This website uses cookies. Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our services, you consent to our use of cookies. Your data is safe with us. We do not pass on your analysis or contact data to third parties! Further information can be found in the data protection declaration.
The European Parliament presented an explosive study in which the use of chip implants by Europeans is explained in detail. But who exactly should be chipped and why? In this broadcast you will learn how our fundamental rights can be avoided so that chipping the population can be justified.[continue reading]
License: Creative Commons License: Attribution CC BY
As early as 2018, the European Parliament presented a study detailing the use of chip implants in European workers. Although it is not compatible with the basic rights of workers to require a chip to be implanted under their skin, this is exactly what the study recommends.
It is also openly admitted that the introduction of implants is a violation of the inviolability of the human body. Basic rights such as religious beliefs and data protection are listed in order to promptly explain how they can be circumvented.
The study concludes that higher interests, such as national security, are essential to introduce implants anyway. However, it has to be proven that there is no other strong alternative to the use of implanted chips. The rollout will be difficult "until there is an overwhelming need or demand for implantable RFID chips in the workplace."
Has this exceptional situation "in the interest of national security" been brought about with the global Corona pandemic in order to justify the forthcoming chipping of humanity?
30.08.2022 | www.kla.tv/23465
As early as 2018, the European Parliament presented a study detailing the use of chip implants in European workers. Although it is not compatible with the basic rights of workers to require a chip to be implanted under their skin, this is exactly what the study recommends. It is also openly admitted that the introduction of implants is a violation of the inviolability of the human body. Basic rights such as religious beliefs and data protection are listed in order to promptly explain how they can be circumvented. The study concludes that higher interests, such as national security, are essential to introduce implants anyway. However, it has to be proven that there is no other strong alternative to the use of implanted chips. The rollout will be difficult "until there is an overwhelming need or demand for implantable RFID chips in the workplace." Has this exceptional situation "in the interest of national security" been brought about with the global Corona pandemic in order to justify the forthcoming chipping of humanity?
from maf
www.wochenblick.at/corona/in-10-jahren-sind-alle-gechippt-eu-denkfabrik-plant-aus-fuer-freiheit-und-grundrechte/