This website uses cookies. Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our services, you consent to our use of cookies. Your data is safe with us. We do not pass on your analysis or contact data to third parties! Further information can be found in the data protection declaration.
Amnesty International: defender of moral or troublemaker?
Amnesty International, a western non-governmental organization (NGO) for human rights, currently admonishes Europe to radically change their course in the refugee policy. However, does Europe really need to be instructed in this matter by an organization, which itself, unfortunately, has contributed in the past to the fact that this refugee disaster could emerge in the first place?[continue reading]
License: Creative Commons License: Attribution CC BY
Good evening, dear viewers.
Amnesty International, a western non-governmental organization (NGO) for human rights, currently admonishes Europe to radically change their course in the refugee policy.
With the call for a "radical reform of Europe's collapsing asylum system", the NGO insistently exerts pressure with emphasis on the European countries and demands in a 5-point plan, which was published on the Sept. 9, 2015 by the largest German newspapers, a uniform European action in the refugee issue.
The refugee problem had reached a magnitude unequalled since the Second World War and during the next 2 years one would have to cope with at least 1.38 million more refugees.
Dear viewers, there is no doubt about the fact that the refugee crisis reaches a dramatic scale and that one must help needy people urgently.
However, does Europe really need to be instructed in this matter by an organization, which itself, unfortunately, has contributed in the past to the fact that this refugee disaster could emerge in the first place?
Let us remind ourselves: just like back in December 1990, when Amnesty published the notorious incubator lie and with this, morally supported the cruel 1st gulf war against Iraq, Amnesty also rhetorically massively supported the destabilization of the Near and Middle East during the past years and so has in essence substantiated it.
The Amnesty report in 2010 about the supposedly precarious human rights situation in Libya was part of the "moral justification" for the Libya war, likewise the regularly returning reports on atrocities of the Syrian government around Bashar al-Assad, which heated up the conflict in Syria.
In media-oriented calls Amnesty released alerts about assumed war crimes as well as about the assumed use of chlorine gas on the occasion of Syrian air raids and so, contributed to a further escalation of the situation in Syria.
Subsequently, most of these reports turned out to be false or they could never be verified.
Quite in general, in these questionable reports, Amnesty mostly appeals to so-called "activists" whose identities remain unknown.
Professor Francis Boyle, professor for "International Law" and "Political Science" at the universities of Illinois and Chicago, is a former board member of Amnesty USA and uses plain language.
He warns publicly that Amnesty International and Amnesty USA are imperialistic tools of the USA.
Moreover, in the past, Secret Service employees were involved in the group of leaders of Amnesty.
Mrs. Suzanne Nossel, executive director of Amnesty USA between 2012 and 2013, previously worked for the US government.
In an article for "Foreign Affairs", the worldwide leading technical periodical for foreign affairs, she wrote in 2004: "US interests should also be promoted by utilizing others for the implementation."
In this article she asked the USA to expand its power by all means and tactics everywhere in the world, and besides military power also "to use" the UN and other NGOs for the enforcement of US interests.
Mrs. Nossel has supported an armed "intervention" in states like Libya and Syria and has backed a military attack on Iran.
Ladies and gentlemen, you can see what manner of spirit the top leadership level of Amnesty International seems to be of.
Actually, without mentioning the true causes, Amnesty International asks Europe to pay uncomplainingly for this tragedy.
Herewith, this organization, which superficially seems to be noble-minded, unfortunately, once again turns out to be a megaphone for instrumentalizing US-global strategists.
In addition watch our brand-new documentation "Instrumentalizing Warfare".
With heart and mind, Europe really needs to stand by needy refugees, but never without at the same time honestly researching and disclosing the underlying causes for this refugee disaster and to implement the corresponding consequences.
Please assist by spreading our broadcasts.
Good evening.
Sendungstext
herunterladen
13.10.2015 | www.kla.tv/6916
Good evening, dear viewers. Amnesty International, a western non-governmental organization (NGO) for human rights, currently admonishes Europe to radically change their course in the refugee policy. With the call for a "radical reform of Europe's collapsing asylum system", the NGO insistently exerts pressure with emphasis on the European countries and demands in a 5-point plan, which was published on the Sept. 9, 2015 by the largest German newspapers, a uniform European action in the refugee issue. The refugee problem had reached a magnitude unequalled since the Second World War and during the next 2 years one would have to cope with at least 1.38 million more refugees. Dear viewers, there is no doubt about the fact that the refugee crisis reaches a dramatic scale and that one must help needy people urgently. However, does Europe really need to be instructed in this matter by an organization, which itself, unfortunately, has contributed in the past to the fact that this refugee disaster could emerge in the first place? Let us remind ourselves: just like back in December 1990, when Amnesty published the notorious incubator lie and with this, morally supported the cruel 1st gulf war against Iraq, Amnesty also rhetorically massively supported the destabilization of the Near and Middle East during the past years and so has in essence substantiated it. The Amnesty report in 2010 about the supposedly precarious human rights situation in Libya was part of the "moral justification" for the Libya war, likewise the regularly returning reports on atrocities of the Syrian government around Bashar al-Assad, which heated up the conflict in Syria. In media-oriented calls Amnesty released alerts about assumed war crimes as well as about the assumed use of chlorine gas on the occasion of Syrian air raids and so, contributed to a further escalation of the situation in Syria. Subsequently, most of these reports turned out to be false or they could never be verified. Quite in general, in these questionable reports, Amnesty mostly appeals to so-called "activists" whose identities remain unknown. Professor Francis Boyle, professor for "International Law" and "Political Science" at the universities of Illinois and Chicago, is a former board member of Amnesty USA and uses plain language. He warns publicly that Amnesty International and Amnesty USA are imperialistic tools of the USA. Moreover, in the past, Secret Service employees were involved in the group of leaders of Amnesty. Mrs. Suzanne Nossel, executive director of Amnesty USA between 2012 and 2013, previously worked for the US government. In an article for "Foreign Affairs", the worldwide leading technical periodical for foreign affairs, she wrote in 2004: "US interests should also be promoted by utilizing others for the implementation." In this article she asked the USA to expand its power by all means and tactics everywhere in the world, and besides military power also "to use" the UN and other NGOs for the enforcement of US interests. Mrs. Nossel has supported an armed "intervention" in states like Libya and Syria and has backed a military attack on Iran. Ladies and gentlemen, you can see what manner of spirit the top leadership level of Amnesty International seems to be of. Actually, without mentioning the true causes, Amnesty International asks Europe to pay uncomplainingly for this tragedy. Herewith, this organization, which superficially seems to be noble-minded, unfortunately, once again turns out to be a megaphone for instrumentalizing US-global strategists. In addition watch our brand-new documentation "Instrumentalizing Warfare". With heart and mind, Europe really needs to stand by needy refugees, but never without at the same time honestly researching and disclosing the underlying causes for this refugee disaster and to implement the corresponding consequences. Please assist by spreading our broadcasts. Good evening.
from ss.
http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article146176163/Amnesty-praesentiert-Fuenf-Punkte-Plan-fuer-Europa.html
http://domiholblog.tumblr.com/post/114311729044/dochregierungsorganisationen-gegen-syrien
http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.ch/2015/05/zdf-krokodilstranen-alligatoren-tarnen.html
http://www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=20663