Right Answers Versus Right Questions (by Ivo Sasek)

22.04.2026 | www.kla.tv/41050

[Speaker:] On March 14, 2026, Kla.TV founder Ivo Sasek hosted an international resonance meeting with all volunteer contributors from Kla.TV, AZK and the OCG. The following excerpts from Sasek's speech must not remain insider knowledge for the sake of their significance and topicality. May his impulses also find resonance in all free educators and multiply the joint impact in bringing light into the darkness. [Ivo:] Now I'm going to talk about the big picture. Black or white, they say. It is right or wrong, it is truth or a lie. And when people don't live in the truth, and you hit them at the point where you convict them of lying, they come up with the saying: "You're always so black and white. There are also a lot of different colors in between in life." Just so they don't have to admit it: I lied, I cheated, I broke unity, I didn't play in the team but went my own way and so on. And we do not even contradict this glorious realization that there is not just black and white. But it is still important to trace the one great central theme, in precisely this time of ours and in this hour where we have arrived at. Right now! This central theme indeed however, in its sum, represents the unbroken color black. You understand? And in spite of the devil's black-and-white trimmings, it is all the more important to follow the one spirit of life. And this one spirit of life in turn represents the undivided color white. That's how it works in practice, right? And only when this clear black-and-white problem, which currently dominates everything, has arrived in people's consciousness will we move on to the secondary problems or the color subtones. The different colors are subtones, let's call them minor problems. First of all, the really blatant ones have to be dealt with. So we keep the current black-and-white-main problem unwaveringly in focus until the spirit's working in us turns to the variety of colors in the subordinate world problems. Now pay close attention to what we are talking about now. That is a basic key, a principle. You can hunt for answers or ask the right questions. You can concentrate on the answers or on asking the right questions. You know? We are still partly completely wrongly conditioned in this respect. For example, we are always eager to find the even more correct answers to current issues. Something like this: Is the earth globe-shaped or is it flat after all? We are looking for answers. Do we live on or in the globe? And from this persistent, not to say dogged, search for the right or more correct answers, we sooner or later will bang our heads because this is a principle. Why is that? It's quite simple. Because we are bombarded with a thousand answers in the form of arguments that try to convince us that the earth is globe-shaped. And then we are bombarded with another thousand answers and opposing voices, arguments that try even more to convince us that the earth is flat. So as long as we are only doggedly looking for answers, we will continue to be separated further and further – as a principle. I said, as a principle. An undivided victory for those who have chosen "divide and conquer" as their war strategy. So, instead of spending another thousand years or so digging for even better and more conclusive answers, we should finally agree on first learning to ask the right questions – together. And now I'm asking: What would be the right question with regard to the world view concerning the earth, for example? The right question, and the one to be insisted on, which all disagreeing parties should ask together is: Why has NASA demonstrably faked all space pictures? Can you see the difference? We don't answer their questions, we ask questions that we won't let go of anymore. Why can NASA openly admit that there is not a single real picture of the earth from space? Why do these people get away with the terse and completely unsatisfactory explanation that this is just the way it has to be? With regard to 9/11, the common relentless question - I always emphasize relentless, we never stop asking the same question: Why is there still no investigation and public explanation as to why WTC 7 collapsed? Why is there never a capitulation when there is proof that all the claims are 100% physically impossible? Such as a few thousand liters of aviation fuel can pulverize 120,000 tons of concrete? Why, why? Always ask this question. In view of medicine, such as the vaccination issue, the common, right question must be: Why are the tens of millions of proven vaccine injuries not being publicly documented and investigated? So it's not just an all-time search for ever more right answers, for example how much a vaccination will help now, does it help, does it not help? A little more, a little less? Is this one any good or the other one no good at all? Is this one more dangerous than that one? You know? Is this one more dangerous than that one? You know? These answers distract us. But why is this not being investigated, since there are innumerable vaccination studies that have proven this? - That is the right question, which must always be kept alive. Instead of arguing in vain about a thousand such contradictory answers, we should therefore only collectively prioritize the following question: Why the hell are these thousands of elaborate vaccination studies by highly professional people and luminaries in their fields still being categorically suppressed and concealed? With regard to the mobile phone problem, we also need to stop always looking for the same answers: Whether mobile phone radiation, WiFi, etc., is or is it not harmful to health. I'm not saying we should stop doing this. I'm just saying we need to prioritize. It's not wrong, all these answers - that's what we're doing all the time. But now we see how this is increasingly turning into a battle because the enemy is presenting us with counter-answers. But here he is checkmated if we get on the right track. If we not only discuss these answers on how much it harms health, but recognize this perennial striving for ever similar answers as a wedge coming between us and dividing us even more and more. However, if all parties together stick to the one far more important question which is why also in this field thousands of elaborate studies are simply blindly being swept under the carpet – then all will become much more interesting and clear and therefore more uniform. You understand? Only always sitting on this one question, because it has not yet been answered. So not always looking for new answers – just because the other party doesn't answer this one question, and so we keep going. That's the same mistake as when I used to think that because people haven't changed, I still need to preach better. And at the end I realized that the very first sermon was the best. But they didn't put it into practice. And that's why the problems didn't stop. And I'm trying to preach better and still better, but all it takes is one thing: to finally do what the first one said. Period. It's the same thing. So also with regard to the mobile phone problem, the right question that constantly needs to be focused on and asked is: Why do all these studies not find their way into our governments? Why just as little into the formation of public opinion, on TV, radio, in the press and the like? Why are high-ranking scientists consistently muzzled and their work abandoned to futility? These are the right questions we should be asking relentlessly on all sides! And as soon as we are focused on the right questions, we can of course also point out resulting consequences. When it comes to the thousands of proven dangers of mobile communications, we in Switzerland now have perhaps the last opportunity to rub our parliament's noses in this issue. According to the Kla.TV program shown in the back (www.kla.tv/40532), our Swiss Federal Council wants to completely abolish and ban the right to object to radiation emissions. And if we allow this, mobile network operators can generate or amplify radiation and equip antennas with new technologies as they wish without prior examination and approval. And that is why the "Protection from Radiation" association is urgently calling for action now. It wants to collect over 10,000 signatures in three months. But let me tell you something: this collecting of signatures makes a mockery of the right question to ask! You understand? Another 10,000 signatures - and then submit them to the Federal Council ... But I say, let's do so. Let's definitely take part in this campaign too, even if it is a slap in the face to the right question at first. But I propose the following: We should inundate the Federal Council with letters that first ask them the right question already mentioned. And then directly accuse them of involuntary manslaughter if they continue to willfully conceal the thousands of high-quality studies. You see? We need to make it clear to the Federal Council that – if these studies are right – they are committing direct genocide. That's how it has to sound and it must not leave the minds of the people out there anymore. Not always new discussions about "Is this level still dangerous or not dangerous?" You know, always going deeper and deeper, this is the real problem. It's proven, period. It's genocide when you do it. And in any case, if they ban it afterwards, so you can no longer object. We must make it clear to the Federal Council that we will continue to prosecute them until they receive their rightful punishment for this horrendous crime. Please let us tackle this, because our state is deeply involved in conflicts of interest here. Why? Because they are in direct trade with mobile network operators. Our state makes its money from it. The Federal Council also has to be blamed for this entanglement as a criminal offense in this context. But now back to today's topics and the right questions. Let us work on extracting the common right questions from the presentations we are hearing today. For me, these are the resonance rounds where we penetrate to the right questions. In other words, this day must not be misused for the sole purpose of striving for more and more definitive answers or to conjure up such answers solely because of the tricky sub-topics presented today. So, the subsequent resonance part of today's meeting is not intended to add even more fuel to the fire of the divide-and-rule strategists. Instead, we will look for the common resonance in the questions we feel together to be the right ones. And then we will go out again and start implementing these questions in public until they have reached every single citizen of this world. And at this point I would really like to take it to the extreme and say: The more divided we might be with regard to any topic or problem mentioned today, the more we should strive for the common, unified, right question! All the more! So that wherever we find ourselves least, we would achieve the greatest breakthrough and mutate into the greatest breakthrough-power. And why is that? Because today we are consciously learning how to put an end to the constant hunt for the right answers in order to set new priorities together in the future. And what are these? They are how you as divided people keep asking the right questions that will bestow on us the breakthrough on all sides and promote us to a constructive unity. I would now like to give a few examples, practical ones, across our Kla.TV main fields of topic. Just so we have a bit of a thought pattern imprinted on our thinking. These are no absolute examples, but they help to find the track. Instead of looking for more and more answers, for example on how many genders there are – of course we don't do that, but I'll take that as a crude example – whether there are two or 64 or even more genders ... with all this back and forth, we are just asking the far more overriding general question: Who exactly created this kind of questions with all their divisive potential in the first place? And we will come to the realization together, which can then be proven: it was satanic high-degree freemasonry. Or let's go to the topic of the pharma sickness trade, medicine. Instead of continuing looking for a thousand answers as to which medicine is the best, we are asking the far more overriding, general question: Who is actually behind this, categorically banning and misrepresenting any form of alternative and far cheaper medicine that has even been witnessed to be more effective? And we will collectively and uniformly find out that satanic high-degree freemasonry is behind it. You understand? After all, the latter has not only infiltrated and introduced all the chemicals into the healthcare system, but has also chosen trade from illness as their basic business model. I'll give you two formulas: The firmly committed staying with uniform questions should end the hunt for divisive answers! Second formula: A few limited, uniform questions should take the place of numerous and endless answers! One last example from science and technology on that. When we think of the countless suppressed inventions, we should not strive for more and more answers regarding even more suppressed inventions. That too, that too, that too – it's endless. There are tens of thousands of them. Instead, we should keep asking the question: Who is it that suppresses high-level inventions? Why does he or they do this? And again, we can find the epicenter of the issue within our new freemasonry encyclopedia. Do you see where all this is aimed at? Lois has already pointed this out well – that's where the main threads run together, that's where we'll find each other. Because that is what you can prove today. And if you have this basis of what kind of people they are, these are people no one likes. No one likes people who worship the devil, who sacrifice children, and who offer peoples as sacrifice to their boss, Satan, their devil! Do you see? Nobody likes that! That you go to war for them, so they could offer a worthy sacrifice... And if these people are behind all the other issues, and we can ask the right questions, I say: you'll get quite many on your side. And these are the people who are currently driving us to war. I would like to emphasize again the initial statement regarding the axiom [= principle recognized as correct]. There is always and in everything one common path of life, peace, freedom and strength. Here's another formula: even above all divisive answers, overarching questions exist that unite us. That is such an axiom, the content of an axiom that we should hold on to. Must hold on to! That's the only way to get through. Even above all divisive answers, there are overarching questions uniting us. And that is a principle. If we observe it collectively and put it into practice faithfully, we will always be able to triumph over all divisive elements. Another formula: a divisive, wrong answer cannot stand up to a unified, right question just as darkness cannot stand up to light. I repeat: a divisive, wrong answer cannot stand up to a unified, right question just as darkness cannot stand up to light. You see, these are weapons of light that we are handing out here. With regard to chemtrails, there are countless answers today about the degree of their harmfulness. How harmful are chemtrails now? Suddenly everyone is discussing: Do they really contain these substances or not? But the far more overarching and unifying, joint, right questions are: Why was it claimed in public for decades that chemtrails do not exist at all? Why were all those who uncovered their existence branded as liars, babblers and conspiracy theorists? Why have they never been publicly rehabilitated after the whole scam was exposed? Who exactly is behind this whole smear story? These are the right questions regarding chemtrails. And the only correct answer to this question is: satanic high-degree freemasonry with its military and depopulation plans! You understand? Even with regard to the current Epstein files, it should not just continue to be about the hunt for the right answers. For example, this or that person also testify as eyewitnesses that there are more than just a few individual perpetrators behind it, or also these new voices testify that a global network of highly pedophile world leaders are behind it. Do you understand what I'm saying? You can always add another person and another claim, then the other person says: "Ah, that's him again, he's just a faker anyway!" Then it's back to the place of all such and similar answers. I'm not saying they're wrong. I'm not saying that we should basically stop doing it, you know? I'm just saying where the journey leads us, where we maintain unity, where we remain firm, where we achieve a breakthrough: not on this answer track, but on the question track! So all such and similar answers should urgently be replaced by this one right and important question that unites us all: What is behind the redacted lines of these three million pages? Only this one thing is decisive: a comprehensive disclosure of the Epstein files. I want to know what's behind it, something is blacked out, something is wrong, ok? And then all the other things are completely self-explanatory. Not we have to explain, they have explained it themselves. And you know what we're praying: You betray yourselves, you destroy yourselves! The same questions must also irrevocably be asked regarding the RKI protocols until they are properly disclosed and dealt with and answered in front of the whole world. You know? But you see, the devil's trick is to hold his breath – they just don't do anything! The government does nothing, and then you come along with all the powerlessness, the judiciary does nothing, nobody does anything! And now time is running out, what should we do, what should we do? Instead of continuing asking the same question and even louder and more, always the same question, always the same question – what do we do? We are looking for new answers. We stick to this one question, even if it is not answered. Then we get louder and louder and louder until the last person in the world has heard it and wants to know: What is actually behind it? Professionally treated. And what are the consequences of the entire Covid story which was clearly a politically driven plandemic? These are the questions. Why are the true connections that have been established and brought to light not being made public? Who is not disclosing them etc.? Who exactly is behind it? ...high-degree freemasonry. Because in their hands are the pharmaceutical giants as well as the WHO and all the key players in our healthcare system and, of course, all significant mass media. But it must become clear through the questions we ask, without letting go. In the future, entire lists of such right and synergizing questions will have to be compiled as a catalogue, always linked to the right question: Why is all this not getting through to humanity? And the right answer that needs to be constantly focused on will always be: Because the media converge in the hands of the high-degree freemasons. It must ring in humanity's ears so that they realize: These people, it's these people and they are in here, they are in here and they are in here. And you see, that is a small circle in relation to the entire world population. It is a negligible circle that is pulling all these strings together here. That's why there is a huge opportunity, if we don't move away from the right questions, that we can convert the world community to our questions, win them over to ask the same question and not let go until this right one question is answered. The one that matters, not answering thousands of questions that don't break through in no way and keep dividing us. So, the principally right knowledge in everything will be: As soon as an octopus feels threatened, it releases its cloud of ink, which it uses to perfectly camouflage its position. Yes, we know this from experience. As soon as you catch it, it goes "shh...", then you don't know where it is. It goes under a stone, goes down there - and the next second it comes out from behind there. Because it makes these quick turns in the cloud, and then it's in a completely different place. That's the camouflage. That is the confusion. In practical terms, this means: Whenever these misanthropes feel threatened, they come up with or create a new catastrophe. These are Plan B, Plan C – as they are called in practice – which are intended to distract people from the right questions. Because a properly asked question is the harpoon arrow, right in front of its head! Do you understand? We must therefore condition humanity to stubbornly stick to the right questions. It makes no difference whether the satanist enemies of mankind are currently conjuring up an Armageddon or not. That's what matters, you know? That's the key: fix on the right question until it's through! This is the only way to ensure that the right questions, which carry the fuel of unity, will reach the outermost members of society. We have experienced it in various ways during the corona plandemic. Because we firmly stuck to the right questions, the octopus had to let go of its prey during the plandemic. That's it. And hidden under a cloud of ink, take up this new position. And as tragic as it sounds, this new position was the Ukraine-Russia conflict, and still is. But I said at the time: now we're sticking to it all the more, even if the war is raging! I will say it again now, even if an Armageddon should befall the world: we will not let go of these questions. We will return to them again and again and again, war or no war. Do you understand the difference? There is nothing easier than in the war forgetting everything that was before and just getting confused and reoriented in the new playing field, the secondary playing field, starting from scratch. There is nothing easier. But the other thing is the most important. And as I said, this war had to stand in its place. And in the current one, too, we must therefore never turn away from the originally rightly asked questions. Now, as far as the war is concerned over there. It is still not a question of which regions should belong to Ukraine or Russia in the future. The right question, which must always be asked, must still be: Who instigated and fomented this conflict from the root? Who exactly benefits from this entire conflict in the end? ... The fellows and vassals of satanic high-degree freemasonry! Because the entire war machinery and the entire national claims rest in their hands and intentions. That's how it is, this can be proven. And the majority of humanity is incessantly striving for superficial and therefore divisive answers instead of the deeper, fundamental and therefore unifying, right questions. So, the aim and core of today's harmonization rounds therefore lie solely in working out mutual, overarching issues. Not in picking out even better detailed answers that we can agree on, but which are all still subordinate for the moment. Do we understand that? Let us therefore as OCG, Kla.TV and AZK crew, always endeavor to find the right questions in all the 13 vassal areas of sin, death and devil, in order to then keep asking them constantly again and again in an unstoppable synergy! Over and over again, until the whole world will join this black-and-white phase and later maturely, in the power of the all-working spirit, also implement with us the colorful questions in the same way. They together with us. So that's it. Thank you.

von is.

Quellen/Links: Creative Commons Licenses https://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/
Documentary: Tree Damage From Mobile Radiation https://www.diagnose-funk.org/aktuelles/artikel-archiv/detail&newsid=1839