WEBVTT 00:00.512 --> 00:07.382 Since March 1, 2020, a measles vaccination mandate has applied in Germany to certain groups such as children from the 00:07.382 --> 00:14.183 completed first year of life upon new admission to a community facility such as a daycare center or school. 00:14.183 --> 00:21.136 Employees in community and medical facilities who were born after 1970 and others. 00:21.136 --> 00:29.003 Such a measles vaccination mandate was highly questionable from the outset with regard to its medical and legal justification. 00:29.003 --> 00:34.280 In practice, physicians, scientists, and jurists were repeatedly confronted with the 00:34.280 --> 00:37.703 distress of patients or also parents and children: 00:37.703 --> 00:44.216 either due to severe vaccination side effects or also due to exclusion from community facilities, or high fine 00:44.216 --> 00:48.376 demands on the part of the authorities for non-vaccination. 00:48.376 --> 00:57.190 This prompted them to thoroughly examine the official narratives of a measles vaccination mandate. Kla.TV reported. 00:57.190 --> 01:04.284 This topic also moved, among others, the alliance "Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and 01:04.284 --> 01:09.116 Democracy, e.V." with its deputy chairman Dr. Ronald Weikl. 01:09.116 --> 01:14.309 The alliance launched a petition for the immediate lifting of the measles vaccination mandate. 01:14.309 --> 01:20.063 The necessary quorum of 30,000 co-signatures was reached in order to obtain a hearing before the 01:20.063 --> 01:24.636 Petitions Committee of the Bundestag in Berlin. 01:24.636 --> 01:30.168 This took place on September 21, 2026, with Dr. Ronald Weikl accompanied by the 01:30.168 --> 01:33.990 specialist lawyer for medical law Beate Bahner. 01:33.990 --> 01:39.232 In the following, you will see the most important excerpts from the roughly one-hour question-and-answer session. 01:39.232 --> 01:46.156 It was telling that Dr. Weikl had shortly beforehand been excluded from entering the Bundestag. 01:46.156 --> 01:50.643 At the beginning, the petitioners described their concern: 01:50.643 --> 01:55.050 "Dear Madam Chairwoman, dear ladies and gentlemen members of parliament, a warm greeting also 01:55.050 --> 01:57.972 to all viewers in the hall and in the livestream. 01:57.972 --> 02:04.060 First, I would like to briefly state that I find it extremely regrettable and also in no way comprehensible that, as was 02:04.060 --> 02:08.626 communicated to me virtually at the last minute – namely on Friday at 10:20 a.m. through a 02:08.626 --> 02:10.350 phone call during my office hours – I quote: 02:10.350 --> 02:15.502 "that the reliability check by the police at the German Bundestag, based on the rules of the German 02:15.502 --> 02:20.756 Bundestag, has shown that I cannot be granted access to the properties of the German Bundestag." 02:20.756 --> 02:23.769 End of quote. That is why I am sitting here in a Berlin hotel room. 02:23.769 --> 02:29.368 Why this was communicated on Friday at the last minute, at a time when I can virtually do nothing more, I cannot understand. 02:29.368 --> 02:34.372 For the Federal Police has obviously known for some time that, after months of email and telephone contact with the 02:34.372 --> 02:37.536 Petitions Committee, I would appear here as the main petitioner. 02:37.536 --> 02:42.818 But because the issue is so important and so many people are affected and have long been waiting for the 02:42.818 --> 02:48.010 possibility that this important concern can finally also be presented at the parliamentary level, 02:48.010 --> 02:53.694 I accepted the offer to join via Zoom and will try, even under these somewhat limited conditions, to do my 02:53.694 --> 02:58.521 best, together with Ms. Bahner, who thank God was not excluded and can be present on site. 02:58.521 --> 03:00.875 I hope the connection here works. 03:00.875 --> 03:06.923 Ms. Attorney Bahner and I represent here and today, as members of the Measles Protection Act working group of the 03:06.923 --> 03:11.115 association MWGfD, the interests of thousands of people in Germany, especially many parents, 03:11.115 --> 03:17.286 who want to have themselves or their children vaccinated against measles or measles, mumps, rubella, contrary to the requirements 03:17.286 --> 03:21.447 of the Measles Protection Act, for medically comprehensible reasons, since there is now 03:21.447 --> 03:23.923 only a triple vaccine or quadruple vaccine. 03:23.923 --> 03:31.230 The unimaginable ordeal to which these people are mostly exposed when it comes to contraindication certificates must finally be 03:31.230 --> 03:37.673 ended and is no longer acceptable, as is the inconceivable criminal prosecution and defamation of honest doctors 03:37.673 --> 03:41.676 who issue such certificates after a careful medical history. 03:41.676 --> 03:46.111 Daycare and school administrations, public health offices and not least local courts are also often 03:46.111 --> 03:48.943 completely overwhelmed in dealing with these regulations. 03:48.943 --> 03:54.416 I know what I am talking about, because I myself am confronted with this issue daily in my practice. 03:54.416 --> 03:59.444 And although there would be serious reasons for it, the goal of our petition is not the prohibition of the 03:59.444 --> 04:03.975 measles vaccination, but merely the repeal of the almost absurd mandatory measles vaccination. 04:03.975 --> 04:08.973 For there are numerous medical and legal arguments against it, which we have published on 04:08.973 --> 04:11.770 the website meine-freie-impfentscheidung.de. 04:11.770 --> 04:13.941 The conclusion of our assessment is clear. 04:13.941 --> 04:18.163 There is no necessity whatsoever for a mandatory measles vaccination. 04:18.163 --> 04:24.209 You, the members of the German Bundestag, are obviously being deceived, or obviously were deceived, with numerous pieces of 04:24.209 --> 04:30.330 misinformation regarding the alleged necessity of a mandatory vaccination when you had to vote on the law in November 2019. 04:30.330 --> 04:36.903 In fact, the risk of harm from the vaccination is unfortunately many times higher than the risk of harm from a measles infection. 04:36.903 --> 04:40.496 That alone already constitutes a contraindication for the vaccination. 04:40.496 --> 04:45.187 And as with other vaccinations, from our point of view it must be left solely to the discretion of the parents and those affected 04:45.187 --> 04:47.596 and the adults whether they want to be vaccinated or not. 04:47.596 --> 04:51.600 And that applies all the more given the harmlessness of the childhood disease 04:51.600 --> 04:54.510 measles, which has anyway been almost eliminated. 04:54.510 --> 04:59.310 Doctors are therefore obligated to provide concrete, correct and critical information. 04:59.310 --> 05:03.536 We therefore ask you to inform all colleagues in your parliamentary group about our arguments. 05:03.536 --> 05:08.893 And please initiate all necessary steps across party lines so that the Measles Protection Act and the mandatory vaccination 05:08.893 --> 05:11.483 formulated therein are repealed as quickly as possible." 05:11.483 --> 05:15.903 "Why is the Measles Protection Act untenable for honest jurists? 05:15.903 --> 05:21.196 Because healthy unvaccinated children are excluded from daycare and thus from social life. 05:21.196 --> 05:29.923 For me as a specialist lawyer for medical law, this is a new disgrace in view of our inglorious German past. 05:29.923 --> 05:35.490 Because there is a complete lack of any risk analysis as to what extent unvaccinated children actually pose a danger. 05:35.490 --> 05:43.132 Never has a clean, correct, evidence-based scientific risk assessment been carried out with regard to the 05:43.132 --> 05:47.356 alleged danger posed by these unvaccinated children. 05:47.356 --> 05:54.235 A distinguished safety and risk expert, Prof. Werner Bergholz, has made up for this on the basis of 05:54.235 --> 06:01.556 international standards and describes the daycare exclusion as simply grotesque due to the lack of risk. 06:01.556 --> 06:05.043 In fact, unvaccinated children are not a danger, but perfectly healthy. 06:05.043 --> 06:08.623 An American study proves this. 06:08.623 --> 06:14.303 Vaccinated children are chronically sicker than unvaccinated children. 06:14.303 --> 06:20.447 The exclusion of unvaccinated daycare children is a blatant violation of the UN Convention on the Rights 06:20.447 --> 06:26.196 of the Child and the absolute prohibition of discrimination enshrined therein in Article 2. 06:26.196 --> 06:32.058 The German legislature and the Federal Constitutional Court disregard binding international law and the German Basic 06:32.058 --> 06:39.060 Law and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which contain the fundamental right to free medical decision-making." 06:39.060 --> 06:45.132 The following question-and-answer section first deals with the risk of a serious measles vaccination injury in 06:45.132 --> 06:48.776 relation to the risk of a serious complication from measles. 06:48.776 --> 06:57.316 "Yes, the ECDC declares, or rather the German NAVKO has declared measles eliminated for Germany for several years. 06:57.316 --> 07:04.483 The ECDC says there are five per one million measles cases, so an extremely rare disease. 07:04.483 --> 07:12.743 The ECDC also says that in the entire European WHO region, one in 100 million people dies 07:12.743 --> 07:17.410 from measles, ten out of 930 million people. 07:17.410 --> 07:25.430 One in a billion, says the ECDC, so these are official figures, gets encephalitis from measles. 07:25.430 --> 07:37.376 In contrast, there are 140 severe measles vaccine injuries declared by the Paul Ehrlich Institute. 07:37.376 --> 07:45.000 140 families every year – two deaths, the Paul Ehrlich Institute also reports, about annually. 07:45.000 --> 07:52.773 So that is 140 times as high as the risk of contracting a measles illness, a severe 07:52.773 --> 07:58.116 consequence of measles, encephalitis, or even dying. 07:58.116 --> 08:06.391 However, we must extrapolate these figures from the Paul Ehrlich Institute – 140 of them 110 severe, two of them 08:06.391 --> 08:14.321 fatal each year – by a factor of 20, because it has been proven that side effects are only reported at 5%. 08:14.321 --> 08:18.810 However, this applies to medications, vaccines only at one percent. 08:18.810 --> 08:28.341 Then, when extrapolated, we have 20 times 100, between 280 and 1140 severe vaccine side effects. 08:28.341 --> 08:31.150 That is absurd. I hand over to Ronny Weikl." 08:31.150 --> 08:36.900 "Admittedly, it is the case that vaccinations certainly lead to a decline in measles cases, the incidence. 08:36.900 --> 08:38.795 But we must ask ourselves at what price. 08:38.795 --> 08:40.596 Because measles is a harmless disease. 08:40.596 --> 08:42.750 And measles also has many advantages. 08:42.750 --> 08:48.571 This illness – immune protection, longer-term immune protection – it also contributes to the fact that having had measles 08:48.571 --> 08:52.023 results in permanent immunity, in contrast to vaccination. 08:52.023 --> 08:59.141 People who have had measles later in life have significantly fewer certain diseases such as autoimmune 08:59.141 --> 09:02.870 diseases, cancers, and have many other advantages. 09:02.870 --> 09:04.420 So at what price did we do that? 09:04.420 --> 09:12.257 And an important factor is that by now vaccinated mothers can no longer pass on sufficient nest protection to their children, so 09:12.257 --> 09:19.972 that frequently even infants in a significantly endangered age are now falling ill, so that the number of measles cases, which 09:19.972 --> 09:23.323 has indeed declined due to vaccination, is not really a gain. 09:23.323 --> 09:27.983 " "The situation before the introduction of the vaccination was actually a completely harmless one. 09:27.983 --> 09:31.236 Incidentally, the vaccination was introduced in the USA in 1963. 09:31.236 --> 09:34.943 In Germany we were at 73, so ten years later. 09:34.943 --> 09:39.437 We have statistics showing that the death rates were still relatively high around the turn of the 09:39.437 --> 09:44.235 millennium, but then, long before the introduction of the vaccination, they virtually dropped to zero. 09:44.235 --> 09:48.556 There is a wonderful statistic by an Armstrong that can be looked up everywhere. 09:48.556 --> 09:50.990 And there are also statistics for Germany. 09:50.990 --> 09:59.168 We can assume that in the 1960s there were still approximately 100 to 1,500 deaths per year, with an estimated one 09:59.168 --> 10:03.713 million measles cases, because virtually everyone had measles. 10:03.713 --> 10:05.280 It was a harmless childhood disease. 10:05.280 --> 10:09.850 And in the 1970s there were still approximately 20 to 30 deaths per year. 10:09.850 --> 10:18.303 This illness was even longed for by some, because measles infection demonstrably brought about immune stabilization. 10:18.303 --> 10:24.310 Many children, it was described, then underwent developmental leaps and were also protected from other illnesses later 10:24.310 --> 10:30.556 in life, so that parents sometimes sent their children to neighbors who had measles before they reached school age. 10:30.556 --> 10:36.416 Almost everyone got measles between the ages of four and ten and was then permanently protected for life. 10:36.416 --> 10:43.016 And this protection then also contributed, as it were, to herd protection, this protection through normal illness. 10:43.016 --> 10:47.588 And basically, it wasn't treated at all, because it didn't have to be treated. 10:47.588 --> 10:52.048 Except that the children were simply granted rest, that they were given some care, that 10:52.048 --> 10:54.556 they were looked after, love and affection. 10:54.556 --> 10:57.296 And it was seen that reducing fever does not help at all. 10:57.296 --> 11:02.190 It was seen overall that reducing fever brings most of the complications with it. 11:02.190 --> 11:08.279 Another advantage was that the mothers provided sufficient herd protection, so that illnesses 11:08.279 --> 11:11.750 in early childhood or infancy hardly occurred. 11:11.750 --> 11:19.129 So we had a completely harmless situation, and I can also cite a quote from a Professor Henneberg from Beate Bahner's 11:19.129 --> 11:25.650 book. After all, he was a former RKI president and vice president of the former Federal Health Office. 11:25.650 --> 11:32.086 And he said - quote - in 1962: "A vaccination against measles is currently not advisable also for the reason 11:32.086 --> 11:37.656 that measles only becomes dangerous in rare cases - which can be treated therapeutically. 11:37.656 --> 11:40.956 A measles prophylaxis is therefore not justified, " 11:40.956 --> 11:46.484 The question went to the State Secretary of the Federal Ministry of Health Dr. Schenderlein as to 11:46.484 --> 11:49.510 whether the BMG had carried out a risk assessment. 11:49.510 --> 11:53.296 Here is the answer, or rather the non-answer. 11:53.296 --> 11:59.436 "Thank you very much, Madam Chair. First of all, it must be said that the figures that have been expressed here, 11:59.436 --> 12:02.641 now also in the previous round, are completely unfounded. 12:02.641 --> 12:05.370 These figures do not exist in this form. 12:05.370 --> 12:11.629 Of course, we work very closely with the RKI and the Paul Ehrlich Institute. 12:11.629 --> 12:19.883 And above all, the portrayal that measles is a purely harmless childhood disease is completely incorrect. 12:19.883 --> 12:25.208 The goal is indeed to eliminate this disease. 12:25.208 --> 12:26.230 How does that succeed? 12:26.230 --> 12:29.016 Through a high vaccination rate. 12:29.016 --> 12:34.830 This vaccination rate has also increased since this proof-of-vaccination requirement was introduced. 12:34.830 --> 12:36.196 That is why these figures are clear. 12:36.196 --> 12:42.510 They are also the basis, and they are also correspondingly evident. 12:42.510 --> 12:49.436 And the institutions have also dealt with this intensively. 12:49.436 --> 12:56.770 The Federal Constitutional Court, too, already ruled comprehensively on this in 2022. 12:56.770 --> 13:03.757 And said that the regulations in the Measles Protection Act are constitutional. 13:03.757 --> 13:11.083 And that the proof requirement is also correspondingly practicable and feasible. 13:11.083 --> 13:16.203 Above all in the sense that this disease entails great dangers. 13:16.203 --> 13:26.370 One must say that the valid figures concern the fact that 1 in 1,000 cases can lead to a death. 13:26.370 --> 13:35.880 By contrast: allergic reactions, which are easily treatable, occur with the measles vaccination at 1 to 4 per million. 13:35.880 --> 13:43.360 So these are completely different foundations and figures, which are also verifiable here and 13:43.360 --> 13:47.980 on which these decisions were of course based. 13:47.980 --> 13:52.890 On the accuracy of the figures mentioned, Ms. Bahner addresses this elsewhere: 13:52.890 --> 14:01.490 "Again, I am very surprised that the Ministry of Health here speaks of false information and false figures. 14:01.490 --> 14:12.343 They are the WHO's own figures and those of the RKI on how many measles deaths there are in a region of almost one billion. 14:12.343 --> 14:14.100 That is, namely, ten in one year. 14:14.100 --> 14:16.316 That makes one in 100 million. 14:16.316 --> 14:20.461 I am also surprised that you do not know the RKI's figures. 14:20.461 --> 14:29.293 For about ten years there has been virtually no death from measles in Germany, and only every few years an 14:29.293 --> 14:34.743 encephalitis or an SSPE, which is highly controversial anyway. 14:34.743 --> 14:40.830 You will find all these figures in the book. Nice that you got it. With evidence! 14:40.830 --> 14:46.103 And that is, after all, the measles report, the annual measles report of the ECDC. 14:46.103 --> 14:52.323 If you call that misinformation, then I have to be surprised. 14:52.323 --> 14:56.640 Then I also wonder whether your real concern here is the health, especially of children. 14:56.640 --> 15:00.913 A main argument of the official proponents of mandatory vaccination is the protection of 15:00.913 --> 15:03.709 vulnerable groups such as infants or older people. 15:03.709 --> 15:08.903 In response to a question on this matter, State Secretary Schenderlein answered as follows: 15:08.903 --> 15:14.896 Thank you very much, colleague, for above all establishing this connection, which is so crucial. 15:14.896 --> 15:22.590 This vaccination and this proof requirement that was introduced serve above all to especially protect vulnerable groups. 15:22.590 --> 15:23.200 Who are they? 15:23.200 --> 15:27.080 These are, on the one hand, infants who cannot yet be vaccinated - vaccination is only 15:27.080 --> 15:29.676 carried out starting from the first year of life. 15:29.676 --> 15:31.740 And of course also older persons. 15:31.740 --> 15:39.730 And of course it is always also a protection, especially of these vulnerable groups, which are given particular consideration. 15:39.730 --> 15:44.723 And that is why we are looking very closely at how this vaccination rate is rising. 15:44.723 --> 15:45.760 You said that correctly. 15:45.760 --> 15:46.896 It has risen slightly. 15:46.896 --> 15:52.096 But we are also not yet at the point where we say that this is actually now the goal. 15:52.096 --> 15:58.583 Because actually we truly want to reach over 90, ideally 95%. 15:58.583 --> 16:02.923 And therefore comprehensive educational efforts are taking place. 16:02.923 --> 16:06.255 And this proof requirement must also be enforced. 16:06.255 --> 16:13.676 It must also, and indeed a great deal of information is continually being passed on. 16:13.676 --> 16:18.810 For example, we are also currently seeing the problem that there is a great deal of misinformation. 16:18.810 --> 16:23.663 And that leads to great uncertainty. 16:23.663 --> 16:28.709 And in order to counteract this, educational efforts are also taking place, for 16:28.709 --> 16:32.130 example, especially by the Robert Koch Institute. 16:32.130 --> 16:40.866 As an example, I would like to mention the fact sandwiches that are available and that also serve to educate 16:40.866 --> 16:45.963 about the methodology and also to refute false information. 16:45.963 --> 16:50.700 And that can then also be used in conversations." 16:50.700 --> 16:54.623 To protect vulnerable groups, Dr. Weikl states: 16:54.623 --> 16:57.405 "Now I would like to take a question from Ms. Schenderlein. 16:57.405 --> 17:04.575 How can one, with a vaccination that demonstrably does not offer one hundred percent protection, as seen in the fact that 20 17:04.575 --> 17:11.481 to 30% of measles cases actually affect vaccinated individuals, how can one eliminate or eradicate anything with that? 17:11.481 --> 17:12.716 That is the question. 17:12.716 --> 17:19.313 And the alleged protection of vulnerable groups, how can that result when we know – now after one, this can be taken from the 17:19.313 --> 17:24.908 ECDC Annual Report 2024 – that a large number of those now falling ill are falling ill at the age of under 17:24.908 --> 17:30.636 one year, which previously – when the aforementioned nest protection existed – was not the case at all. 17:30.636 --> 17:32.921 So infants are actually put at greater risk by the vaccination. 17:32.921 --> 17:39.950 And the same applies to older persons, who, if they had gone through the illness earlier, would be protected for life. 17:39.950 --> 17:44.110 And now to the other question, the question from the member of parliament. 17:44.110 --> 17:48.665 So we refer to several studies, which can also be read in our report, which, by the way, we 17:48.665 --> 17:51.443 already sent to all members of parliament in November. 17:51.443 --> 17:53.623 All source references are listed at the bottom. 17:53.623 --> 18:00.850 But for example, we have the report from the Paul Ehrlich Institute, which issued the last one in 2012. 18:00.850 --> 18:02.776 One wonders why no new one is coming. 18:02.776 --> 18:07.641 According to Professor Sönnichsen, who deals with this, the data are currently very difficult to discern. 18:07.641 --> 18:12.683 The data on side effects only through PDF files, which are very difficult to pick apart. 18:12.683 --> 18:18.570 But we have a report from 2012 and there you can see that the vaccination is not so harmless after all. 18:18.570 --> 18:26.190 For we see that 13,000 serious side effects were reported to the Paul Ehrlich Institute. 18:26.190 --> 18:32.703 And that corresponds to about 5.7 reports per 100,000 vaccine doses. 18:32.703 --> 18:36.900 And we carry out 1.2 million vaccinations per year. 18:36.900 --> 18:46.215 And we see that encephalitis, for example, is also very common: 1 in 8,000. 18:46.215 --> 18:53.930 And that means that we can expect a very high number of children harmed by the vaccination. 18:53.930 --> 18:57.176 Over 100 children due to the vaccination in Germany based purely on the figures. 18:57.176 --> 19:01.129 Then there is also a Cochrane review from 2020. 19:01.129 --> 19:05.645 It likewise confirms that the vaccination can cause dramatic harm. " 19:06.336 --> 19:09.096 Dr. Weikl adds elsewhere: 19:09.096 --> 19:11.950 "Back again to the Cochrane review 2020. 19:11.950 --> 19:17.063 It names aseptic meningitis with a risk of 1 in 8,000. 19:17.063 --> 19:19.103 That means this is a very high risk. 19:19.103 --> 19:26.410 The Cochrane Review 2021 then itself assesses the evidence on the safety of the measles vaccination as low to moderate. 19:26.410 --> 19:30.803 The authors had to resort in part to observational studies of inferior quality, they write themselves. 19:30.803 --> 19:34.890 And adequate safety studies with a long-term design are simply lacking. 19:34.890 --> 19:36.160 We must once again bear in mind. 19:36.160 --> 19:39.781 The vaccination consists of live viruses that can spread and multiply in the body. 19:39.781 --> 19:46.312 We know that in frequent cases they lead to febrile seizures, epilepsy, autoimmune diseases, idiopathic thrombocytopenic 19:46.312 --> 19:52.270 purpura, all of which is also stated in the report, compared with hardly any risks from a measles infection. 19:52.270 --> 19:54.003 Purpura Schönlein-Henoch is mentioned to me. 19:54.003 --> 20:00.072 And the Henry Ford study, to which I would like to refer, which examined over 18,000 children, showed that the 20:00.072 --> 20:03.350 unvaccinated are significantly healthier than the vaccinated. 20:03.350 --> 20:08.849 We also have connections regarding the measles vaccination with developmental delays, autism, dermatitis, 20:08.849 --> 20:11.755 eczema, type 1 diabetes, allergies, asthma, and so on. 20:11.755 --> 20:18.016 There is a very, very large amount of evidence, also in the Cochrane Review, that we absolutely must take into account." 20:18.016 --> 20:25.093 In the second round of questions, the discussion focused on the usefulness of a second measles vaccination, the unavailability 20:25.093 --> 20:31.703 of a single vaccine for measles, whether measles is a dangerous or beneficial childhood disease, and other aspects. 20:31.703 --> 20:37.723 Dr. Weikl comments on the question of whether elimination of measles is even possible. Because that is the 20:37.723 --> 20:41.700 official objective of the mandatory measles vaccination: 20:41.700 --> 20:47.040 "On the one hand, we know that these reports to the reporting authorities are extremely underrepresented. 20:47.040 --> 20:50.243 We have already stated a factor of 15 to 20. 20:50.243 --> 20:51.976 It is probably even much, much higher. 20:51.976 --> 20:53.536 Some even speak of a factor of 100. 20:53.536 --> 20:56.410 The reports of side effects are much, much higher. 20:56.410 --> 21:02.900 The most important question is: How can we, with a vaccination that does not work 100% anyway—but we see it in the ECDC 21:02.900 --> 21:09.743 figures that approximately 20 to 30% of measles cases involve vaccinated individuals, and many other studies also show this. 21:09.743 --> 21:14.343 Can we even eliminate something that was just addressed by the State Secretary?! 21:14.343 --> 21:16.236 Then the question about the combination vaccine. 21:16.236 --> 21:20.283 How can one administer a combination vaccine that contains a disease, for example rubella, which has been 21:20.283 --> 21:23.010 considered eliminated in Germany for years—that is bodily harm. 21:23.010 --> 21:31.283 And I would like to emphasize once again the dangerousness of the vaccination, an expert opinion that Professor Jilk, former member 21:31.283 --> 21:38.717 of the STIKO, prepared on behalf of the Amberg public prosecutor's office for an investigation, and in which he himself 21:38.717 --> 21:46.040 writes that the risk of measles encephalitis with a vaccination is eight to 17 times higher than without vaccination. 21:46.040 --> 21:49.220 He writes that the vaccination brings with it massive harm. 21:49.220 --> 21:52.629 And the crucial question that we must ask ourselves is this: 21:52.629 --> 21:59.697 How can the decline in measles incidence sold to us as a common good, with many, many disadvantages, be weighed 21:59.697 --> 22:03.896 against a health risk to an individual that demonstrably exists. 22:03.896 --> 22:07.183 We doctors are obligated to the individual, not to public health. 22:07.183 --> 22:12.840 And we currently know from the ECDC figures that one to two out of 100 million people in the WHO European 22:12.840 --> 22:17.876 Region, which includes almost one billion people, everything is indeed still included there. 22:17.876 --> 22:22.470 One to two out of 100 million people die of measles. 22:22.470 --> 22:31.216 In 2024, 23 died in the region, and in 2023 there were 10. 22:31.216 --> 22:37.785 That is an extremely low number and it in no way justifies an epidemiological emergency, which would actually 22:37.785 --> 22:42.296 be necessary for a restriction of fundamental rights." 22:42.296 --> 22:44.103 Esteemed viewers! 22:44.103 --> 22:51.820 This is not about any legal disputes and medical theories, but about the well-being of millions of people. 22:51.820 --> 22:58.046 Kla.TV will continue to monitor for you how the members of the Bundestag deal with this petition.