedral, for example, would rise out of the sea.
At the same time, scientists were presenting the population with the CO₂ scapegoat.
From then on, the vital CO₂ was demonized under a scientific guise.
The CO₂ certificate indulgence trade, reminiscent of the sale of indulgences in medieval church history, could begin.
As a result, this crime became a very profitable business model.
As in a detective story, the real perpetrators of climate change have therefore acted with diabolical
calculation from the outset and have laid a false trail.
In order to continue experimenting with criminal climate weapons in secret, all climate
change had to be blamed on the CO₂ scapegoat.
The real climate criminals have always been able to hide in the dark behind a supposedly scientifically proven CO₂ thesis.
This means that the CO₂ theory ultimately turns out to be a pure diversionary tactic to protect the actual perpetrators.
Under no circumstances was the public allowed to find out what a devious crime was actually being committed.
In plain language, however, this also means that the entire sincere climate movement has been
instrumentalized and abused for criminal purposes.
Sincere people who have campaigned for the protection of the global climate have allowed
themselves to be harnessed to their "CO₂ cart".
Military and commercial objectives were pursued under the charitable pretext of saving the
climate and nature by reducing CO₂ emissions.
A look behind the curtain of climate criminals
The famous saying "Follow the money" is used as advice to analyze money flows in order to
uncover motives, backers or corrupt networks.
It fits into the picture that the Rockefeller family, of all people, is a major sponsor of the CO₂–framed climate movement.
The Rockefeller family plays a leading role in freemasonry.
This secret society as well as the Rockefeller Foundations pretend in public to support charitable goals.
But what are their real goals?
The common goal of the high-degree freemasons is the establishment of a New World Order with a one-world government
For their benefit and not for the benefit of the world's population.
David Rockefeller outlined the path to achieving this goal as follows:
"We are on the verge of a global transformation.
All that is needed is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.
These world domination obsessives are thus working with crises on a grand scale to get the world’s population to not
only affirm a world dictatorship, but to downright desire it.
In addition to terrorist crises such as 9-11, alleged pandemic crises, all possible or real threats of world war,
the climate crisis caused by weather weapons must also be counted among the crises of major proportions."
"In order to be able to stage these crises on a large scale, the actors in the background
are dependent on the support of the mass media."
That's why David Rockefeller said many, many years ago, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New
York Times, Time magazine and other great publications,
whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity."
For this reason, the role of the mass media must also be clarified in conclusion.
The role of the media financed by compulsory levies
The example of the climate debate is a very good illustration of the influence of the public media on people's perceptions.
Although the existence of weather weapons has been proven for decades, these weapons are not
perceived by the public as existing in any way.
Instead, the average citizen concludes that unusual weather phenomena are always directly linked to the increased CO₂
emissions caused by humans and the resulting climate change.
After all, this is how it was instilled in them over decades on all channels of the system media.
On the other hand, information about military weather weapons was withheld from the public.
An emerging public debate about such weapons systems was nipped in the bud by the media and the spraying of
toxic substances over the heads of all citizens was relegated to the realm of conspiracy theories.
In this way, the media financed by compulsory levies serve a small minority and their interests.
Dear viewers, kla.tv has been warning for years: "Bought mass media, above all the public broadcasters, are
among the most dangerous organizations in the world!"
They did not uncover the criminal machinations in the climate debate either, but hushed them up and thus became actors.
ARD, ZDF, ORF, SRF and Co. have disqualified themselves.
For example, how much longer do we want to allow substances to be sprayed over our homes and gardens and poison our food?
The order of the day is therefore for citizens to inform citizens.
Take the time now and make this documentary known to your circle of friends.
You can also use social media such as WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok or even X.
The displayed short link will help you with the dissemination.