Diese Website verwendet Cookies. Cookies helfen uns bei der Bereitstellung unserer Dienste. Durch die Nutzung unserer Dienste erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies setzen. Bei uns sind Ihre Daten sicher. Wir geben keine Ihrer Analyse- oder Kontaktdaten an Dritte weiter! Weiterführende Informationen erhalten Sie in der Datenschutzerklärung.
Uncensored: undertaker reveals all Free title: Uncensored: undertaker reveals all – Interview with Marlies Spuhler
01.10.2024
Subtitle "Afrikaans" was produced by machine.Subtitle "አማርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "العربية " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ārāmāyâ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "azərbaycan dili " was produced by machine.Subtitle "беларуская мова " was produced by machine.Подзаглавието "България" е създадено от машина.Subtitle "বাংলা " was produced by machine.Subtitle "བོད་ཡིག" was produced by machine.Subtitle "босански" was produced by machine.Subtitle "català" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Cebuano" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ગુજરાતી" was produced by machine.Subtitle "corsu" was produced by machine.Podtitul "Čeština" byl vytvořen automaticky.Subtitle "Cymraeg" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Dansk" was produced by machine.Untertitel "Deutsch" wurde maschinell erzeugt.Subtitle "Untertitel" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ελληνικά" was produced by machine.Subtitle "English" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Esperanto" was produced by machine.El subtítulo "Español" se generó automáticamente.Subtitle "Eesti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "euskara" was produced by machine.Subtitle "فارسی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Suomi" was produced by machine.Le sous-titre "Français" a été généré automatiquement.Subtitle "Frysk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gaeilge" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Gàidhlig" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Galego" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Schwizerdütsch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "هَوُسَ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Ōlelo Hawaiʻi" was produced by machine.Subtitle "עברית" was produced by machine.Subtitle "हिन्दी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Mẹo" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Hrvatski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Kreyòl ayisyen " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Magyar" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Հայերեն" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Indonesia " was produced by machine.Subtitle "Asụsụ Igbo " was produced by machine.Textun"Íslenska" var framkvæmt vélrænt.Sottotitoli "Italiano" sono stati generati automaticamente.字幕は"日本語" 自動的に生成されました。Subtitle "Basa Jawa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ქართული" was produced by machine.Subtitle "қазақ тілі " was produced by machine.Subtitle "ភាសាខ្មែរ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ಕನ್ನಡ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "한국어" was produced by machine.Subtitle "कोंकणी語" was produced by machine.Subtitle "کوردی" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Кыргызча" was produced by machine.Subtitle " lingua latina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lëtzebuergesch" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lingala" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ພາສາ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Lietuvių" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Latviešu" was produced by machine.Subtitle "fiteny malagasy" was produced by machine.Subtitle "te reo Māori" was produced by machine.Subtitle "македонски јазик" was produced by machine.Subtitle "malayāḷaṁ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Монгол хэл" was produced by machine.Subtitle "मराठी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Bahasa Malaysia" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Malti" was produced by machine.Subtitle "မြန်မာစာ " was produced by machine.Subtitle "नेपाली" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Nederlands" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Norsk" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiCheŵa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ਪੰਜਾਬੀ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Polska" was produced by machine.Subtitle "پښتو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Português" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Română" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Язык жестов (Русский)" was produced by machine.Субтитры "Pусский" были созданы машиной.Subtitle "Kinyarwanda" was produced by machine.Subtitle "सिन्धी" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Deutschschweizer Gebärdensprache" was produced by machine.Subtitle "සිංහල" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovensky" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Slovenski" was produced by machine.Subtitle "gagana fa'a Samoa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "chiShona" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Soomaaliga" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Shqip" was produced by machine.Subtitle "србски" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Sesotho" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Basa Sunda" was produced by machine.Undertext "Svenska" är maskinell skapad.Subtitle "Kiswahili" was produced by machine.Subtitle "தமிழ்" was produced by machine.Subtitle "తెలుగు" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Тоҷикй" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ภาษาไทย" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ትግርኛ" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tagalog" ay nabuo sa pamamagitan ng makina.Subtitle "Türkçe" was produced by machine.Subtitle "татар теле" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Українська " was produced by machine.Subtitle "اردو" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Oʻzbek" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Tiếng Việt" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Serbšćina" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiXhosa" was produced by machine.Subtitle "ייִדיש" was produced by machine.Subtitle "Yorùbá" was produced by machine.Subtitle "中文" was produced by machine.Subtitle "isiZulu" was produced by machine.
kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не носи отговорност за некачествен превод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nenese žádnou odpovědnost za chybné překlady.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV übernimmt keine Haftung für mangelhafte Übersetzung.kla.TV accepts no liability for inadequate translationkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV no se hace responsable de traducciones incorrectas.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV n'assume aucune responsabilité en cas de mauvaise traduction.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV nem vállal felelősséget a hibás fordításértkla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV tekur enga ábyrgð á áræðanleika þýðingarinnarKla.TV non si assume alcuna responsabilità per traduzioni lacunose e/o errate.Kla.TV は、不適切な翻訳に対して一切の責任を負いません。kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV не несет ответственности за некачественный перевод.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.Kla.TV tar inget ansvar för felaktiga översättningar.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla. Walang pananagutan ang TV sa mga depektibong pagsasalin.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.kla.TV accepts no liability for defective translation.
Uncensored: undertaker reveals all Free title: Uncensored: undertaker reveals all – Interview with Marlies Spuhler
Gesprochener Text
Despite alarming excess mortality, advertising for corona vaccines continues. Witnesses of death are to be silenced. Because more and more insiders, like undertaker Marlies Spuhler, are making their observations public! See her descriptions of the death process here. Marlies Spuhler: "Everything has been different since 2021!"
[weiterlesen]
What do the UN, WHO, EU and WEF currently see as the greatest threat? That's right: disinformation. This must be combated urgently.
In mid-November 2023, for example, the French Senate examined a draft law against disinformation. According to this, people critical of pharmaceuticals face high fines and prison sentences. Anyone who dares to criticize the government's medical narratives can come into conflict with this law.
The CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the German Bundestag struck the same note in mid-December 2023. It submitted a motion entitled: "For transparent negotiations on the WHO pandemic agreement - Against misinformation and conspiracy theories".
At the annual meeting of the WEF in Davos in mid-January 2024, the fight against disinformation was also given the highest priority.
Why?
Since the declaration of the corona pandemic, the population's trust in politics, the media and health authorities has dwindled massively. Many people suffer from vaccine side effects. There is a clear excess mortality rate even among younger people. Nevertheless, advertising for the Covid vaccination continues as if nothing had happened. The Federal Center for Health Education, for example, still claims that the Covid vaccination is effective and safe. Although countless voices from vaccine victims, doctors, statisticians, vaccine developers, pathologists, etc. have long since proven the opposite. What a mockery of all the victims who are left in the lurch, severely injured.
The suppression of precisely these dissenting voices is the aim of the fight against alleged "disinformation". Because the calls for legal investigation into the Corona crimes alone are getting louder and louder.
Below you can see undertaker Marlies Spuhler from southern Germany. Ms. Spuhler reports what she has experienced since Corona. She testifies: "Everything has been different since 2021" and comes to the conclusion: "Our politicians cannot shirk this responsibility. [...] No, I think they should be dragged to court now. What they are doing is mass murder for me!”
Watch the slightly shortened interview by Sören Schumann with undertaker Marlies Spuhler here. Spread this information in times of increasing censorship and help uncensored news to break through!
Sören Schumann: Welcome to today's interview. My name is Sören Schumann and today I am interviewing Marlies Spuhler and yes, we are talking about what she has experienced over the last three or four years. Marlies is an undertaker or yes, in a funeral home and that is quite exciting because you get to see, let's say, from the front line how many people die and perhaps from what. I find it very, very exciting to share her perspective, her experiences, her experiences with you here. And yes, Marlies, do you want to say something about yourself and your work and also how you were confronted with these issues?
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, it was like this: Yes, I'm Marlies Spuhler, exactly, 42 years old. My husband and I founded an ecological carpentry business with funerals in 2007. And that's how I got involved. My husband has a master carpenter's title and I have a master undertaker's title. Exactly. And yes, and now we've been running our small family business ever since.
Sören Schumann: Since 2007, that's about 16 years.
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes.
Sören Schumann: That means you already have a lot of experience. You can see what's going on outside, also by how much (you) have to do.
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, absolutely.
Sören Schumann: And yes, how did it all start for you? What were your first experiences or encounters in the area of this plandemic, I have to say? What were your first encounters with it?
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, we heard about the whole thing from the news, like everyone else. We didn't notice anything about the deceased at first. In fact, fewer people died in 2020 than in the year before or the years before that. So it was a rather low-mortality year.
Sören Schumann: Yes, although it officially started at the end of 2019. So people said: "Hey, now it's really bad!"
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly.
Sören Schumann: And you said that in 2020 you had a little less to do, so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. We had, well, it varies every year, the number of deaths. And we are here in the village with about 8,000 to 9,000 inhabitants and people say – before 2019 at least, it was still the case that one percent of the village dies every year. That’s roughly the death rate. And it was just like that, and we share the place with another undertaker who has been around longer than us. And in 2019, I think, we had 45, 46 funerals. That’s a lot for a small undertaker like us. And the following year, in 2020, we only had 35. That's really not much. And it was a quiet year. So you could do a lot of private things too. Exactly. And yes, it just didn't match what they said on TV. I always thought: Yes, where are they? Where are they all? And at some point it was the case that in the hospitals it always said that they died with a C. Exactly. That was always on the death certificate. And then at some point we noticed that it was only like that in the hospital. We didn't have that at all with the home pickups. And then we have another undertaker here in our area who is also on the ball. And since then we've been on the phone, or at the beginning we were on the phone almost every day, yes, and just exchanged information about these oddities that we noticed. First of all, the thing with the death certificates in the hospital. We think that was also a priority. There was just a bit more money, yes.
Sören Schumann: If that's what it says, so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes, not for us, but for the hospital. Exactly, and yes, it just wasn't normal at home. People died there in a really normal way. And those were the first abnormalities that made us suspicious.
Sören Schumann: And you didn't do that alone, you were also in contact with colleagues.
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly.
Sören Schumann: And they had made similar observations.
Marlies Spuhler: They observed it too, yes. Exactly.
Sören Schumann: Okay. And so, 2019, to put it into context, 2019 was a normal year, 2020 also had very little to do, even though the very big health crisis was supposedly already well advanced. And then the next chapter probably started in 2021, right?
Marlies Spuhler: We really noticed it then. It actually started at the end of 2020. I promised myself at “Facts Peace Freedom” that over the years, you can get confused sometimes. Yes, exactly, they started vaccinating at the end of 2020. And there were only three, four, five days left until the year was over. I don’t remember how often we were in the nursing homes. Well, only in the nursing homes, not at home at all. But we didn’t really think that it could be the injection. Exactly. And yes, that’s how it was. And in January and February it was really bad. I had an intern there who is actually a palliative care doctor, who then wanted to change direction because she had also experienced strange things in her hospital. And then I said, hey, I don’t know yet how many deaths we have. You can never say that in advance. And then it hit so hard. And I was so glad she was there. Because she was older, had a driver's license. She went to the offices with me at the beginning. And then she drove alone. She extended her internship so that she could help me. She said she would only finish her internship when we had finished it because there were so many. And there were really eight or nine deaths a week at the beginning of the year. That was really tough. That was totally unusual. We'd never had that before. We had four or five a week, but not eight or nine. That was really, you really had to make sure you didn't forget anything, document everything precisely.
Sören Schumann: You could hardly keep up, so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. That was exciting. And then, spring was just quiet. Where most people normally die, it was just quiet. Nothing was going on, yes.
Sören Schumann: It's spring 2021 now, right?
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly. It was suddenly very quiet. There was very, very little. One, two, very little. I think we had three weeks in a row where we had nothing at all. And that is really unusual. And we just think that the people with pre-existing conditions, the elderly, those who would normally have died in that period, they simply died earlier, yes. Because of the injection. And yes, and when the treatment for the people with pre-existing conditions began, we noticed it again. Because then we had all the atypical deaths. Just lying dead in bed, yes. Cardiac arrest. Yes, really strange things. We also had deaths. I found that rather scary. They were really bleeding from every pore, yes. That wasn't nice. We've never had that once in 16 years. So really unusual things that happened that hadn't happened before. Sören Schumann: When does the work of an undertaker actually begin? A death is reported. Then probably some otherstill need to be clarified. And when do you come into play?
Marlies Spuhler: Well, it depends on where the person dies. In the hospital, the doctor issues the death certificate. And if you die at home, you have to call the doctor home. Some family doctors give out their phone numbers. They then come. Or, or rather, when the doctor's office is closed, you call the on-call service. And then they send the doctor at some point. Provided that the on-call service is busy. I don't know if there will be a new solution now. Because we are reducing the on-call service.
Sören Schumann: Okay.
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, that's not so nice either.
Sören Schumann: Yes.
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly. And yes, if the doctor was there and the death certificate doesn't say "cause of death unknown", then we can come.
Sören Schumann: Okay. And when is that roughly the case, so that the audience has an idea?
Marlies Spuhler: We discuss that with the relatives. The deceased can stay at home for up to 36 hours.
Sören Schumann: Ah, okay.
Marlies Spuhler: Because many families also use that to say goodbye. After that, the changes occur anyway. And then they don't necessarily want to go to the open coffin. That's understandable. That's fine. It's a different atmosphere at home. But we've also had it happen that we should come straight away. Whether it's three in the morning or whatever, it happens too. But it's less common. Most people actually wait until the morning to call.
Sören Schumann: Yes, but that means, as you said, you also noticed clear differences. In the state in which you found the deceased.
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, we've experienced that a few times now, that it was so totally unusual with all that blood. Sören Schumann: From the end of 2020 or the beginning of 2021, so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: That was in 2021. Also in 2022. That is what we have experienced more or less in the last two years, or it has been three years already. Yes. And what we are still finding is simply that we sometimes come to the funeral homes, I have already consulted with other undertakers, they also experience this. We sometimes come to the funeral homes, and it seems to us as if the deceased either no longer have rigor mortis at all, or it goes away very quickly, disappears and decomposition sets in straight away. You have to be careful with the laying out of the bodies. Of course, you can no longer guarantee this for as long as you used to.
Sören Schumann: How long does rigor mortis usually last?
Marlies Spuhler: 48 hours actually. The deceased are usually kept at 5 degrees. Then it's definitely two days.
Sören Schumann: And now it's much shorter. That means it could also be because of the gene therapy injections that were used, which also changed things, so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: Well, we're in contact with a group of doctors and other people. And there are some who work a lot with the dark field microscope. I can actually recommend that to everyone. If you know a naturopath or anyone with dark field, get it done. It's very interesting. We did that too. And we were shocked at how full our blood was of heavy metals. And we've been detoxing all this time, taking vitamins regularly and so on. And we're really much better than before. Exactly. And yes, in any case, they've already done various tests, with our own blood, with the different batches and so on. And they also found that the blood was breaking down extremely quickly. And that of course corresponds with the observation that we made. So they explain it in such a way that it can be good that it is just like that.
Sören Schumann: Yes. What I think would be interesting is that you have been active in this profession for about 16 years now. And there have been one or two pandemics, so to speak, in the country. Swine flu, bird flu and so on, where similar scenarios were brought up. How did you react when it started, about three or four years ago? What feelings did you have at the time? Or did you already have certain intuitions about what it might be about?
Marlies Spuhler: Well, it seemed strange to me from the beginning. Just the way it was set up on TV. So we found out about it from the news. And it was always our mealtime. So we actually always watched the news while we ate.
Sören Schumann: Maybe not the best idea.
Marlies Spuhler: No. Aso we stopped that a long time ago. Yes, and we actually had a bad feeling at the beginning because we didn't know what was coming. But it quickly passed, simply through the experiences we had at work. We saw that the hospitals apparently just wanted to cash in because it was only there. And strangely enough, nobody died at home. And the pandemics before that, our district was never affected. Yes, so there was nothing there either. I think they were experiments that went wrong, I don't know. Now they just couldn't enforce it anymore. I don't know. Yes, so for us it definitely only started when the injections started. So before that everything was quiet, normal. Sometimes it was more, sometimes less.
Sören Schumann: Yes. It's also very interesting, you've said twice now that you didn't notice anything at the beginning and only the hospital deaths were given this label. The suspicion, the suspicion is there, that there are financial interests behind it. It wouldn't be the first time, so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: We have been told by families - I don't want to name anyone here - but they were actually offered money by the wards, by the doctor, if they could put the Covid entry in there. I think that's really pretty crazy. I think that's already a criminal offense here. What should you actually do here? It's manipulation, offering people money. I could imagine that many people accepted it, even if you don't have anything to spare. I really think that nobody said anything, nobody took action against it, I think that's crazy.
Sören Schumann: Yes, this, let's say, framing is often interpreted in a way that suits it, or where there are certain interests or certain advantages for the person who does it. For example, if someone has had a gene therapy injection and perhaps suffered certain damage, then it is very difficult for this to be recognized, because of course nobody is really interested in being held liable for it. Or the doctor may then also be held responsible. On the other hand, if I can put the Corona stamp on people when they are dead, i.e. if I write there, and earn something from it, then of course some people will at least be happy to use it. And what has already come through very clearly is that in the beginning, although it was a huge health crisis, fewer people died, at least not more. And then with the big cure, which was touted, which was pushed through in a very special approval process, where all the alarm bells were already ringing, so to speak, but which was then done anyway, the death rates went up. It's also paradoxical, because it was actually supposed to protect or help.
Marlies Spuler: We actually had a case where it actually said: "died of C". And the man went 14 days after the third vaccination, so a third time, so to speak - and yes, - he died and was already over 80. And he was really, yes, sick, tested positive and then died from it. And that was the only one we had with "from C", yes, as the reason. They don't actually have to write it down. It's enough if they tick the box next to infectious. But that wasn't done here. It seems that it was important here that it was always stated what it was.
Sören Schumann: Yes.
Marlies Spuhler: I don't know. Yes.
Sören Schumann: Very interesting. So you're talking about the doctors who go to the deceased at home, so to speak. Yes. Okay.
Marlies Spuhler: But the man was also in the hospital, then. He was still on a ventilator and so on. He just doesn't have it.
Sören Schumann: Yes. And what have you noticed in the social sector? I mean, you're probably in contact with the families, with those affected. You certainly pick up a lot of things there.
Marlies Spuhler: Well, before that, we had deaths. They wanted to see proof from me. And I have proof of immunity. We had that done. We actually had Corona at the beginning of 2020, we just didn't know it. Then a year and a half later, we had it confirmed through the blood test that we had done, and we then got this immunity certificate through "Evidence of Reason" [citizens' initiative]. In many cases, it was also recognized. Still testing and so on. We always did that as a precaution before we went to theCustomers are that they are reassured if they want to see it. We have the piece of paper and that's it. Exactly. So that was one. I have to say. With this campaign, we noticed that this division that affects this society, which was played out at the local bar or at the family table. This was actually reflected in the grieving families. There were accusations like: "... because he wasn't vaccinated, he died. It's your fault, because none of you are." And then family members stayed away from the funeral. And I actually thought that was a shame. How suddenly this topic accompanied everything. The only thing that mattered was whether you were (vaccinated) or not. I'm just talking so strangely now, because people are trying to get around the censorship a little bit. Yes. That people still understand what I'm getting at. Exactly. And I think that's a shame, because you can actually still feel it. Somehow people can't find a way to get along anymore, and when it's all about dividing the inheritance, they might end up arguing. We've seen that before. But now it was already happening before. Where people are excluded from funerals if possible, so that they don't even find out that this person or that person has died. But if someone loses their mother or father, then I have to say. I don't call them, but if they call me and ask, then of course I say yes. I can't say: I'm not allowed to say anything because my sister doesn't want me to or something. I actually think that's the worst thing.
[...]
Sören Schumann: So have you noticed any changes? That at the beginning you were even attacked strongly or that people said: Hey, yes, it's so bad with this virus. And were afraid of it and that then maybe things changed a bit, that it was perhaps also because of the injection that the people died.
Marlies Spuler: We have that now. People don't speak to me directly during the bereavement conversation, but mostly when we have the second or third contact.
Sören Schumann: So the bereavement conversation is basically the first conversation?
Marlies Spuler: The first contact, so to speak, yes. Well, not the first contact, but yes, exactly, the first conversation that you have, where you discuss everything. You always have to see what kind of situation the relatives are in now? Can you talk to them about everything? I always leave a pad there with a few things written on it that they then have to think about. These are then arrangements, funeral ceremonies and things like that. Exactly. And that hasn't been addressed yet. But I've had the case several times now, when I go there for the second or third time, and then they say, oh, Ms. Spuhler. And then they either know my videos, my interviews. They then speak to me directly and say that they think it's so great that I dare to tell the truth. And then they tell me their suspicions. I often hear: "If my wife hadn't been ... (vaccinated) ... she would still be alive." Or: "Since the second time, my mom has been feeling worse." Or: "Since the third time, it was foreseeable for my dad." So I'm hearing it more and more often now. And especially with the middle-aged, I'll put it this way, it's difficult to estimate, they'll all be between 40 and 60. They'll notice it now.
And they also say quite clearly: "So we - never again." And then you hear how many there are in families where either the whole family isn't (vaccinated) at all. So that still happens. Or there's actually someone in every family who really went through with it, who said: "You won't get me!" So there are more than you think. Even if we are told here that the vaccination rate is so and so high, I don't believe that. I think there are more of us. We just didn't know each other at the beginning. We felt pretty alone. We also thought, oh God, are we the only ones here now. We tried to warn everyone at the beginning. We had the experience at the beginning of January, February. And we said: "Hey guys, don't go there. Lots of people die here." So even with that and with facts... - you could see it. Where were they all, the people who died from Corona? There weren't any there. You couldn't calm them down with facts. In the end, they even demanded that all this crap be approved. They were happy as a cure, as a miracle cure in the end. And I think it's a shame that so many people don't question it anymore. Where has the awareness of health gone?ndheit?
We have an ecological carpentry shop. The majority of our customers are either ecological or vegan or whatever. They generally live a healthy lifestyle. We oil the cupboards with natural oil. But when they see the dirt, they run to the doctor. We don't understand it. They let it go. When it comes to food, they make sure that it is definitely not genetically modified.
Sören Schumann: They get themselves gene-treated...
Marlies Spuhler: I don't know. So that's something we've never really been able to understand. What happened in people's heads is that they simply put aside this critical thinking and blindly trust everything that is happening right now. Have they all lost their gut feeling?
[...]
Marlies Spuhler: It's not like we do a job that is so omnipresent, right? If an undertaker warns you, then you should really take it seriously. I never understood why people still...
Sören Schumann: What were the reactions like? So when you said: Hey, this and that is said, but we experienced it the other way around. When you said that to someone, how did people react?
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, they listened to it and then the next time you met them, they were (vaccinated). It had already happened. Even though you had more or less warned them beforehand.
Sören Schumann: And you said that now it is partly the case that people are realizing that perhaps it was not the right choice that they made. That they are now making certain connections. Was there perhaps a development from: Not at all at the beginning... And then now you say that perhaps people are now making certain connections several times. Was that also a certain development over time?
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, absolutely. Absolutely. At the beginning they didn't see it. We have had deaths before. There are also brave doctors. They write down death by third party (vaccination). And then there is an autopsy by the police.
Sören Schumann: Was it like that, if it says that, there is an autopsy?
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, then it is confiscated. That is an unnatural death.
Sören Schumann: If it says death by injection, then...
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, it is unnatural. Exactly. And then an autopsy is carried out, but by the criminal investigation department, the police. And we had, in one special case, the relatives had their appointment with the doctor on Friday for the booster. Exactly. And the autopsy was on Wednesday. And then they just waited for the result. And all that came out was cardiac arrest. The connection was not investigated. Yes, they went for the (vaccination) on Friday, yes, and got the next shot. That's just how it was. Yes, and in the beginning it was more like that, they trusted the whole thing, of course. And if you said the opposite, then "oh well". And you might have heard one or two conversations like that in your circle of friends. I've often heard: I trust the government, it was elected by the people. Yes, and they don't believe that the government wanted to do anything bad to the people. What do you want, you're no use anymore. Yes, and we can't compete with the doctors who are for it, who support the whole thing. We don't stand a chance. As a patient, you trust your doctor. Yes, and apparently they are somehow above us.
Sören Schumann: And were there certain events where it developed in the other direction? Or was it a very gradual process from: "Yes, I trust him and he has definitely died of the virus now," to: "Yes, this gene therapy could..., that would probably have been the reason," right?
Marlies Spuhler: You notice, as I said, we really do watch it ourselves. We have everything that is paid for by the GEZ, we don't watch it anymore. We avoid it consistently because we simply don't want to be bombarded with that nonsense. But you notice what was going on outside on the street when you talk to people. Because they always say the same thing, or reflect what they heard there. And people are also in contact with each other. And now, when someone says: "Hey, I've been feeling so bad since then," then the next person dares to do it too. And that is also a process. You have noticed that now. More and more people dare to come out and say: "Yes, I'm unhappy with it," plus the experiences that families have with deaths. So many families are affected more than once. Yes, they have buried five of their family members in the last two years. So if theyI don't know why they don't understand it yet.
Sören Schumann: But there are probably some who still say: "Yeah, okay."
Marlies Spuhler: Not them. The lady said: "Definitely never again." So she is also firmly convinced that it is because of the whole thing. Because it simply can't be true, yes. And two of her siblings, neither of whom was yet 70, yes. One not 60, the other not 70, and both parents in their early 80s. So somewhere... Yes, especially when you talk about a life expectancy of, I don't know, supposedly, yes. And suddenly everyone is dying. That can't be true, right. And they see that now. As I said, I hear that more and more often. If my wife hadn't been there (for vaccination), she would still be alive, yes. Or since the third, fourth, fifth, depending on how many, things have gone downhill, right. Although most people actually say: things have been going downhill since the third one. I think if you go more often now, that's just my personal opinion, right. Then you'll feel even worse.
Sören Schumann: Let's talk about the timeline and the numbers again. So a quick summary again. In 2020 it was very quiet, less than before. It started at the end of 2020. You can also see a temporal connection to the injection programs. In 2021 it was definitely significantly more than... . .
Marlies Spuhler: That was a lot of fun.
Sören Schumann: Excuse me?
Marlies Spuhler: That was a lot of fun from 2021 onwards.
Sören Schumann: In 2021 it really was a lot of fun. And what happened in the years after that? 2022, 2023?
Marlies Spuhler: So in 2022 it was also tough. Until 2022, so 2021, 2022, we always noticed the correlation. Yes. So it was always about two weeks later that things took off. And now it's 2023. . .
Sören Schumann: So two weeks after an injection. . .
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes, exactly. And now it's 2023 [...] it seems to be leveling out again. We actually had the most deaths again this year in spring and autumn. Although I have to say again that for us this year it really started again on September 28th, yes, when a lot of people died. And on September 18th was the start again, right, they started again.
Sören Schumann: It started, there was an official recommendation, so to speak, from...
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, and we also know from friends, from acquaintances who work for doctors, who are medical assistants or something, and the appointment books were full. Yes, people were already waiting to be able to, yes, refresh their appointments. And there it was the same, as I said, it was exactly ten days again, as it started with us. And what is striking now is that the older society is catching up again. I then notice that that was the focus. Because we have a lot of people now in their 30s, where they were born, in the 30s, where everyone... Which is not immediately unusual. Old people just die, especially when you are 90. Don't get that wrong. But it is striking again, as I said: 18 (September) was the start. 28th (September) that's when it started. And now things are calming down.
Sören Schumann: And you can probably see it in the state of the deceased, as you said at the beginning.
Marlies Spuhler: Unfortunately you can see it. Many of them have this grey, very grey, pale face. It's unnatural. Not what a deceased person normally looks like. And the others are also bright yellow. We have lots of yellow ones, yes.
Sören Schumann: Yellow, does that have something to do with the liver?
Marlies Spuhler: In the group of doctors we are part of, many have said that this spike protein tends to accumulate in the liver. And that is what causes this yellow appearance. I can only report what I have heard. I'm already out of that. It's not my area of expertise anymore. But I have observed it and the decomposition is still going on. This autolysis starts much earlier. We pick up a lot of people who have only died a day ago. And you can't touch them because you might accidentally pull the skin off or something. And that shouldn't happen. Not after a day, yes. And they don't all get cortisone and chemotherapy or something like that. That would be a reason why. No, they died under normal circumstances, I'll call them normal circumstances. And yet the condition is still like that. That can't really be true. Not with this frequency. As I said, it has always happened. Someone who has had chemotherapy for three months or more and died as a result, the decomposition starts at the same time.eich. We don't need to talk about it. It's extremely exhausting for the body. But people die without chemotherapy. Or without having received high doses of cortisone or something else. Or some kind of morphine. Like, who knows what you get there. Yes, and that's very noticeable. And we still see that. And the stupid thing is, they have the burial, which is stupid, I don't know yet whether that's good or bad. They've increased the burial period to ten days. Before, it was seven. Since the start of the pandemic. And that's a problem for us, of course. Especially with burials. When the funeral is only a week later. And that includes laying out the body. You really have to check whether the coffin isn't closed earlier. It's just a different kind of communication that takes place now than before.
Sören Schumann: Because of the appearance of the deceased.
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, exactly. You can't expect the relatives to put up with that anymore.
Sören Schumann: Yes, that means you also communicate: "Hey, if you want to see the person again now, you have to do it by this time, because otherwise it's no longer reasonable," so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. There are also smells and so on. We can get rid of them on a large scale, I'll say now, yes. But at some point they'll come back anyway. The decomposition can't be stopped except through thanatopractic [thanatopraxia or thanatopraxis includes all activities in the funeral industry that are necessary beyond hygienic care of the dead in order to ensure that the deceased is laid out in an aesthetically and hygienically perfect manner] treatment. But nobody does that. It's only done for transfers abroad. Or Michael Jackson or anyone who is laid out for a longer period of time. Exactly. Otherwise it doesn't make sense.
[...]
Sören Schumann: You said that a few months ago, when the official recommendations were made again, it started again. Where do you think things are going? Well, you once said that some people have already woken up and are questioning it. But you still notice clearly that when recommendations are made to inject, the number of deaths increases. Where do you think things are going? What are you preparing for, in your job too?
Marlies Spuhler Well, I just bought a few things to be on the safe side, because you just can't predict where the whole thing is going. I hope, of course, that people will stop running there at some point. That would be a possibility. What I think is a shame is our older society, which can't defend itself. Especially the people who are in nursing homes. If you don't have children who are on the ball, then you are completely at the mercy of the whole thing. There's nothing you can do about it. And I think that's a shame. Because right now, when you notice, let's put it this way, that people are demanding that things be dealt with, even if the other side isn't doing it that way. Or when reports, like the MDR, for example, had a report on the side effects of vaccinations last Tuesday. I thought that was very brave. Of course, not everything was said, it would have been too much for normal citizens. But it has already been taken down from the media library. I think it's a shame that you can't watch it anymore. Where does the explanation start? Why, what are they afraid of? Yes, they made a mistake. But they have to own up to it and not try to wriggle out of it somehow and carry on like that just because they're stuck on so many doses. Yes, enough billions have already been wasted on other things. Yes, then it doesn't matter whether it's the same with this one. So what? And yes, a review would be incredibly important. I have an incredible amount of grief. Oh, how do you want to give people back the denied farewell or the bereavement support when they weren't allowed to be there? Yes, even the farewell in the crematorium or the accompanied cremation? All of that was forbidden. Or the best friend wasn't even allowed to go to the funeral because they were excluded.
Sören Schumann: You mean in general or for people who didn't have a certain status?
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, you had to be part of the close family circle to be able to attend the funeral. And that wasn't possible. Only then, when the testing requirement and so on came about, did 3 or 2 G apply in the cemetery, depending. And yes, the processing would be important. The people simply had a very important part taken away from them. And especially when the bond is close. So that means the great-grandchild was actually already allowed tono longer go to the great-grandmother's funeral. But it could just as well be that the great-grandchild was only with the great-grandmother for the first three or four years of his life. And then there is a strong bond there. And I can't then say to him, no, you can't come. Yes, how is the child ever supposed to get over this grief properly or have a proper development of grief? I mean, you are often confronted with grief at some point. We are experienced people at saying goodbye. We say goodbye every day. You mustn't forget that. But this goodbye forever is something different. I think that's a shame. And I think it's a shame that people are still holding back the truth. And something is going on. Everything has been different since 2021. It's just like that. Everything is different. And what is different? Only one thing has been introduced differently.
Sören Schumann: So it's not actually that difficult to solve the equation, so to speak.
Marlies Spuhler: No, exactly. It's a completely normal, simple math problem. And if you can't figure that out, well, I don't know. I mean, slowly... And I just think that our politicians can't shirk this responsibility. And it doesn't help if you just resign or do something else. No, I think they should be dragged to court now. What they're doing is mass murder in my opinion! You really have to use that word.
Sören Schumann: Sounds like a strong word, a big accusation. But if you really look at it in detail, then you really should think about it.
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, I think, as I said, but that's not meant to be an excuse. But it just brought a lot of people forward (with early deaths). They would probably have died in the near future anyway. Especially the older ones. They often have a lot of illnesses already. And that just made it worse. That's not meant to be an excuse for them having to go early. But I think there are enough other people who would still be alive if they hadn't let the stuff get to them. Yes, really. And I just don't think that's right. And they should justify it. We also filed a criminal complaint in Karlsruhe. We took part in it. And I can really only recommend that to everyone. We did a bit of advertising on the side. You can download the card from ZAAVV, Z -A -A -V -V [Center for the Investigation, Clarification, Legal Prosecution and Prevention of Crimes Against Humanity]. You can fill it out. You can submit it to the Federal Court of Justice. So I can only say to everyone, take part! And I think they should be prosecuted. And especially our Mr Lauterbach, who talks so much rubbish, yes, as Minister of Health, honestly. It has nothing to do with health. For me he's a Minister of Disease.
Sören Schumann: Yes, you don't know whether to laugh or cry. Cry more likely.
Marlies Spuhler: Yes, I mean, I have never personally attacked politicians. I have always held back. But yes, when you see what is happening here. Yes, to be honest. Then you have to do something. And people shouldn't just accept everything. That can't be right! I never understand that. Where has all the fighting spirit gone?
[...]
Sören Schumann: Maybe for you personally. What have the last three years been like? What have you learned for yourself? When did you realise something? Or what do you say: Hey, that has become very clear to me again?
Marlies Spuhler: Well, that's how it is for me now, or generally for our family. We have learned to be critical of everything. And not to rely on statements from individuals. And always to convince ourselves first. So I generally only believe what I see live. Not even here on TV or something. We know today that everything can be staged. Yes, this thinking a little bit for yourself, doing a little research yourself. What could be true about all this? To mention some positive aspects: we have never had any problems with the lockdown or anything. We have always seen everything in a positive light. It was actually pleasant. There was nothing going on on the streets. People had to keep their distance when shopping. If you had an appointment with the doctor, you had to call, you were seen straight away. You didn't have to wait. So you have to take the positive things out of it all. And what I don't want to miss at all are all the people I have met in the three years now. I think even before the miracle cure came along, you could already tell that C (Corona) had asimply showed the true character of people. And then you saw how many people you were actually mistaken about. How many people basically present an image to the outside world that they are not at all like on the inside. And in the last three years, through the reorientation, the people you have met, and it is just like that. I am much, much better now than I was at the beginning. Well, definitely. And we are not afraid at all anymore. We have completely got rid of that. So we don't let anything throw us off track anymore. Unless someone goes straight to the family or something. Exactly. But I am really proud of the people we know now. ...
[...]
Sören Schumann: Would you like to say anything to people at the end? [...]
Marlies Spuhler: Well, I would just like to say something to everyone. Don't always believe everything that is said out there. Convince yourself. Don't forget to be self-critical. Yes, generally critical of everything. And just look for people like you. […] And if we are strong and stick together, nothing will happen to us. I believe that very firmly.
Sören Schumann: OK, nice closing words and thank you for your efforts, dear Marlies. I hope that we can reach a lot of people. There were a lot of exciting things there. I was able to learn a lot too. And thank you for your courage and your efforts.
01.10.2024 | www.kla.tv/30629
What do the UN, WHO, EU and WEF currently see as the greatest threat? That's right: disinformation. This must be combated urgently. In mid-November 2023, for example, the French Senate examined a draft law against disinformation. According to this, people critical of pharmaceuticals face high fines and prison sentences. Anyone who dares to criticize the government's medical narratives can come into conflict with this law. The CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the German Bundestag struck the same note in mid-December 2023. It submitted a motion entitled: "For transparent negotiations on the WHO pandemic agreement - Against misinformation and conspiracy theories". At the annual meeting of the WEF in Davos in mid-January 2024, the fight against disinformation was also given the highest priority. Why? Since the declaration of the corona pandemic, the population's trust in politics, the media and health authorities has dwindled massively. Many people suffer from vaccine side effects. There is a clear excess mortality rate even among younger people. Nevertheless, advertising for the Covid vaccination continues as if nothing had happened. The Federal Center for Health Education, for example, still claims that the Covid vaccination is effective and safe. Although countless voices from vaccine victims, doctors, statisticians, vaccine developers, pathologists, etc. have long since proven the opposite. What a mockery of all the victims who are left in the lurch, severely injured. The suppression of precisely these dissenting voices is the aim of the fight against alleged "disinformation". Because the calls for legal investigation into the Corona crimes alone are getting louder and louder. Below you can see undertaker Marlies Spuhler from southern Germany. Ms. Spuhler reports what she has experienced since Corona. She testifies: "Everything has been different since 2021" and comes to the conclusion: "Our politicians cannot shirk this responsibility. [...] No, I think they should be dragged to court now. What they are doing is mass murder for me!” Watch the slightly shortened interview by Sören Schumann with undertaker Marlies Spuhler here. Spread this information in times of increasing censorship and help uncensored news to break through! Sören Schumann: Welcome to today's interview. My name is Sören Schumann and today I am interviewing Marlies Spuhler and yes, we are talking about what she has experienced over the last three or four years. Marlies is an undertaker or yes, in a funeral home and that is quite exciting because you get to see, let's say, from the front line how many people die and perhaps from what. I find it very, very exciting to share her perspective, her experiences, her experiences with you here. And yes, Marlies, do you want to say something about yourself and your work and also how you were confronted with these issues? Marlies Spuhler: Yes, it was like this: Yes, I'm Marlies Spuhler, exactly, 42 years old. My husband and I founded an ecological carpentry business with funerals in 2007. And that's how I got involved. My husband has a master carpenter's title and I have a master undertaker's title. Exactly. And yes, and now we've been running our small family business ever since. Sören Schumann: Since 2007, that's about 16 years. Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. Sören Schumann: That means you already have a lot of experience. You can see what's going on outside, also by how much (you) have to do. Marlies Spuhler: Yes, absolutely. Sören Schumann: And yes, how did it all start for you? What were your first experiences or encounters in the area of this plandemic, I have to say? What were your first encounters with it? Marlies Spuhler: Yes, we heard about the whole thing from the news, like everyone else. We didn't notice anything about the deceased at first. In fact, fewer people died in 2020 than in the year before or the years before that. So it was a rather low-mortality year. Sören Schumann: Yes, although it officially started at the end of 2019. So people said: "Hey, now it's really bad!" Marlies Spuhler: Exactly. Sören Schumann: And you said that in 2020 you had a little less to do, so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. We had, well, it varies every year, the number of deaths. And we are here in the village with about 8,000 to 9,000 inhabitants and people say – before 2019 at least, it was still the case that one percent of the village dies every year. That’s roughly the death rate. And it was just like that, and we share the place with another undertaker who has been around longer than us. And in 2019, I think, we had 45, 46 funerals. That’s a lot for a small undertaker like us. And the following year, in 2020, we only had 35. That's really not much. And it was a quiet year. So you could do a lot of private things too. Exactly. And yes, it just didn't match what they said on TV. I always thought: Yes, where are they? Where are they all? And at some point it was the case that in the hospitals it always said that they died with a C. Exactly. That was always on the death certificate. And then at some point we noticed that it was only like that in the hospital. We didn't have that at all with the home pickups. And then we have another undertaker here in our area who is also on the ball. And since then we've been on the phone, or at the beginning we were on the phone almost every day, yes, and just exchanged information about these oddities that we noticed. First of all, the thing with the death certificates in the hospital. We think that was also a priority. There was just a bit more money, yes. Sören Schumann: If that's what it says, so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes, not for us, but for the hospital. Exactly, and yes, it just wasn't normal at home. People died there in a really normal way. And those were the first abnormalities that made us suspicious. Sören Schumann: And you didn't do that alone, you were also in contact with colleagues. Marlies Spuhler: Exactly. Sören Schumann: And they had made similar observations. Marlies Spuhler: They observed it too, yes. Exactly. Sören Schumann: Okay. And so, 2019, to put it into context, 2019 was a normal year, 2020 also had very little to do, even though the very big health crisis was supposedly already well advanced. And then the next chapter probably started in 2021, right? Marlies Spuhler: We really noticed it then. It actually started at the end of 2020. I promised myself at “Facts Peace Freedom” that over the years, you can get confused sometimes. Yes, exactly, they started vaccinating at the end of 2020. And there were only three, four, five days left until the year was over. I don’t remember how often we were in the nursing homes. Well, only in the nursing homes, not at home at all. But we didn’t really think that it could be the injection. Exactly. And yes, that’s how it was. And in January and February it was really bad. I had an intern there who is actually a palliative care doctor, who then wanted to change direction because she had also experienced strange things in her hospital. And then I said, hey, I don’t know yet how many deaths we have. You can never say that in advance. And then it hit so hard. And I was so glad she was there. Because she was older, had a driver's license. She went to the offices with me at the beginning. And then she drove alone. She extended her internship so that she could help me. She said she would only finish her internship when we had finished it because there were so many. And there were really eight or nine deaths a week at the beginning of the year. That was really tough. That was totally unusual. We'd never had that before. We had four or five a week, but not eight or nine. That was really, you really had to make sure you didn't forget anything, document everything precisely. Sören Schumann: You could hardly keep up, so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. That was exciting. And then, spring was just quiet. Where most people normally die, it was just quiet. Nothing was going on, yes. Sören Schumann: It's spring 2021 now, right? Marlies Spuhler: Exactly. It was suddenly very quiet. There was very, very little. One, two, very little. I think we had three weeks in a row where we had nothing at all. And that is really unusual. And we just think that the people with pre-existing conditions, the elderly, those who would normally have died in that period, they simply died earlier, yes. Because of the injection. And yes, and when the treatment for the people with pre-existing conditions began, we noticed it again. Because then we had all the atypical deaths. Just lying dead in bed, yes. Cardiac arrest. Yes, really strange things. We also had deaths. I found that rather scary. They were really bleeding from every pore, yes. That wasn't nice. We've never had that once in 16 years. So really unusual things that happened that hadn't happened before. Sören Schumann: When does the work of an undertaker actually begin? A death is reported. Then probably some otherstill need to be clarified. And when do you come into play? Marlies Spuhler: Well, it depends on where the person dies. In the hospital, the doctor issues the death certificate. And if you die at home, you have to call the doctor home. Some family doctors give out their phone numbers. They then come. Or, or rather, when the doctor's office is closed, you call the on-call service. And then they send the doctor at some point. Provided that the on-call service is busy. I don't know if there will be a new solution now. Because we are reducing the on-call service. Sören Schumann: Okay. Marlies Spuhler: Yes, that's not so nice either. Sören Schumann: Yes. Marlies Spuhler: Exactly. And yes, if the doctor was there and the death certificate doesn't say "cause of death unknown", then we can come. Sören Schumann: Okay. And when is that roughly the case, so that the audience has an idea? Marlies Spuhler: We discuss that with the relatives. The deceased can stay at home for up to 36 hours. Sören Schumann: Ah, okay. Marlies Spuhler: Because many families also use that to say goodbye. After that, the changes occur anyway. And then they don't necessarily want to go to the open coffin. That's understandable. That's fine. It's a different atmosphere at home. But we've also had it happen that we should come straight away. Whether it's three in the morning or whatever, it happens too. But it's less common. Most people actually wait until the morning to call. Sören Schumann: Yes, but that means, as you said, you also noticed clear differences. In the state in which you found the deceased. Marlies Spuhler: Yes, we've experienced that a few times now, that it was so totally unusual with all that blood. Sören Schumann: From the end of 2020 or the beginning of 2021, so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: That was in 2021. Also in 2022. That is what we have experienced more or less in the last two years, or it has been three years already. Yes. And what we are still finding is simply that we sometimes come to the funeral homes, I have already consulted with other undertakers, they also experience this. We sometimes come to the funeral homes, and it seems to us as if the deceased either no longer have rigor mortis at all, or it goes away very quickly, disappears and decomposition sets in straight away. You have to be careful with the laying out of the bodies. Of course, you can no longer guarantee this for as long as you used to. Sören Schumann: How long does rigor mortis usually last? Marlies Spuhler: 48 hours actually. The deceased are usually kept at 5 degrees. Then it's definitely two days. Sören Schumann: And now it's much shorter. That means it could also be because of the gene therapy injections that were used, which also changed things, so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: Well, we're in contact with a group of doctors and other people. And there are some who work a lot with the dark field microscope. I can actually recommend that to everyone. If you know a naturopath or anyone with dark field, get it done. It's very interesting. We did that too. And we were shocked at how full our blood was of heavy metals. And we've been detoxing all this time, taking vitamins regularly and so on. And we're really much better than before. Exactly. And yes, in any case, they've already done various tests, with our own blood, with the different batches and so on. And they also found that the blood was breaking down extremely quickly. And that of course corresponds with the observation that we made. So they explain it in such a way that it can be good that it is just like that. Sören Schumann: Yes. What I think would be interesting is that you have been active in this profession for about 16 years now. And there have been one or two pandemics, so to speak, in the country. Swine flu, bird flu and so on, where similar scenarios were brought up. How did you react when it started, about three or four years ago? What feelings did you have at the time? Or did you already have certain intuitions about what it might be about? Marlies Spuhler: Well, it seemed strange to me from the beginning. Just the way it was set up on TV. So we found out about it from the news. And it was always our mealtime. So we actually always watched the news while we ate. Sören Schumann: Maybe not the best idea. Marlies Spuhler: No. Aso we stopped that a long time ago. Yes, and we actually had a bad feeling at the beginning because we didn't know what was coming. But it quickly passed, simply through the experiences we had at work. We saw that the hospitals apparently just wanted to cash in because it was only there. And strangely enough, nobody died at home. And the pandemics before that, our district was never affected. Yes, so there was nothing there either. I think they were experiments that went wrong, I don't know. Now they just couldn't enforce it anymore. I don't know. Yes, so for us it definitely only started when the injections started. So before that everything was quiet, normal. Sometimes it was more, sometimes less. Sören Schumann: Yes. It's also very interesting, you've said twice now that you didn't notice anything at the beginning and only the hospital deaths were given this label. The suspicion, the suspicion is there, that there are financial interests behind it. It wouldn't be the first time, so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: We have been told by families - I don't want to name anyone here - but they were actually offered money by the wards, by the doctor, if they could put the Covid entry in there. I think that's really pretty crazy. I think that's already a criminal offense here. What should you actually do here? It's manipulation, offering people money. I could imagine that many people accepted it, even if you don't have anything to spare. I really think that nobody said anything, nobody took action against it, I think that's crazy. Sören Schumann: Yes, this, let's say, framing is often interpreted in a way that suits it, or where there are certain interests or certain advantages for the person who does it. For example, if someone has had a gene therapy injection and perhaps suffered certain damage, then it is very difficult for this to be recognized, because of course nobody is really interested in being held liable for it. Or the doctor may then also be held responsible. On the other hand, if I can put the Corona stamp on people when they are dead, i.e. if I write there, and earn something from it, then of course some people will at least be happy to use it. And what has already come through very clearly is that in the beginning, although it was a huge health crisis, fewer people died, at least not more. And then with the big cure, which was touted, which was pushed through in a very special approval process, where all the alarm bells were already ringing, so to speak, but which was then done anyway, the death rates went up. It's also paradoxical, because it was actually supposed to protect or help. Marlies Spuler: We actually had a case where it actually said: "died of C". And the man went 14 days after the third vaccination, so a third time, so to speak - and yes, - he died and was already over 80. And he was really, yes, sick, tested positive and then died from it. And that was the only one we had with "from C", yes, as the reason. They don't actually have to write it down. It's enough if they tick the box next to infectious. But that wasn't done here. It seems that it was important here that it was always stated what it was. Sören Schumann: Yes. Marlies Spuhler: I don't know. Yes. Sören Schumann: Very interesting. So you're talking about the doctors who go to the deceased at home, so to speak. Yes. Okay. Marlies Spuhler: But the man was also in the hospital, then. He was still on a ventilator and so on. He just doesn't have it. Sören Schumann: Yes. And what have you noticed in the social sector? I mean, you're probably in contact with the families, with those affected. You certainly pick up a lot of things there. Marlies Spuhler: Well, before that, we had deaths. They wanted to see proof from me. And I have proof of immunity. We had that done. We actually had Corona at the beginning of 2020, we just didn't know it. Then a year and a half later, we had it confirmed through the blood test that we had done, and we then got this immunity certificate through "Evidence of Reason" [citizens' initiative]. In many cases, it was also recognized. Still testing and so on. We always did that as a precaution before we went to theCustomers are that they are reassured if they want to see it. We have the piece of paper and that's it. Exactly. So that was one. I have to say. With this campaign, we noticed that this division that affects this society, which was played out at the local bar or at the family table. This was actually reflected in the grieving families. There were accusations like: "... because he wasn't vaccinated, he died. It's your fault, because none of you are." And then family members stayed away from the funeral. And I actually thought that was a shame. How suddenly this topic accompanied everything. The only thing that mattered was whether you were (vaccinated) or not. I'm just talking so strangely now, because people are trying to get around the censorship a little bit. Yes. That people still understand what I'm getting at. Exactly. And I think that's a shame, because you can actually still feel it. Somehow people can't find a way to get along anymore, and when it's all about dividing the inheritance, they might end up arguing. We've seen that before. But now it was already happening before. Where people are excluded from funerals if possible, so that they don't even find out that this person or that person has died. But if someone loses their mother or father, then I have to say. I don't call them, but if they call me and ask, then of course I say yes. I can't say: I'm not allowed to say anything because my sister doesn't want me to or something. I actually think that's the worst thing. [...] Sören Schumann: So have you noticed any changes? That at the beginning you were even attacked strongly or that people said: Hey, yes, it's so bad with this virus. And were afraid of it and that then maybe things changed a bit, that it was perhaps also because of the injection that the people died. Marlies Spuler: We have that now. People don't speak to me directly during the bereavement conversation, but mostly when we have the second or third contact. Sören Schumann: So the bereavement conversation is basically the first conversation? Marlies Spuler: The first contact, so to speak, yes. Well, not the first contact, but yes, exactly, the first conversation that you have, where you discuss everything. You always have to see what kind of situation the relatives are in now? Can you talk to them about everything? I always leave a pad there with a few things written on it that they then have to think about. These are then arrangements, funeral ceremonies and things like that. Exactly. And that hasn't been addressed yet. But I've had the case several times now, when I go there for the second or third time, and then they say, oh, Ms. Spuhler. And then they either know my videos, my interviews. They then speak to me directly and say that they think it's so great that I dare to tell the truth. And then they tell me their suspicions. I often hear: "If my wife hadn't been ... (vaccinated) ... she would still be alive." Or: "Since the second time, my mom has been feeling worse." Or: "Since the third time, it was foreseeable for my dad." So I'm hearing it more and more often now. And especially with the middle-aged, I'll put it this way, it's difficult to estimate, they'll all be between 40 and 60. They'll notice it now. And they also say quite clearly: "So we - never again." And then you hear how many there are in families where either the whole family isn't (vaccinated) at all. So that still happens. Or there's actually someone in every family who really went through with it, who said: "You won't get me!" So there are more than you think. Even if we are told here that the vaccination rate is so and so high, I don't believe that. I think there are more of us. We just didn't know each other at the beginning. We felt pretty alone. We also thought, oh God, are we the only ones here now. We tried to warn everyone at the beginning. We had the experience at the beginning of January, February. And we said: "Hey guys, don't go there. Lots of people die here." So even with that and with facts... - you could see it. Where were they all, the people who died from Corona? There weren't any there. You couldn't calm them down with facts. In the end, they even demanded that all this crap be approved. They were happy as a cure, as a miracle cure in the end. And I think it's a shame that so many people don't question it anymore. Where has the awareness of health gone?ndheit? We have an ecological carpentry shop. The majority of our customers are either ecological or vegan or whatever. They generally live a healthy lifestyle. We oil the cupboards with natural oil. But when they see the dirt, they run to the doctor. We don't understand it. They let it go. When it comes to food, they make sure that it is definitely not genetically modified. Sören Schumann: They get themselves gene-treated... Marlies Spuhler: I don't know. So that's something we've never really been able to understand. What happened in people's heads is that they simply put aside this critical thinking and blindly trust everything that is happening right now. Have they all lost their gut feeling? [...] Marlies Spuhler: It's not like we do a job that is so omnipresent, right? If an undertaker warns you, then you should really take it seriously. I never understood why people still... Sören Schumann: What were the reactions like? So when you said: Hey, this and that is said, but we experienced it the other way around. When you said that to someone, how did people react? Marlies Spuhler: Yes, they listened to it and then the next time you met them, they were (vaccinated). It had already happened. Even though you had more or less warned them beforehand. Sören Schumann: And you said that now it is partly the case that people are realizing that perhaps it was not the right choice that they made. That they are now making certain connections. Was there perhaps a development from: Not at all at the beginning... And then now you say that perhaps people are now making certain connections several times. Was that also a certain development over time? Marlies Spuhler: Yes, absolutely. Absolutely. At the beginning they didn't see it. We have had deaths before. There are also brave doctors. They write down death by third party (vaccination). And then there is an autopsy by the police. Sören Schumann: Was it like that, if it says that, there is an autopsy? Marlies Spuhler: Yes, then it is confiscated. That is an unnatural death. Sören Schumann: If it says death by injection, then... Marlies Spuhler: Yes, it is unnatural. Exactly. And then an autopsy is carried out, but by the criminal investigation department, the police. And we had, in one special case, the relatives had their appointment with the doctor on Friday for the booster. Exactly. And the autopsy was on Wednesday. And then they just waited for the result. And all that came out was cardiac arrest. The connection was not investigated. Yes, they went for the (vaccination) on Friday, yes, and got the next shot. That's just how it was. Yes, and in the beginning it was more like that, they trusted the whole thing, of course. And if you said the opposite, then "oh well". And you might have heard one or two conversations like that in your circle of friends. I've often heard: I trust the government, it was elected by the people. Yes, and they don't believe that the government wanted to do anything bad to the people. What do you want, you're no use anymore. Yes, and we can't compete with the doctors who are for it, who support the whole thing. We don't stand a chance. As a patient, you trust your doctor. Yes, and apparently they are somehow above us. Sören Schumann: And were there certain events where it developed in the other direction? Or was it a very gradual process from: "Yes, I trust him and he has definitely died of the virus now," to: "Yes, this gene therapy could..., that would probably have been the reason," right? Marlies Spuhler: You notice, as I said, we really do watch it ourselves. We have everything that is paid for by the GEZ, we don't watch it anymore. We avoid it consistently because we simply don't want to be bombarded with that nonsense. But you notice what was going on outside on the street when you talk to people. Because they always say the same thing, or reflect what they heard there. And people are also in contact with each other. And now, when someone says: "Hey, I've been feeling so bad since then," then the next person dares to do it too. And that is also a process. You have noticed that now. More and more people dare to come out and say: "Yes, I'm unhappy with it," plus the experiences that families have with deaths. So many families are affected more than once. Yes, they have buried five of their family members in the last two years. So if theyI don't know why they don't understand it yet. Sören Schumann: But there are probably some who still say: "Yeah, okay." Marlies Spuhler: Not them. The lady said: "Definitely never again." So she is also firmly convinced that it is because of the whole thing. Because it simply can't be true, yes. And two of her siblings, neither of whom was yet 70, yes. One not 60, the other not 70, and both parents in their early 80s. So somewhere... Yes, especially when you talk about a life expectancy of, I don't know, supposedly, yes. And suddenly everyone is dying. That can't be true, right. And they see that now. As I said, I hear that more and more often. If my wife hadn't been there (for vaccination), she would still be alive, yes. Or since the third, fourth, fifth, depending on how many, things have gone downhill, right. Although most people actually say: things have been going downhill since the third one. I think if you go more often now, that's just my personal opinion, right. Then you'll feel even worse. Sören Schumann: Let's talk about the timeline and the numbers again. So a quick summary again. In 2020 it was very quiet, less than before. It started at the end of 2020. You can also see a temporal connection to the injection programs. In 2021 it was definitely significantly more than... . . Marlies Spuhler: That was a lot of fun. Sören Schumann: Excuse me? Marlies Spuhler: That was a lot of fun from 2021 onwards. Sören Schumann: In 2021 it really was a lot of fun. And what happened in the years after that? 2022, 2023? Marlies Spuhler: So in 2022 it was also tough. Until 2022, so 2021, 2022, we always noticed the correlation. Yes. So it was always about two weeks later that things took off. And now it's 2023. . . Sören Schumann: So two weeks after an injection. . . Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes, exactly. And now it's 2023 [...] it seems to be leveling out again. We actually had the most deaths again this year in spring and autumn. Although I have to say again that for us this year it really started again on September 28th, yes, when a lot of people died. And on September 18th was the start again, right, they started again. Sören Schumann: It started, there was an official recommendation, so to speak, from... Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, and we also know from friends, from acquaintances who work for doctors, who are medical assistants or something, and the appointment books were full. Yes, people were already waiting to be able to, yes, refresh their appointments. And there it was the same, as I said, it was exactly ten days again, as it started with us. And what is striking now is that the older society is catching up again. I then notice that that was the focus. Because we have a lot of people now in their 30s, where they were born, in the 30s, where everyone... Which is not immediately unusual. Old people just die, especially when you are 90. Don't get that wrong. But it is striking again, as I said: 18 (September) was the start. 28th (September) that's when it started. And now things are calming down. Sören Schumann: And you can probably see it in the state of the deceased, as you said at the beginning. Marlies Spuhler: Unfortunately you can see it. Many of them have this grey, very grey, pale face. It's unnatural. Not what a deceased person normally looks like. And the others are also bright yellow. We have lots of yellow ones, yes. Sören Schumann: Yellow, does that have something to do with the liver? Marlies Spuhler: In the group of doctors we are part of, many have said that this spike protein tends to accumulate in the liver. And that is what causes this yellow appearance. I can only report what I have heard. I'm already out of that. It's not my area of expertise anymore. But I have observed it and the decomposition is still going on. This autolysis starts much earlier. We pick up a lot of people who have only died a day ago. And you can't touch them because you might accidentally pull the skin off or something. And that shouldn't happen. Not after a day, yes. And they don't all get cortisone and chemotherapy or something like that. That would be a reason why. No, they died under normal circumstances, I'll call them normal circumstances. And yet the condition is still like that. That can't really be true. Not with this frequency. As I said, it has always happened. Someone who has had chemotherapy for three months or more and died as a result, the decomposition starts at the same time.eich. We don't need to talk about it. It's extremely exhausting for the body. But people die without chemotherapy. Or without having received high doses of cortisone or something else. Or some kind of morphine. Like, who knows what you get there. Yes, and that's very noticeable. And we still see that. And the stupid thing is, they have the burial, which is stupid, I don't know yet whether that's good or bad. They've increased the burial period to ten days. Before, it was seven. Since the start of the pandemic. And that's a problem for us, of course. Especially with burials. When the funeral is only a week later. And that includes laying out the body. You really have to check whether the coffin isn't closed earlier. It's just a different kind of communication that takes place now than before. Sören Schumann: Because of the appearance of the deceased. Marlies Spuhler: Yes, exactly. You can't expect the relatives to put up with that anymore. Sören Schumann: Yes, that means you also communicate: "Hey, if you want to see the person again now, you have to do it by this time, because otherwise it's no longer reasonable," so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. There are also smells and so on. We can get rid of them on a large scale, I'll say now, yes. But at some point they'll come back anyway. The decomposition can't be stopped except through thanatopractic [thanatopraxia or thanatopraxis includes all activities in the funeral industry that are necessary beyond hygienic care of the dead in order to ensure that the deceased is laid out in an aesthetically and hygienically perfect manner] treatment. But nobody does that. It's only done for transfers abroad. Or Michael Jackson or anyone who is laid out for a longer period of time. Exactly. Otherwise it doesn't make sense. [...] Sören Schumann: You said that a few months ago, when the official recommendations were made again, it started again. Where do you think things are going? Well, you once said that some people have already woken up and are questioning it. But you still notice clearly that when recommendations are made to inject, the number of deaths increases. Where do you think things are going? What are you preparing for, in your job too? Marlies Spuhler Well, I just bought a few things to be on the safe side, because you just can't predict where the whole thing is going. I hope, of course, that people will stop running there at some point. That would be a possibility. What I think is a shame is our older society, which can't defend itself. Especially the people who are in nursing homes. If you don't have children who are on the ball, then you are completely at the mercy of the whole thing. There's nothing you can do about it. And I think that's a shame. Because right now, when you notice, let's put it this way, that people are demanding that things be dealt with, even if the other side isn't doing it that way. Or when reports, like the MDR, for example, had a report on the side effects of vaccinations last Tuesday. I thought that was very brave. Of course, not everything was said, it would have been too much for normal citizens. But it has already been taken down from the media library. I think it's a shame that you can't watch it anymore. Where does the explanation start? Why, what are they afraid of? Yes, they made a mistake. But they have to own up to it and not try to wriggle out of it somehow and carry on like that just because they're stuck on so many doses. Yes, enough billions have already been wasted on other things. Yes, then it doesn't matter whether it's the same with this one. So what? And yes, a review would be incredibly important. I have an incredible amount of grief. Oh, how do you want to give people back the denied farewell or the bereavement support when they weren't allowed to be there? Yes, even the farewell in the crematorium or the accompanied cremation? All of that was forbidden. Or the best friend wasn't even allowed to go to the funeral because they were excluded. Sören Schumann: You mean in general or for people who didn't have a certain status? Marlies Spuhler: Yes, you had to be part of the close family circle to be able to attend the funeral. And that wasn't possible. Only then, when the testing requirement and so on came about, did 3 or 2 G apply in the cemetery, depending. And yes, the processing would be important. The people simply had a very important part taken away from them. And especially when the bond is close. So that means the great-grandchild was actually already allowed tono longer go to the great-grandmother's funeral. But it could just as well be that the great-grandchild was only with the great-grandmother for the first three or four years of his life. And then there is a strong bond there. And I can't then say to him, no, you can't come. Yes, how is the child ever supposed to get over this grief properly or have a proper development of grief? I mean, you are often confronted with grief at some point. We are experienced people at saying goodbye. We say goodbye every day. You mustn't forget that. But this goodbye forever is something different. I think that's a shame. And I think it's a shame that people are still holding back the truth. And something is going on. Everything has been different since 2021. It's just like that. Everything is different. And what is different? Only one thing has been introduced differently. Sören Schumann: So it's not actually that difficult to solve the equation, so to speak. Marlies Spuhler: No, exactly. It's a completely normal, simple math problem. And if you can't figure that out, well, I don't know. I mean, slowly... And I just think that our politicians can't shirk this responsibility. And it doesn't help if you just resign or do something else. No, I think they should be dragged to court now. What they're doing is mass murder in my opinion! You really have to use that word. Sören Schumann: Sounds like a strong word, a big accusation. But if you really look at it in detail, then you really should think about it. Marlies Spuhler: Yes, I think, as I said, but that's not meant to be an excuse. But it just brought a lot of people forward (with early deaths). They would probably have died in the near future anyway. Especially the older ones. They often have a lot of illnesses already. And that just made it worse. That's not meant to be an excuse for them having to go early. But I think there are enough other people who would still be alive if they hadn't let the stuff get to them. Yes, really. And I just don't think that's right. And they should justify it. We also filed a criminal complaint in Karlsruhe. We took part in it. And I can really only recommend that to everyone. We did a bit of advertising on the side. You can download the card from ZAAVV, Z -A -A -V -V [Center for the Investigation, Clarification, Legal Prosecution and Prevention of Crimes Against Humanity]. You can fill it out. You can submit it to the Federal Court of Justice. So I can only say to everyone, take part! And I think they should be prosecuted. And especially our Mr Lauterbach, who talks so much rubbish, yes, as Minister of Health, honestly. It has nothing to do with health. For me he's a Minister of Disease. Sören Schumann: Yes, you don't know whether to laugh or cry. Cry more likely. Marlies Spuhler: Yes, I mean, I have never personally attacked politicians. I have always held back. But yes, when you see what is happening here. Yes, to be honest. Then you have to do something. And people shouldn't just accept everything. That can't be right! I never understand that. Where has all the fighting spirit gone? [...] Sören Schumann: Maybe for you personally. What have the last three years been like? What have you learned for yourself? When did you realise something? Or what do you say: Hey, that has become very clear to me again? Marlies Spuhler: Well, that's how it is for me now, or generally for our family. We have learned to be critical of everything. And not to rely on statements from individuals. And always to convince ourselves first. So I generally only believe what I see live. Not even here on TV or something. We know today that everything can be staged. Yes, this thinking a little bit for yourself, doing a little research yourself. What could be true about all this? To mention some positive aspects: we have never had any problems with the lockdown or anything. We have always seen everything in a positive light. It was actually pleasant. There was nothing going on on the streets. People had to keep their distance when shopping. If you had an appointment with the doctor, you had to call, you were seen straight away. You didn't have to wait. So you have to take the positive things out of it all. And what I don't want to miss at all are all the people I have met in the three years now. I think even before the miracle cure came along, you could already tell that C (Corona) had asimply showed the true character of people. And then you saw how many people you were actually mistaken about. How many people basically present an image to the outside world that they are not at all like on the inside. And in the last three years, through the reorientation, the people you have met, and it is just like that. I am much, much better now than I was at the beginning. Well, definitely. And we are not afraid at all anymore. We have completely got rid of that. So we don't let anything throw us off track anymore. Unless someone goes straight to the family or something. Exactly. But I am really proud of the people we know now. ... [...] Sören Schumann: Would you like to say anything to people at the end? [...] Marlies Spuhler: Well, I would just like to say something to everyone. Don't always believe everything that is said out there. Convince yourself. Don't forget to be self-critical. Yes, generally critical of everything. And just look for people like you. […] And if we are strong and stick together, nothing will happen to us. I believe that very firmly. Sören Schumann: OK, nice closing words and thank you for your efforts, dear Marlies. I hope that we can reach a lot of people. There were a lot of exciting things there. I was able to learn a lot too. And thank you for your courage and your efforts.
from Anne G./ag
UN https://www.un.org/en/countering-disinfor
mationhttps://unric.org/de/bekaempfung-von-desinformation/ WEF https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/welt/wirtschaft/wef-falschinformationen-ki-globale-krise-100.html
EU https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/de/policies/online-disinformation
Frankreich https://legitim.ch/gruseliger-gesetzesentwurf-die-franzoesische-regierung-will-alternativmediziner-und-verschwoerungstheoretiker-wegsperren/
https://actu.fr/societe/complotisme-medecines-alternatives-les-signalements-pour-derives-sectaires-ont-explose-en-2021_54952920.html
https://www.miviludes.interieur.gouv.fr/quest-ce-quune-d%C3%A9rive-sectaire
https://www.senat.fr/leg/pjl23-111.html?s=08
Deutschland https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/schwerpunkte/umgang-mit-desinformation/was-ist-desinformation-1875148
https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/20/097/2009737.pdf
Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung empfiehlt Corona-Impfung https://www.infektionsschutz.de/coronavirus/schutzimpfung/impfung-gegen-covid-19/
Bestatterin packt aus YT-Kurzversion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FSozTM2mwk
Langversion unter: https://soeren-schumann.com/marlies-spuhler-bestatterin-packt-aus-jetzt-kommt-alles-ans-licht/