For weeks now, coverage of this year's heat wave by the so-called mainstream media has
been keeping people on the edge of their seats.
Reports of dried-up rivers and the resulting restrictions on inland waterway shipping, forest fires in Southern
Europe, and the threat of crop losses in agriculture are leaving people in a state of utter shock.
Across all media outlets, climate change—allegedly caused by CO2—is consistently cited
as the cause of these extreme temperatures.
Time and again, the media instills in the public a supposed connection to this constantly promoted CO2 agenda.
This naturally raises the question: Is the intention here to cause climate panic among the public?
The program “Not CO2! – Secret Military Weapons and Toxic Spraying Campaigns Threaten the Global Climate!”
demonstrates that this connection is even systematically promoted by the so-called mainstream media:
January 2025: Wildfires are raging in Southern California.
And the finding of this study is that climate change has increased the risk of devastating wildfires.
The hot, dry, and windy conditions that have led to the massive scale of the fires are 35
percent attributable to human-induced climate change.
January 23, 2025: Storm Éowyn is raging over Ireland.
There are plausible links between extreme storms like the one we're experiencing today and climate change, and we
will see more intense storms as a result of global warming.
May 28, 2025: The Swiss mountain village of Blatten is largely destroyed by a debris and ice avalanche.
Professor Michael Krautblatter heads the Chair of Landslides at the Technical University of Munich.
He suspects that the event in Valais is related to climate change.
Early July 2025: Massive flooding in Texas.
Was climate change to blame?
Climate change makes tropical storms more dangerous in more ways than just this one.
It is therefore to be expected that, as a result of climate change, more extreme and
potentially more deadly storms will become more frequent.
July 27, 2025: Greece and Turkey are battling record-breaking heat and wildfires.
Climate Change as a Catalyst for Wildfires
Scientists see climate change as the key factor behind the increasingly extreme conditions.
This documentary raises the serious question of whether this is a deliberate deception based on an extremely questionable CO2
theory, designed to ensure that the actual causes of climate change remain hidden and are not exposed to public scrutiny.
Given the current heat wave and the associated highly questionable coverage by the mainstream media, the
serious questions raised by this thought-provoking documentary must be asked now more urgently than ever.
For this reason, we are presenting the rest of this documentary’s insightful commentary here:
These were just a few examples of how the mainstream media has covered natural disasters this year.
Did you spot the common thread?
The scapegoat for these disasters is always climate change, which is supposedly caused by CO2.
On its website, ZDF defines the cause of this climate change as follows:
"Climate change is accelerating—but we can slow it down by reducing our emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases."
However, this categorical assertion by ZDF and other media outlets—that climate change is caused solely by greenhouse
gases—is shaken to its very foundations when, in addition to the so-called mainstream, one also considers independent,
alternative information platforms to speak out as countervoices.
Here are two examples:
First: The kla.tv documentary *Climate Consensus Under the Microscope* refutes the claim that 97% of
scientists agree that climate change is caused by CO2.
This is a case of scientific fraud involving cheap sleight-of-hand tricks.
Second: The kla.tv documentary *Updates for Greta* uses facts and figures to demonstrate that
climate change is caused by entirely different factors.
In numerous other documentaries, Kla.TV has aired counterarguments to the CO2 theory.
Well-researched expert presentations—which are withheld from viewers of ARD, ZDF, and other networks—actually
highlight other causes of climate change as well.
The following three facts should give any objective observer pause regarding this controversial “CO2 theory”:
Fact 1: The volume fraction of CO2 in the air is 0.04%
Fact 2: The proportion of CO2 in the air that humans can actually influence is approximately 4% Thus, humans can
influence only 4% of the 0.04% CO2 content in the air—that is approximately 0.0016% of the total volume of air!
Fact 3: Germany's share of global CO2 emissions is at most 2%!
This means that, in terms of CO2, German citizens account for only about 0.000032% of the total volume of air!
Can the sixth decimal place really save the climate?
Given these figures, who can still fully understand the perspective on the CO2 climate issue, especially since
billions are poured into CO2 offset projects every year?
However, as the examples from 2025 mentioned at the beginning show, ARD, ZDF, and others continue to sell
this CO2 theory as fact to their audience of millions, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
What is important in this context is that there are publicly available documents proving that the military,
in particular, can actually influence the climate on a large scale using weather-weapon systems:
Evidence of the existence of climate-altering weapons systems
First: The European Parliament
In a report dated January 14, 1999, titled “HAARP—A Weapon System That Affects the Climate,” the European
Parliament confirms the existence of dangerous weather weapons.
Here are some brief excerpts from this highly controversial report:
“HAARP can be used for many purposes.”
By manipulating the electrical properties of the atmosphere, it is possible to control immense forces.
If used as a military weapon, the consequences for the enemy could be disastrous.
HAARP can charge a clearly defined area with energy millions of times more intensely than any other conventional energy source
HAARP can cause changes in climatic conditions.
The system can also affect the entire ecosystem.
"Another serious consequence of HAARP is the holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful upward-directed waves."
Second: The UN ENMOD Convention—known as the United Nations Convention on Environmental Warfare
Here is an excerpt from the 1976 UN ENMOD Convention that illustrates the potential consequences
of using environmental manipulation techniques:
“Earthquakes, tsunamis, disruption of a region’s ecological balance, changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation,
various types of cyclones, and tornadoes), changes in climate patterns, changes in ocean currents, changes in the state of
the ozone layer, and changes in the state of the ionosphere.”
Third: Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Dr. William Cohen
Cohen confirmed the existence of these climate-altering weapons on April 28, 1997, at a conference on terrorism in Athens:
“Others are even engaging in a form of eco-terrorism, altering the climate, triggering earthquakes, and causing
volcanoes to erupt through the use of electromagnetic waves.”
"It's real, and that's why we must step up our counterterrorism efforts!"
Fourth: Numerous patents confirm the existence of weather weapons!
There are hundreds of U.S. weather patents for weather-manipulation technologies.
Numerous patents, such as U.S. Patent 4,412,654, confirm that aircraft can spray highly toxic substances—such as
aluminum, barium, or lead—in the form of fine particulate matter, thereby having a massive impact on the weather.
Could it be that all of these very expensive U.S. patents have in fact only been filed, but will never be put to use?
Hardly, since the U.S. Senate approved 110 weather modification programs between 1947 and 1978.
A 1996 U.S. Air Force document clearly states the objective:
We'll be in control of the weather until 2025!
These documents prove beyond a doubt that secret military weapons have existed for decades that can trigger
storms, severe weather, and even extreme drought, and have been shown to alter our climate.
Specifically, this concerns, among other things, the HAARP antenna arrays mentioned earlier.
Such facilities have existed for decades in numerous countries, as the world map shown on screen indicates!
The United States, in particular, has demonstrably engaged in climate and weather manipulation through one of its
largest facilities in Alaska, the operation of which has required vast amounts of energy since the 1990s.
To make this weapon even more effective, it is sometimes necessary to have aircraft spray highly toxic substances.
The fact that this is actually happening—and is by no means a conspiracy theory—was confirmed by none other than
former FBI Director Ted Gunderson shortly before his death.
Dr. Antony J. Hilder, a U.S. investigative journalist, reported—citing medical evidence—that
Gunderson did not die of natural causes but was poisoned.
The documents cited by Gunderson, as well as his personal statement, do indeed cast the
ubiquitous climate debate of recent years in a new light.
And of course, not every natural disaster has been caused by weather weapons.
However, with regard to mass media coverage, the following two questions must be asked as a matter of urgency:
First: Why is a CO2 theory constantly being sold to the public as established science?
Second: Why, on the other hand, are secret military climate weapons—which have been proven to harm our
climate—completely ignored or even denied in the climate debate?
The following scenario provides a convincing explanation for these two controversial questions:
High-ranking military officials have always taken a keen interest in the weather, because
control over the weather can be decisive in war.
It was not without reason that former U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson said, “Whoever
controls the weather will control the world.”
However, the military was aware from the very beginning that the use of these secret military weather weapons and the
associated spraying of toxic metal oxide particles into the atmosphere would inevitably alter the climate in the long term.
To avoid being exposed as the cause of serious climate change, they have promoted the CO2 theory through media campaigns.
Suddenly, warnings began to circulate about a climate nightmare scenario in which entire cities would sink
into the sea and, for example, only Cologne Cathedral would remain visible above the water.
At the same time, scientists began speaking out, presenting “CO2” as a scapegoat for climate change to the public.
From then on, the vital gas CO2 was virtually demonized under the guise of science.
The trading of CO2 credits—reminiscent of the sale of indulgences in medieval church history—was set to begin.
As a result, this crime also became, incidentally, a very profitable business model.
Just like in a crime thriller, the true culprits behind climate change have acted with diabolical
calculation from the very beginning and have laid a false trail.
In order to continue experimenting with criminal climate weapons in secret and without being detected, all
climate changes had to be blamed on the “CO2 scapegoat.”
Hiding behind a supposedly scientifically proven CO2 theory, the real climate criminals
have always been able to remain in the shadows.
Thus, the CO2 theory ultimately turns out to be nothing more than a diversionary tactic designed to protect the real culprits!
Under no circumstances was the public to find out what underhanded crime was actually taking place.
Put simply, however, this also means that the entire genuine climate movement has been
exploited and misused for criminal purposes.
Sincere people who have worked to protect the global climate have allowed themselves to be used as pawns in the CO2 debate.
Under the benevolent pretext of saving the climate and nature by reducing CO2 emissions,
military and commercial objectives were pursued.
A Look Behind the Scenes at Climate Offenders
The famous saying “Follow the money” is used as advice to analyze the flow of money in order to uncover
motives, the people behind the scenes, or corrupt networks.
It fits right in that the Rockefeller family, of all people, is providing substantial
funding for the “CO2-driven” climate movement.
The Rockefeller family plays a leading role in Freemasonry.
This secret society—as well as the Rockefeller Foundations—publicly claim to support charitable causes.
But what are their real goals?
The common goal of high-ranking Freemasons is to establish a new world order with a one-world government.
For their own benefit, not for the good of the world's population.
David Rockefeller outlined the path to achieving this goal as follows:
"We are on the brink of a global upheaval.
"All it would take is a major crisis, and the nations will embrace the new world order."
So these people obsessed with world domination are using “crises of massive proportions” to get the world’s population not
only to accept a global dictatorship, but to actually crave it.
In addition to terrorist crises such as 9/11, alleged pandemic crises, and all possible or real threats of world war,
the climate crisis caused by weather weapons must also be counted among the “crises of major proportions.”
In order to stage these “large-scale crises,” the actors behind the scenes rely on the support of the mass media.
That is why David Rockefeller said many, many years ago: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New
York Times, Time magazine, and other major publications.”
Their directors have attended our meetings, and they have kept their promise of discretion for nearly 40 years.
"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had been
in the public spotlight during those years."
For this reason, the role of the mass media must also be clarified in conclusion.
The Role of Mandatory Submission Media
The climate debate serves as a very good example to illustrate the influence of the media on public perception:
For although the existence of weather weapons has been proven for decades, in the public
perception these weapons do not exist at all.
Instead, the “average person” concludes that extreme weather events are always directly linked to increased
human-caused CO2 emissions and the resulting climate change.
That's how it was gradually drummed into him over the course of decades across all channels of the mainstream media.
On the other hand, the public was denied information about military weather weapons.
Any emerging public debate about such weapons systems has already been nipped in the bud by the media, and the spraying
of toxic substances over the heads of all citizens has been relegated to the realm of conspiracy theories.
The state-controlled media thus serve a small minority and its interests.
Dear viewers, For years, Klartv has been warning that the mass media—especially the public broadcasters—are
among the most dangerous organizations in the world.
They did not expose the criminal schemes in the climate debate either, but instead
covered them up, thereby becoming accomplices.
ARD, ZDF, ORF, SRF, and others have disqualified themselves.
For example, how much longer are we going to allow substances to be sprayed over our homes and gardens and poison our food?
The order of the day, therefore, is: Citizens inform citizens!
Why not take a moment now to share this documentary with your friends and family?
You can also use social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok, or even X.
The short link that appears will help you share this!