This website uses cookies. Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our services, you consent to our use of cookies. Your data is safe with us. We do not pass on your analysis or contact data to third parties! Further information can be found in the data protection declaration.
An Ethics Council which should aim at upholding the moral values of society independently of political decision-makers, degenerates into a mere surrogate agent of mostly worthless politics when people are specifically appointed![continue reading]
License: Creative Commons License: Attribution CC BY
“The German Ethics Council deals with the great questions of life. Along with its opinions and recommendations, it provides orientation for society and politics. The members are appointed by the President of the German Bundestag”, this is how the Ethics Council describes itself on its website. Recently, a majority of the Ethics Council recommended an extension of the facility-based mandatory vaccination against Covid-19 (e.g. in nursing professions), which had already been decided by the German Bundestag. In other words: mandatory vaccination for all would be fine! Let's take a look at who is presiding over this decision in the Ethics Council.
Alena Buyx, educated, young and dynamic, has been the Chair of the Ethics Council since April 2020. Since then, based on experience over the past two years, it is highly unlikely that such positions will be filled randomly. It is fascinating to examine how a committee got new members during the stage of this historic plandemic or who took on a particular role at what point in time. So for example, Prof. Alena Buyx was placed on the throne precisely with the plandemic. She is the perfect fit to head the "Ethics Council" in the current transformation of the world. The ideas behind the current events are globally designed and coordinated. It is about transhumanistic ideas of a new world in which humans and technology merge, where gene therapy measures are part of everyday life, where the control of behavior and "health" are to be managed digitally. It is also about the introduction of artificial intelligence and robotics in all areas of life as well as population control and reduction. The use of the technology required for this raises many questions, especially with regard to moral values. Who should be thinking about all this? Ethicists, of course. However, independent ethicists who are willing and able to evaluate in regards to goods and interests. But what about the independence and neutrality of Alena Buyx?
We will first look at what other positions she holds besides that of Chair of the
Ethics Council:
• Member of the Bavarian AI [artificial intelligence] Council (since 2020)
• Member of the WHO Expert Committee on Human Genome Control- she heads the working group on human germline genetic interventions (reproductive manipulation)
• Connection to the Brocher Foundation in Geneva. This Foundation is a Rockefeller think-tank that works closely with numerous private organizations such as WHO, the UN and more on the transhumanist future of humanity. It also addresses eugenic issues.
• Scientific Ambassador to the "Munich School of Robotics and Machine Intelligence" (since 2019). The "School" is sponsored by Microsoft, among others.
• Member of the scientific advisory board of the RKI and thus directly networked with the central plandemic service manager of the federal government where she has connections to RKI head Lothar Wieler, who is also a colleague of hers at the Leopoldina. Mitglied im Bayerischen KI [künstliche Intelligenz] -Rat (seit 2020)
If you look at how she was placed in the central plandemic structures (RKI, Ethics Council, Leopoldina, etc.), it becomes clear that the agenda-setting [which means the deliberate setting of thematic priorities]] is carried out with one person present in many committees at the same time.
At "Network of Pandemists" [www.Laufpass.com] it was judiciously formulated: "Buyx delivers – it seems like a commissioned work at the right time - pseudo-ethical legitimations for the pandemicists’ offensives on all parts of society."
What does she think her tasks are as chair of the Ethics Council? Shouldn't she be the one to stand up against scientific censorship, the exclusion and dismissal of researchers who think differently? Shouldn’t she allow alternative models of thoughts, analyze facts, and seek discourse with all smart scientists instead of altering with Karl Lauterbach on the talk show and playing the ethics trumpet game in the pandemic orchestra in order to "help politicians justify their decisions"?
04.04.2022 | www.kla.tv/22141
“The German Ethics Council deals with the great questions of life. Along with its opinions and recommendations, it provides orientation for society and politics. The members are appointed by the President of the German Bundestag”, this is how the Ethics Council describes itself on its website. Recently, a majority of the Ethics Council recommended an extension of the facility-based mandatory vaccination against Covid-19 (e.g. in nursing professions), which had already been decided by the German Bundestag. In other words: mandatory vaccination for all would be fine! Let's take a look at who is presiding over this decision in the Ethics Council. Alena Buyx, educated, young and dynamic, has been the Chair of the Ethics Council since April 2020. Since then, based on experience over the past two years, it is highly unlikely that such positions will be filled randomly. It is fascinating to examine how a committee got new members during the stage of this historic plandemic or who took on a particular role at what point in time. So for example, Prof. Alena Buyx was placed on the throne precisely with the plandemic. She is the perfect fit to head the "Ethics Council" in the current transformation of the world. The ideas behind the current events are globally designed and coordinated. It is about transhumanistic ideas of a new world in which humans and technology merge, where gene therapy measures are part of everyday life, where the control of behavior and "health" are to be managed digitally. It is also about the introduction of artificial intelligence and robotics in all areas of life as well as population control and reduction. The use of the technology required for this raises many questions, especially with regard to moral values. Who should be thinking about all this? Ethicists, of course. However, independent ethicists who are willing and able to evaluate in regards to goods and interests. But what about the independence and neutrality of Alena Buyx? We will first look at what other positions she holds besides that of Chair of the Ethics Council: • Member of the Bavarian AI [artificial intelligence] Council (since 2020) • Member of the WHO Expert Committee on Human Genome Control- she heads the working group on human germline genetic interventions (reproductive manipulation) • Connection to the Brocher Foundation in Geneva. This Foundation is a Rockefeller think-tank that works closely with numerous private organizations such as WHO, the UN and more on the transhumanist future of humanity. It also addresses eugenic issues. • Scientific Ambassador to the "Munich School of Robotics and Machine Intelligence" (since 2019). The "School" is sponsored by Microsoft, among others. • Member of the scientific advisory board of the RKI and thus directly networked with the central plandemic service manager of the federal government where she has connections to RKI head Lothar Wieler, who is also a colleague of hers at the Leopoldina. Mitglied im Bayerischen KI [künstliche Intelligenz] -Rat (seit 2020) If you look at how she was placed in the central plandemic structures (RKI, Ethics Council, Leopoldina, etc.), it becomes clear that the agenda-setting [which means the deliberate setting of thematic priorities]] is carried out with one person present in many committees at the same time. At "Network of Pandemists" [www.Laufpass.com] it was judiciously formulated: "Buyx delivers – it seems like a commissioned work at the right time - pseudo-ethical legitimations for the pandemicists’ offensives on all parts of society." What does she think her tasks are as chair of the Ethics Council? Shouldn't she be the one to stand up against scientific censorship, the exclusion and dismissal of researchers who think differently? Shouldn’t she allow alternative models of thoughts, analyze facts, and seek discourse with all smart scientists instead of altering with Karl Lauterbach on the talk show and playing the ethics trumpet game in the pandemic orchestra in order to "help politicians justify their decisions"?
from wou