1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,512 2 00:00:00,512 --> 00:00:07,382 Since March 1, 2020, a measles vaccination mandate has applied in Germany to certain groups such as children from the 3 00:00:07,382 --> 00:00:14,183 completed first year of life upon new admission to a community facility such as a daycare center or school. 4 00:00:14,183 --> 00:00:21,136 Employees in community and medical facilities who were born after 1970 and others. 5 00:00:21,136 --> 00:00:29,003 Such a measles vaccination mandate was highly questionable from the outset with regard to its medical and legal justification. 6 00:00:29,003 --> 00:00:34,280 In practice, physicians, scientists, and jurists were repeatedly confronted with the 7 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,703 distress of patients or also parents and children: 8 00:00:37,703 --> 00:00:44,216 either due to severe vaccination side effects or also due to exclusion from community facilities, or high fine 9 00:00:44,216 --> 00:00:48,376 demands on the part of the authorities for non-vaccination. 10 00:00:48,376 --> 00:00:57,190 This prompted them to thoroughly examine the official narratives of a measles vaccination mandate. Kla.TV reported. 11 00:00:57,190 --> 00:01:04,284 This topic also moved, among others, the alliance "Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and 12 00:01:04,284 --> 00:01:09,116 Democracy, e.V." with its deputy chairman Dr. Ronald Weikl. 13 00:01:09,116 --> 00:01:14,309 The alliance launched a petition for the immediate lifting of the measles vaccination mandate. 14 00:01:14,309 --> 00:01:20,063 The necessary quorum of 30,000 co-signatures was reached in order to obtain a hearing before the 15 00:01:20,063 --> 00:01:24,636 Petitions Committee of the Bundestag in Berlin. 16 00:01:24,636 --> 00:01:30,168 This took place on September 21, 2026, with Dr. Ronald Weikl accompanied by the 17 00:01:30,168 --> 00:01:33,990 specialist lawyer for medical law Beate Bahner. 18 00:01:33,990 --> 00:01:39,232 In the following, you will see the most important excerpts from the roughly one-hour question-and-answer session. 19 00:01:39,232 --> 00:01:46,156 It was telling that Dr. Weikl had shortly beforehand been excluded from entering the Bundestag. 20 00:01:46,156 --> 00:01:50,643 At the beginning, the petitioners described their concern: 21 00:01:50,643 --> 00:01:55,050 "Dear Madam Chairwoman, dear ladies and gentlemen members of parliament, a warm greeting also 22 00:01:55,050 --> 00:01:57,972 to all viewers in the hall and in the livestream. 23 00:01:57,972 --> 00:02:04,060 First, I would like to briefly state that I find it extremely regrettable and also in no way comprehensible that, as was 24 00:02:04,060 --> 00:02:08,626 communicated to me virtually at the last minute – namely on Friday at 10:20 a.m. through a 25 00:02:08,626 --> 00:02:10,350 phone call during my office hours – I quote: 26 00:02:10,350 --> 00:02:15,502 "that the reliability check by the police at the German Bundestag, based on the rules of the German 27 00:02:15,502 --> 00:02:20,756 Bundestag, has shown that I cannot be granted access to the properties of the German Bundestag." 28 00:02:20,756 --> 00:02:23,769 End of quote. That is why I am sitting here in a Berlin hotel room. 29 00:02:23,769 --> 00:02:29,368 Why this was communicated on Friday at the last minute, at a time when I can virtually do nothing more, I cannot understand. 30 00:02:29,368 --> 00:02:34,372 For the Federal Police has obviously known for some time that, after months of email and telephone contact with the 31 00:02:34,372 --> 00:02:37,536 Petitions Committee, I would appear here as the main petitioner. 32 00:02:37,536 --> 00:02:42,818 But because the issue is so important and so many people are affected and have long been waiting for the 33 00:02:42,818 --> 00:02:48,010 possibility that this important concern can finally also be presented at the parliamentary level, 34 00:02:48,010 --> 00:02:53,694 I accepted the offer to join via Zoom and will try, even under these somewhat limited conditions, to do my 35 00:02:53,694 --> 00:02:58,521 best, together with Ms. Bahner, who thank God was not excluded and can be present on site. 36 00:02:58,521 --> 00:03:00,875 I hope the connection here works. 37 00:03:00,875 --> 00:03:06,923 Ms. Attorney Bahner and I represent here and today, as members of the Measles Protection Act working group of the 38 00:03:06,923 --> 00:03:11,115 association MWGfD, the interests of thousands of people in Germany, especially many parents, 39 00:03:11,115 --> 00:03:17,286 who want to have themselves or their children vaccinated against measles or measles, mumps, rubella, contrary to the requirements 40 00:03:17,286 --> 00:03:21,447 of the Measles Protection Act, for medically comprehensible reasons, since there is now 41 00:03:21,447 --> 00:03:23,923 only a triple vaccine or quadruple vaccine. 42 00:03:23,923 --> 00:03:31,230 The unimaginable ordeal to which these people are mostly exposed when it comes to contraindication certificates must finally be 43 00:03:31,230 --> 00:03:37,673 ended and is no longer acceptable, as is the inconceivable criminal prosecution and defamation of honest doctors 44 00:03:37,673 --> 00:03:41,676 who issue such certificates after a careful medical history. 45 00:03:41,676 --> 00:03:46,111 Daycare and school administrations, public health offices and not least local courts are also often 46 00:03:46,111 --> 00:03:48,943 completely overwhelmed in dealing with these regulations. 47 00:03:48,943 --> 00:03:54,416 I know what I am talking about, because I myself am confronted with this issue daily in my practice. 48 00:03:54,416 --> 00:03:59,444 And although there would be serious reasons for it, the goal of our petition is not the prohibition of the 49 00:03:59,444 --> 00:04:03,975 measles vaccination, but merely the repeal of the almost absurd mandatory measles vaccination. 50 00:04:03,975 --> 00:04:08,973 For there are numerous medical and legal arguments against it, which we have published on 51 00:04:08,973 --> 00:04:11,770 the website meine-freie-impfentscheidung.de. 52 00:04:11,770 --> 00:04:13,941 The conclusion of our assessment is clear. 53 00:04:13,941 --> 00:04:18,163 There is no necessity whatsoever for a mandatory measles vaccination. 54 00:04:18,163 --> 00:04:24,209 You, the members of the German Bundestag, are obviously being deceived, or obviously were deceived, with numerous pieces of 55 00:04:24,209 --> 00:04:30,330 misinformation regarding the alleged necessity of a mandatory vaccination when you had to vote on the law in November 2019. 56 00:04:30,330 --> 00:04:36,903 In fact, the risk of harm from the vaccination is unfortunately many times higher than the risk of harm from a measles infection. 57 00:04:36,903 --> 00:04:40,496 That alone already constitutes a contraindication for the vaccination. 58 00:04:40,496 --> 00:04:45,187 And as with other vaccinations, from our point of view it must be left solely to the discretion of the parents and those affected 59 00:04:45,187 --> 00:04:47,596 and the adults whether they want to be vaccinated or not. 60 00:04:47,596 --> 00:04:51,600 And that applies all the more given the harmlessness of the childhood disease 61 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:54,510 measles, which has anyway been almost eliminated. 62 00:04:54,510 --> 00:04:59,310 Doctors are therefore obligated to provide concrete, correct and critical information. 63 00:04:59,310 --> 00:05:03,536 We therefore ask you to inform all colleagues in your parliamentary group about our arguments. 64 00:05:03,536 --> 00:05:08,893 And please initiate all necessary steps across party lines so that the Measles Protection Act and the mandatory vaccination 65 00:05:08,893 --> 00:05:11,483 formulated therein are repealed as quickly as possible." 66 00:05:11,483 --> 00:05:15,903 "Why is the Measles Protection Act untenable for honest jurists? 67 00:05:15,903 --> 00:05:21,196 Because healthy unvaccinated children are excluded from daycare and thus from social life. 68 00:05:21,196 --> 00:05:29,923 For me as a specialist lawyer for medical law, this is a new disgrace in view of our inglorious German past. 69 00:05:29,923 --> 00:05:35,490 Because there is a complete lack of any risk analysis as to what extent unvaccinated children actually pose a danger. 70 00:05:35,490 --> 00:05:43,132 Never has a clean, correct, evidence-based scientific risk assessment been carried out with regard to the 71 00:05:43,132 --> 00:05:47,356 alleged danger posed by these unvaccinated children. 72 00:05:47,356 --> 00:05:54,235 A distinguished safety and risk expert, Prof. Werner Bergholz, has made up for this on the basis of 73 00:05:54,235 --> 00:06:01,556 international standards and describes the daycare exclusion as simply grotesque due to the lack of risk. 74 00:06:01,556 --> 00:06:05,043 In fact, unvaccinated children are not a danger, but perfectly healthy. 75 00:06:05,043 --> 00:06:08,623 An American study proves this. 76 00:06:08,623 --> 00:06:14,303 Vaccinated children are chronically sicker than unvaccinated children. 77 00:06:14,303 --> 00:06:20,447 The exclusion of unvaccinated daycare children is a blatant violation of the UN Convention on the Rights 78 00:06:20,447 --> 00:06:26,196 of the Child and the absolute prohibition of discrimination enshrined therein in Article 2. 79 00:06:26,196 --> 00:06:32,058 The German legislature and the Federal Constitutional Court disregard binding international law and the German Basic 80 00:06:32,058 --> 00:06:39,060 Law and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which contain the fundamental right to free medical decision-making." 81 00:06:39,060 --> 00:06:45,132 The following question-and-answer section first deals with the risk of a serious measles vaccination injury in 82 00:06:45,132 --> 00:06:48,776 relation to the risk of a serious complication from measles. 83 00:06:48,776 --> 00:06:57,316 "Yes, the ECDC declares, or rather the German NAVKO has declared measles eliminated for Germany for several years. 84 00:06:57,316 --> 00:07:04,483 The ECDC says there are five per one million measles cases, so an extremely rare disease. 85 00:07:04,483 --> 00:07:12,743 The ECDC also says that in the entire European WHO region, one in 100 million people dies 86 00:07:12,743 --> 00:07:17,410 from measles, ten out of 930 million people. 87 00:07:17,410 --> 00:07:25,430 One in a billion, says the ECDC, so these are official figures, gets encephalitis from measles. 88 00:07:25,430 --> 00:07:37,376 In contrast, there are 140 severe measles vaccine injuries declared by the Paul Ehrlich Institute. 89 00:07:37,376 --> 00:07:45,000 140 families every year – two deaths, the Paul Ehrlich Institute also reports, about annually. 90 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:52,773 So that is 140 times as high as the risk of contracting a measles illness, a severe 91 00:07:52,773 --> 00:07:58,116 consequence of measles, encephalitis, or even dying. 92 00:07:58,116 --> 00:08:06,391 However, we must extrapolate these figures from the Paul Ehrlich Institute – 140 of them 110 severe, two of them 93 00:08:06,391 --> 00:08:14,321 fatal each year – by a factor of 20, because it has been proven that side effects are only reported at 5%. 94 00:08:14,321 --> 00:08:18,810 However, this applies to medications, vaccines only at one percent. 95 00:08:18,810 --> 00:08:28,341 Then, when extrapolated, we have 20 times 100, between 280 and 1140 severe vaccine side effects. 96 00:08:28,341 --> 00:08:31,150 That is absurd. I hand over to Ronny Weikl." 97 00:08:31,150 --> 00:08:36,900 "Admittedly, it is the case that vaccinations certainly lead to a decline in measles cases, the incidence. 98 00:08:36,900 --> 00:08:38,795 But we must ask ourselves at what price. 99 00:08:38,795 --> 00:08:40,596 Because measles is a harmless disease. 100 00:08:40,596 --> 00:08:42,750 And measles also has many advantages. 101 00:08:42,750 --> 00:08:48,571 This illness – immune protection, longer-term immune protection – it also contributes to the fact that having had measles 102 00:08:48,571 --> 00:08:52,023 results in permanent immunity, in contrast to vaccination. 103 00:08:52,023 --> 00:08:59,141 People who have had measles later in life have significantly fewer certain diseases such as autoimmune 104 00:08:59,141 --> 00:09:02,870 diseases, cancers, and have many other advantages. 105 00:09:02,870 --> 00:09:04,420 So at what price did we do that? 106 00:09:04,420 --> 00:09:12,257 And an important factor is that by now vaccinated mothers can no longer pass on sufficient nest protection to their children, so 107 00:09:12,257 --> 00:09:19,972 that frequently even infants in a significantly endangered age are now falling ill, so that the number of measles cases, which 108 00:09:19,972 --> 00:09:23,323 has indeed declined due to vaccination, is not really a gain. 109 00:09:23,323 --> 00:09:27,983 " "The situation before the introduction of the vaccination was actually a completely harmless one. 110 00:09:27,983 --> 00:09:31,236 Incidentally, the vaccination was introduced in the USA in 1963. 111 00:09:31,236 --> 00:09:34,943 In Germany we were at 73, so ten years later. 112 00:09:34,943 --> 00:09:39,437 We have statistics showing that the death rates were still relatively high around the turn of the 113 00:09:39,437 --> 00:09:44,235 millennium, but then, long before the introduction of the vaccination, they virtually dropped to zero. 114 00:09:44,235 --> 00:09:48,556 There is a wonderful statistic by an Armstrong that can be looked up everywhere. 115 00:09:48,556 --> 00:09:50,990 And there are also statistics for Germany. 116 00:09:50,990 --> 00:09:59,168 We can assume that in the 1960s there were still approximately 100 to 1,500 deaths per year, with an estimated one 117 00:09:59,168 --> 00:10:03,713 million measles cases, because virtually everyone had measles. 118 00:10:03,713 --> 00:10:05,280 It was a harmless childhood disease. 119 00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:09,850 And in the 1970s there were still approximately 20 to 30 deaths per year. 120 00:10:09,850 --> 00:10:18,303 This illness was even longed for by some, because measles infection demonstrably brought about immune stabilization. 121 00:10:18,303 --> 00:10:24,310 Many children, it was described, then underwent developmental leaps and were also protected from other illnesses later 122 00:10:24,310 --> 00:10:30,556 in life, so that parents sometimes sent their children to neighbors who had measles before they reached school age. 123 00:10:30,556 --> 00:10:36,416 Almost everyone got measles between the ages of four and ten and was then permanently protected for life. 124 00:10:36,416 --> 00:10:43,016 And this protection then also contributed, as it were, to herd protection, this protection through normal illness. 125 00:10:43,016 --> 00:10:47,588 And basically, it wasn't treated at all, because it didn't have to be treated. 126 00:10:47,588 --> 00:10:52,048 Except that the children were simply granted rest, that they were given some care, that 127 00:10:52,048 --> 00:10:54,556 they were looked after, love and affection. 128 00:10:54,556 --> 00:10:57,296 And it was seen that reducing fever does not help at all. 129 00:10:57,296 --> 00:11:02,190 It was seen overall that reducing fever brings most of the complications with it. 130 00:11:02,190 --> 00:11:08,279 Another advantage was that the mothers provided sufficient herd protection, so that illnesses 131 00:11:08,279 --> 00:11:11,750 in early childhood or infancy hardly occurred. 132 00:11:11,750 --> 00:11:19,129 So we had a completely harmless situation, and I can also cite a quote from a Professor Henneberg from Beate Bahner's 133 00:11:19,129 --> 00:11:25,650 book. After all, he was a former RKI president and vice president of the former Federal Health Office. 134 00:11:25,650 --> 00:11:32,086 And he said - quote - in 1962: "A vaccination against measles is currently not advisable also for the reason 135 00:11:32,086 --> 00:11:37,656 that measles only becomes dangerous in rare cases - which can be treated therapeutically. 136 00:11:37,656 --> 00:11:40,956 A measles prophylaxis is therefore not justified, " 137 00:11:40,956 --> 00:11:46,484 The question went to the State Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Health Dr. Schenderlein as to 138 00:11:46,484 --> 00:11:49,510 whether the BMG had carried out a risk assessment. 139 00:11:49,510 --> 00:11:53,296 Here is the answer, or rather the non-answer. 140 00:11:53,296 --> 00:11:59,436 "Thank you very much, Madam Chair. First of all, it must be said that the figures that have been expressed here, 141 00:11:59,436 --> 00:12:02,641 now also in the previous round, are completely unfounded. 142 00:12:02,641 --> 00:12:05,370 These figures do not exist in this form. 143 00:12:05,370 --> 00:12:11,629 Of course, we work very closely with the RKI and the Paul Ehrlich Institute. 144 00:12:11,629 --> 00:12:19,883 And above all, the portrayal that measles is a purely harmless childhood disease is completely incorrect. 145 00:12:19,883 --> 00:12:25,208 The goal is indeed to eliminate this disease. 146 00:12:25,208 --> 00:12:26,230 How does that succeed? 147 00:12:26,230 --> 00:12:29,016 Through a high vaccination rate. 148 00:12:29,016 --> 00:12:34,830 This vaccination rate has also increased since this proof-of-vaccination requirement was introduced. 149 00:12:34,830 --> 00:12:36,196 That is why these figures are clear. 150 00:12:36,196 --> 00:12:42,510 They are also the basis, and they are also correspondingly evident. 151 00:12:42,510 --> 00:12:49,436 And the institutions have also dealt with this intensively. 152 00:12:49,436 --> 00:12:56,770 The Federal Constitutional Court, too, already ruled comprehensively on this in 2022. 153 00:12:56,770 --> 00:13:03,757 And said that the regulations in the Measles Protection Act are constitutional. 154 00:13:03,757 --> 00:13:11,083 And that the proof requirement is also correspondingly practicable and feasible. 155 00:13:11,083 --> 00:13:16,203 Above all in the sense that this disease entails great dangers. 156 00:13:16,203 --> 00:13:26,370 One must say that the valid figures concern the fact that 1 in 1,000 cases can lead to a death. 157 00:13:26,370 --> 00:13:35,880 By contrast: allergic reactions, which are easily treatable, occur with the measles vaccination at 1 to 4 per million. 158 00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:43,360 So these are completely different foundations and figures, which are also verifiable here and 159 00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:47,980 on which these decisions were of course based. 160 00:13:47,980 --> 00:13:52,890 On the accuracy of the figures mentioned, Ms. Bahner addresses this elsewhere: 161 00:13:52,890 --> 00:14:01,490 "Again, I am very surprised that the Ministry of Health here speaks of false information and false figures. 162 00:14:01,490 --> 00:14:12,343 They are the WHO's own figures and those of the RKI on how many measles deaths there are in a region of almost one billion. 163 00:14:12,343 --> 00:14:14,100 That is, namely, ten in one year. 164 00:14:14,100 --> 00:14:16,316 That makes one in 100 million. 165 00:14:16,316 --> 00:14:20,461 I am also surprised that you do not know the RKI's figures. 166 00:14:20,461 --> 00:14:29,293 For about ten years there has been virtually no death from measles in Germany, and only every few years an 167 00:14:29,293 --> 00:14:34,743 encephalitis or an SSPE, which is highly controversial anyway. 168 00:14:34,743 --> 00:14:40,830 You will find all these figures in the book. Nice that you got it. With evidence! 169 00:14:40,830 --> 00:14:46,103 And that is, after all, the measles report, the annual measles report of the ECDC. 170 00:14:46,103 --> 00:14:52,323 If you call that misinformation, then I have to be surprised. 171 00:14:52,323 --> 00:14:56,640 Then I also wonder whether your real concern here is the health, especially of children. 172 00:14:56,640 --> 00:15:00,913 A main argument of the official proponents of mandatory vaccination is the protection of 173 00:15:00,913 --> 00:15:03,709 vulnerable groups such as infants or older people. 174 00:15:03,709 --> 00:15:08,903 In response to a question on this matter, State Secretary Schenderlein answered as follows: 175 00:15:08,903 --> 00:15:14,896 Thank you very much, colleague, for above all establishing this connection, which is so crucial. 176 00:15:14,896 --> 00:15:22,590 This vaccination and this proof requirement that was introduced serve above all to especially protect vulnerable groups. 177 00:15:22,590 --> 00:15:23,200 Who are they? 178 00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:27,080 These are, on the one hand, infants who cannot yet be vaccinated - vaccination is only 179 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:29,676 carried out starting from the first year of life. 180 00:15:29,676 --> 00:15:31,740 And of course also older persons. 181 00:15:31,740 --> 00:15:39,730 And of course it is always also a protection, especially of these vulnerable groups, which are given particular consideration. 182 00:15:39,730 --> 00:15:44,723 And that is why we are looking very closely at how this vaccination rate is rising. 183 00:15:44,723 --> 00:15:45,760 You said that correctly. 184 00:15:45,760 --> 00:15:46,896 It has risen slightly. 185 00:15:46,896 --> 00:15:52,096 But we are also not yet at the point where we say that this is actually now the goal. 186 00:15:52,096 --> 00:15:58,583 Because actually we truly want to reach over 90, ideally 95%. 187 00:15:58,583 --> 00:16:02,923 And therefore comprehensive educational efforts are taking place. 188 00:16:02,923 --> 00:16:06,255 And this proof requirement must also be enforced. 189 00:16:06,255 --> 00:16:13,676 It must also, and indeed a great deal of information is continually being passed on. 190 00:16:13,676 --> 00:16:18,810 For example, we are also currently seeing the problem that there is a great deal of misinformation. 191 00:16:18,810 --> 00:16:23,663 And that leads to great uncertainty. 192 00:16:23,663 --> 00:16:28,709 And in order to counteract this, educational efforts are also taking place, for 193 00:16:28,709 --> 00:16:32,130 example, especially by the Robert Koch Institute. 194 00:16:32,130 --> 00:16:40,866 As an example, I would like to mention the fact sandwiches that are available and that also serve to educate 195 00:16:40,866 --> 00:16:45,963 about the methodology and also to refute false information. 196 00:16:45,963 --> 00:16:50,700 And that can then also be used in conversations." 197 00:16:50,700 --> 00:16:54,623 To protect vulnerable groups, Dr. Weikl states: 198 00:16:54,623 --> 00:16:57,405 "Now I would like to take a question from Ms. Schenderlein. 199 00:16:57,405 --> 00:17:04,575 How can one, with a vaccination that demonstrably does not offer one hundred percent protection, as seen in the fact that 20 200 00:17:04,575 --> 00:17:11,481 to 30% of measles cases actually affect vaccinated individuals, how can one eliminate or eradicate anything with that? 201 00:17:11,481 --> 00:17:12,716 That is the question. 202 00:17:12,716 --> 00:17:19,313 And the alleged protection of vulnerable groups, how can that result when we know – now after one, this can be taken from the 203 00:17:19,313 --> 00:17:24,908 ECDC Annual Report 2024 – that a large number of those now falling ill are falling ill at the age of under 204 00:17:24,908 --> 00:17:30,636 one year, which previously – when the aforementioned nest protection existed – was not the case at all. 205 00:17:30,636 --> 00:17:32,921 So infants are actually put at greater risk by the vaccination. 206 00:17:32,921 --> 00:17:39,950 And the same applies to older persons, who, if they had gone through the illness earlier, would be protected for life. 207 00:17:39,950 --> 00:17:44,110 And now to the other question, the question from the member of parliament. 208 00:17:44,110 --> 00:17:48,665 So we refer to several studies, which can also be read in our report, which, by the way, we 209 00:17:48,665 --> 00:17:51,443 already sent to all members of parliament in November. 210 00:17:51,443 --> 00:17:53,623 All source references are listed at the bottom. 211 00:17:53,623 --> 00:18:00,850 But for example, we have the report from the Paul Ehrlich Institute, which issued the last one in 2012. 212 00:18:00,850 --> 00:18:02,776 One wonders why no new one is coming. 213 00:18:02,776 --> 00:18:07,641 According to Professor Sönnichsen, who deals with this, the data are currently very difficult to discern. 214 00:18:07,641 --> 00:18:12,683 The data on side effects only through PDF files, which are very difficult to pick apart. 215 00:18:12,683 --> 00:18:18,570 But we have a report from 2012 and there you can see that the vaccination is not so harmless after all. 216 00:18:18,570 --> 00:18:26,190 For we see that 13,000 serious side effects were reported to the Paul Ehrlich Institute. 217 00:18:26,190 --> 00:18:32,703 And that corresponds to about 5.7 reports per 100,000 vaccine doses. 218 00:18:32,703 --> 00:18:36,900 And we carry out 1.2 million vaccinations per year. 219 00:18:36,900 --> 00:18:46,215 And we see that encephalitis, for example, is also very common: 1 in 8,000. 220 00:18:46,215 --> 00:18:53,930 And that means that we can expect a very high number of children harmed by the vaccination. 221 00:18:53,930 --> 00:18:57,176 Over 100 children due to the vaccination in Germany based purely on the figures. 222 00:18:57,176 --> 00:19:01,129 Then there is also a Cochrane review from 2020. 223 00:19:01,129 --> 00:19:05,645 It likewise confirms that the vaccination can cause dramatic harm. " 224 00:19:05,645 --> 00:19:06,336 225 00:19:06,336 --> 00:19:09,096 Dr. Weikl adds elsewhere: 226 00:19:09,096 --> 00:19:11,950 "Back again to the Cochrane review 2020. 227 00:19:11,950 --> 00:19:17,063 It names aseptic meningitis with a risk of 1 in 8,000. 228 00:19:17,063 --> 00:19:19,103 That means this is a very high risk. 229 00:19:19,103 --> 00:19:26,410 The Cochrane Review 2021 then itself assesses the evidence on the safety of the measles vaccination as low to moderate. 230 00:19:26,410 --> 00:19:30,803 The authors had to resort in part to observational studies of inferior quality, they write themselves. 231 00:19:30,803 --> 00:19:34,890 And adequate safety studies with a long-term design are simply lacking. 232 00:19:34,890 --> 00:19:36,160 We must once again bear in mind. 233 00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:39,781 The vaccination consists of live viruses that can spread and multiply in the body. 234 00:19:39,781 --> 00:19:46,312 We know that in frequent cases they lead to febrile seizures, epilepsy, autoimmune diseases, idiopathic thrombocytopenic 235 00:19:46,312 --> 00:19:52,270 purpura, all of which is also stated in the report, compared with hardly any risks from a measles infection. 236 00:19:52,270 --> 00:19:54,003 Purpura Schönlein-Henoch is mentioned to me. 237 00:19:54,003 --> 00:20:00,072 And the Henry Ford study, to which I would like to refer, which examined over 18,000 children, showed that the 238 00:20:00,072 --> 00:20:03,350 unvaccinated are significantly healthier than the vaccinated. 239 00:20:03,350 --> 00:20:08,849 We also have connections regarding the measles vaccination with developmental delays, autism, dermatitis, 240 00:20:08,849 --> 00:20:11,755 eczema, type 1 diabetes, allergies, asthma, and so on. 241 00:20:11,755 --> 00:20:18,016 There is a very, very large amount of evidence, also in the Cochrane Review, that we absolutely must take into account." 242 00:20:18,016 --> 00:20:25,093 In the second round of questions, the discussion focused on the usefulness of a second measles vaccination, the unavailability 243 00:20:25,093 --> 00:20:31,703 of a single vaccine for measles, whether measles is a dangerous or beneficial childhood disease, and other aspects. 244 00:20:31,703 --> 00:20:37,723 Dr. Weikl comments on the question of whether elimination of measles is even possible. Because that is the 245 00:20:37,723 --> 00:20:41,700 official objective of the mandatory measles vaccination: 246 00:20:41,700 --> 00:20:47,040 "On the one hand, we know that these reports to the reporting authorities are extremely underrepresented. 247 00:20:47,040 --> 00:20:50,243 We have already stated a factor of 15 to 20. 248 00:20:50,243 --> 00:20:51,976 It is probably even much, much higher. 249 00:20:51,976 --> 00:20:53,536 Some even speak of a factor of 100. 250 00:20:53,536 --> 00:20:56,410 The reports of side effects are much, much higher. 251 00:20:56,410 --> 00:21:02,900 The most important question is: How can we, with a vaccination that does not work 100% anyway—but we see it in the ECDC 252 00:21:02,900 --> 00:21:09,743 figures that approximately 20 to 30% of measles cases involve vaccinated individuals, and many other studies also show this. 253 00:21:09,743 --> 00:21:14,343 Can we even eliminate something that was just addressed by the State Secretary?! 254 00:21:14,343 --> 00:21:16,236 Then the question about the combination vaccine. 255 00:21:16,236 --> 00:21:20,283 How can one administer a combination vaccine that contains a disease, for example rubella, which has been 256 00:21:20,283 --> 00:21:23,010 considered eliminated in Germany for years—that is bodily harm. 257 00:21:23,010 --> 00:21:31,283 And I would like to emphasize once again the dangerousness of the vaccination, an expert opinion that Professor Jilk, former member 258 00:21:31,283 --> 00:21:38,717 of the STIKO, prepared on behalf of the Amberg public prosecutor's office for an investigation, and in which he himself 259 00:21:38,717 --> 00:21:46,040 writes that the risk of measles encephalitis with a vaccination is eight to 17 times higher than without vaccination. 260 00:21:46,040 --> 00:21:49,220 He writes that the vaccination brings with it massive harm. 261 00:21:49,220 --> 00:21:52,629 And the crucial question that we must ask ourselves is this: 262 00:21:52,629 --> 00:21:59,697 How can the decline in measles incidence sold to us as a common good, with many, many disadvantages, be weighed 263 00:21:59,697 --> 00:22:03,896 against a health risk to an individual that demonstrably exists. 264 00:22:03,896 --> 00:22:07,183 We doctors are obligated to the individual, not to public health. 265 00:22:07,183 --> 00:22:12,840 And we currently know from the ECDC figures that one to two out of 100 million people in the WHO European 266 00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:17,876 Region, which includes almost one billion people, everything is indeed still included there. 267 00:22:17,876 --> 00:22:22,470 One to two out of 100 million people die of measles. 268 00:22:22,470 --> 00:22:31,216 In 2024, 23 died in the region, and in 2023 there were 10. 269 00:22:31,216 --> 00:22:37,785 That is an extremely low number and it in no way justifies an epidemiological emergency, which would actually 270 00:22:37,785 --> 00:22:42,296 be necessary for a restriction of fundamental rights." 271 00:22:42,296 --> 00:22:44,103 Esteemed viewers! 272 00:22:44,103 --> 00:22:51,820 This is not about any legal disputes and medical theories, but about the well-being of millions of people. 273 00:22:51,820 --> 00:22:58,046 Kla.TV will continue to monitor for you how the members of the Bundestag deal with this petition.