“mRNA Cancer Vaccination“ The Next Scandal After the Covid Vaccination?

27.09.2026 | www.kla.tv/42721

If you look at the headlines from the past few months, you could easily be amazed by this huge leap forward in cancer treatment. They report on a promising mRNA vaccine against skin cancer. The stock exchange price of the pharmaceutical company Moderna is skyrocketing. Upon closer inspection, however, serious doubts arise: After all, wasn't it precisely the mRNA vaccines during the COVID pandemic that caused turbo cancer in many cases? Dr. Ute Krueger explained the link between mRNA vaccination and an extremely fast-growing tumor in an interview with kla.TV. Didn’t those very same mRNA-based COVID vaccines have such a harmful effect that they caused excess mortality in Germany, particularly among younger age groups? Statistician Marcel Barz showed from his analysis of raw data from the Federal Statistical Office that there was excess mortality in 2021 and 2022 even among younger and middle age groups. This clearly points to a connection with the administered COVID vaccine. [Marcel Barz:] “But when I look at the raw data, I see exactly the opposite. Not only do I see no anomalies in 2020, but I actually see record lows in the number of deaths in 2020. And now 2021 and 2022 are being added to the list. However, a pattern is emerging here that has never been seen in this age group in any of the previous years. […] And that simply means that many young people have died here from some kind of danger out there that now needs to be investigated.” If a cancer treatment based on the same dangerous mRNA technology is now being introduced and touted, all alarm bells should be ringing. Especially since, to this day, there has been no genuine reappraisal of this disastrous human experiment! In the documentary “The Hidden Abysses of Cancer Research,” Kla.TV examined important background information on cancer research. You won't want to miss this! Hardly any other disease has such a profound impact on our society as cancer. Everyone certainly knows someone in their immediate circle who has been diagnosed with cancer or has even died from it. In 2018 alone – that is, before the pandemic – there were 18 million new cancer cases worldwide. In Germany, cancer was the second leading cause of death in 2022. Statistics from the past 10 years show an upward trend in the cancer mortality rate, with an increase of 1.5 percent. In 2019, the Südkurier ran the headline: “120 Billion Euros for Research: Why the EU Is Now Declaring War on Cancer.” According to this, research spending is set to increase by an additional 120 billion between 2021 and 2027. Vast amounts of money have always been poured into cancer research. But why, then, has there been no significant progress in the fight against cancer so far? Let's start with a brief look at the history of cancer research more than 100 years ago. 1. History of Cancer Research Around 1900, more and more pathogens were discovered that were responsible for various infectious diseases [infection caused by pathogens]. In the case of cancer, too, researchers initially searched for a pathogen. The research findings of Professors Robert Koch and M. Newjadomskij were very insightful. They both independently concluded that cancer cells differ from normal tissue. They exhibit behaviors not typically seen in body cells under normal conditions. For example, they exhibit seemingly unlimited growth, move “like amoebas,” and form metastases in completely different parts of the body. That is why Koch and Newjadomskij concluded that cancer is caused by microparasites, that is, minute pathogens. Other researchers, on the other hand, described the development of cancer as arising from an “inanimate” cause, such as irritants affecting the body’s cells. According to this, a tumor cell is a mutated – that is, degenerate – cell produced by the body. After heated debates, the theory of the degenerate cell gained acceptance. Today's oncology [the study of tumors] is based on this “degeneration” theory. The search for a pathogen was officially called off. Other research findings were no longer in demand. To this day, official cancer research has managed to ignore “alternative” research findings or to suppress researchers whose work is inconvenient. That's why we've included a brief overview here of research findings that you've probably never heard of. 2. Alternative Research Findings Alfons Weber In 1967, German oncologist and cell biologist Dr. Alfons Weber published the results of his research. According to this, he could provide evidence of microparasites in any tumor tissue. Dr. Alfons Weber was convinced that none of the officially approved cancer treatments would be effective. These attack the tissue cells instead of the cancer-causing microparasites. His research findings were largely ignored. They are described as “artifacts, water bubbles, or artificial formations,” or even “the hallucinations of a madman.” His successful method of treating cancer with malaria drugs led to years of legal battles and his physician's license being revoked. In 1972, he was admitted to a psychiatric hospital, even though he had not been diagnosed with a psychiatric illness. Helmut Keller, Germany Starting in 1972, Keller treated certain tumors very successfully with an extract from the Venus flytrap. His remedy, “Carnivora,” received provisional approval in Germany and enjoyed great popularity among patients. A thorn in the side of the pharmaceutical industry. As a result, the Federal Health Office saw itself forced to ban the new drug again in 1986. Because Dr. Keller continued to treat his patients with Carnivora, he was ordered to pay a fine of 10,000 DM. Tamara Lebedeva In 1989, the Russian chemist and microbiologist identified the ancient parasite Trichomonas as a cancer-causing agent. In her experience, the flagellates would appear to be cancer cells to the eye of an untrained oncologist. Trichomonas are “masters of deception.” For example, they could transform from their elongated shape – with filaments and flagella – into a round, amoeba-like shape that closely resembles a human cell. In their amoeboid form, they form colonies and encyst themselves as needed. Lebedeva recognized trichomoniasis [a disease of the oral cavity, intestines, genital organs, or urethra caused by trichomonads] as the first stage of cancer. Her efforts to draw public attention to these research findings failed. Lebedeva: “Every letter, every inquiry sent to the Ministry of Health or other health care agencies is forwarded to the National Oncology Center in Moscow, and from there comes the same dismissive response every time: that the finding is not worth investigating.” Dear viewers: The research findings presented here are representative of many others. Why are they being withheld from the public? Who has an interest in suppressing, slandering, and even criminalizing alternative cancer research? In the following, we'll explain how certain circles in high finance have hijacked the healthcare system for their own purposes. 3. Transformation of the Healthcare System Let’s turn our attention to a family that went down in history as “great benefactors,” also known as philanthropists: the American Rockefeller family. Around 1880, Rockefeller Sr. controlled 90% of the entire U.S. oil market. Around 1900, scientists discovered "petrochemistry" – that is, the production of chemicals from petroleum. They began synthesizing active substances from plants. These could be patented and marketed at a high profit. Rockefeller's plan was to create a market for chemical medical products. However, Americans' preference for natural and herbal remedies stood in his way. In addition, nearly half of the doctors and medical schools in the U.S. practiced holistic medicine. So how did Rockefeller Sr. manage to take over the medical field? 3.1 The Flexner Report Rockefeller's "partner in lucrative business ventures" had always been Andrew Carnegie. Both were staunch eugenicists. Eugenicists are committed to population control and the suppression of so-called “inferior segments of the population,” for example through mandatory sterilizations. [Infertility – A Diabolical Agenda www.kla.tv/26028] Andrew Carnegie amassed great wealth through the steel industry and, early in his career, earned a reputation as a “great philanthropist” through his generous donations and the founding of institutions. For example, in 1905, Carnegie established the “Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching” [CFAT]. To implement Rockefeller's plan, the Carnegie Foundation commissioned education theorist Abraham Flexner to conduct a study on medical higher education in the United States. Flexner published his findings in 1910 in what is known as the “Flexner Report.” This report set the medical field on the course Rockefeller desired – with far-reaching consequences for the training of medical professionals. Briefly these were: All schools that did not teach according to “pharmaceutical-chemical,” that is, “scientific medicine,” lost their accreditation and all financial support Of the 155 medical schools that once existed in the United States and Canada, only 66 remained in 1935. The remaining medical schools lost their autonomy. The holistic approach to health and preventive health care largely disappeared from teaching and training. Chemically based medications became the scientific standard. Americans were won over by the slogan “A pill for every ill.” Medicines of natural origin have been defamed. 3.2 Implementation of the Flexner Report The Flexner Report was implemented through John D. Rockefeller Sr.'s “General Education Board” [GEB}. The GEB is a foundation that he established in 1902. Through this foundation, funds were distributed to colleges, universities, and medical schools. They were supposed to facilitate the “restructuring” in a way that would benefit the Rockefeller family. Also involved was Abraham Flexner. He joined the GEB as deputy secretary in 1912. Flexner: “…Between 1919 and 1928, the General Education Board ... had, directly and indirectly, added half a billion dollars or more to the resources and endowments of American medical education.” That amounts to a present-day value of 9.1 billion dollars – a figure that is not entirely without self-interest. Two decades after the founding of the General Education Board, John D. Rockefeller Jr. established the International Education Board [IEB: International Education Board]. In addition to institutions, the IEB also provided funding to individual researchers at the international level. It awarded hundreds of scholarships and grants to organizations in 39 different countries. In total, Rockefeller Jr. contributed more than $21 million to the IEB. That is equivalent to $376 million today. In 1938, the Rockefeller Foundation took over the responsibilities of the International Education Board and continued them. 3.3 Other Organizations Founded by the Rockefellers As you can see, John D. Rockefeller Sr. was a strategic thinker who did not “bring medical education into the modern era” out of sheer do-goodism. After all, he had become an oil tycoon – and, at the time, the richest man in the world – through unscrupulous business practices. He always used his money strategically to maximize profits. By restructuring medical education and health care, he created a massive market for chemical medical products. At the same time, he had a significant influence on scientific research. To this end, the Rockefellers founded, among other things, influential universities, a most important research hospital, and an elite medical school: 1901: Founding of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, now known as Rockefeller University – a private biomedical research institution. 1910: Founding of Rockefeller University Hospital, the first research hospital in the United States Privately funded studies are conducted there. The problem is that these often lead to a “sponsor-friendly” outcome. 1910: Founding of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. To learn more about the influence and connections of the entire Rockefeller family, tune in to the broadcast “The Rockefeller Dynasty: One Step Ahead of World Events?” [www.kla.tv/27869]. Next, we’ll take a closer look at Rockefeller Jr. and his influence on the American Cancer Society. 4. Rockefeller Funds the American Cancer Society In 1913, the “American Society for the Control of Cancer” was founded; today it is known simply as the “American Cancer Society,” or ACS for short. The website linkedin.com even lists Rockefeller Jr. as the founder of the ACS. According to its own description, it is a “supra-regional, community-based, voluntary health organization dedicated to eradicating cancer as a major health problem.” But what is the reality – despite a budget in the billions? Let's take a look at the numbers: In 1913, out of approximately 96 million people in the U.S., 75,000 died of cancer. This results in a death rate of 78 per 100,000 residents. Today, approximately 606,000 Americans die of cancer each year out of a population of 338 million (as of 2022). The death rate is 179 per 100,000. After 110 years of work by the ACS, the cancer mortality rate in the U.S. has more than doubled. The detailed book *Murder by Injection* by E. Mullins, published in 1988, documents which bank executives were behind the cancer industry and into whose pockets the funds for cancer research flowed: “Critics noted in 1976 that at least eighteen members of the American Cancer Society’s board of directors were senior executives at banks. (...) An ACS spokesperson admitted that 70% of its 1976 research budget went to "individuals or institutions" with which its board members were affiliated." 5. Chemotherapy With the founding of the Rockefeller Institute and Hospital, the Rockefeller family was able to exert direct influence on biomedical research. Simply by interpreting the research findings, research can be steered in a specific, desired direction. Today, chemotherapy is the most common form of cancer treatment. It first emerged during World War II. In 1942, researchers at the Yale School of Medicine were studying the effects of the chemical warfare agent mustard gas on lymphomas [cancers of the blood-forming cells]. Mustard gas was first used as a chemical weapon during World War I. The world's largest producer of poison gases was the German-American Frederick Zinsser – father-in-law of World Bank President John J. McCloy. Frederick Zinsser learned how to produce poison gas in Heidelberg and went on to make his fortune in the United States. […] Under the Nazis and under Adenauer, Heidelberg remained a center of German chemical and biological weapons research. The German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) is located in Heidelberg. Back in the U.S.: In 1957, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) treated its first cancer patient with chemotherapy. As everyone knows, the chemotherapy administered today is associated with severe side effects. Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten states: “Chemotherapy is covered by public health insurance, and the pharmaceutical industry sponsors the studies so that chemotherapy will sell. (…) Often, chemotherapy isn't about the patient; rather, it's about the immense amounts of money that can be made.” Each course of chemotherapy costs an average of €10,000 to €20,000, which public health insurance institutions reimburse to pharmaceutical manufacturers using the ever-rising contributions paid by the insured. Chemotherapy thus generates enormous profits for the pharmaceutical industry. At this point, we do not wish to deny that chemotherapy has certainly achieved some success in treating cancer and saving lives. But at what cost? Why are alternative research findings and alternative therapies still being vehemently suppressed? By what right does the official cancer research community so heavily suppress alternatives to chemotherapy? Why don't we hear anything about the fact that cancer is virtually nonexistent in Malaysia because people there eat what's known as the "cancer fruit"? Or here's an example from Russian medicine: Sara Bennet, a therapist and singer with a large network of contacts, reports that for many doctors in Russia, cancer is no more serious than a cold. Why don't we hear anything about Russian medicine, which is currently making such great strides in cancer treatment? Why do those circles – whose treatment methods have produced such poor results that the cancer mortality rate has more than doubled over the past 110 years – keep all alternative treatments under lock and key? 6. Big Pharma: The Masks are falling Did you know that in April 2024, the French Parliament passed a bill “to strengthen the fight against dangerous sectarian developments”? The law criminalizes “incitement” to refrain from or discontinue medical treatment if such treatment deviates from “the current state of scientific knowledge.” Violations are punishable by one year of imprisonment and a fine of 30,000 euros. In serious cases, offenders face up to three years in prison and a fine of 45,000 euros. Why such a harsh approach? The law is intended to ensure that the pharmaceutical industry can continue to expand its control. Critics therefore refer to the law as the “Pfizer Law.” Anyone who suggests an alternative therapy that is not “scientifically validated” or does not correspond to “the current state of medical knowledge” should be silenced. We are already familiar with this approach from the Flexner Report. Question: Why does Big Pharma want to “look after” people’s “well-being” in a dictatorial manner, even against their free will if necessary? Could this possibly be the exact opposite of “charity and health” for everyone? 7. False-flag Biological Weapons Research In an interview, Heiko Schöning, a doctor and officer, reveals a highly interesting aspect: He directly links cancer research to biological weapons research. Watch these short clips from this broadcast. [Heiko Schöning warns: The next attack will be bioweapons and bacteria! (AUF1 interview, abridged version) https://www.kla.tv/27257] [Heiko Schöning:] “We are now in the age of bioweapons. This technical progress is possible. And if we look back, we see that there was officially a ban on bioweapons in 1972. They were not allowed to be used, not allowed to be produced, and not allowed to be stored, absolutely not. And interestingly enough, U.S. President Richard Nixon said that. However, it is well documented that Richard Nixon was the best trickster in the global organized crime mafia. In fact, his official nickname was Tricky Dick. Yes, and Nixon actually just hid and renamed bioweapons research in the USA. Because one of the main places was Fort Detrick in the USA. And what happened to all these bioweapons researchers and the facilities, the buildings then? They were just renamed. There was a new sign. And the sign said NCI (National Cancer Institute) – National Cancer Research Institute. You really have to understand that. The same researchers, the same buildings stayed there, and now officially, this was cancer research.” A quick aside: “Purely by coincidence,” the National Cancer Act was passed by the U.S. government at the same time that the ban on biological weapons research was enacted. President Nixon pledged seven billion dollars to "fight cancer" by 1976. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) suddenly became the largest and most influential of all U.S. health institutes – or, let’s say, “bioweapons institutes.” Schöning continues: [Heiko Schöning:] “What exactly are biological weapons? They’re cell toxins. What are anticancer drugs? Cell toxins. So what's the difference between biological weapons tests and cancer studies? The difference in notation. And that's exactly what Nixon did. They simply changed the sign at Fort Detrick to read, "No more biological weapons research – National Cancer Institute." Dear viewers, one thing must be clear to us: Biological weapons are generally designed to kill without drawing attention! What can we expect next from the biological weapons institutes – pardon me, cancer research institutes? Schöning continues: [Heiko Schöning:] “And it was a cover, a concealment that these bioweapons researchers suddenly spent decades researching a vaccination against cancer. And that's been forgotten again. But very recently, to continue with this, we are now hearing that mRNA vaccines, that is, experimental gene therapies against cancer, are now being sold to us.” Well, after the whole disaster with the so-called mRNA COVID vaccines, mRNA cancer vaccines are now set to be marketed to the general public. The crimes associated with the COVID vaccines – which have had devastating consequences, such as the onset of turbo cancer – have not yet been fully investigated. In the broadcast “Explosion of Aggressive Cancers Following COVID Vaccination,” Kla.TV explained the link between mRNA vaccines and extremely fast growing tumors. And now new mRNA vaccines are available. So it's hardly surprising that people's trust in pharmaceutical-driven medicine is rapidly declining! Conclusion 1. Unscrupulous men driven by money and power, such as Rockefeller & Co., laid the foundation for the modern pharmaceutical industry and our healthcare system. 2. From the very beginning, they have sought absolute control over medical education and science. 3. From the very beginning, independent research has been fiercely opposed, even when it shows promise. 4. The “philanthropic image” of foundations and institutions run by the super-rich serves to conceal their true intentions: namely, the expansion of power and control. 5. Despite massive investments, cancer death rates are steadily rising. 6. There is evidence that, behind the high-budget cancer research, research into biological weapons is also being conducted. Biological weapons are usually designed to kill large numbers of people discreetly! 7. Today, we have reached a point where there is a threat of authoritarian control over citizens and highly dangerous compulsory medical measures. The pharmaceutical industry, controlled by the Rockefellers of this world, is turning out to be the real cancer. We ask ourselves: Can the official statements regarding cancer research really be true? When huge sums of money have been poured into it for about 100 years and there have been so few successes? The success rate of the treatments seems so low that it is barely enough to keep hope alive. [Obituary displayed: He fought, he hoped, and yet he lost! We ask you to refrain from sending flowers and instead donate to cancer research.] The endless reports of hope for a cure for cancer ensure that the massive flow of money for dubious research never dries up. An increasingly radical and dictatorial pharmaceutical complex is proving to be the real cancer. Now is the time to uncover the true causes and culprits behind the steadily rising cancer rates. We need to investigate who is profiting from the toxins in food, air, soil, water, and pharmaceutical products. Because we must put a stop to any patronizing behavior by the WHO and its vassals, which are controlled by the pharmaceutical industry!

from beka.

Sources/Links: Introduction https://www.apotheke-adhoc.de/nachrichten/detail/pharmazie/melanom-impfstoff-ueberzeugt-in-studie/
https://www.zeit.de/gesundheit/2026-08/impfung-hautkrebs-mrna-moderna-forschung-durchbruch
https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/finanzen/moderna-merck-impfstoff-hautkrebs-100.html
https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/plus6a85b788d479dd659e0b4071/moderna-sensation-der-grosse-mrna-moment-an-der-boerse-das-sind-die-wahren-gewinner.html
https://www.wallstreet-online.de/nachricht/21261516-hautkrebs-moderna-krebsmedikament-laesst-aktie-explodieren
Cancer Data https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/krebs-zahl-der-neuerkrankungen-wird-sich-bis-2040-weltweit-fast-verdoppeln-a-aa28085e-4727-4a14-9761-5f8002bd1bb3
https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/172573/umfrage/krebstote-in-deutschland/
Südkurier https://www.suedkurier.de/ueberregional/politik/120-Milliarden-Euro-fuer-die-Forschung-Warum-die-EU-jetzt-dem-Krebs-den-Kampf-ansagt;art410924,10030288
1. History of Cancer Research Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, S. 36 Article „Krebs: Die verkannte Seuche?“ in https://www.zeitenschrift.com/artikel/krebs-die-verkannte-seuche
Lebedewa, Tamara: Krebserreger entdeckt! Die verblüffenden Erkenntnisse einer russischen Forscherin. Published by Driediger, 11th edition 2022, p. 41. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiropterakarzinom
2. Alternative Research Results Alfons Weber Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, p. 36ff., 135-139. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfons_Weber_
(Mediziner,_1915) Helmut Keller Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, pp. 24-26. Tamara Lebedewa https://volkskrankheit-parasiten.org/meta-studie/#table_contents1210
Article „Krebs: Die verkannte Seuche?“ in ZeitenSchrift 113/2023, pp. 14-19 Zitat T. Lebedewa, in: Lebedewa, Tamara: Krebserreger entdeckt! Die verblüffenden Erkenntnisse einer russischen Forscherin. Published by Verlag Driediger, 11th edition 2022, p. 13f. 3. Transformation of the Healthcare Service https://uncutnews.ch/der-flexner-bericht-von-1910-rockefellers-hat-den-pharmazeutischen-medizinischen-industriekomplex-geschaffen-und-konsolidiert/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-rockefeller-founded-deep-state-pharma-waged-war-cures-mukhamedin
https://www.zeitenschrift.com/artikel/wie-die-medizin-dem-mammon-erlag
3.1 The Flexner Report Andrew Carnegie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Carnegie
Eugenics https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/List
of eugenics organizations https://kla.tv/26028
https://kla.tv/16194
John D. Rockefeller Sr. https://www.zeitenschrift.com/artikel/wie-die-medizin-dem-mammon-erlag
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-rockefeller-founded-deep-state-pharma-waged-war-cures-mukhamedin
Flexner-Report Quote from Flexner: “between 1919 and 1928” https://gesellschaft-medizinische-ausbildung.org/files/ZMA-Archiv/1991/1/Loh%C3%B6lter_R-l.pdf,
p. 3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexner_Report
http://youtube.com/watch?v=N2QOhECuodw
https://gesellschaft-medizinische-ausbildung.org/files/ZMA-Archiv/1991/1/Lohölter_R-l.pdf,
p. 2 3.2 Implementation of the Flexner Report Abraham Flexner https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller-Stiftung
General Education Board https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexner_Report
https://gesellschaft-medizinische-ausbildung.org/files/ZMA-Archiv/1991/1/Lohölter_R-l.pdf,
S. 3 International Education Board https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/almanac/international-education-board/
https://resource.rockarch.org/story/the-international-education-board-1923-1938/
3.3 Other Rockefeller Foundations Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_University
The Rockefeller University Hospital https://www.rucares.org/clinicalresearch/mission-history
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klinische_Studie
4. Rockefeller Funds the American Cancer Society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Cancer_Society
https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/almanac/american-cancer-society/
https://www.cancer.org/about-us/who-we-are/our-history.html
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-rockefeller-founded-deep-state-pharma-waged-war-cures-mukhamedin
Cancer mortality rates in the USA https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/840-united-states-of-america-fact-sheet.pdf
Population of the USA https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/19320/umfrage/gesamtbevoelkerung-der-usa/
Quote from book by Mullins In: Mullins, Eustace: Murder by injection, The National Council for Medical Research, Library of Congress Card Catalog No. 88-060694 5. Chemotherapy https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemotherapie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_gas
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senfgas#Herstellung_von_S-Lost
Bioweapon researchers in the USA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einheit_731
Adenauer-Zinsser-McCloy family Schöning, Heiko: Angriff aufs Mikrobiom, Etica Media Verlag, 2023, englische Version? www.corage.media,
ISBN 978 90 83 37 92 10; pp 96-107 Schöning, Heiko; GAME OVER. COVID-19 / ANTHRAX-01, Blue Tiger Media Verlag, 2021, ISBN 978 94 93 26 20 96; pp 291-296 englische Version? Chemotherapy and Pharma Quote Dt. Wirtschaftsnachrichten, 13.01.2014: https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2014/01/13/chemotherapie-milliarden-geschaeft-fuer-die-pharmaindustrie
Cost of chemotherapy https://www.meinmed.at/therapie/chemotherapie/1909
Russian medicine – Sara Bennett Naturheilzentrum Oberland Schweiz: Conference: „Hat Gott uns verlassen?“ Speaker Sara Bennett on March 28, 2024 from minute 43:45 6. Big Pharma: The Masks Are Falling https://www.cnews.fr/france/2024-04-09/le-parlement-en-lutte-contre-les-derives-sectaires-adopte-un-nouveau-delit-contre
https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/article/impfung-artikel-pfizer-ist-in-frankreich-kritik-an-behandlungen-kuenftig-strafbar-2187658
https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/frances-parliament-adopts-controversial
https://tkp.at/2024/04/15/gesetz-pfizer-im-franzoesischen-parlament-verabschiedet/
https://apollo-news.net/frankreich-kriminalisiert-kritik-an-medizinischem-konsens-impfkritiker-fuerchten-zensur/
https://uncutnews.ch/warum-das-neue-franzoesische-anti-vax-gesetz-viel-schlimmer-ist-als-man-denkt/
7. False-flag Bioweapon Research Heiko Schöning Interview https://kla.tv/27249
Schöning, Heiko: Angriff aufs Mikrobiom, Etica Media Verlag, 2023, englische Version? www.corage.media,
ISBN 978 90 83 37 92 10 Nixon and the NCI Lenberg, W.O.: Jahrhundert-Skandal Krebs, ES-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1987, p. 43. mRNA cancer vaccines https://www.dkfz.de/de/aktuelles/mRNA-Impfung-gegen-Krebs.html
Creative Commons Licenses https://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/
Ticket: SE-1956